KOMITI ITI ARA WAKA
Traffic Subcommittee
31
August 2021
Order
Paper for the meeting to be held via Zoom
on:
Tuesday 7
September 2021 commencing at
2.00pm
Membership
|
Cr
B Dyer (Chair)
|
|
|
Cr J Briggs (Deputy Chair)
|
Cr K Brown
|
|
Cr A Mitchell
|
Cr N Shaw
|
|
|
|
|
Cr D Hislop (Alternate)
|
Deputy Mayor Lewis (Alternate)
|
|
Cr S Rasheed (Alternate)
|
|
For
the dates and times of Council Meetings please visit www.huttcity.govt.nz
Have your say
You can speak under public comment to items
on the agenda to the Mayor and Councillors at this meeting. Please let us know
by noon the working day before the meeting. You can do this by emailing DemocraticServicesTeam@huttcity.govt.nz or calling the
Democratic Services Team on 04 570 6666 | 0800 HUTT CITY
PURPOSE:
The Traffic Subcommittee has primary responsibility for
considering and making recommendations to Council on traffic matters and
considering any traffic matters referred to it by Council.
For the avoidance of doubt, “traffic” includes
parking, and excludes temporary road closures under clause 11(e) of the Tenth
Schedule of the LGA 1974 and the Transport (Vehicular Traffic Road Closure)
Regulations 1965.
TERMS OF REFERENCE:
The Traffic Subcommittee
has authority to:
§
Do all things necessary to hear,
consider and make recommendations to Council on any traffic related matter.
§ Regulate its own processes and proceedings to achieve
its purpose and objective.
§ Provide options for the consideration of Council.
The Chair will have
authority to refer any traffic matter to:
§ A Community Board; or
§ The Infrastructure & Regulatory Committee; or
§ Council.
DELEGATED AUTHORITY:
The Traffic Subcommittee will have delegated authority to
carry out activities within its terms of reference.
HUTT CITY COUNCIL
Komiti Iti Ara Waka | Traffic
Subcommittee
Meeting
to be held via Zoom
on
Tuesday
7 September 2021 commencing at 2.00pm.
ORDER
PAPER
Public Business
1. APOLOGIES
2. PUBLIC
COMMENT
Generally up to
30 minutes is set aside for public comment (three minutes per speaker on items appearing on the agenda). Speakers may be
asked questions on the matters they raise.
3. CONFLICT
OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Members
are reminded of the need to be vigilant to stand aside from decision making
when a conflict arises between their role as a member and any private or other
external interest they might have.
4. RecommendationS to Council- Te Kaunihera o Te Awa Kairangi
5 October 2021
a)
Traffic
Resolutions - Proposed Changes to Route 160 (Homedale to Hutt Central) Bus Stop
Configuration (21/1330)
Report
No. TSC2021/4/211 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations 5
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendations contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
b) Traffic
Resolution - Cuba Street, Petone - P15 & P120 Parking Restrictions (21/1328)
Report No. TSC2021/4/187 by the Traffic Engineer - Network
Operations 86
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendations contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
c) Traffic
Resolution - Taine Street (Slip Lane),Taita - No Parking (Except Emergency
Vehicles) (21/1341)
Report No. TSC2021/4/188 by the Traffic
Engineer - Network Operations 90
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendations contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
d) Traffic
Resolution - Raroa Road, Hutt Central - No Stopping (At All Times). (21/1320)
Report No. TSC2021/4/185 by the Traffic Engineer - Network
Operations 94
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendations contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
e) Traffic
Resolution - High Street, Hutt Central - No Stopping (At All Times). (21/1325)
Report No.
TSC2021/4/186 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations 99
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendations contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
5. Information
Item
Traffic Subcommittee Work Programme (21/1231)
Report No. TSC2021/4/114 by the Democracy Advisor 103
Chair’s
Recommendation:
|
“That the recommendation contained in the report be
endorsed.”
|
6. QUESTIONS
With reference to section 32 of
Standing Orders, before putting a question a member shall endeavour to obtain
the information. Questions shall be concise and in writing and handed to the
Chair prior to the commencement of the meeting.
Toi Lealofi
DEMOCRACY ADVISOR
Traffic
Subcommittee
19 August 2021
File:
(21/1330)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/211
Traffic Resolutions -
Proposed Changes to Route 160 (Homedale to Hutt Central) Bus Stop Configuration
Purpose
of Report
1. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s
approval of changes being proposed to local Route 160 Bus Stops to
improve safety and accessibility in line with Waka Kotahi’s
‘Guidelines for Public Transport Infrastructure and Facilities’ and
the Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 2021 - 2031.
|
Recommendations
That the
Subcommittee recommends that Council:
(1) notes and receives
the information;
(2) approves the
proposed changes attached as Appendix A to the report;
(3) rescinds any previous
resolutions pertaining to traffic controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the
extent that they are in conflict with the traffic controls described in this
resolution; and
(4) notes that these resolutions will take
effect once the appropriate signage and/or road-markings have been installed.
For the reasons that the proposed bus stop layout changes will ensure that the bus box
is of sufficient length to accommodate buses; no stopping restrictions will
prevent other vehicles from blocking full access to the bus stop; and
passengers will be able to board and alight safely and easily.
|
Background
2. Greater
Wellington Regional Council’s (GWRC) Te Mahere Waka Whenua Tūmatanui
o te Rohe o Pōneke (Wellington Regional Public Transport Plan 2021 - 2031)
has outline three Strategic Focus Areas:
a. Mode Shift;
b. Decarbonise
Public Transport Vehicle Fleet; and
c. Improve
Customer Experience.
3. As
part of improving the customer experience GWRC has committed to prioritising
the safety and maintenance of the public transport network to encourage safe
behaviours. The associated key measure is a 40% reduction in serious injuries
on the public transport network by 2030 which can be achieved by prioritising
safety through continuous improvements to both infrastructure and operations.
4. In
2018 GWRC implemented the largest range of changes to Wellington City bus
services for many years. The changes were the culmination of years of
engagement with residents, and community representatives and technical work to
review the bus network, as well as the development and implementation of new
contractual arrangements with operators in line with the Government’s
Public Transport Operating Model (PTOM).
5. The
implementation of changes started on 30 April 2018 in Wairarapa, followed by
the Hutt Valley on 17 June and then Kāpiti Coast, Porirua and Wellington
on 15 July. While the changes caused some disruption and customer reaction, in
Wellington City other less predictable issues like driver shortages led to
ongoing operational issues such as reliability. The major change to bus routes
and timetables occurred within Wellington City, with minor changes to
timetables in other areas.
6. A high quality, reliable, accessible and modern
public transport network relies on the provision of fit for purpose, well
designed and maintained infrastructure and facilities. This includes roads, bus
stops and shelters, transport interchanges and hubs, rail tracks and associated
infrastructure, train stations, ferry terminals and wharves, Park and Ride
facilities, cycle paths and footpaths, and door-to-door transport services for
those with limited access to public transport.
7. Infrastructure
and facilities need to provide good access, safety and personal security at all
stages of the journey, particularly for people with impairments. Public
transport elements also require clear and consistent branding with services and
levels and information to meet customer needs for an integrated, easy-to-use
customer focused system. As different agencies have ownership or control of
various elements of the system, communication and cooperation between all
parties is required to achieve this.
8. The
bus route 160 runs from Queensgate to Homedale as shown below;
Discussion
9. Current bus stop
infrastructure hasn’t kept pace with a changing and improving bus fleet.
While new buses are designed to be fully accessible for customers, they are
only accessible where the bus can pull up parallel to the kerb, allowing
customers step-free access to the bus.
10. This is particularly critical
for customers with wheelchairs or other mobility aids, along with prams and
wheeled luggage, where having to step out onto the roadway and then up into the
bus is a significant barrier to access.
11. In order to ensure
consistency across the wider network, alterations to existing stops are
designed to comply with Waka Kotahi’s – Guidelines for Transport
Infrastructure and Facilities.
Options
12. The options include:
a. approve the proposed changes
to the Route 160 bus stops as they appear in this report;
b. reject the proposed changes
to the Route 160 bus stops as they appear in this report; and/or
c. provide comment to the Traffic
Subcommittee to assist in their decision regarding the proposed changes to the
Route 160 bus stops.
13. Officers recommend options a.
and c. as the proposed changes go toward achieving the goals of the Regional
Public Transport Plan.
Climate
Change Impact and Considerations
14. The matters addressed in this
report have been considered in accordance with the process set out in
Council’s Climate Change
Considerations Guide.
15. Transport
infrastructure and facilities that provide good access, safety and personal
security at all stages of the journey, particularly for people with impairments
will help to remove barriers to the use of public transport. The more
barriers removed by Council will make the choice to use public transport easier
and will support moves to reduce car dependency and therefore the corresponding
carbon emissions.
16. The decision will not increase greenhouse gas emissions and
will not be affected by a changing climate. There are no opportunities in this
decision to reduce emissions or build resilience.
Consultation
17. GWRC undertook consultation
with all affected residents within proximity to the bus stops.
18. Consultation occurred from
July 2020 through to March 2021 given the extent of the bus stops affected.
19. All feedback received from
the GRWC consultation appears in Appendix 67 as attached to this report.
20. The Wainuiomata Community
Board will be considering this report and the associated bus stop changes at
its meeting to be held on 1 September 2021.
Legal
Considerations
21. The proposed changes in restrictions are made pursuant to
the provisions of the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2017
Financial
Considerations
22. These changes can be and will be funded from
Council’s 2021/22 transport budgets.
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix A - Bus Stop Restrictions
|
13
|
|
2⇩
|
Appendix 1
|
17
|
|
3⇩
|
Appendix 2
|
18
|
|
4⇩
|
Appendix 3
|
19
|
|
5⇩
|
Appendix 4
|
20
|
|
6⇩
|
Appendix 5
|
21
|
|
7⇩
|
Appendix 6
|
22
|
|
8⇩
|
Appendix 7
|
23
|
|
9⇩
|
Appendix 8
|
24
|
|
10⇩
|
Appendix 9
|
25
|
|
11⇩
|
Appendix 10
|
26
|
|
12⇩
|
Appendix 11
|
27
|
|
13⇩
|
Appendix 12
|
28
|
|
14⇩
|
Appendix 13
|
29
|
|
15⇩
|
Appendix 14
|
30
|
|
16⇩
|
Appendix 15
|
31
|
|
17⇩
|
Appendix 16
|
32
|
|
18⇩
|
Appendix 17
|
33
|
|
19⇩
|
Appendix 18
|
34
|
|
20⇩
|
Appendix 19
|
35
|
|
21⇩
|
Appendix 20
|
36
|
|
22⇩
|
Appendix 21
|
37
|
|
23⇩
|
Appendix 22
|
38
|
|
24⇩
|
Appendix 23
|
39
|
|
25⇩
|
Appendix 24
|
40
|
|
26⇩
|
Appendix 25
|
41
|
|
27⇩
|
Appendix 26
|
42
|
|
28⇩
|
Appendix 27
|
43
|
|
29⇩
|
Appendix 28
|
44
|
|
30⇩
|
Appendix 29
|
45
|
|
31⇩
|
Appendix 30
|
46
|
|
32⇩
|
Appendix 31
|
47
|
|
33⇩
|
Appendix 32
|
48
|
|
34⇩
|
Appendix 33
|
49
|
|
35⇩
|
Appendix 34
|
50
|
|
36⇩
|
Appendix 35
|
51
|
|
37⇩
|
Appendix 36
|
52
|
|
38⇩
|
Appendix 37
|
53
|
|
39⇩
|
Appendix 38
|
54
|
|
40⇩
|
Appendix 39
|
55
|
|
41⇩
|
Appendix 40
|
56
|
|
42⇩
|
Appendix 41
|
57
|
|
43⇩
|
Appendix 42
|
58
|
|
44⇩
|
Appendix 43
|
59
|
|
45⇩
|
Appendix 44
|
60
|
|
46⇩
|
Appendix 45
|
61
|
|
47⇩
|
Appendix 46
|
62
|
|
48⇩
|
Appendix 47
|
63
|
|
49⇩
|
Appendix 48
|
64
|
|
50⇩
|
Appendix 49
|
65
|
|
51⇩
|
Appendix 50
|
66
|
|
52⇩
|
Appendix 51
|
67
|
|
53⇩
|
Appendix 53
|
68
|
|
54⇩
|
Appendix 54
|
69
|
|
55⇩
|
Appendix 55
|
70
|
|
56⇩
|
Appendix 56
|
71
|
|
57⇩
|
Appendix 57
|
72
|
|
58⇩
|
Appendix 58
|
73
|
|
59⇩
|
Appendix 59
|
74
|
|
60⇩
|
Appendix 60
|
75
|
|
61⇩
|
Appendix 61
|
76
|
|
62⇩
|
Appendix 62
|
77
|
|
63⇩
|
Appendix 63
|
78
|
|
64⇩
|
Appendix 64
|
79
|
|
65⇩
|
Appendix 65
|
80
|
|
66⇩
|
Appendix 66
|
81
|
|
67⇩
|
Appendix 67 - Consultation Comments
|
82
|
Author: Charles Agate
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: John Gloag
Head of Transport
Approved By: Kara Puketapu-Dentice
Director Economy and Development
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix A - Bus Stop Restrictions
|
|
Attachment 11
|
Appendix 10
|
|
Attachment 12
|
Appendix 11
|
|
Attachment 13
|
Appendix 12
|
|
Attachment 14
|
Appendix 13
|
|
Attachment 15
|
Appendix 14
|
|
Attachment 16
|
Appendix 15
|
|
Attachment 17
|
Appendix 16
|
|
Attachment 18
|
Appendix 17
|
|
Attachment 19
|
Appendix 18
|
|
Attachment 20
|
Appendix 19
|
|
Attachment 21
|
Appendix 20
|
|
Attachment 22
|
Appendix 21
|
|
Attachment 23
|
Appendix 22
|
|
Attachment 24
|
Appendix 23
|
|
Attachment 25
|
Appendix 24
|
|
Attachment 26
|
Appendix 25
|
|
Attachment 27
|
Appendix 26
|
|
Attachment 28
|
Appendix 27
|
|
Attachment 29
|
Appendix 28
|
|
Attachment 30
|
Appendix 29
|
|
Attachment 31
|
Appendix 30
|
|
Attachment 32
|
Appendix 31
|
|
Attachment 33
|
Appendix 32
|
|
Attachment 34
|
Appendix 33
|
|
Attachment 35
|
Appendix 34
|
|
Attachment 36
|
Appendix 35
|
|
Attachment 37
|
Appendix 36
|
|
Attachment 38
|
Appendix 37
|
|
Attachment 39
|
Appendix 38
|
|
Attachment 40
|
Appendix 39
|
|
Attachment 41
|
Appendix 40
|
|
Attachment 42
|
Appendix 41
|
|
Attachment 43
|
Appendix 42
|
|
Attachment 44
|
Appendix 43
|
|
Attachment 45
|
Appendix 44
|
|
Attachment 46
|
Appendix 45
|
|
Attachment 47
|
Appendix 46
|
|
Attachment 48
|
Appendix 47
|
|
Attachment 49
|
Appendix 48
|
|
Attachment 50
|
Appendix 49
|
|
Attachment 51
|
Appendix 50
|
|
Attachment 52
|
Appendix 51
|
|
Attachment 53
|
Appendix 53
|
|
Attachment 54
|
Appendix 54
|
|
Attachment 55
|
Appendix 55
|
|
Attachment 56
|
Appendix 56
|
|
Attachment 57
|
Appendix 57
|
|
Attachment 58
|
Appendix 58
|
|
Attachment 59
|
Appendix 59
|
|
Attachment 60
|
Appendix 60
|
|
Attachment 61
|
Appendix 61
|
|
Attachment 62
|
Appendix 62
|
|
Attachment 63
|
Appendix 63
|
|
Attachment 64
|
Appendix 64
|
|
Attachment 65
|
Appendix 65
|
|
Attachment 66
|
Appendix 66
|
|
Attachment 67
|
Appendix 67 - Consultation Comments
|
Traffic Subcommittee
19 August 2021
File:
(21/1328)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/187
Traffic Resolution -
Cuba Street, Petone - P15 & P120 Parking Restrictions
Purpose
of Report
1. The purpose of
this report is to seek the Petone Community Board’s endorsement of the
proposed parking restrictions outside the Salvation Army’s Worship and
Community Centre at 72 Cuba Street, Petone.
|
Recommendations
That the Subcommittee recommends
that Council:
(1) notes and receives
the information;
(2) approves the
installation of a P15, (8am – 6pm Monday to Friday (excluding Public
Holidays)), time limited parking restriction as shown on the plan attached as
Appendix 1 to this report;
(3) approves the
installation of a P120, (8am – 6pm Monday to Friday (excluding Public
Holidays)), time limited parking restriction as shown on the plan attached as
Appendix 1 to this report;
(4) rescinds any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic
controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict
with the traffic controls described in this resolution; and
(5) notes that this resolution will take effect when the
traffic control devices that evidence the restrictions described in this
resolution are in place.
For the reason that the
proposed restriction will improve serviceability for the surrounding area,
and is supported by Council’s current Parking Policy.
|
Background
2. Council officers
were approached by the Salvation Army’s Central Youth Services Director
on the recommendation of a Petone Community Board Member, to assess the current
parking allocation outside their community centre in light of recent changes to
their community playground and community services.
Discussion
3. It is intended to
provide one (1) P15 parking space and three (3) P120 parking spaces along the
Cuba Street frontage of the Salvation Army Worship and Community Centre.
4. The 5.4m P15
parking space will facilitate short term ‘drop in’ access to the
centre. The recent service additions available at the centre align with the
short term nature of the parking space.
5. The three (3) P120
spaces occupying 17.6m of kerb space will allow for vehicle turnover for people
wishing to access the services offered by the community centre, including the
community playground.
Options
6. The options
include:
a. Maintain
the existing level of service (unrestricted parking);
b. Endorse
the proposed changes; or
c. Recommend
a modified set of time restrictions to a greater or lesser extent to those
proposed within this report.
7. Council Officers
support option b. as the proposed restrictions align with current weekday
on-street parking demand.
Climate
Change Impact and Considerations
8. The matters
addressed in this report have been considered in accordance with the process
set out in Council’s Climate Change Considerations Guide.
9. The decision will not increase greenhouse gas emissions,
and will not be affected by a changing climate. There are no opportunities in
this decision to reduce emissions or build resilience.
Consultation
10. The residents / owners of the
private residences at 68 and 70 Cuba Street have been approached for comment.
At the time of writing this report, no responses have been received.
11. At its meeting held on Monday
30 August 2021 the Petone Community Board endorsed the proposed changes.
Legal
Considerations
12. These restrictions are made pursuant to the provisions of
the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2017
Financial
Considerations
13. These changes can be, and will be, funded from
Council’s 2021/22 transport budgets.
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix 1: Installation of a P15, (8am – 6pm
Monday to Friday (excluding Public Holidays)), time limited parking
restriction
|
89
|
Author: Charles Agate
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: John Gloag
Head of Transport
Approved By: Kara Puketapu-Dentice
Director Economy and Development
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix 1: installation of a P15, (8am – 6pm
Monday to Friday (excluding Public Holidays)), time limited parking
restriction
|
Traffic Subcommittee
23 August 2021
File:
(21/1341)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/188
Traffic Resolution -
Taine Street (Slip Lane),Taita - No Parking (Except Emergency Vehicles)
Purpose
of Report
1. The
purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval for the installation
of one Emergency Vehicle parking space, to allow emergency vehicles access to
the Walter Nash Stadium at 20 – 22 Taine Street, Taita, as shown on the
plan attached as Appendix 1 to the report.
|
Recommendations
That the Subcommittee
recommends that Council:
(1) receives and notes the information;
(2) approves the No Parking – Except Emergency Vehicles
– At All Times restriction within the Taine Street (Slip Lane), Taita,
attached as Appendix 1 to the report;
(3) rescinds any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic
controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict
with the traffic controls described in this resolution; and
(4) notes that these resolutions will take effect once the
appropriate signage and/or road-markings have been installed.
|
Background
2. A recent medical
emergency at the Walter Nash Stadium highlighted to management a need for a
designated parking space in front of the stadium entrance for emergency
vehicles.
3. Currently
the kerb space in front of the stadium is unrestricted apart from Loading Zone
and Disability parking spaces.
Discussion
4. The proposed
location aligns with the pedestrian ramp in front of the Walter Nash Stadium.
5. Having a
designated Emergency Services parking space provides certainty for vehicles
being able to locate close to the main entrance of the stadium
Options
6. The options are
to:
a. keep the existing parking layout and accept the current
level of service;
b. approve the installation of a No Parking - Except for
Emergency Services (At All Times) Restriction outside the Walter Nash Stadium
shown in Appendix 1 as attached to the report; and /or
c. approve restrictions over a lesser or greater extent.
7. Officers recommend option b. as it provides a designated
parking space for emergency vehicles when attending the Walter Nash Stadium,
while maintaining an acceptable level of service for on-street parking.
Climate
Change Impact and Considerations
8. The matters
addressed in this report have been considered in accordance with the process
set out in Council’s Climate Change Considerations Guide.
9. The decision will not increase greenhouse gas emissions and
will not be affected by a changing climate. There are no opportunities in this
decision to reduce emissions or build resilience.
Consultation
10. As the proposed restrictions
directly affect access associated with an individual property, and are
supported by existing prohibitions within the Land Transport (Road User) Rule
2004, no consultation was undertaken expect with the properties current tenant.
Legal
Considerations
11. These restrictions are made pursuant to the provisions of
the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport (Road User) Rule
2004.
Financial
Considerations
12. The required markings and
signage changes can be financed from transport budgets for the 2021/22
financial year.
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix 1: No Parking – Except Emergency
Vehicles – At All Times restriction
|
93
|
Author: Charles Agate
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: John Gloag
Head of Transport
Approved By: Kara Puketapu-Dentice
Director Economy and Development
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix 1: No Parking – Except Emergency Vehicles
– At All Times restriction
|
Traffic Subcommittee
19 August 2021
File:
(21/1320)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/185
Traffic Resolution -
Raroa Road, Hutt Central - No Stopping (At All Times).
Purpose
of Report
1. The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s
approval for the removal of one metered parking space, to improve visibility
for vehicles exiting the New Zealand Police compound (14 – 16 Raroa
Road), as shown on the plan attached as Appendix 1 to the report.
|
Recommendations
That the Subcommittee recommends
that Council:
(1) notes and receives
the report;
(2) approves the
installation of a No Stopping – At All Times restriction on a 5 metre
section of Raroa Road, as shown on the plan attached as Appendix 1 to this
report;
(3) rescinds any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic
controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict
with the traffic controls described in this resolution (one metered parking
space); and
(4) notes that these resolutions will take effect
once the appropriate signage and/or road-markings have been installed.
For the reason that the
proposed restrictions will improve the operational efficiency of our local emergency
service, and is supported by current Hutt City Policies.
|
Background
2. Council Officers
received a request from NZ Police (Service Delivery Manager – Hutt Valley)
resulting from a recent incident where a Police vehicle collided with a vehicle
travelling along Raroa Road as it exited the Lower Hutt Police Station
Compound.
3. NZ Police
requested that the first parking space to the right of the driveway (as you exit)
be removed to improve visibility given the proximity of trees, and the
closeness of parked vehicles.
4. With multiple
vehicle movements into, and out of this driveway, and given the importance of
the service provided from this location, it is important that the visibility
available from this location exceeds the minimum standards.
Discussion
5. Waka Kotahi (NZTA)
– Road Traffic Standard 6 – Guidelines for Visibility at Driveways
states;
‘Driveways should be
located, designed and constructed so that vehicles can enter or leave the
driveway in a safe and convenient manner without causing undue adverse effect
on the safe and efficient operation of the road network. The potential for
adverse effects depends on:
• the number of movements to or from the driveway;
• the traffic functions and traffic flow on the
frontage road;
• the number and spacing of driveways along the road.
Generally the potential for adverse effects increases with increasing numbers
of movements to or from driveways and higher traffic flows on the frontage
road.’
6. The
RTS 6 guideline was published in 1993 and was based on the 1988 NAASA1 Guide to
traffic engineering practice. The NAASRA guideline has been superseded by more
recent Austroads guidelines having longer minimum sight distances as the result
of road safety research, and different measurement parameters.
7. The
RTS6 publication remains in effect as a valid standard by the New Zealand
Transport Agency (NZTA). Until such time that NZTA recalls the document, it
remains valid and appropriate for use on New Zealand roads.
8. The
aerial image provided below shows the availability of off-road parking for even
numbered properties along Raroa Road. The abundance of spaces minimises the
effect of removing an on-road metered parking space.
Options
9. The options are
to;
a. Maintain the exiting level
of service – Do Nothing;
b. Improve the visibility of
vehicles exiting from the NZ Police compound by approving the removal of one
metered parking space, and installing the proposed no stopping restriction; or
c. Approve a modified
restriction to a greater or lesser extent in consultation with Council
Officers.
10. Officers support option b. as
it provides improved visibility for emergency services exiting their compound,
and surrounding businesses have sufficient off-street parking for the change to
have minimal impact.
Climate
Change Impact and Considerations
11. The matters addressed in this
report have been considered in accordance with the process set out in
Council’s Climate Change Considerations Guide.
12. The decision will not increase greenhouse gas emissions and
will not be affected by a changing climate. There are no opportunities in this
decision to reduce emissions or build resilience.
Consultation
13. Given the nature of the
request, no consultation was undertaken.
Legal
Considerations
14. These restrictions are made pursuant to the provisions of
the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2017.
Financial
Considerations
15. These changes can be funded from Council’s 2021/22
transport budgets.
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix 1: Raroa Road, Hutt Central - No Stopping (At
All Times)
|
98
|
Author: Charles Agate
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: John Gloag
Head of Transport
Approved By: Kara Puketapu-Dentice
Director Economy and Development
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix 1: Raroa Road, Hutt Central - No Stopping
(At All Times)
|
Traffic Subcommittee
19 August 2021
File:
(21/1325)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/186
Traffic Resolution -
High Street, Hutt Central - No Stopping (At All Times).
Purpose
of Report
1. The
purpose of this report is to seek Council’s approval for the removal of
one P15 parking space, to allow access to a storage garage at (337 High Street,
Hutt Central), as shown on the plan attached as Appendix 1 to the report.
|
Recommendations
That the Subcommittee
recommends that Council:
(1) receives and notes the information;
(2) approves the No Stopping – At All Times restriction
on High Street, Central Hutt attached as Appendix 1 to the report;
(3) rescinds any previous resolutions pertaining to traffic
controls made pursuant to any bylaw to the extent that they are in conflict
with the traffic controls described in this resolution; and
(4) notes that these resolutions will take effect once the
appropriate signage and/or road-markings have been installed.
|
Background
2. A recent change in
rental tenant has led to a need to use the storage garage associated with the
property at 337 High Street, Hutt Central.
3. Currently the kerb
space in front of the garage has a P15 time restriction.
Discussion
4. The current
on-road layout does not meet the needs of the current tenant.
5. Having a signed
short term (P15) parking space in front of the garage restricts access.
Options
6. The options are
to:
a. keep the existing parking layout, and accept the current
level of service;
b. rescind the existing P15 parking restriction outside 337
High Street, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;
c. approve the installation of a No Stopping (At All
Times) Restriction outside 337 High Street, as shown in Appendix 1 attached to
the report; and /or
d. approve restrictions over a lesser or greater extent.
7. Officers recommend options b. and c. combined as they
reinforce good parking behaviour, by reinforcing existing restrictions with
regards to parking over driveways, while maintaining an acceptable level of
service for on-street parking.
Climate
Change Impact and Considerations
8. The matters
addressed in this report have been considered in accordance with the process
set out in Council’s Climate Change Considerations Guide.
9. The decision will not increase greenhouse gas emissions and
will not be affected by a changing climate. There are no opportunities in this
decision to reduce emissions or build resilience.
Consultation
10. As the proposed restrictions
directly affect access associated with an individual property, and are
supported by existing prohibitions within the Land Transport (Road User) Rule
2004, no consultation was undertaken expect with the properties current tenant.
Legal
Considerations
11. These restrictions are made pursuant to the provisions of
the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2017 and Land Transport (Road User) Rule
2004.
Financial
Considerations
12. The required markings and
signage changes can be financed from transport budgets for the 2021/22
financial year.
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix 1: No Stopping (At All Times) Restriction
outside 337 High Street
|
102
|
Author: Charles Agate
Traffic Engineer - Network Operations
Reviewed By: John Gloag
Head of Transport
Approved By: Kara Puketapu-Dentice
Director Economy and Development
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix 1: No Stopping (At All Times) Restriction
outside 337 High Street
|
Traffic Subcommittee
03 August 2021
File:
(21/1231)
Report no:
TSC2021/4/114
Traffic Subcommittee
Work Programme
|
Recommendation
That the work programme be received and noted.
|
Appendices
|
No.
|
Title
|
Page
|
|
1⇩
|
Appendix 1: Traffic Subcommittee Work Programme 2021
|
104
|
Author: Toi Lealofi
Democracy Advisor
Approved By: Kate Glanville
Senior Democracy Advisor
|
Attachment 1
|
Appendix 1: Traffic Subcommittee Work Programme 2021
|
