community boards – functions and delegations

This document records the delegation of Council functions, responsibilities, duties, and powers to Community Boards.

The Community Boards have been established under section 49 of the Local Government Act 2002 to represent, and act as an advocate for, the interests of their community.

The delegations are expressed in general terms. The delegations shall be exercised with proper regard for the Council’s strategic direction, policies, plans, Standing Orders and its interpretation of its statutory obligations. The delegations are to be read together with the following propositions.

These delegations are based on the following principles:

· Issues relevant to a specific community should be decided as closely as possible to that community. Where an issue has city-wide implications, ie any effects of the decision cross a ward or community boundary or have consequences for the city as a whole, the matter will be decided by Council after seeking a recommendation from the relevant Community Board or (any ambiguity around the interpretation of “city-wide” will be determined by the Mayor and Chief Executive in consultation with the relevant Chair);

· Efficient decision-making should be paramount;

· Conflicts of interest should be avoided and risks minimised;

· To ensure processes are free from bias and pre-determination Community Boards should not adjudicate on issues on which they have advocated or wish to advocate to Council;

· Community Boards should proactively and constructively engage with residents on local matters that affect the community they represent and raise with Council issues raised with them by their community and advocate on behalf of their community.

These delegations:

(a) do not delegate any function, duty or power which a statute (for example section 53(3) and clause 32(1) of Schedule 7 of the Local Government Act 2002) prohibits from being delegated;

(b) are subject to and do not affect any delegation which the Council has already made or subsequently makes to any other committee, Council officer or other member of staff;

(d) are subject to any notice issued by the Council, from time to time, to a Community Board that a particular issue must be referred to Council for decision;

(e) reflect that decisions with significant financial implications should be made by Council (or a committee with delegated authority);

(f) promote centralisation of those functions where the appropriate expertise must be ensured; and

(g) reflect that all statutory and legal requirements must be met.

DELEGATIONS

Decide:

· Naming new roads and alterations to street names (in the Community Board’s area).

· Official naming of parks, reserves and sports grounds within the provisions of Council’s Naming Policy. Note [1]

· Removal and/or planting of street trees within the provisions of Council’s Operational Guide for Urban Forest Plan where a dispute arises that cannot be resolved at officer level. Note [2]

· The granting of leases and licences in terms of Council policy to voluntary organisations for Council owned properties in their local area, for example, halls, but not including the granting of leases and licences to community houses and centres.

· The granting of rights-of-way and other easements over local purpose reserves and granting of leases or licences on local purpose reserves.

· The granting of leases and licences for new activities in terms of Council policy to community and commercial organisations over recreation reserves subject to the provisions of the Reserves Act 1977 and land managed as reserve subject to the provisions of the Local Government 2002, in their local area. (Note: renewal of existing leases and licences will be reported once a year to Council’s City Development Committee).

· The allocation of funding from the Community Engagement Fund in accordance with Council’s adopted guidelines.

· Expenditure of funds allocated by the Council to the Board from the Miscellaneous Budget to cover expenditure associated with the activities of the Board. The Chair to approve expenditure, in consultation with the Board, and forward appropriate documentation to the Committee Advisor for authorisation. Boards must not exceed their annual expenditure from the Miscellaneous Budget.

· The allocation of funding for the training and development of Community Board or members, including formal training courses, attendance at seminars or attendance at relevant conferences.

Consider and make recommendations to Council on:

· Particular issues notified from time to time by Council to the Community Board.

· Roading issues considered by the Mayor and Chief Executive to be strategic due to their significance on a city-wide basis, including links to the State Highway, or where their effects cross ward or community boundaries.

· Parks, reserves and sports ground naming for sites that have a high profile, city-wide importance due to their size and location and/or cross ward or community boundaries.

· Representatives to any Council committee, subcommittee, subordinate decision-making body, working group, or ad hoc group on which a Community Board representative is required by Council.

· The setting, amending or revoking of speed limits in accordance with the Hutt City Council Bylaw 2005 Speed Limits, including the hearing of any submissions.

GENERAL FUNCTIONS

Provide their local community’s input on:

· Council’s Long Term Plan and/or Annual Plan.

· Council’s policies, programmes (including the District Roading Programme) and bylaws.

· Changes or variations to the District Plan.

· Resource management issues which it believes are relevant to its local community, through advocacy.

· The disposal or acquisition of significant assets.

· Road safety including road safety education within its area.

· Any other issues a Board believes is relevant to its local area.

· Review Local Community Plans as required.

Reports may be prepared by the Board and presented to Council Committees, along with an officer’s recommendation, for consideration.

Any submissions lodged by a Board or Committee require formal endorsement by way of resolution.

Co-ordinate with Council staff:

· Local community consultation on city-wide issues on which the Council has called for consultation.

Maintain:

· An overview of roadworks, water supply, sewerage, stormwater drainage, waste management and traffic management for its local area.

· An overview of parks, recreational facilities and community activities within its local area.

Develop:

· Community Response Plans in close consultation with the Wellington Region Emergency Management Office, emergency organisations, the community, residents’ associations, other community groups, and local businesses. The Community Response Plans will be reviewed on an annual basis.

Grant:

· Local community awards.

Promote:

· Recreational facilities and opportunities in its area with a view to ensure maximum usage.

· Arts and crafts in its area.

Appoint:

· A liaison member or, where appropriate, representatives to ad hoc bodies, which are involved in community activities within the Board’s area, on which a community representative is sought.

Endorse:

1. Amendments to the Eastbourne Community Trust Deed (Eastbourne Community Board only).

14 8 April 2019

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

Wainuiomata Community Board

Minutes of a meeting held in the Wainuiomata Community Library, Queen Street, Wainuiomata on

Monday 8 April 2019 commencing at 7.00pm

PRESENT:	Mr G Tupou (Chair)
	Cr C Barry	Cr J Briggs
	Ms K Brown
	Ms S Tuala-Le’afa	Ms J Winterburn

APOLOGIES: Mr R Sinnott, Mr T Stallworth

IN ATTENDANCE: Ms J Randall, Committee Advisor

PUBLIC BUSINESS

1. APOLOGIES

Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Ms Tuala-Le'afa) Minute No. WCB 19201

“That the apologies received from Mr Sinnott and Mr Stallworth be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2. PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.

Speaking under public comment, Ms L Olsen advised of rubbish and tyres dumped at the top of Antrim Crescent. She added that storm water had brought toxins from the rubbish down into gardens and the local creek. She asked that Council investigate the problem. She asked for signage at the end of the Marae driveway to slow down traffic and create a safer intersection.

The Chair agreed to follow up with officers regarding the issues raised by Ms Olsen.

Resolved: (Cr Barry/Ms Brown) Minute No. WCB 19202

“That the Board requests that officers report back on issues at the Parkway extension.”

Speaking under public comment Mr Gatherer expressed concern about footpath safety in Wainuiomata. He explained footpaths were hazardous for older citizens because of scalloped and sloping footpaths and wheelie bins. He added that work done to replace footpaths was often of inferior standard.

Resolved: (Ms Brown/Cr Briggs) Minute No. WCB 19203

“That the Board asks officers to report back on the safety of the footpaths of the main arterial routes around Parkway, Fitzherbert Road and Moohan Street.”

Speaking under public comment, Ms Innes and Mr Innes advised that a significant area of the forest understorey around Wainuiomata had been destroyed by deer, pigs and goats. They expressed concern that some of the wild pigs were domestic breeds that had been released into the bush. They added that the foraging had allowed weeds to dominate. Mr Innes suggested a bounty system might be a cost effective means of controlling the animals.

In response to questions from members, Mr Innes and Ms Innes confirmed they had invited hunters onto their property but noted animals took a considerable time to catch. Ms Innes said Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) had sent a representative to listen to their concerns but she had since heard that no action was to be taken to address the problem. She confirmed both herself and Mr Innes belonged to the Rural Ratepayers Group but suggested that an independent pest control committee might be needed to deal with the problem.

Cr Briggs agreed to follow up the issue with GWRC.

Speaking under public comment, Ms D Clark advised that GWRC allowed hunters annually into the area of the forest that was once part of the Regional Water Board. She suggested this be extended to give hunters longer to reduce the population of deer.

Cr Briggs agreed to follow up the issue with GWRC.

3. Presentations

Presentation by a Representative from Love Wainuiomata (19/224)

Ms King outlined some of the projects undertaken by Love Wainuiomata (the Group). She explained Council had provided less funding than in previous years with a request that they postponed bigger projects and instead focussed on community engagement. She said the Group was now focussing on activating spaces for the community to use and encouraging community engagement. She said some of the projects undertaken were ‘pop-ups’ and others were longer term but not necessarily permanent.

In response to questions from members, Ms King said the Group would be undertaking projects that trialled simple cost-effective equipment and ideas. She explained that by trialling simple installations and engaging with the community, the Group could advise Council what was wanted in Wainuiomata. She expected the Group would see what worked best in the area and add value to future development. She added the Group hoped to install a pop-up sign on the Wainuiomata Hill and some simple children’s play equipment. She outlined some of their current projects, including engaging with local residents.

In response to a question from a member, Ms King said the Group maintained good communication with Council. She hoped the relationship would bring more significant benefits for the local community and its children in the future.

Presentation on Dog Exercise Areas in Wainuiomata (19/364)

Mr L Dalton, Regional Manager, Animal Services advised Council had purchased an old industrial site at Parkway to create an adventure park (the park) for dogs. He explained the park was linked to the shared pathway over the Wainuiomata Hill. He said Council was working alongside contractors creating the shared pathway so that earthworks and off-cuts from the path could be used to create mounds and build equipment in the park. He noted the site was elevated and would be fenced with double gates for safety. He believed the park would become a regional attraction for dog owners.

Ms C Robilliard, a landscape architect working on the site, considered the park would be a pleasant place for dogs and people and an area for both to socialise. She advised the site would have three entrances, a wetland, plantings, and a number of paths including one through the trees above the site. She added there would be dog agility equipment, seating, dog fountains and information boards. She concluded the park would be divided into three areas to separate large and small dogs.

In response to questions from members, Mr Dalton explained the fencing above the park would not impact native bush but would be an opportunity to improve the ecology of the area by removing blackberry to accommodate a path. He added he expected the park to be opened by early 2020. He said the park would be open to all breeds of dogs. He anticipated the park would have a committee of local dog owners to oversee it and could be used for dog training.

Cr Briggs congratulated Mr Dalton and Ms Robilliard on their work and thanked them for providing a safe place for local residents to exercise their dogs.

MINOR ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA – wainuiomata sportsville

Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Cr Briggs) Minute No. WCB 19204

That in terms of Standing Order 10.13, the Board agrees that a minor matter relating to Wainuiomata Sportsville which was not included on the agenda due to lateness be discussed at this meeting.”

Mr D Head, a representative of Wainuiomata Sportsville (Sportsville), explained the work Sportsville was undertaking with the local community. He advised Sportsville had been allocated $4.8M from Council but it was yet to obtain support and agreement from some sports clubs. He noted the Sportsville concept had support from the baseball community, and there had been interest from indoor sports codes in Wainuiomata. He confirmed the local rugby club had decided not to support the concept. Mr Head noted the revenue approach to sports had moved from a reliance on bar takings to running programmes. He said he was keen to progress Sportsville in Wainuiomata.

In response to questions from members, Mr Head said most residents had indicated they would like an indoor sports facility. He considered it important to develop a plan that was supported by both the community and local clubs. He advised that many sports clubs wanted an area to display their memorabilia and a café area. He said he expected the Sportsville plan would be reviewed to ensure it met the needs of the community. He added he would be meeting with officers from Council’s Leisure Active in the near future.

4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

5. Minutes

Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Ms Winterburn) Minute No. WCB 19205

“That the minutes of the meeting of the Wainuiomata Community Board held on Wednesday, 20 February 2019, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”

6.	Community Engagement Fund 2018-2019 (19/309) Memorandum dated 15 March 2019 by the Community Advisor - Funding and Community Contracts
	Speaking under public comment, Ms S Hutchison, a volunteer at the Remutaka Conservation Trust (the Trust), reported on funding the Trust had received in November 2018 through the Wainuiomata Community Engagement Fund. She advised the Trust had used the funds to encourage community involvement and showcase the park through their Wild Kiwi Family Day. She said approximately 250 people had attended the event in December, and the Trust hoped to make it an annual or biennial occurrence. She added the Trust was considering advertising wider than Facebook and flyer distribution next time so it could better anticipate numbers. The Board discussed the eligibility of Love Wainuiomata’s (the Group) application. Crs Briggs and Barry advised that the Group’s operational budget from Council did not cover their costs. They noted that projects of the kind proposed by the Group would not be possible without additional funding sources. In response to questions from members, Ms King from the Group agreed the flags were not a capital expense in the sense of being a long term asset. She confirmed that if the organisation used Council funding for the flags project it would increase their funding shortfall even further and reduce what they could deliver for Wainuiomata. In response to a question from a member, Cr Briggs advised that any funds not allocated through the Community Engagement Fund would be returned to Council.
	Resolved: (Cr Barry/Ms Winterburn) Minute No. WCB 19206 “That the Board approves the application from Love Wainuiomata from the Community Engagement Fund for the total of $900.00 for the purchase of x10 Wainuiomata Town Centre Community Flags, subject to advice from the Funding officer to ensure it falls within the purview of the Community Engagement Fund.”
	Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Cr Barry) Minute No. WCB 19207 “That the Board: (i) notes that the Community Engagement Fund closed on 4 March 2019 and five applications had been received; (ii) agrees that the applications were considered according to the merits of the application criteria and priorities of the fund; (iii) approves the application from Wainuiomata Tennis Club from the Community Engagement Fund for the total of $1,000 for the purchase of x 5 new nets for their courts; (iv) approves the application from Wainuiomata Little Theatre from the Community Engagement Fund for the total of $2,621.00 for marketing and advertising costs for the production of Mamma Mia in October 2019; (v) approves the application from Te Awakairangi Access Trust from the Community Engagement Fund for the total of $480.00 for hire of a bus to transport people from Wainuiomata to attend the free Symphony in the Hutt event to be held at Walter Nash on Friday 17 May 2019; (vi) declines the application from Youth Inspire from the Community Engagement Fund for the total of $499.00 for the purchase of an office filing cabinet; and (vii) agrees that the organisations granted funding will be required to attend a meeting of the Board once the project has been completed.”
7.	Chair's Report (19/418) Report No. WCB2019/2/38 by the Chair
	The Chair elaborated on the report. He noted that Wainuiomata had generated 160 visitors to Council’s Annual Plan Online Forum. He added that engagement from the Wainuiomata community had exceeded that of other areas in Lower Hutt. In response to a question from a member, the Chair explained that in an earthquake or tsunami emergency, individuals were expected to have enough water stored for seven days. He added Wainuiomata was one of most resourced areas in Lower Hutt with regard to water. He advised there were a number of large water tanks at schools, the medical centre, the marae and reservoirs. He noted there were 75,000 litres of water stored in the Wainuiomata Valley.
	Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Cr Briggs) Minute No. WCB 19208 “That the Board notes the report”.
8.	Committee Advisor's Report (19/362) Report No. WCB2019/2/33 by the Committee Advisor
	Resolved: (Mr Tupou/Ms Winterburn) Minute No. WCB 19209 “That the Board notes the report.”
9.	Whaitua Committee Update The Chair advised the next Whaitua Committee meeting would take place on Thursday 11 April 2019. He added he would provide an update for the Board’s next meeting to be held on 26 June 2019.

10. QUESTIONS

There were no questions.

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 9.05 pm.

Mr G Tupou

CHAIR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26^th day of June 2019

17 26 June 2019

Wainuiomata Community Board

17 June 2019

File: (19/788)

Report no: WCB2019/3/123

Review of Urban Reserves in Wainuiomata

Purpose of Report

To present the draft review of urban reserves in Wainuiomata and to seek feedback on the contents, themes and proposed consultation process from the Board.

Recommendations

That the Board:

(i) notes the contents of the draft Review of Reserve Land Wainuiomata, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii) notes that when adopted this plan will guide the management, provision and development of urban reserve land in Wainuiomata;

(iii) notes the proposed consultation plan as outlined in paragraph 10;

(iv) provides feedback to officers on the draft plan; and

(v) notes that officers will report back after public consultation on proposed changes to the plan.

For the reasons outlined in the report.

Background

1. In 2013 Council completed a review of reserve land on the Lower Hutt valley floor in response to a desire to identify possible surplus land for development.

2. At that time areas such as Eastbourne, Stokes Valley and Wainuiomata were omitted from this review.

3. While the review did identify some land that was considered surplus it also identified areas for improvement within the network and has resulted in redevelopment being undertaken across the reserve network.

4. In recent times urban development in Wainuiomata has been gaining pace as evidenced by two recent subdivisions along Parkway Extension with more development likely.

5. Due to this added pressure Officers felt it was prudent to review how the reserve network in Wainuiomata is supporting the needs of the local community. As such PAOS Ltd. were commissioned in March 2019 to commence this review.

Discussion

6. The draft report (attached as Appendix 1 to the report) is based on current knowledge and condition of reserves.

7. This data has been cross referenced with what we know about possible future development pressures and outcomes sought in the Urban Growth Strategy.

8. The main recommendations identified in the draft review are:

a. To provide safe off-road routes for pedestrians and cyclists by constructing all weather paths, removing barriers and activating areas such as Black Creek and the Wainuiomata River corridors.

b. Making more of existing reserves by providing for more activities at some sites e.g. adding large trees and picnic spots to sports grounds.

c. Improving access to reserves, particularly to tracks within the surrounding hills.

9. We are now seeking feedback from the Board and community on the draft report and recommendations.

10. Our proposed engagement approach with the community is:

a. On-line consultation advertised through Council media channels, local newspaper and the library and community hub.

b. Meetings with key stakeholders including: the Wainuomata Marae, Love Wainuiomata, Forest & Bird, Wainuiomata Trail Project.

c. Youth engagement through Wainuiomata High School.

11. The public consultation period will run for eight weeks from 15 July to 9 September 2019.

12. After consultation has been assessed we will report back to the Board on any changes proposed to the draft plan.

Options

13. There are no options at this stage

Consultation

14. The proposed consultation plan is detailed above.

Legal Considerations

15. There are none at this stage.

Financial Considerations

16. There are none at this stage.

Appendices

No.	Title	Page
1 ⇩	Wainuiomata Reserves June 2019	18

Author: Marcus Sherwood

Divisional Manager, Parks and Recreation

Approved By: Matt Reid

Acting Chief Executive/General Manager City and Community Services

47 26 June 2019

Wainuiomata Community Board

14 June 2019

File: (19/765)

Report no: WCB2019/3/63

Committee Advisor's Report

1. The primary purpose of this report is to update the Board on various items of interest.

Recommendation

That the Board notes the report.

2. Community Consultations

Please see below a list of current proposals Council is consulting on. These can be viewed on Council’s website http://www.huttcity.govt.nz/haveyoursay

Consulting on	Closing Date
Double Decker Buses Coming to the Hutt Valley	21 June 2019
Proposed Alcohol Fees Bylaw	28 June 2019

3. Heritage Policy Review

The Heritage Policy Review is ongoing. Engagement took place earlier in the year to assist with drafting the Heritage Policy, and there will be an opportunity later in the year to provide further input.

4. Proposed District Plan Change 43 – Proposed Residential and Suburban Mixed use

A hearing of submissions for Plan Change 43 will take place later this year. The purpose of the proposed plan change is to provide for greater housing capacity and a wider range of options for housing styles and sizes at medium densities within the existing urban area.

More information and updates are available on Council’s website: http://www.huttcity.govt.nz/pc43

5. 2018/2019 Expenditure

The Board’s Miscellaneous Administration Budget for the 2018/2019 financial year is $5,000.00. Expenditure to date is $3,676.45.

The Board’s Training Budget for the 2018/2019 financial year is $3,000.00. Expenditure to date is $1,761.19.

A breakdown of expenditure is attached as Appendix 1 to the report.

Appendices

No.	Title	Page
1 ⇩	Wainuiomata Community Board expenditure to June 2019	48

Author: Judy Randall

Committee Advisor

Approved By: Donna Male

Acting Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

50 26 June 2019

Wainuiomata Community Board

19 June 2019

File: (19/813)

Report no: WCB2019/3/125

Notice of Motion - Mr G Tupou Declaration of a Climate Emergency

Purpose of Report

1. To consider a Notice of Motion received from Mr Gabriel Tupou, Chair of the Wainuiomata Community Board.

Recommendations

That the Board:

(i) declares a climate emergency in recognition of the urgent need to protect the future of today’s community and those who will follow;

(ii) asks that Council joins other local authorities in declaring a climate emergency; and

(iii) asks that Council makes climate change an integral part of planning and decision making, including specific goals and objectives that are regularly audited.

Background

2. The Acting Chief Executive has received a Notice of Motion from Mr Tupou within the timeframe specified in Standing Orders.

3. This notice of motion is for inclusion on the agenda for the Wainuiomata Community Board meeting to be held on 26 June 2019. Mr Tupou proposes to move the following motion:

4. That the Board:

(i) declares a climate emergency in recognition of the urgent need to protect the future of today’s community and those who will follow;

(ii) asks that Council joins other local authorities in declaring a climate emergency; and

(iii) asks that Council makes climate change an integral part of planning and decision making, including specific goals and objectives that are regularly audited.

5. Mr Tupou’s signed Notice of Motion is attached as Appendix 1 to the report.

Appendices

No.	Title	Page
1 ⇩	Notice of Motion - Mr G Tupou	51

Author: Judy Randall

Committee Advisor

Reviewed By: Bradley Cato

General Counsel

Approved By: Matt Reid

Acting Chief Executive/General Manager City and Community Services

Attachment 1

Community Board Conference report - Ms S Tuala Le'afa June 2019

Community Board Conference 2019 Report

2019 Conference Theme: ‘Community Boards in a Time of Change’

On behalf of the Wainuiomata Community Board, I had the honour of attending this year’s biennial national Community Board conference in New Plymouth.

I would like to take this opportunity to express my thanks and appreciation to Judy Randall and Rosemary Bowman for all the support and work to ensure that everything went as smoothly as possible. Thank you to my travel companions, Pam & Tui from Petone Community Board for being awesome on the trip and to Pam for offering to share her notes in aid of our respective reports.

There were a number of great key note speaker presentations and workshops. People seemed to naturally gravitate to workshops most relevant to their community projects, or attended with the view to enhance the mahi in their spaces.

This was definitely the case for me, I attended workshops that were more youth and community development focused.

How to activate, develop and empower your local youth voice, with Shay Wright and Sarah Colcord.

This was fully packed out each session that it ran and I attended two sessions. The animated discussions that happened in this space were both enlightening and disheartening all at once.

- Some of the discussions highlighted (surprisingly) how far ahead we are in the Hutt Valley when compared to the rest of the country.

- Each representative spoke of challenges and issues that they were facing, I heard common issues just at different stages/levels.

- I also found that the youth members in the room where slightly targeted for the answers to all and any issues discussed.

- A point of frustration for me, was that there were some people in the room that praised and were very vocal about the inclusion of youth then proceeded to dictate their own thoughts about what youth should…need…’just’…think…

- From this experience I urge our Board to be better LISTENERS, advocate for our youth voice and empower them to use it. Not SAY that we do then proceed to silence our youth by speaking over them.

- A question that stood out for me was – ‘who selects the youth for youth councils?’ the answers varied throughout the motu.

- Youth Council is an area that I feel we as the Wainuiomata Community board lack involvement and could look into ways of increasing our local involvement/participation so that any youth council from the Hutt Valley has a good diverse representation.

The Conference dinner was really well organised and the highlight of the night for me, was when former Cambridge Mayoress, Mary Burke gave her alphabetical advice on local government. By the time we arrived at ‘Z’ everyone was in fits of laughter.

I heard quite a bit of grumbling from some of the pākeke in attendance due to the conference being so heavily youth and engagement focused – which was quite different to the last Community Board Conference held in Methven.

This, to me, showed how much work we have ahead of us to bridge these gaps between the different generational thinking in order to lay stronger foundations to support progress in these changing times; the politician of the future may look very different to the politician of today.

In summary, what I got from this year’s conference was a number of challenges that I want to extend to my fellow Wainuiomata Community Board members:

- MEANINGFUL engagement – ensure that our engagement with our community, not just our Maori/PI communities, is not outcome based but VALUE based – this is good advice for all of us to keep in mind whenever we are engaging with people in general.

- Be BOLD in our leadership

- The ‘customer’ is constantly changing and we must be able to adjust to keep progressing. For our Wainuiomata Community Board, I suggest that we use allocated budget to upskill as a board to be more effective for our community.

These are just a few things that we and all future Board members should consider when we think about engagement and consultation.

More notes on key note speakers available upon request.

Faafetai lava

Sisi Tuala-Le’afa

Wainuiomata Community Board

[1] This excludes sites that are considered high profile, significant on a city-wide basis due to their size and location, or where the site crosses ward or community boundaries.

[2] The Operational Guide for Urban Forest Plan is available from Council’s Parks and Gardens Division.

Gabriel Tupou (Chair)	Richard Sinnott (Deputy Chair)
Keri Brown	Terry Stallworth
Sisi Tuala-Le’afa	Jodie Winterburn
Cr C Barry	Cr J Briggs