21 March 2019
Order Paper for Council meeting to be held in the
Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt,
on:
Tuesday 26 March 2019 commencing at 6.00pm
Membership
Mayor W R Wallace (Chair) |
|
Deputy Mayor D Bassett |
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
Cr L Bridson |
Cr J Briggs |
Cr M Cousins |
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
Cr M Lulich |
Cr G McDonald |
Cr C Milne |
Cr L Sutton |
|
|
|
For the dates and times of Council Meetings please visit www.huttcity.govt.nz
![]() |
COUNCIL |
|
Membership: |
13 |
Meeting Cycle: |
Council meets on a six weekly basis (Extraordinary Meetings can be called following a resolution of Council; or on the requisition of the Chair or one third of the total membership of Council) |
• Make a rate.
• Make bylaws.
• Borrow money other than in accordance with the Long Term Plan (LTP).
• Purchase or dispose of assets other than in accordance with the LTP.
• Purchase or dispose of Council land and property other than in accordance with the LTP.
• Adopt the LTP, Annual Plan and Annual Report.
• Adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Act in association with the LTP or developed for the purpose of the Local Governance Statement.
• Appoint the Chief Executive.
• Exercise any powers and duties conferred or imposed on the local authority by the Public Works Act 1981 or the Resource Management Act 1991 that are unable to be delegated.
• Undertake all other actions which are by law not capable of being delegated.
• The power to adopt a Remuneration and Employment Policy.
• Adoption of all policy required by legislation.
• Adoption of policies with a city-wide or strategic focus.
• Promotion of Plan Changes and Variations recommended by the District Plan Committee prior to public notification.
• The withdrawal of Plan Changes in accordance with clause 8D, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.
• Approval, to make operative, of District Plan and Plan Changes (in accordance with clause 17, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991).
• The method of voting for the Triennial elections.
• Representation reviews.
• Council’s Code of Conduct and Local Governance Statement.
• Elected Members Remuneration.
• The outcome of any extraordinary vacancies on Council.
• Any other matters for which a local authority decision is required under the Local Electoral Act 2001.
• All matters identified in these Terms of Reference as delegated to Council Committees (or otherwise delegated by the Council) and oversee those delegations.
• Council‘s delegations to officers and community boards.
The review and negotiation of the contract, performance agreement and remuneration of the Chief Executive.
• Standing Orders for Council and its committees.
• Council’s annual meeting schedule.
• The establishment and disposal of any Council Controlled Organisation or Council Controlled Trading Organisation and approval of annual Statements of Corporate Intent on the recommendation of the Finance and Performance Committee.
• Civil Defence Emergency Management Group matters requiring Council’s input.
• Road closing and road stopping matters.
• All other matters for which final authority is not delegated.
• The non-elected members of the Standing Committees (including extraordinary vacancies of non-elected representatives).
• The Directors of Council Controlled Organisations and Council Controlled Trading Organisations.
• Council’s nominee on any Trust.
• Council representatives on any outside organisations (where applicable and time permits, recommendations for the appointment may be sought from the appropriate standing committee and/or outside organisations).
• The Chief Executive of Hutt City Council.
• Council’s Electoral Officer, Principal Rural Fire Officer and any other appointments required by statute.
HUTT CITY COUNCIL
Ordinary meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Tuesday 26 March 2019 commencing at 6.00pm.
ORDER PAPER
Public Business
1. APOLOGIES
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Generally up to 30 minutes is set aside for public comment (three minutes per speaker on items appearing on the agenda). Speakers may be asked questions on the matters they raise.
3. Mayoral Statement (19/296)
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
5. Committee Reports with Recommended Items
a) Traffic Subcommittee
25 February 2019 15
Recommended Items
Item 4i) Muritai Road - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (18/1699) 16
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4ii) Orr Crescent - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/47) 16
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4iii) Naenae Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/57) 17
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4iv) Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/67) 17
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4v) Connolly Street - Proposed P60 Parking Restrictions (19/68) 18
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4vi) Rutherford Street - Proposed P30 Parking Restrictions (19/73) 19
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4vii) Amberley Grove - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions (19/76) 19
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4viii) Bristol Square - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions (19/89) 20
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4ix) Eastern Hutt Road Proposed Parking Restriction on Omnibus Parking (19/182) 21
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4x) Myrtle Street - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (19/203) 22
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
b) Policy and Regulatory Committee
4 March 2019 35
Recommended Item
Item 4i) Revised Training Budget for Community Boards (19/208) 36
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
c) City Development Committee
5 March 2019 44
Recommended Item
Item 5) Central City Transformation Plan (19/169) 46
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
d) Finance and Performance Committee
6 March 2019 253
Recommended Items
Item 4i) Wellington Water Limited's Shareholders Agreement and Constitution (19/205) 254
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4ii) Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/166) 257
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4iii) Seaview Marina Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/167) 257
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
Item 4iv) Urban Plus Group Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/168) 258
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed with a new part to read:
notes that as Council completes its Homelessness and Housing Strategies, the Statement of Intent may need to be reviewed and changed at a later date.” |
e) Recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee meeting dated 25 March 2019
Recommended Item
Item 4) Homelessness - Council Contribution to Improving the Response to Homelessness in Lower Hutt (19/278)
The recommendations will be tabled at the meeting |
6. Miscellaneous
a) Triennial Local Authority Elections 2019 (19/259)
Report No. HCC2019/1/31 by the Electoral Officer 390
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
b) 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference (19/280)
Memorandum dated 8 March 2019 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services 394
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That part (i) be endorsed and a new part (ii) to read “nominates the Mayor and two Councillors to represent Hutt City Council at the 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference to be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019.” |
c) Membership of the Homelessness Working Group (19/293)
Memorandum dated 13 March 2019 by the Mayor 398
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the memorandum be endorsed.” |
|
7. Council MINUTES
11 December 2018 400
14 January 2019 421
17 January 2019 423
12 February 2019 425
Extraordinary 27 February 2019 428
8. Committee Reports without Recommended Items
a) District Plan Committee
29 November 2018 430
Please note the recommended item was considered by Council at its meeting held on 29 November 2018
b) Community Plan Committee
12 February 2019 441
Please note the recommended items were resolved by Council at its meeting held on 12 February 2019
c) Hearings Panel
Hearings Panel Decision - 4-6 Bolton Street, Petone 449
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That Council receives the decision from the Hearings Panel for 4-6 Bolton Street, Petone.” |
|
d) Hearing by Independent Commissioner
Decision 96A Witako Street, 79B Copeland Street, 51 Hall Crescent, Lower Hutt 492
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That Council receives the decision from the Independent Commissioner for 79B Copeland Street, 96A Witako Street and 51 Hall Crescent, Lower Hutt.”
|
|
e) Hutt Valley Services Committee
1 March 2019 541
f) Community Services Committee
7 March 2019 548
9. Sealing Authority (18/1996)
Report No. HCC2019/1/13 by the Executive Assistant, Corporate Services 553
Mayor’s Recommendation:
“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.” |
10. QUESTIONS
With reference to section 32 of Standing Orders, before putting a question a member shall endeavour to obtain the information. Questions shall be concise and in writing and handed to the Chair prior to the commencement of the meeting.
11. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION:
“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:
12. Committee Report withOUT Recommended Item
Finance and Performance Committee - 6 March 2019
13. Council Minutes
11 December 2018 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/330)
14 January 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/300)
17 January 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/329)
Extraordinary 27 February 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/328)
The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
(A) |
(B) |
(C) |
|
|
|
General subject of the matter to be considered. |
Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter. |
Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution. |
|
|
|
Report of the Finance and Performance Committee held on 6 March 2019 – The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust – Six Monthly Report to 31 December 2018 |
The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities(s7(2)(h)). |
That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist. |
Council Minutes 11 December 2018 Purchase of Land Lowry Bay, Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Board Appointment of Director, Land Purchase Eastern Hills, Sale Negotiations, Strategic Structure Review |
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)). The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)). The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)). |
That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist. |
Minutes of Council 14 January 2019 and 17 January 2019 – Recruitment of the Chief Executive |
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)). |
That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist. |
Extraordinary Minutes of Hutt City Council 27 February 2019 – Update from the Chief Executive’s Employment Subcommittee – Appointment of the Chief Executive. |
The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)). |
That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist. |
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”
Kathryn Stannard
Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
24
Traffic Subcommittee
Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Monday 25 February 2019 commencing at 3.00pm
PRESENT: Cr Cousins (Chair) Cr Briggs
Cr Edwards (Deputy Chair) Cr Lewis (from 3.04pm)
Cr Sutton
APOLOGIES: There was an apology received from Cr Barratt.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr D Simmons, Traffic Asset Manager
Mr J Gloag, Divisional Manager, Transport (part meeting)
Mr A Hopkinson, Senior Traffic Engineer
Mr Z Moodie, Traffic Engineer – Network Operations
Mr D Wood, Traffic Engineer
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
Cr Lewis joined the meeting at 3.04pm.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. Recommendations to Council - 26 March 2019
5. Information Items
6. QUESTIONS
Cr Sutton raised a question relating to Eastern Hutt Road and making a safer crossing area to get to and from the train station.
The Traffic Asset Manager responded that there were pedestrian refuse islands in the area and the road was a collector road with a 70km/h speed restriction. He noted that the lighting in the area was soon to be upgraded to LED lights. However, with the road speeds a pedestrian crossing would not be considered due to safety reasons. He agreed to respond to Cr Sutton in writing to provide to the resident who raised the issue.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 4.28pm.
Cr MJ Cousins
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
39
Policy and Regulatory Committee
Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Monday 4 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm
PRESENT: Cr MJ Cousins (Chair) Cr C Barry
Deputy Mayor D Bassett Cr L Bridson
Cr J Briggs Cr S Edwards (Deputy Chair)
Cr T Lewis Cr M Lulich
Cr C Milne (from 5.36pm) Cr L Sutton
APOLOGIES: Mayor WR Wallace
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation
Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services
Mr J Scherzer, Sustainability and Resilience Manager
Mr G George, Manager, Trade Waste
Mr J Hoyle , Communications and Marketing Advisor
Ms J Randall, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. PRC 19101 “That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. Recommendation to Council - 26 March 2019
7. Information Item
8. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 6.27pm.
Cr MJ Cousins
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Attachment 1 |
Revised Training Policy for Community Boards2019 |
training policy for community boards
1. Purpose
The purpose of ensuring that Community Board members have access to training is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of Boards in representing the interests of their specific community and supporting Council in its governance role by facilitating local input into Council’s decision-making processes.
The Training Policy (the policy) for Community Boards should be read in conjunction with the Code of Conduct for Elected Members.
2. PRINCIPLES
The following principles underpin Hutt City Council’s approach to the training and development of Community Board members.
· Training begins with the induction of Community Board members. Newly elected members will come from a variety of backgrounds and have differing degrees of training needs when they take up their role.
· Community Board members will have ongoing training and professional development needs which should be met to ensure they are able to fulfil their roles.
· Because having inadequately trained Community Board members is potentially more costly than providing training, Hutt City Council will invest in training.
· Any training undertaken must relate to the roles and responsibilities of each individual Community Board member.
· Funding will be available for training which meet the criteria contained in this policy. Funding will not be available for any training outside of those criteria.
3. Financial support
Community Board members are eligible for financial support for training and development. Such training and development may include on-demand webinars, development videos, formal training courses, attendance at seminars or attendance at relevant conferences in addition to training or information provided during induction.
A maximum cap of $3,000 per financial year for each Community Board will be applied. The maximum amount Council will pay towards the training needs and work programme of any one Community Board member is $1,500 per financial year.
There will be an overall training budget of $9,000 available to meet the training needs and work programme requirements of Community Boards each financial year.
Financial support may include the cost of attending the training courses, seminars, forums or conferences and other events and the related costs of travel and accommodation, if the training is not held in Wellington.
LGNZ courses at the beginning of each triennium are provided to members at no cost to their budget - this is funded through the induction training budget for elected members.
Community Boards’ Conference
The Community Boards’ Conference is held every two years. More than one Community Board member can attend if still within the overall training budget and any expenditure beyond budget be personally funded. Approval requires a formal decision as part of their Community Board meeting.
The number of Community Board members being funded through the
training budget to attend the biennial Community Boards’ conference is
limited to one per Board.
4. Procedure for applying for financial support
Consideration and Approval
Any request for funding must first be made to the relevant Board for consideration and approval. When making the decision to either approve or decline the request for professional development Boards must have regard to:
· The purpose and principles of the Training Policy
· the skills make up of Board members
· the skills required; and
· the amount of assistance requested with reference to the amount of training budget available.
The
Board may approve any request for funding up to $750. They must advise
the Divisional Manager Secretariat Services Divisional Manager Democratic Services directly of
any requests and approvals. They must also make a formal decision as part
of their Community Board meeting. The request must be placed on the
relevant Board agenda for discussion.
Requests
to attend formal training courses, seminars, forums or conferences and other
events with a value over $750 (other than the Community
Boards’ Conference) are to be made by the Chair or Deputy Chair of
the Board in writing to the Divisional Manager
Democratic Services General Counsel for
a decision with a recommendation regarding whether or not the request should be
approved based on the training criteria.
Any member attending a training course, conference, seminar or similar event will be required to provide a written report and evaluation to:
· The relevant Board in a form agreed in advance and
· The
Divisional Manager Secretariat Democratic Services.
5. criteria and basis for approval
The criteria and basis for any approval for financial support to be given for training and development under this policy are as follows:
· The training course is either specified in Schedule A of this policy OR relates directly to the specific Community Board member’s duties and responsibilities that are not covered in Schedule A; and
· Related to knowledge and successes including acceptance of recognition and prizes where this is relevant to the Community Board activity.
6. Procedure for applying for financial support for longer term training courses
All
requests for financial support to attend longer-term training courses are to be
made in writing to the General Manager Corporate
Services General Counsel for a
decision. Additional guiding principles when making a decision in this
situation are:
· what is the overall duration of the course; and
· the point of time in the triennium when the training is requested.
Financial support, if approved, is capped at 50% of total costs (and within the maximum stated above).
SCHEDULE a
APPROVED TRAINING
Approval may be given by the relevant Board for attendance at any of the following courses:
Induction
· This includes Hutt City Council’s normal induction process for Elected Members.
· Chair and Deputy Chair training
LGNZ Courses – Local Government Equip
A series of two day workshops to bring new members up to speed and refresh longer serving members are held shortly after local government elections. Designed for all members, whether from district, city and regional Councils or Community Boards, the programme draws on a broad range of sector expertise and up-to-date information. Topics covered include:
· understanding the local government system
· role of members
· introduction to the Local Government Act
· decision-making
· long-term planning
· consultation
· regulation and the Resource Management Act
· funding
· putting democracy into practice - ethics, conflicts of interest and freedom of information.
This training provides knowledge about legislation and council processes to ‘get started'.
Members may also attend other LGNZ Professional Development Courses that:
· are relevant to the role they are playing as a Board member eg Chair, Deputy Chair, events, community development
· add to their level of experience and expertise as a Community Boards member and
· grow the engagement/consultation skills of members
· grow the technical/financial skill sets of members relevant to the role they play on the Board
http://www.lgnz.co.nz/equip/training/
City Development Committee
Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Tuesday 5 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm
PRESENT: |
Acting Mayor D Bassett (Chair) |
Cr G Barratt |
|
Cr C Barry (until 6.37pm) |
Cr M J Cousins |
|
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
|
Cr M Lulich |
Cr C Milne |
|
Cr L Sutton (Acting Chair) |
|
APOLOGIES: Apologies received from Mayor Wallace and Cr McDonald
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services
Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services (part meeting)
Mr G Craig, Divisional Manager, City Growth (part meeting)
Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager (part meeting)
Mr C Gousmett, Corporate Information Manager (part meeting)
Ms J Henton, City Archivist (part meeting)
Mr A Hopkinson, Senior Traffic Engineer (part meeting)
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Acting Mayor Bassett) Minute No. CDC 19101 “That the apologies received from Mayor Wallace and Cr McDonald be accepted and leave of absence be granted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
Precedence of Business |
Resolved: (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt) Minute No. CDC 19102 “That, in terms of Standing Order 10.4, precedence be accorded to item 7 dealing with Technology Valley Six Monthly Update to 31 December 2018.” |
The items are recorded in the order in which they were listed on the order paper. |
3. Presentation
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interst declarations.
5. Recommendation to Council - 26 March 2019
14. Information Item
15. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.21pm.
Deputy Mayor D Bassett
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Finance and Performance Committee
Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Wednesday 6 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm
PRESENT: Cr C Milne (Chair) Cr C Barry (until 6.49pm)
Cr G Barratt Acting Mayor D Bassett
Cr J Briggs Cr MJ Cousins
Cr S Edwards Cr M Lulich
Cr L Sutton (Deputy Chair)
APOLOGIES: An apology was received from Mayor Wallace.
IN ATTENDANCE: Cr G McDonald (part meeting)
Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services
Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services
Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)
Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City & Community Services (part meeting)
Mr B Cato, General Counsel
Ms H Stringer, Rates and Receivables Team Leader (part meeting)
Mr R Newton, Business Transformation Manager (part meeting)
Ms H Clegg, Minute Taker
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19101 “That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 4iii) and 8 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.
Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 4i), 4iv) and 9 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.
Cr Cousins declared a conflict on interest in relation to items 4ii) and 13 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.
4. Recommendations to Council - 26 March 2019
5. |
Progress Update on the Re-design of Council's Combined Rates Invoice (19/43) Report No. FPC2019/1/6 by the Rates and Receiveables Team Leader |
|
The Acting Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 6.51pm and rejoined the meeting at 6.53pm. The Rates and Receiveables Team Leader elaborated on the report. She confirmed that Greater Wellington Regional Council had provided its consent to the proposed new rates invoices. In response to a question from a member, the Rates and Receiveables Team Leader advised that each page was mass printed and there would be considerable costs involved to highlight the rates instalment that each particular page referred to. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Acting Mayor Bassett) Minute No. FPC 19109 “That the Committee receives the report and notes the revised design of Council’s combined rates invoice, attached as Appendix 1 to the report.” |
6. |
2019/20 Revenue Increase and Cost Reduction Target Update (19/218) Report No. FPC2019/1/37 by the Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|
The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Barratt) Minute No. FPC 19110 “That the Committee: (i) notes the progress update on identifying $300,000 of cost reductions for the 2019/20 Annual Plan; and (ii) notes the action taken to generate $500,000 of additional revenue that is now included in the 2019/20 Draft Annual Plan.” |
7. |
Financial Report for the Quarter Ended 31 December 2018 (19/29) Report No. FPC2019/1/5 by the Acting Chief Financial Officer |
|
Speaking under public comment, Mr M Shierlaw expressed concern with the forecast development stimulus package overspend adding that an overspend represented revenue foregone. He expressed further concern that the overspend was proposed to be offset by capital urban growth expenditure of $2.9M. He believed the development incentives had to be paid to offset the extra infrastructural requirements and to prevent existing ratepayers subsidising such requirements. He asked members to reject the $3.2M budget variance. He considered the budget should be treated in a similar way to Council’s Grants Budget. He asked members to exercise strong governance with regard to the matter.
The Acting Chief Financial Officer acknowledged the public speaker’s concerns. He explained that it was proposed to offset the overspend in Council’s Developments Incentives Package Project (‘the scheme’). He noted it was an operating cost by transferring budget from Council’s Urban Growth Strategy capital project. He explained that the scheme and the Urban Growth Strategy Capital project were both intended as ways to stimulate growth and development in the City. He highlighted that this was in line with what was intended in Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP). He highlighted that while it was a transfer of funds it this was appropriate and reasonable with no additional monies being requested.
The Chair noted that in hindsight, having the two budget items aimed at the same outcome may not have been best practice. He advised that the scheme closed on 31 December 2018 with the current draw-down on the budget occurring to honour all applications made. He also advised the critical point was that the proposal was for revenue foregone as opposed to a ‘cheque being written.’ This resulted in increasing the rates base which had long term benefits for the City. He added that the scheme was more successful than forecasted was a positive outcome. |
|
The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report. He corrected an error within his report which related to the tables on pages 167 and 168 of the order paper. He highlighted that the graphs had been inserted the wrong way around. He explained that the tables reported the statement of income in accordance with Council’s LTP and that the split out the costs related to the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust grants and costs related to the scheme. |
|
The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the impact of the scheme, the additional consent fees and the expected higher landfill fees. He also elaborated on the impact of higher bulk water costs, the increase in landfill operating costs and an overspend in the events’ costs. He mentioned the forecast overspend on depreciation and explained that depreciation was complex and difficult to budget due to difficulty in arriving at the correct depreciation rates, the timing of when projects were completed and the deferral of some projects. He advised that officers were looking at ways to improve the accuracy of the depreciation budgets and further noted that depreciation was a non-cash item and had no bearing on debt levels. |
|
RESOLVED: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19111 “That the Committee agrees that errors identified in Finance and Performance Committee’s Order Paper be corrected including on Council’s website.” |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19112 “That the Committee notes Council’s financial performance and position for the quarter ended 31 December 2018.” |
8. |
Seaview Marina Limited Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/71) Report No. FPC2019/1/35 by the Senior Management Accountant |
|
Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter. Cr Sutton assumed the Chair for the duration of the item. |
|
Mr Alan McLellan, Chief Executive of Seaview Marina Limited (SML), and Cr Milne, as Council’s representative on the Board of SML, elaborated on the report. The Chief Executive of SML advised that it had been an excellent six months for SML. He added that since the end of December 2018, occupancy had increased to 95% from 90%. He highlighted that plans were underway to construct more berths in the next financial year resulting in an increase in revenue, along with payments for the leasing of the breakwater estimated at $100,000 each year for 10 years. He said there had been no complaints received from the user group and that walkways and other beautification works had been completed. He advised that the power rate had been corrected, which had resulted in a doubling of power costs and security costs had also increased. The General Manager, Corporate Services advised the business was operating efficiently and that dividends could be expected in the future. |
|
In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of SML advised the breakwater structure was owned by Council and it was not insured at present. He noted that investigations into SML insuring the structure was underway. He highlighted that an engineering survey completed five years ago reported the structure to be in excellent condition. Cr Milne advised that the breakwater was re-inspected after the Kaikoura earthquake and no impacts were found on its structure. In response to a questions from members, the Chief Executive of SML explained it would cost approximately $400,000 in 2019 to replace all non-compliant power pedestal boxes. He added water usage was being carefully monitored pier by pier. He confirmed that SML staff were working with officers regarding the carbon zero resolution. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Sutton/Acting Mayor Bassett) Minute No. FPC 19113 “That the Committee receives the half year report from Seaview Marina Limited attached as Appendix 1 to the report.” |
9. |
Urban Plus Group Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/75) Report No. FPC2019/1/36 by the Senior Management Accountant |
|
Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter. |
|
Mr Craig Walton, Chief Executive of Urban Plus Group (UPL), elaborated on the report. He advised the Group had experienced a strong six months with the Fairfield, Avalon, Waterloo and Central Park developments progressing well. He added the Britannia Street apartments had been purchased and would slowly be transitioned to public housing. In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive, UPL advised that occupancy over all properties was close to 100%. He explained that the net purchase yield for the Britannia Street property was 7% and there was a large plot of land associated with this property which could be developed in the future with up to 10 units. With regard to the Britannia Street property, he advised that the profile from the existing tenants was not clear without detailed analysis. In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of UPL agreed to liaise with officers concerning Council’s proposed Homelessness Strategy and would await further direction from Council. In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive, UPL explained a detailed Construction Management Plan was in place for the Jackson Street apartments which included a Traffic Management Plan. He added that talks were planned with the owner of the neighbouring supermarket concerning site access. He said that a final decision had yet to be made on the long term plan for the apartments. In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of UPL confirmed discussions with officers continued with regard to the management of all Council buildings. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19114 “That the Committee receives the half year report from Urban Plus Limited Group attached as Appendix 1 to the report.” |
10. Information Items
a) |
TechnologyOne SaaS Project Update (19/219) Report No. FPC2019/1/31 by the Business Transformation Manager |
|
The Business Transformation Manager elaborated on the report. In response to a question from a member, the Business Transformation Manager confirmed the information used in TechnologyOne to the Document Management System intregration may not be available through the Cloud Integration method. |
|
In response to a question from a member, the Business Transformation Manager advised that a Solutions Architect provided the overall technical design for how the integrations would work and these were then handed to developers who completed the actual build. The Chair thanked officers for their work to date and complimented the management of the project. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Acting Mayor Bassett) Minute No. FPC 19115 “That the report be noted and received.”
|
b) |
Memorandum dated 7 February 2019 by the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services |
|
||
|
The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the report. He explained that the increase in water usage throughout the City could not be attributed to growth or leaks which had remained at a constant level. He acknowledged that without water meters it was difficult to accurately explain the increase. He added there was a known 18% loss of water due to undetected reasons and the average daily use of water per person in the City was 270 litres for 2018/19. He further added this compared to the 220 litres per person for the rest of the Wellington region. He highlighted that a workshop on water was planned for early May with representatives from Wellington Water Limited (WWL) to speak about projected future demand for bulk water in the region. In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services explained that at the beginning of the year, officers estimated the amount of bulk water the commercial users would use based on figures from previous years and paid WWL for that amount. He added that this year, the actual commercial usage figures were lower than estimated which resulted in the unfavourable budget variance. He noted there was no further data was available to better assess the increased water usage of the City. He added that the upcoming workshop would address the water conservation options. The General Manager, City and Community Services advised that the cost of installing meters could be approximately $200 per residential meter. |
|
||
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Lulich) Minute No. FPC 19116 “That the information be received.” |
|
||
c) |
Health & Safety Officer Due Diligence Report July 2018 to December 2018 (19/85) Report No. FPC2019/1/32 by the Health and Safety Wellbeing Advisor |
|
||
|
The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report. He highlighted that reporting on the matter would be moving to a six monthly reporting cycle. |
|
||
|
In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that officers were continually reminded to report near miss incidents and over time the reporting of these incidents was expected to improve. Acting Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 7.22pm. The General Manager, Corporate Services acknowledged the work of the Health and Safety Wellbeing Advisor. |
|
||
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19117 “That the report be noted and received.“ |
|
||
|
d) |
Finance & Performance Committee Work Programme 2018 (19/30) Report No. FPC2019/1/7 by the Committee Advisor |
||
|
|
The General Manager, Corporate Services advised there would likely to be a meeting on 1 May 2019 which was not indicated on the work programme. He elaborated on the reports that would be covered at the meeting. Acting Mayor Bassett rejoined the meeting at 7.24pm. |
||
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19118 “That the work programme be noted and received, with the insertion of the 1 May 2019 meeting.” |
||
11. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
12. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton) Minute No. FPC 19119 “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely: 13. The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/84) The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” |
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.24pm and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 8.43pm.
Cr C Milne
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
25 February 2019
File: (19/259)
Report no: HCC2019/1/31
1. The purpose of this report is to provide an update on planning for the 2019 elections and to seek Council approval for the ordering of candidate names on the voting paper and to conduct the election for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust in conjunction with the Council elections.
It is recommended that Council: (i) notes that in accordance with regulation 31 of the Local Electoral Regulations 2001, Council has the ability to determine the method used to order the names on the voting paper for the 2019 triennial local elections, using alphabetical, random or pseudo-random order; (ii) agrees to use the random order method of arranging candidates’ names on the voting paper for the 2019 triennial local elections for Lower Hutt City and its community boards; and (iii) agrees that the election for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust be conducted in conjunction with the 2019 triennial local elections for Lower Hutt City. |
Background
2. Planning for the 2019 triennial local elections is well underway with agreements in place for election services from NZ Post for the printing and distribution of voting papers and electionz.com for the processing of voting papers and provisions of results and statistics.
3. Election Day is Saturday 12 October 2019 with the three-week voting period commencing on Friday 20 September 2019. As with all other Councils the elections will be conducted by postal voting. It is unlikely that the on-line voting trial, (additional to and not instead of postal voting), being considered by nine Councils will proceed due to cost.
4. Candidate nominations for the various elections, mayor and council, the community boards, the regional council and the district health board, open on Friday 19 July 2019 and close at 12.00 noon on Friday 16 August 2019. Other key dates are shown in the table below.
5. As in previous elections voting papers will be processed progressively with preliminary results available shortly after the close of polling. Provisions for special voting will be available at three locations in the City as per the 2016 elections, (Wainuiomata Library, Walter Nash Centre and Main Administration Building). A further option is being considered to utilise the special voting booth provided by Wellington City Council at its central library, to enable Lower Hutt electors who work in Wellington to either drop off voting papers at the Wellington booth or make a special vote.
6. Electoral officials from throughout the country met in Wellington for two days in October 2018, to help prepare and plan for the elections. Regional meetings of electoral officials will be held over the next few months to ensure there is good co-ordination and support.
7. With a voting turnout of 37.8% of electors at the 2016 elections, officers are currently considering ways to better engage with electors to encourage participation in these elections. A regional campaign is being planned, (spearheaded by Wellington City Council), to which we will be contributing. On the national scale, Local Government New Zealand and SOLGM are jointly running a VOTE 2019 campaign The campaign will be about listening and engaging on the issues that matter to locals that will make New Zealand a better place to live, work and play.
8. A change to section 42 of the Local Government Act is proposed, through the Local Government Regulatory Systems Bill, to require the Chief Executive Officer to “facilitate and foster representative and substantial elector participation in elections and polls held under the Local Electoral Act 2001”.
Order of Candidates’ Surnames
9. Council is able to determine the method used to order candidates’ surnames on the voting paper. There are three options. These are to order surnames in:
a. alphabetical order; or
b. random order, where each single voting paper has the names of the candidates randomly ordered; or
c. pseudo-random where the surnames of candidates are randomly selected once for all of the voting papers.
10. The cost of and time required to process voting papers will not be affected by whichever option is used. If no decision is made, alphabetical order is the default order of candidate surnames that must be used.
11. Council has resolved to use the random ordering of surnames at the 2013 and 2016 triennial elections, as well as for all by-elections held since 2011. Both Greater Wellington Regional Council and the Hutt Valley District Health Board used random order at the 2013 and 2016 elections.
Hutt Mana Charitable Trust Election
12. The election of trustees for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust has been conducted in conjunction with the past four triennial local elections for Lower Hutt.
13. As the Trust is not specified as an organisation under section 7 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 to which the Act applies, (which would otherwise automatically require the Electoral Officer to conduct the election in conjunction with the local authority elections), authority for the Electoral Officer to conduct this election needs to be made by resolution of Council.
14. Section 8 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 gives Council that authority to direct the electoral officer to conduct this election.
15. As well as being a pragmatic solution in having all elections on the one combined voting paper, there is a financial benefit to Council in doing so, as shared costs such as printing and postage are distributed across the organisations for which the elections are being held.
Consultation
16. Consultation is not required.
Legal Considerations
17. The Local Electoral Act 2001 and Local Electoral Regulations 2001 govern the conduct of local elections and polls.
Financial Considerations
18. The total cost of holding the elections is 2016 is estimated to be $408,000 of which approximately $230,000 will be recovered from the other organisations with issues on the combined voting paper. (Hutt Valley District Health Board, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Hutt Mana Charitable Trust.)
Other Considerations
19. There are no other considerations.
Bruce Hodgins
electoral officer
MEMORANDUM 395 26 March 2019
TO: Mayor and Councillors
Hutt City Council
FROM: Kathryn Stannard
DATE: 08 March 2019
SUBJECT: 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference
That Council:
(i) notes the 2019 Local Government Conference programme attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum; and
(ii) nominates the Mayor and one or two Councillors to represent Hutt City Council at the 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference to be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019. |
Purpose of Memorandum
1. The purpose of the memorandum is for Council to nominate the Mayor and one or two Councillors to represent Council at the annual Local Government New Zealand conference from 7-9 July 2019.
Background
Local Government New Zealand (‘LGNZ’)
2. LGNZ is the primary political representative body of local government in New Zealand. Its purpose is to provide national representation to elected representatives. LGNZ monitors developments affecting local government in New Zealand and has advocacy, research and advisory roles.
3. To assist LGNZ in its activities the country is divided into six geographical zones. Hutt City Council is a member of Zone 4 which comprises all members’ authorities within the Wellington Region.
2019 LGNZ Conference
4. This year LGNZ's annual conference and EXCELLENCE Awards will be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019.
5. The 2019 conference theme is "Riding the localism wave: Putting communities in charge". The programme is attached as Appendix 1.
6. The conference will take place in Wellington and be host to approximately 500 delegates made up of Mayors, Chairs, Chief Executives, Councillors and senior management from New Zealand’s Council’s along with key players from the private sector. It is the once chance each year for all Councils to be in the same room at the same time.
7. The full registration cost per participant is $1,400. Part registration (Monday only) is $720 and half day on Tuesday is $530.
8. Last year the Deputy Mayor Bassett (as Acting Mayor) and Crs Barratt, Barry and Bridson represented Council at the annual conference.
Financial Considerations
9. There is financial provision in the 2018/2019 budget for this activity.
No. |
Title |
Page |
1⇩ |
LGNZConferenceProgramme |
396 |
Author: Kathryn Stannard
Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
Approved By: Brent Kibblewhite
Attachment 1 |
LGNZConferenceProgramme |
7.00am |
Breakfast session |
8.35am |
Localism: No.8 wire fixes to New
Zealand's challenges |
9.30am |
Localism - what's your natural
advantage? |
11.00am |
Climate change - a stitch in
time |
11.45am |
Leader of the
Opposition's address |
12.00pm |
'Zone of Origin' crocodile bike race |
1.15pm |
Have you drunk the
central government Kool-Aid? |
1.45pm |
Minister of Local
Government address |
2.00pm |
Housing and
building in New Zealand - can we fix it? |
2.45pm |
Walkshops |
6.45pm |
Conference dinner
and LGNZ EXCELLENCE Awards |
Tuesday 9 July 2019
9.15am |
Managing fresh
water - best practice, breakthroughs in innovation and barriers |
10.45am |
Out of the Shadows |
11.30am |
Creating change:
Inspiring leadership in local communities |
12.15pm |
Early bird
registration prize draw |
12.20pm |
Poroporoaki | Closing ceremony |
1.30pm - 3.30pm |
Member meetings · Mayors Taskforce for Jobs AGM · Regional Sector meeting · Young Elected Members meeting Members only |
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmail
TO: Mayor and Councillors
Hutt City Council
FROM: Ray Wallace
DATE: 13 March 2019
SUBJECT: Membership of the Homelessness Working Group
That Council:
(i) receives and notes the information contained in the memorandum; and (ii) appoints Cr Briggs as a member of the Homelessness Working Group. |
Purpose of Memorandum
1. To ask Council to consider appointing Cr Briggs as a member of the Homelessness Working Group (the group).
Background
2. In November 2017, Council asked officers to examine homelessness in Lower Hutt, the range and depth of the problem, the services available to homeless people and families, and what Council’s role might be in addressing homelessness.
3. In May 2018, Council resolved the following:-
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. C 18201(4)
“That Council:
(i) notes the investigative study on Homeless in Lower Hutt has been completed;
(ii) notes Council can play a leadership role in solving this growing problem by leading co-ordination with other Government Agencies, non-Government Agencies and the wider community to reduce homelessness in the city;
(iii) requests officers to start work on a Homelessness Strategy for the City with a timeline and resourcing requirements presented to the Community Plan Committee on 6 June 2018;
(iv) establishes a working group to work with officers consisting of the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee (the Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee to chair the working group), the Chair and Deputy Chair of Community Services Committee and Crs Barry, Sutton and McDonald; and
(v) agrees that the working group will have the power to co-opt external members as required who have skills and knowledge to assist the working group.”
Membership of the Group
4. There was a discussion earlier this year as to whether Cr Briggs was still formally a member of the group after his role was changed from Deputy Chair of the Community Services Committee to a member of that committee late last year.
5. Cr Briggs has asked that he be reinstated as a member of the group.
Author: Ray Wallace
Mayor
421
Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Tuesday 11 December 2018 commencing at 6.00pm
PRESENT: |
Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) |
|
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
|
Deputy Mayor D Bassett |
Cr L Bridson |
|
Cr J Briggs |
Cr MJ Cousins |
|
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
|
Cr M Lulich (until 8.45pm) |
Cr G McDonald |
|
Cr C Milne |
Cr L Sutton |
APOLOGIES: There were no apologies.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation (part meeting)
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services (part meeting)
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)
Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services (part meeting)
Ms L Dalby, Senior Communications Advisor (part meeting)
Ms O Miller, Policy Advisor (part meeting)
Mr J Pritchard, Principal Research & Policy Advisor (part meeting)
Mr J Hoyle, Communications & Marketing Advisor (part meeting)
Mr M de Haast, Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)
Mr B Cato, General Counsel (part meeting)
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services (part meeting)
Ms J Randall, Committee Advisor (part meeting)
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
There were no apologies.
|
MAJOR ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA |
|
Mayor Wallace advised that the Strategic Structure Review item would be considered while the public was excluded for the reason that it contained personal information. Resolved: Minute No. C 18501(2) “That in terms of Standing Order 10.12 Council: (i) notes that the matter of the Strategic Structure Review was not included in the agenda for the meeting, for the reason that the information was not available until after the agenda had been distributed; and
(ii) agrees that the recommendation be considered at this meeting for the reason that the matter needs to be addressed urgently and cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.” |
||
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. |
Mayor Wallace read out the Mayoral Statement. |
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 18502(2) “That the Mayoral Statement be noted and received.” |
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest in relation to Item 5b 4d) ‘Establishment of Alcohol Hearings’, and Item 15 ‘Sale Negotiations.’
5. Committee Reports with Recommended Items
e) Traffic Subcommittee
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18503(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 12 November 2018, with the exception of items 4i)-4viii), be adopted.”
|
Recommended Items
Item 4i) |
Trafalgar Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1593) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18504(2) “That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Trafalgar Street, Waterloo attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/298.” |
Item 4ii) |
Fraser Colman Grove - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1599) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18505(2) “That Council: (i) approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Fraser Colman Grove, Wainuiomata for the non-legal carparks outside numbers 11 and 17 and 15 and 16 Fraser Colman Grove, attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/299; and (ii) asks officers to review parking in Wise Street, Wainuiomata and after the implementation of any recommendations, will review other issues within Fraser Colman Grove.” |
Item 4iii) |
Randwick Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1608) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18506(2) “That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Randwick Road, Moera attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/300.” |
Item 4iv) |
Brown Grove - Proposed P120 and No Stopping At All Times Parking Restrictions (18/1609) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18507(2) “That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times restrictions, L and T bar parking bay markings and P120 parking restrictions on Brown Grove, Waterloo attached as Appendix 2 to Report TRS2018/5/301.” |
Item 4v) |
Bolton Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1659) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18508(2) “That Council: (i) approves the installation of the proposed Parking Bays (L and T bar markings) on Bolton Street, Petone, attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/302; and (ii) approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times and markings on the corners of Bolton Street and Adelaide Street, Petone attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/302.” |
Item 4vi) |
Cleary Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1660) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18509(2) “That Council approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times restrictions on Cleary Street, Waterloo attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/303.” |
Item 4vii) |
High Street - Proposed School Bus Stop 3.00-3.30pm School Days Only (18/1717) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18510(2) “That Council approves the installation of a School Bus Stop during the hours of 3.00-3.30pm School Days only, outside St Oran’s College on High Street, Lower Hutt attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/305.” |
Item 4viii) |
Fitzherbert Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1718) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18511(2) “That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Fitzherbert Street, Alicetown attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/304.” |
f) Policy and Regulatory Committee
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Lewis) Minute No. C 18512(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 26 November 2018, with the exception of items 4a)-4e), be adopted.” |
Recommended Items
Item 4a) |
Cr Milne highlighted that central government had not yet introduced its bill for setting carbon targets. He proposed a decision on the matter be delayed until legislation was passed. He advised that he would not be supporting the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee. Cr Briggs considered the recommendations should go further and include carbon from closed landfills. He advised that he would not be supporting the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee. Cr Bridson noted the recommendations asked officers to work on emissions from landfills in the future. She regarded climate change as an extreme danger and expressed support for the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee. Cr Edwards considered that climate change would become irreversible in the not too distance future. He noted the recommendations were an initial step only and expressed support for the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee. Mayor Wallace reminded members the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee were just the beginning of the matter. He noted there was no date for central government to set its carbon targets and he wanted Council to show leadership on the issue. He added that officers would be asked for further reports on carbon emissions with regard to the landfill. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18513(2) “That Council: (i) sets an organisational target of Council reducing its greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, by no later than 2050; (ii) notes that in order to put Council onto a low-carbon pathway, Council will need to make changes to its operations, including: (a) preventing the installation of high-carbon-emitting technology (eg, natural gas for heating) at any existing facilities at the time of renewal, or new facilities not already under construction, and utilising lower carbon emitting options instead; (b) increasingly electrifying its vehicle fleet; and (c) having more regard to climate change objectives in its procurement decisions; (iii) agrees that officers will provide advice on recommended intermediate targets, and specific and measurable performance measures for Council activity areas and associated business units, such as existing buildings and facilities, the vehicle fleet, procurement, and waste management, toward achieving the target and any other relevant associated environmental objectives; (iv) agrees that officers will provide advice on the indicative cost of displacing natural gas as a heating energy source with a lower carbon emitting option for key Council infrastructure, in line with the organisational target; (v) requests that officers report to the Policy and Regulatory Committee annually on Council progress toward the target; (vi) requests that officers will investigate how best to reflect the target in relevant accountability documents, to enable periodic reporting against this target and/or relevant key performance indicators; (vii) agrees that Council’s organisational target should also apply to its wholly-owned or partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations, ie the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust, Urban Plus Ltd, Seaview Marina Ltd and Wellington Water Ltd; (viii) requests that officers propose specific and measurable performance measures, in line with the target, for its wholly-owned and partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations, with a view to reflect these in the organisations’ next Statements of Intent; (ix) invites other councils to consider adopting the same organisational target, including for their relevant wholly-owned or partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations; (x) notes that if a New Zealand net Zero by 2050 target as proposed by the New Zealand Government is passed via the Zero Carbon Bill in 2019, then this will become the de-facto Lower Hutt community-wide emissions target; (xi) agrees that officers will scope the development of a Lower Hutt Climate and Resilience Plan to identify relevant objectives and prioritised community focused actions, to assist in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with the proposed New Zealand net Zero by 2050 target; and (xii) asks officers to report back on the feasibility of including old landfills, where practicable, in the organisational target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, by no later than 2050.” Crs Milne and Briggs requested their dissenting votes be recorded against the above matter. |
Item 4b) |
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. C 18514(2) “That Council: (i) notes the information in the report; (ii) agrees to take no further action, effectively agreeing not to participate in the online trial for the 2019 triennial local elections, on the basis that the tight timeframe for implementing the trial poses a relatively high cost in order to adequately manage risk; and (iii) requests officers to report back to the new Council in 2020 on the online trial, should it proceed, so that the new Council can consider introducing online voting for the 2022 triennial local elections.” |
Item 4c) |
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18515(2) “That Council agrees to sell the property known as Lot (ACC) 145 DP 25070, situated at the end of Bushey Way as shown shaded yellow attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2018/5/307, to the owners of the adjacent property at 26 Bushey Way.” |
Item 4d) |
|
|
Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter. |
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) “That Council approves the establishment of an Alcohol Hearings Subcommittee comprising Deputy Mayor Bassett (Chair), Cr Milne, Cr Sutton, Cr Barry (alternate) and Cr Barratt (alternate) for the purpose of hearing submissions on the pre-consultation to decide whether an Alcohol Fees Bylaw is needed and then make recommendations to Council.” |
Item 4e) |
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Lulich) Minute No. C 18517(2) “That Council: (i) notes the work that has been done to date to implement the smokefree outdoor pavement dining clause of the Smokefree Outdoor Public Places Policy; (ii) agrees to include a condition to the contract for businesses leasing public land from Council for the purposes of outdoor pavement dining that requires these businesses to: (a) display smokefree signage supplied by Council; and (b) not have ashtrays or other devices for collecting cigarette litter on or near tables or seating areas; (iii) implements time-limited incentives (to a maximum of two years) to businesses leasing public land from Council, for the purposes of outdoor pavement dining through reducing or removing the charge for leasing that land; (iv) agrees that where it assists a business owner to establish outdoor pavement dining for the premise, that assistance is provided on the condition that the outdoor dining area: (a) is actively promoted as a smokefree area; and (b) does not have ashtrays or other devices for collecting cigarette litter on or near tables or seating; and (v) agrees that it will communicate with businesses about the new requirement and that it will provide smokefree signage, as led by Healthy Families Lower Hutt.” |
|
|
Item 4f) Lower Hutt Homelessness – Homelessness Strategy report
Speaking under public comment, Mr V Tamihere expressed concern with the number of homeless sleeping outside in Naenae.
Speaking under public comment, Ms K Brown welcomed a Strategic Homelessness Plan to approach housing problems unique to Lower Hutt. She noted homelessness affected all ages. She expressed concern Lower Hutt had more homeless than Wellington and advised Council needed to take action.
In response to questions from members, the Principal Research and Policy Advisor confirmed that a list of names had been circulated to members so that additional Homelessness Strategy Working Group (working group) members could be identified. He suggested circulating an expanded list for further consideration. He said he was confident he could provide a range of people from an mixture of backgrounds. He would be recommending individuals working in the homelessness area who could take ideas and turn them into actions.
Members discussed the process of appointing external appointments to the working group.
Mayor Wallace noted there had already been considerable public input into the process so far. He agreed that officers should provide a list of suggested working group members for Council’s consideration. He further agreed that the proposed numbers on the working group be changed to between two and four positions.
Cr Cousins expressed concern that Council was being pushed down a Wainuiomata/Labour Party point of view instead of a Citywide view.
Cr Briggs expressed concern regarding the
comments made by
Cr Barry raised a point of order believing
the comments made by
Mayor Wallace provided Cr Cousins with a right of reply.
Cr Cousins highlighted that most of those with input to the Homelessness Strategy had been from one part of the City. She considered a broad vision from across the City was needed. She advised that she would not apologise for her comments.
In response to a question from a member, the General Counsel agreed that there was a possibility members of the working group could disqualify themselves from being able to submit in the event of a hearing on the matter. He further advised that members of organisations who were appointed to the working group in their personal capacity might avoid potential conflicts of interest.
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs) Minute No. C 18518(2) “That Council:
(i) agrees to the proposed strategic approach to homelessness: Summary: Working together to end homelessness: Ending homelessness doesn’t mean that no-one will lose their home again. It means that we have a response in-place to prevent homelessness whenever possible and that if homelessness occurs, it is rare, brief, and non-recurring; Guiding principles: Housing is a basic human right: everyone has the right to housing that is habitable, affordable, suitable, and secure; Person centred: to give people control and enable them to set their own aims and goals for the future; Culturally appropriate: an approach and service delivery that meets the needs of all our people; Collaborative action: working together and taking action; Priorities: 1. Preventing homelessness; 2. Improving the supply of suitable accommodation and support for people experiencing homelessness; 3. Ending rough sleeping - help people who are street homeless or living in their cars move into and retain settled accommodation; 4. Increasing the supply of affordable homes to rent and buy; and 5. Improving data on homelessness in Lower Hutt; (ii) agrees that officers consult on the strategic approach and priorities; (iii) agrees to officers continuing working with partners to develop actions and options for the role of Council in contributing to the response to homelessness; (iv) agrees to the development of a housing strategy to address housing needs in Lower Hutt; (v) makes available between two and four positions on the Homelessness Strategy Working Group for between two and four community representatives; and
(vi) asks officers to provide a list of people for the positions of community representatives to the Homelessness Strategy Working Group for its consideration.” |
g) Finance and Performance Committee
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18519(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 28 November 2018, with the exception of items 4i)-4ii), be adopted.”
|
Recommended Items
Item 4i) |
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr McDonald) Minute No. C 18520(2) “That Council: (i) notes there is no legislative requirement of public consultation for the 2019/20 Annual Plan if there are no significant changes from the Long Term Plan; (ii) notes no significant changes from Year 2 of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan are proposed for the 2019/20 Annual Plan; (iii) agrees that for the 2019/2020 Annual Plan, there is no need to use the special consultation procedure as has occurred in previous years but that an engagement process will be carried out which Council believes will give better outcomes for the community; (iv) approves the high level budget assumptions outlined in Report No. FPC2018/5/325; (v) approves the high level community engagement approach for the 2019/20 Annual Plan; and (vi) provides any further direction and guidance required for the 2019/20 Annual Plan.” |
Item 4ii) |
Formation of Innovative Young Minds Charitable Trust (18/1854) |
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 18521(2) “That Council: (i) approves the establishment of the Innovative Young Minds Trust as a Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) and a charitable trust; (ii) approves an exemption from CCO requirements for the Innovative Young Minds Trust for the purposes of section 6(4)(i) of the Local Government Act 2002, for the following reasons: (a) due to its very small size and scope of activities (currently limited to one contractor and the management of one programme in Wellington and one alumnae programme in Silicon Valley); and (b) that being a CCO would place a large administrative burden on the charitable trust, and exempting it from this status will relieve it of that burden and therefore benefit the community, the charitable trust and Council by saving time and resources; and (iii) approves not publically advertising for the founding trustees and approves the appointment of three officers: Mr Gary Craig, Divisional Manager City Growth; Dr Laura Sessions, STEMM Sector Development Manager and Dr Anne Ryan, Director of Hutt Science; as founding trustees for a period of two years.” |
h) Hearings Subcommittee
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18522(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 15 November 2018, with the exception of items 3)-4), be adopted.” |
Recommended Items
Item 3) |
|||
|
Resolved: Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18523(2) “That Council: (i) endorses Section 1 of the Control of Animals Bylaw with the following alteration: That the definition of Trapping Device be altered to add the following at the end of the proposed wording: “or other predator free devices (as approved by NAWAC)”; and
(ii) endorses Sections 3 through to 8 inclusive, of the Control of Animals Bylaw.”
|
||
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18524(2) “That Council
(i) requests officers to monitor the Control of Animals Bylaw in relation to its efficiency in dealing with bees, and provide a report after one year to assess if further controls are required; and
(ii) requests officers to consider producing Guidelines for Keeping Bees in Urban Areas for inclusion on Council’s website.”
|
||
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18525(2) “That Council:
(i) endorses Section 2 of the Control of Animals Bylaw;
(ii) acknowledges that cats are an issue in the City, and requests officers to provide a report to the Policy and Regulatory Committee concerning options available to Council in relation to the control of cats, including whether a specific bylaw relating to the control of cats in the City is required, given there is an existing issue; and
(iii) requests officers to advise whether Council needs to ask Local Government New Zealand to take action in relation to obtaining a change in the law to give Councils more accountability around cats in the city including feral cats.”
|
||
|
Resolved: (Mayor
Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) “That Council:
(i) notes the Hearing Subcommittee has recommended that the proposed Control of Animals Bylaw be approved subject to some amendments;
(ii) determines that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed bylaw-
(a) is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and
(b) does not give rise to any implications under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990; and
(iii) agrees to revoke the existing Control of Animals Bylaw 2008 and adopts the amended Control of Animals Bylaw 2018, attached as Appendix 3 to Report HSC2018/5/143 effective from 19 December 2018. “ |
||
|
Item 4) |
Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw: Hearing (18/1939) |
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18527(2) “That Council endorses the Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw attached as Appendix 1 to Report HSC2018/5/345.” |
|
|
|
Resolved: (Mayor
Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) “That Council:
(i) notes that the Hearing Subcommittee has recommended that the proposed Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw be approved without any amendments;
(ii) determines that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed bylaw –
(a) is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and
(b) does not give rise to any implications under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990; and
(iii) agrees to revoke the existing Fire Prevention Bylaw 2008 and adopt the Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw 2018, attached as Appendix 1 to Report HSC2018/5/345 effective from 19 December 2018.” |
|
6. Miscellaneous
d) |
Protecting Lower Hutt's Biodiversity (18/1959) Memorandum dated 6 December 2018 by the Mayor |
||||||
|
Mayor Wallace elaborated on the memorandum. Cr Milne noted the interpretation of a Significant Natural Area (SNA) as defined in the Regional Policy Statement, Policy 23 provided little discretion. He asked that further mapping was undertaken. Cr Barry welcomed Council’s decision to change the recommendations on SNAs. He looked forward to working with the community to protect biodiversity. In response to questions from members, Mayor Wallace asked officers to report back on whether they would be enforcing or challenging Policy 23 under the Regional Policy Statement. He highlighted the damage caused to Council’s relationship with its community. |
||||||
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18529(2) “That Council: (i) requests officers to report back on an action plan to implement Council’s resolutions of 29 November 2018 to protect biodiversity and including any consequential changes to the District Plan; and
(ii) requests that the report shall specify any additional resources and funding required so that corresponding provisions can be considered for Council’s draft Annual Plan for 2019/2020.” |
||||||
e) |
District Plan Committee Restructure (18/1961) Memorandum dated 6 December 2018 by the Mayor |
|
|||||
|
Speaking under public comment, Mr M Shierlaw expressed support for the restructuring of the District Plan Committee. He noted two other Councils’ decisions on Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) were being appealed through the Environment Court. He suggested Council waited until those revised District Plans were operative so Council could gauge other options before making a decision on the matter. Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young expressed concern that the District Plan Committee (the Committee) was to be restructured without providing a clear recommendation. He noted there was no supporting information on how the Committee’s Terms of Reference would be amended. Mayor Wallace highlighted the need to regain the confidence of the community. He believed the Committee needed to be better algined to the principles, strategic policies, goals and vision for the City. In response to questions from members, Mayor Wallace considered the only way to rebuild confidence was for the City Development Committee (CDC) to provide oversight for the Committee. He agreed the Terms of Reference for the CDC would be amended for this purpose at Council’s first meeting in 2019. He said the additional layer of oversight from the CDC would enable a more thorough scrutiny of issues than the full Council could provide. He confirmed he had addressed concerns about officers with the Chief Executive. He also acknowledged the good work of officers. Cr Bridson expressed concern that she had not been advised of any concerns with the way the Committee was operating. She considered the decision to restructure the Committee needed more reflection and suggested it would be more appropriate to defer the matter until Council’s first meeting in 2019. She noted the CDC considered only the Economic Strategy as part of its Terms of Reference and excluded other key strategies. She expressed concern that the Chair of the CDC had openly opposed Council’s Urban Growth Strategy, the Heritage District Plan Change and the Residential and Suburban Mixed Use Plan Change. Mayor Wallace responded that he had communicated with Cr Bridson to voice his concerns. In response to a question from a member regarding the distrust from the community, officers and members, Mayor Wallace advised that a number of members of the Committee had held a secret meeting without the Chair’s knowledge resulting in the Chair being ‘thrown under the bus’. Cr Barry raised a point of order in response to comments made by Mayor Wallace and asked him to retract the comments. Mayor Wallace withdrew his comments. Cr Briggs proposed that a decision on the matter be deferred until the New Year. He suggested the Councillors planning session be used to discuss the matter further so members had time to consider what arrangement would provide the best outcome for the City. He advised he would be voting against the recommendations. Cr Bridson advised that she was resigning as Chair of the Committee. Crs Briggs and Barry advised that they also were resigning from the Committee. |
|
|||||
|
MOVED: (Cr Briggs/Cr Barry)
|
|
|||||
|
“That the item of business being discussed should lie on the table and not be further discussed at the meeting.” |
|
|||||
|
The motion was declared lost by division with the voting as follows:
|
|
|||||
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) (By Division) Minute No. C 18530(2) “That Council: (i) restructures the District Plan Committee as a subcommittee reporting to the City Development Committee, chaired by Deputy Mayor Bassett to better align the District Plan to meet the Council’s strategic goals, policy and vision; and (ii) agrees to amend the terms of reference of the City Development Committee and District Plan Committee to reflect part (i) above.” |
|
|||||
|
The motion declared carried by division with the voting as follows:
|
|
|||||
f) |
Updated Schedule of Meetings for 2019 (18/1790) Memorandum dated 12 November 2018 by the Committee Advisor |
||||||
|
In response to questions from a member, Mayor Wallace advised that a concern had been raised by the Petone Community Board that Community Panels (the Panels) had been listed on Council’s Schedule of Meetings (the schedule). He noted he had no issue with the Panels being listed on the schedule. He also noted that he had no issue with Cr Barratt continuing to hold Community Services Committee meetings in the community. Cr Cousins believed that the Petone Community Board was being precious about its concerns. She highlighted that Panels held statutory meetings when allocating funding and Councillors needed to be present at those meetings to legitimise the decisions made. Cr Barry raised a point of order relating to the comments made Cr Cousins. Cr Cousins apologised for her comment. In response to a question from a member, Cr Lewis advised that while Community Boards were statutory bodies, Panels were quite separate and did not have the same regulatory status. She considered that if the Panels were included in Council’s Schedule of Meetings for timetabling purposes only, their inclusion should be acceptable to the Petone Community Board. |
||||||
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18531(2) “That Council:
(i) notes the recommendations from the Petone Community Board; and
(ii) adopts the amended schedule of meetings for 2019 attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum.” |
||||||
7. |
Report of Hearings Panel 18 September 2018 to Council (18/1789) Report No. HCC2018/5/57 by the Committee Advisor |
|
Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins) Minute No. C 18532(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 18 September 2018 be received.” |
8. Minutes - COUNCIL
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18533(2) “That the minutes of the meeting of the Hutt City Council held on Tuesday, 9 October 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.” |
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18534(2) “That the minutes of the meeting of the Hutt City Council held on Wednesday, 17 October 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.” |
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18535(2) “That the minutes of the meeting of the Extraordinary Meeting of Council held on Thursday, 29 November 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.” |
9. Committee Reports without Recommended Items
g) Finance and Performance Committee
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18536(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 17 October 2018 be adopted.” |
h) Community Services Committee
|
Cr Lewis asked that work undertaken by officers with the sector, issues progressed within the sector and the ways the strategies were assisting Council be included in future reports to the Accessibility and Inclusiveness Plan Subcommittee. Cr Barratt agreed to ask officers to provide a separate report dealing with the matters raised by Cr Lewis. |
|
Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Cr Lewis) Minute No. C 18537(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 21 November 2018 be adopted.” |
i) City Development Committee
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 18538(2) “That the report of the meeting held on 27 November 2018 be adopted.”
|
||||||
10. |
Report No. HCC2018/5/15 by the Executive Assistant, Corporate Services |
|||||||
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18539(2) “That Council: (i) approves the affixing of the Common Seal to all relevant documents in connection with the items set out in Schedule 1 contained in the report; and (ii) approves the deeds executed under Power of Attorney set out in Schedule 2 contained in the report. SCHEDULE 1 - General Sealing Authority
Subdivision related documents – including Easements to Council and Esplanade Strips Standard easements and related requirements granting rights to Council as part of the subdivision process: a) Hutt
City Council and Christopher John McNay and David William Hercus b) Hutt
City Council and David Robert Lewis c) Hutt
City Council and Tiller’s Holdings Limited d) Hutt
City Council and T&T Leighton Avenue Development Limited e) Hutt City Council and Terence Michael Jordan, Julie Anne Jordan and Charles David Ellesmere Lindsay, Subdivision consent, 214 Whites line East, Lower Hutt L18/200 f) Hutt
City Council and Yu’s Development Limited g) Hutt
City Council and Kevin William Beck and Julie Ann Beck and Deblanc Limited Agreement for Sale and Purchase h) Hutt
City Council and Urban Plus Limited Encumbrance and Transfer i) Hutt
City Council and Lower Hutt Health Limited Partial Cancellation of Building Line Restriction j) Hutt
City Council and Michael Francis Martin and Joanna Elizabeth Martin Warrants Approved
|
11. QUESTIONS
Cr Barry asked if members had been notified of the Naenae Learners Pool roof issue prior to the Councillors workshop on Monday 3 December 2018? He also asked why the roof issue was not prioritised and on the Council order paper for consideration at this meeting?
Mayor Wallace responded that he and the Eastern Ward Councillors had been notified on either Sunday, 2 December or the morning of Monday, 3 December 2018. He added that members had not been notified of the roof issue before the workshop as the roof issue was already a priority and work was progressing.
Cr Barry raised a point of order believing there were no grounds to reject his proposed Notice of Motion regarding the roof issue.
The Chief Executive responded that Cr Barry’s proposed Notice of Motion was refused under Standing Order 27.2 (d).
Cr Briggs asked how action on the roof issue could be undertaken when Council had not made a decision on the matter? He also asked if the Chief Executive had taken into account the significance of the roof issue in Council’s Long Term Plan and whether officers had been told to prioritise the roof issue?
Mayor Wallace responded that it was an operational decision made by Council’s Strategic Leadership Team.
The
Chief Executive responded that the roof issue was a top priority for officers.
12. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18540(2) “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely: 13. Committee Reports with Recommended Items a) Policy
and Regulatory Committee - 26 November 2018 14. Land Purchase - Eastern Hills (18/1943) 15. Sale Negotiations (18/1944) 16. MINUTES – COUNCIL 9 October 2018 The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in
reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and
Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by
section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the
whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as
specified in Column (B) above.” |
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.08pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 9.11pm.
WR Wallace
MAYOR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
HUTT CITY COUNCIL
Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Monday 14 January 2019 commencing at 5.30pm
PRESENT: |
Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) |
|
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
|
Deputy Mayor D Bassett |
Cr L Bridson |
|
Cr J Briggs |
Cr MJ Cousins |
|
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
|
Cr M Lulich |
Cr G McDonald |
|
Cr C Milne (from 5.32pm) |
Cr L Sutton |
APOLOGIES: Cr Milne for lateness.
IN ATTENDANCE: Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald) Minute No. C 19101 “That the apology received from Cr Milne for lateness be accepted.” |
Cr Milne joined the meeting at 5.32pm.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
5. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 19102 “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely: 6. Chief Executive's Recruitment (19/1) The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” |
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 19103 “That Mr Hollander and Mr Boyes, Principal Consultants, JacksonStone & Partners be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item “Chief Executive’s Recruitment as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.” |
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 5.35pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 6.35pm.
WR Wallace
MAYOR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Meeting Rooms 1 and 2, Lower Hutt Events Centre, 30c Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Thursday 17 January 2019 commencing at 9.30am
PRESENT: |
Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) |
|
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
|
Deputy Mayor D Bassett |
Cr L Bridson |
|
Cr J Briggs |
Cr MJ Cousins |
|
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
|
Cr M Lulich |
Cr G McDonald |
|
Cr C Milne |
Cr L Sutton |
APOLOGIES: There were no apologies.
IN ATTENDANCE: Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
There were no apologies.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
5. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 19101(2) “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely: 6. Chief Executive's Recruitment (19/2) The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” |
|
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 19102(2) “That Mr Hollander and Mr Boyes, Principal Consultants, JacksonStone & Partners be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item “Chief Executive’s Recruitment as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.” |
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 9.35am and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 2.30pm.
WR Wallace
MAYOR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Tuesday 12 February 2019 commencing at 2.18pm
PRESENT: |
Deputy Mayor D Bassett (Chair) |
|
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
|
Cr L Bridson |
Cr J Briggs |
|
Cr MJ Cousins |
Cr S Edwards |
|
Cr T Lewis |
Cr M Lulich |
|
Cr G McDonald |
Cr C Milne |
|
Cr L Sutton |
|
APOLOGIES: An apology was received from Mayor Wallace.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services
Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services
Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services
Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 19101(3) “That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Members noted the conflicts of interest from Deputy Mayor Bassett in relation to Urban Plus Limited, from Cr Cousins in relation to Hutt City Communities Facilities Trust and from Cr Milne in relation to Seaview Marina Limited and Hutt Valley Tennis.
4. |
RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL FROM THE COMMUNITY PLAN COMMITTEE DATED 12 FEBRUARY 2019 PROPOSED ANNUAL PLAN 2019/2020 (19/120) |
|
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton) Minute No. C 19102(3) “That Council: (i) adopts the draft budgets attached as Appendices 1 to 4 to the report; (ii) agrees to increase rates by an average of 1.8% in 2019/20; (iii) notes the potential cost pressures currently not included in the draft budget, as outlined in the report (paragraphs 28 to 30 inclusive and paragraphs 44 to 67 inclusive ); (iv) agrees to the changes to the draft budgets including the amendments agreed at the meeting; and (v) notes the further requests for officers to report back to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.” |
5. Miscellaneous
Amendments to the Terms of Reference for the District Plan Subcommittee, the City Development Committee and Council (19/107) Memorandum dated 30 January 2019 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services |
The Divisional Manager, Democratic Services elaborated on the memorandum. Members discussed the opportunity of including a sustainability aspect under the City Development Committee’s Terms of Reference. |
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr McDonald) Minute No. C 19103(3) “That Council: (i) notes the recommended Terms of Reference for the newly established District Plan Subcommittee set out in Appendix 1 to address Council’s decision made at its meeting held on 11 December 2018; (ii) notes that amendments to the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee and Council are required as set out in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 to address Council’s decision made at its meeting held on 11 December 2018; and (iii) adopts the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee, the District Plan Subcommittee and Council attached as Appendix 1, 2 and 3 to the memorandum, subject to the Divisional Manager Democratic Services, in consultation with Cr Cousins, making amendments to the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee to include wording around the Environmental Strategy as seen as appropriate.” |
6. QUESTIONS
There were no
questions.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 2.27pm.
D Bassett
DEPUTY MAYOR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on
Wednesday 27 February 2019 commencing at 5.02pm
PRESENT: |
Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) |
|
|
Cr G Barratt |
Cr C Barry |
|
Deputy Mayor D Bassett |
Cr L Bridson |
|
Cr J Briggs |
Cr MJ Cousins |
|
Cr S Edwards |
Cr T Lewis |
|
Cr M Lulich |
Cr C Milne |
|
Cr L Sutton |
|
APOLOGIES: An apology was received from Cr G McDonald
IN ATTENDANCE: Ms A Blackshaw, Divisional Manager Communications and Marketing
Ms K Alkema, Divisional Manager Human Resources
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt) Minute No. C 19101(2) “That the apology received from Cr G McDonald be accepted and leave of absence be granted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
There was no public comment.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
5. EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 19102(2) “That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely: 6. Update from the Chief Executive's Employment Subcommittee regarding the APPOINTMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE(19/256) The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:
This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” |
Resolved: Minute No. C 19103(2) “That the Divisional Manager Communications and
Marketing, the Divisional Manager Human Resources and the Divisional Manager,
Democratic Services be permitted to remain
after the public during consideration of the item “Update
from the Chief Executive's Employment Subcommittee regarding the Appointment
of the Chief Executive” as they have knowledge
of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this
item.” |
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 5.07pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 5.50pm.
WR Wallace
MAYOR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
440
District Plan Committee
Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Thursday 29 November 2018 commencing at 5.30pm
PRESENT: Cr L Bridson (Chair) Cr MJ Cousins
Cr C Barry Cr S Edwards
Cr J Briggs Cr T Lewis
Cr C Milne
APOLOGIES: There were no apologies.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mayor WR Wallace
Deputy Mayor D Bassett
Cr G Barratt
Cr G McDonald
Cr L Sutton
Cr M Lulich
Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services (part meeting)
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer
Mr B Cato, General Counsel (part meeting)
Ms H Oram, Divisional Manager Environmental Consents
Mr A Cumming, Divisional Manager, District Plan
Ms C Tessendorf, Senior Environmental Policy Analyst (part meeting)
Mr J Jeffries, Environmental Policy Analyst
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
Mr J Hoyle, Communications and Marketing Advisor
Ms S Haniel, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
There were no apologies.
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
The Chair determined that the time limit for public comment would be extended to allow all speakers to be heard by the members.
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
There were no conflict of interest declarations.
4. Recommendation to Council - 29 November 2018
Proposed District Plan Change 46 Significant Natural Areas, Outstanding Natural Landscapes, Outstanding Natural Features and Coastal Natural Character (18/1800) |
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking under public comment, Mr W Bearman-Riedel, representing Power Inc, opposed Proposed District Plan Change 46 (PPC46). He believed he would lose sunlight, have building restrictions and lose property rights. He considered there were already sufficient rules in place to protect the bush. Speaking under public comment, Mr A Olney, representing Power Inc, said that there had not been enough consultation on PPC46. He also said the maps did not adequately identify where restrictions ought to apply. He cited Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society NZ v New Plymouth District Council, which ruled that voluntary controls, on their own were not a sufficient protection to meet Council’s legal obligations. In response to questions from members, Mr Olney said that the scale and accuracy of the maps was important. He considered that voluntary management of Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) in combination with rules would be sufficient for Council to meet its statutory obligations. Speaking under public comment, Ms D Clark, said that she had an online petition to stop Council’s SNA project. She added that the Chief Executive had received a copy of the petition. She did not know how many of the signatories lived in Lower Hutt. Speaking under public comment, Mr G Gilbert opposed PPC46. He believed he would not be able to develop his land and there was no compensation available for his loss. He considered that Council should stop all developments on its green fields that contained flora and fauna. He queried why the Wainuiomata and Orongorongo Rivers had been removed from the SNA areas. Speaking under public comment, Mr A Beatson, representing landowners, considered that SNAs needed to be accurately identified before Council notified PPC46. He further said that the SNAs identified by Wildlands needed to be “ground truthed” before being included in PPC46. Speaking under public comment, Mr I Gordon representing Ms C Henshaw and the Cretney family in Eastbourne, agreed with Mr Onley’s and Mr Beatson’s comments and that Wildlands were required to have correct ground truthing. He said that it was fatuous to suggest that consultation could occur after notification. Speaking under public comment, Mr P Marriot said that he was a Resource Consultant and Conservationist. He opposed PPC46 and believed that private property owners were best placed to carry out forest management. Speaking under public comment, Mr G Innes said that he had previously worked as a Chief Executive in three Councils. He considered that Council should take more time to consult further with the community and have correct mapping before proceeding with PPC46. Speaking under public comment, Ms R Dentice, representing her wider Puketapu whanau, said that they owned five properties and it was the responsibility of her whanau to care for the land. She considered that PPC46 undermined the mana of her whenua by placing an SNA cloak over it. She further considered PPC46 confusing, offensive, frustrating and would disconnect her people from their whenua. Speaking under public comment, Ms V Horrocks, Chair, representing the Eastbourne Community Board, said that landowners wanted certainty about the effects of PPC46 on their properties. She knew of people that were still trying to get information about their SNA from Council and until that occurred, people would not have confidence in PPC46. She noted that Council had two years to notify the decision and asked that officers spend more time with individual landowners. Speaking under public comment, Mr A Alcorn said that Council needed to co-operate with landowners to identify the SNAs and assist them to protect their land. Speaking under public comment, Mr C White said that PPC46 would prevent him from cutting back his bush in order for him to graze sheep. Therefore, he had already cut back the bush so that it would not be affected by the SNA. Speaking under public comment, Ms N Lambourne believed that historically, officers had come onto her land under false pretenses, using the guise of doing a possum count, to assess the SNA on her land. She recommended that landowners do not let officers onto their land. Speaking under public comment, Mr S Galyer said that he had cleared the gorse off his land and the rest was native bush. He did not approve of the way Councils treated SNAs, particularly the use of 1080. Speaking under public comment, Mr P Baker said that the SNA maps were not accurate. He recommended that Council stop the SNA process for private landowners and reconsider what it was trying to achieve from PPC46. Speaking under public comment, Ms L Collins said that all the land around her house was shown as a SNA. She noted that she would not be able to cut down the hebe that was overgrowing her deck. She added that Wildlands was the decision maker and Council was not following a democratic process. Speaking under public comment, Mr G Absalom said that he owned Orongorongo Station. He had asked Council for a meeting with officers three times and had no response. He was alarmed that he would not be able to put tracks in or develop his property for tourism ventures. The meeting adjourned at 7.45pm and reconvened at 7.53pm. The Chair indicated her intention to move a motion to delay notifying PPC46 to allow further consultation with the community. Cr Cousins raised a point of order regarding members of the public creating disorder at the meeting. The Chair noted the point of order. Speaking under public comment, Mr B Lett said that SNAs imposed a severe restriction on the land and was akin to taking private property. He had plans to build an astronomical observatory or a small house on his land and objected strongly to PPC46. Speaking under public comment, Ms R Maxwell and Ms T A Puketapu, representing the Chairman of Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and the Waiwhetu Marae Trust said that they had not been consulted on PPC46. They believed Council had not completed its obligations under the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to consult with mana whenua who have inherent rights of landownership. They requested that Council stop the SNA process and consult with mana whenua. Speaking under public comment, Mr S Buckland said that he supported PPC46 in principle, however, he did not understand the implications to him personally. He requested that it be delayed and be reported back to the Committee in six months time. Speaking under public comment, Mr J Edmunson said that a valuer had told him that a covenant would decrease the value of a property. He advised that he had not seen an impact assessment of the effect that PPC46 would have on property values. He considered that Council could not make a decision unless it knew the cost. Speaking under public comment, Mr O Revera said that the issue of SNAs arose in 1999 and Council should have put them in place in 2001. He bought the property in 2005 after checking it did not have a covenant on it. He considered that Council had not completed its obligations in 2001. Speaking under public comment, Mr I Caddis said that he could not make judgements about PPC46 because he could not get basic information from Council on the matter. He added that Council should not be blindly following law, and should push back on behalf of its ratepayers. Speaking under public comment, Mr G Sinclair encouraged members to set the policy for Council and not to simply rubber stamp recommendations from officers. He added that Council needed maximal input from the community on the matter. Speaking under public comment, Ms L Mead said that she supported SNAs because they offered a layer of protection for biodiversity assets. She added that SNAs were an overlay on the District Plan and were not to stop people doing things on their property. She believed there was a lot of misinformation about SNAs in the community and people did not understand the issue. Speaking under public comment, Ms L Gerrard said that she had a river through her property and when it flooded, they moved their stock to high ground. She believed that under the SNA she would not be able to use the high ground for stock. Speaking under public comment, Mr T Hefford said that he was the Rural Fire Officer in Wainuiomata. He expressed concern that landowners would light fires to clear bush to avoid the SNAs in PPC46. Speaking under public comment, Mr P Roy said that he was confused about the s293 notice he received. He believed it had contrary rules to PPC46 about protecting the biodiversity on his property. He was therefore confused about whether he could remove wilding pines, indigenous or exotic vegetation. Speaking under public comment, Ms J Martin said that 80% of her property would be a SNA. However, 40% of that was gorse, scrub and manuka which she planned to clear to run a tourism venture on her farm. She noted that under PPC46 she would not be able to do so. Speaking under public comment, Mr A Hart said that he supported SNAs. However she believed Council should have undertaken a better consultation process. H e considered that people would clear their bush before PPC46 came into effect. Speaking under public comment, Ms J Sylvester said that SNAs would have a 20% decrease on the value of freehold land. She believed that Council was using drones to assess SNAs. She knew of people that had negative health issues because of the SNA process. She considered SNAs should only be on Council land and that it be a voluntary process for private landowners. Speaking under public comment, Ms J Wooton said that there were incidents of stressed landowners becoming unwell because of the SNA process. She believed there was a lot of mistrust and ill feeling in the community about the issue. Speaking under public comment, Mr C Innes said that he endorsed Council taking a six month delay before progressing the SNAs. Speaking under public comment, Mr D Collins said that he supported Council taking an extra six months to consult before progressing SNAs. he SNA map of his property was incorrect and did not show one of the houses that was on his land. Speaking under public comment, Mr P Matcham said that he supported SNAs and there was a lot of misunderstanding and some deliberate misinformation about the issue which had caused confusion. He had received helpful responses from officers who had done a site visit and answered his queries. PPC46 would be a public good achieved through a partnership between Council and landowners. In response to a question from a member, Mr Matcham said that he would support having a Queen Elizabeth II covenant on his land. Speaking under public comment, Ms V Nelson said that she did not appreciate the way that SNAs had been imposed on her land. She requested that Council consult further with the community. Speaking under public comment, Mr K Jackson said that community engagement on SNAs could occur through workshops with the Forest and Bird Society, landowners and Council. He added that the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society NZ v New Plymouth District Council case was different to the situation at Lower Hutt because the typography of the land differed. He further said that there were inconsistencies with the SNA mapping and encouraged Council to obtain community buy-in. The meeting adjourned at 9.17pm and reconvened at 9.30pm. The Divisional Manager District Plan and Mr Stephen Quinn, Partner, DLA Piper, elaborated on the report. In response to questions from members, the Divisional Manager District Plan advised that: · Evidence to show changes in biodiversity could be obtained by having a comprehensive monitoring regime. · Officers had engaged with iwi, (the Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust (PNBST) and the Wellington Tenths Trust), for the past 18 months. Council’s relationship agreement with iwi was that Council would engage with PNBST in the first instance and take the advice of the PNBST and the Wellington Tenths Trust regarding engagement with iwi. Council recognised engaging with iwi on this project was on at least three levels; as a Treaty partner, obtaining iwi input into the technical assessments and as landowners. · Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) did not have a Regional Policy Statement in 2003. Therefore, Council did not have the same obligation then, as it did now to implement SNAs. · Finalisation of SNA maps could occur during the formal consultation and submission processes. PPC46 maps did not need to be finalised prior to consultation. · Officers had not used drones to assess SNAs. · Legal advice from DLA Piper was that if SNA protection on private land was solely voluntary, then Council would be unlikely to be meeting its statutory obligations under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA). · Officers were undertaking site visits at times that suited property owners. Those times included evenings and weekends. · He believed that landowners had given each other advice not to let officers onto their land because of their concern that the SNA areas would be increased. However, officers had given an undertaking that the SNA would not be increased without the agreement of the landowner. · Officers would not conduct site visits without the agreement of the landowners. · Officers did not recommend the use of forcible entry onto properties where landowners did not agree to a site visit. · Officers had always seen the need to do ground truthing, hence the programme of site visits. However, where landowners refused officers entry, the SNA could not be ground truthed. Following a site visit, most but not all landowners were happier with the proposed SNA on their land. · Officers continually received requests for site visits. However, only two staff, an ecologist and another staff member were available for the work. An increase of another two staff members would speed up the process. · Officers would be pleased to talk to Mr Absalom to correct an error regarding fixing a date for his site visit. · Officers would be able to discuss with Ms Gerrard about using her high ground for stock during flooding events. A site visit would be helpful. There was nothing in PPC46 to prevent stock entering an SNA. The emergency provisions of the RMA would overrule resource consent requirements in a flood emergency. · Parks owned by Council and GWRC were required, under statute, to have management plans in place, therefore had more protection than private land. However, there was room for improved biodiversity management on Council holdings. · Council’s public notice regarding RMA s293 consultation notice resulted from an Environment Court order for Council to consult on the proposed minor technical amendments to Proposed Plan Change 36 (PPC36), Notable Trees and Vegetation Removal. PPC36 was complex and difficult to explain in simple terms. He agreed that the timing of the PPC36 notice and the PPC46 report was confusing. However, they were two separate issues. |
||||||||||||||||||
Resolved: (Cr Briggs/Cr Bridson) Minute No. DPC 18501 “That Standing Order 4.2 be suspended in order to extend the meeting duration past 10.30pm.” |
||||||||||||||||||
Moved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins) “That the Committee: (i) recommends that Council: (a) notes the Proposed Plan Change, attached as Appendix 1 to the report; (b) instructs officers to do further consultation including mana whenua and site visits; (c) instructs officers to puts out a draft plan change consistent with proposed plan change 46 for consultation; (d) notes that changes to the maps will continue as more information becomes available; (e) encourages landowners to have a site visit onto their land; and (ii) recommends that the Community Plan Committee: (a) notes the report “Non-regulatory Support Measures for Indigenous Biodiversity on Private Land,” attached as Appendix 2 to the report; (b) supports the funding of the following non-regulatory support measures that are complementary to Proposed Plan Change 46 as follows:
The motion was declared lost by Division with the voting as follows:
Cr Barry considered that Council needed to work with residents to obtain a good result. He did not agree that Council had to follow the same process that New Plymouth District Council followed. He also considered that a Council subcommittee would assist in the process and encourage a partnership approach with the community. He believed that a voluntary approach with incentives would achieve the same benefits as PPC46. Cr Edwards expressed support with a partnership approach to establishing SNAs. He believed it was important for officers to work with environmental groups, such as the East Harbour Environmental Association. Cr Milne considered that people valued the environment more than they used to as attested to by the proliferation of predator free groups and bird counts. He said that had not seen any evidence of wholesale clearing of native bush and there would be little gain in having PPC46. He supported having a voluntary approach to SNAs and the use of Queen Elizabeth II covenants. Cr Briggs expressed support with Cr Barry’s comments. He believed Council needed to work face to face with the community, Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and Waiwhetu Marae, to regain the faith that had been lost. He considered that Council could monitor the voluntary uptake and the biodiversity in the next 12 to 24 months. He supported a partnership approach with the community and accepted the level of legal risk with the approach. Cr Cousins did not believe a voluntary approach to SNAs would meet Council’s legal obligations. She encouraged landowners to have a site visit and for Council to work toward a draft plan change. Cr McDonald said that she felt for people whose health had been affected by the SNA process. She supported a voluntary approach to SNAs and to wait for six months before proceeding with PPC46. Cr Lewis believed that Council needed to build trust and relationships with residents. The community had told Council that it was not listening; however, members had listened tonight and would do their best for the community. She supported a voluntary approach to SNAs. Cr Lulich said that he was particularly concerned about the stress on Eastbourne residents with regard to; whether the SNA would be on their Land Information Memorandum; the implications when they sold the property; and whether future generations could live on part of the land. He considered that there would be opposition in the Environment Court if Council proceeded with PPC46. He supported a voluntary approach to SNA. The Chair said that she had heard the angst in the community, and that people loved the bush and their land noting that the best people to manage the bush were the landowners. However, there had been a lot of misunderstanding and miscommunication about PPC46 which had put the community offside. She considered PPC46 was the correct document for having better communication about SNAs. She considered a voluntary approach would not be sufficient for Council to meet its statutory obligations. In response to a question from a member,
the Divisional Manager District Plan said that a District Plan change and
mapping would not be required if Council decided to take a voluntary approach
to SNAs. If SNAs were mapped in the District Plan, then their purpose
would be to trigger a consent process. In a voluntary SNA scheme, the
triggering of the consent process would not be required. |
||||||||||||||||||
recommended: (BY DIVISION) (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs) Minute No. DPC 18502 “That the Committee: (i) recommends that Council: (a) takes a partnership approach in identifying and protecting Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) across Lower Hutt, without mandatory restrictions, and instead provide for incentives for the protection and conservation of SNAs and the flora and fauna that live within them; (b) notes that this would allow for stakeholders, and mana whenua (including Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and Waiwhetu Marae), to work together in good faith, and on a case by case basis, towards the enhancement of our biodiversity in Lower Hutt; and (c) asks officers to amend the proposed plan change to give effect to this resolution, and that it be reported back to full Council as soon as practicable; and (ii) recommends that the Community Plan Committee: (a) notes the report “Non-regulatory Support Measures for Indigenous Biodiversity on Private Land,” attached as Appendix 2 to the report; and (b) supports the funding of the following non-regulatory support measures that are complementary to Proposed Plan Change 46 as follows:
The motion was declared carried by Division with the voting as follows:
|
5. Information Item
District Plan Update (18/1661) Report No. DPC2018/5/151 by the Divisional Manager District Plan |
Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins) Minute No. DPC 18503 “That the item being discussed be referred to the next meeting of the Committee.”
|
6. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 11.21 pm.
Cr L Bridson
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
446
Community Plan Committee
Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on
Tuesday 12 February 2019 commencing at 9.30am
PRESENT: Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) (until 10.28am)
Cr G Barratt Cr C Barry (from 9.36am)
Deputy Mayor D Bassett (from 9.31am) Cr L Bridson
Cr J Briggs Cr MJ Cousins
Cr S Edwards Cr T Lewis
Cr M Lulich Cr G McDonald
Cr C Milne Cr L Sutton (from 9.33am)
APOLOGIES: Apologies were received for lateness from Deputy Mayor Bassett and Crs Barry and Sutton.
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive
Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)
Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation (part meeting)
Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services
Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services (part meeting)
Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services (part meeting)
Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer
Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs (part meeting)
Ms M Laban, Divisional Manager, Community Projects and Relationships (part meeting)
Ms L Dalby, Senior Communications Advisor (part meeting)
Mr J Pritchard, Principal Research and Policy Advisor (part meeting)
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. APOLOGIES
Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald) Minute No. CPC 19101 “That the apologies received from Deputy Mayor Bassett and Crs Barry and Sutton for lateness be accepted.” |
2. PUBLIC COMMENT
Deputy Mayor Bassett joined the meeting at 9.31am.
Cr Sutton joined the meeting at 9.33am.
Cr Barry joined the meeting at 9.36am.
Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.
3. PRESENTATION BY THE MAYOR (18/1994) The Chair delivered his presentation. He said Council was on year two of three of the Long Term Plan (LTP), with a mix of ambitious projects to enchance the City. He said that budget assumptions were based on keeping the rates the lowest in the region with a number of significant cost pressures across the City, the region and nationally. He added that members and officers would work collectively to deliver on the exciting and ambitious LTP. |
4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS
Members noted the conflicts of interest from Deputy Mayor Bassett in relation to Urban Plus Limited, from Cr Cousins in relation to Hutt City Community Facilities Trust and from Cr Milne in relation to Seaview Marina Limited and Hutt Valley Tennis.
5. Recommendations to Council – at the conclusion of the Community Plan Committee meeting
i) |
Supporting Lower Hutt's Indigenous Biodiversity (19/88) |
|
Speaking under public comment, Mr D Innes and Ms P Innes expressed their view that Council should copy what Wellington had achieved with Zealandia and Whanganui with Bushey Park, to fence protected areas to extinguish pests and reintroduce birds. They said that 26k hectres of public land was not looked after, with wild goats, pigs and deer, where the natural vegetation had changes and gaps in the canopy cover had developed. They added that it had been successfully argued in 2002 in the Environment Court, the then called SNRs, were counter productive on private land. They believed that it would be ideal to fence the Mohaka Wetlands area and another area on the coast for marine bird breeding. In response to questions from members, Mr Innes confirmed support for the additional funding, with more effective control on wild deer. He believed the 26k hectres of land was made up of public land and was owned jointly between Council, Greater Wellington Regional Council and the Department of Conservation with 5k in private ownership. The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services confirmed for members that 19k hectres was public land and 8k hectres was private land. In response to a question from a member, Mrs Innes said that landowners required help with pest control and that there needed to be a pest plan to eradicate the wild goats, pigs and deer and barberry plants. |
|
Speaking under public comment, Ms D Clark highlighted the importance of Council circulating information to all landowners in the City not just the landowners affected. She elaborated on the costs of pest traps. She added there should be a commitment to being pest free. In response to a question from a member, Ms Clark suggested that an exchange scheme be run to hire traps, with the payment of a deposit. |
|
Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young said that the funding requested was for $265k for the coming year, where last year it was $245k in addition to the statutory requirement funding. He expressed concern wiuth losing the money from the budget along with the protection, with only an additional $20k a year request. Mayor Wallace commented that the $265k was a new request for money. He added that a Council decision identified issues for officers to review and address, with work underway in relation to this. |
|
The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the report. In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that a key issue was the regional plan, for a long term benefit, with consideration on landowners wanting to put on a covenant to protect their land. Mayor Wallace left the meeting at 10.28am and Deputy Mayor Bassett assumed the chair. In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) had a pest control plan which covered a wide area and related to wild pigs, goats and deer. He also advised that Council’s plan concentrated on plant pests. He said that Council managed 200 hectres of land and 8k hectres had been identified as private land. He added that Council’s plan was to be reviewed as part of Council’s Environmental Strategy. |
|
Cr Cousins commented that a submission to GWRC’s as part of its Annual Plan process should be consided, in relation to pests and specifically deers. |
|
ReCOMMENDED: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt) Minute No. CPC 19102 “That the Committee recommends that Council: (i) notes that Council owns and manages approximately 2,000 hectares of bush reserve land with ecological value, most of which has protection via Reserves Act classifications; (ii) notes that Council currently allocates within the Parks budget a total of $415,000 annually to support indigenous biodiversity on these reserves; and (iii) agrees to include an indicative ongoing annual provision in its 2019/20 draft annual plan of $265,000 to support indigenous biodiversity on identified private property.” |
|
|
|
Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. CPC 19103 “That the Committee: (i) asks officers to prepare suitable comments to include in Council’s submission to the Greater Wellington Regional Council’s Annual Plan on its Regional Pest Management Strategy to be signed by the Mayor and Deputy Mayor; and (ii) asks officers to send the submission to Councillors for their information.” |
ii) |
|
|
Speaking under public comment, Ms V Horrocks, Chair representing the Eastbourne Community Board (ECB) questioned the reasons why the Eastern Bays shared path had been reassessed. She said that ambitious projects with technical and bureaucratic processes were likely to go overcost. She hoped that the resource consent would be lodged in March. She added that is was not just a nice project to have, but there were safety issues to address. Speaking under public comment Mr D Wiltshire said that the shared path had been a vision of Council for more than two decades. He added that a resident survey undertaken late in 2016 favoured completion of the project. He believed that a beach replenishment project should be considered as part of the proposal. He added that an enhancement project would have a significant community, regional and national benefit. He concluded that to not proceed would signal a significant vote of no confidence in Council, not just from Eastbourne, but the whole Hutt Valley. |
|
In response to a question from a member, Mr Wiltshire said that each bay had been consulted on the project, with ECB involved and the community’s views had been taken on board by the working group. In response to a question from a member, Ms Horrocks advised that she thought the most dangerous areas to be addressed first would be Windy Point, between Days Bay and Eastbourne, Lowry and York Bays. She added that the whole project was required as issues could arise from areas being completed in part. She noted that the subsidy was based on the whole project. |
|
Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young expressed support for reassessing the shared paths and cycleways. He added that bulk water supply was a cost pressure which should have already been part of the draft budget. He questioned if the Whaitua process would consider water consumption in the Hutt Valley. In response to a question from a member, Mr Young said that the cycleway in parts of the Eastern Bays would just stop and when cycling into the 70km/h roadway it felt quite dangerous. |
|
Deputy Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 11.04am and Cr Cousins assumed the chair. The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report. Deputy Mayor Bassett rejoined the meeting at 11.07am and assumed the chair. In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that officers were working with contractors in relation to the living wage. He noted that the matter would be reported to the next Finance and Performance Committee prior to consideration by this Committee. In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that a report on the bulk water supply would be presented to the next Finance and Performance Committee. In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that the potential cost increase for the Beltway and Eastern Bays shared pathway projects had been included within the draft budget. He noted that other costs associated with the Mobility Hub had not yet been determined. The meeting adjourned at 11.23am and resumed at 11.42am. In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that rates rise was illustrated with example properties, although residential and commercial properties were not treated in the same way in relation to rates. In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that Wellington Water Ltd (WWL) had a communication strategy for the region in relation to water usage. He further expanded on water consumption across the region. In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, City and Community Services advised that worked continued on the Eastern Bays shared pathway project and a workshop would be organised within the next three months. He added that funding was sought for the whole project from the New Zealand Transport Agency. |
|
Members asked officers to report back on paying the Living Wage to contractors through the appropriate committee with proposed recommendations to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019. Members noted that officers were working with Wellington Water Ltd to organise a workshop on the resilience programme for water.
Members noted that officers would be reporting on water consumption to the next Finance and Performance Committee.
Members noted that officers would be reporting back on the Eastern Bays cycleway/shared path to the next Community Plan Committee meeting. |
|
Resolved:(Cr Bridson/Cr McDonald) Minute No. CPC 19104 “That the Committee agrees that if the cycleway programme of work needs to be reassessed in the future that officers undertake consultation including the Walkway Cycle Advisory Group at that time.”
|
|
Cr Milne left the meeting at 12.33pm. The Chief Information Officer and the General Manager, City and Community Services elaborated on the Petone Centre.
Cr Milne rejoined the meeting at 12.34pm.
In response to questions from members, the Chief Information Officer advised that options for the Petone Centre were as follows: · replacement of the current Petone library building, including building apartments above the community centre; · replacement of the current Petone library building with the addition of a master plan for the surrounding area; · repair and upgrade of the current Petone library building; · repair of the current Petone library building; or · explore the option of building a completely new building. Members noted that officers were working with Urban Plus Ltd regarding options for the Petone Centre. Members also noted that officers would be reporting back to the Community Plan Committee meeting on 5 June 2019.
In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that the project would not breach Council’s Significance Policy. Members discussed information provided by Hutt Valley
Tennis Inc. |
|
Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton) Minute No. CPC 19105 “That the Committee: (i) asks officers to undertake further research on the Hutt Valley Tennis Inc proposal; and (ii) reports back to the City Development Committee with proposed recommendations to the Community Plan Committee at its meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.” |
|
Cr Sutton left the meeting at 1.03pm. The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the options for Days Bay Wharf. In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that the refurbishment works could potentially be deferred for three to five years, as works were completed on cycles on four to five years. He added that there was a risk that costs and tenders increasing over that period. Cr Sutton rejoined the meeting at 1.20pm. Members discussed the options, project budget contingency and community expectation of the works to the commercially utilised wharf. The meeting was adjourned at 1.27pm and resumed at 2.03pm. |
|
RECOMMENDED:(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Cousins)Minute No. CPC 19106 “That the Committee recommends that Council: (i) accepts the lowest tender for the Days Bay Wharf reburbishment as is and asks officers to work hard keeping the project within budget; and (ii) establishes a project working group to oversee the Days Bay Wharf reburbishment with the membership being the Chair of the Finance and Performance Committee (Chair) and one Harbour Ward Councillor.” |
|
Cr Milne requested that his dissenting vote be recorded against the above matter. |
|
The Acting Chief Financial Officer displayed the net debt forecast including the $500k for wharves and $265k for biodiversity The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated the the net debt forecast. |
|
RECOMMENDED: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Cousins) Minute No. CPC 19107 “That the Committee recommends that Council: (i) adopts the draft budgets attached as Appendices 1 to 4 to the report; (ii) agrees to increase rates by an average of 1.8% in 2019/20; (iii) notes the potential cost pressures currently not included in the draft budget, as outlined in the report (paragraphs 28 to 30 inclusive and paragraphs 44 to 67 inclusive ); (iv) agrees to the changes to the draft budgets including the amendments agreed at the meeting; and (v) notes the further requests for officers to report back to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.” |
6. QUESTIONS
There were no questions.
There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 2.18pm.
D Bassett
CHAIR
CONFIRMED as a true and correct record
Dated this 26th day of March 2019
Attachment 1 |
HCC Hearing Decision FINAL – 96A Witako St, 79B Copeland St, 51 Hall Cr - RM180215 RM180236 RM180275 |
HUTT VALLEY SERVICES COMMITTEE
Report of a meeting held in the Upper Hutt City Council Chambers,
Level
2, Civic Administration Building, 838-842 Fergusson Drive, Upper Hutt on
Friday 1 March 2019 commencing at 9.30am
PRESENT: Cr D Wheeler, UHCC (Chair)
Cr G McDonald, HCC (Deputy Chair)
Deputy Mayor D Bassett, HCC (from 9.34am)
Cr C Carson, UHCC
Cr L Sutton, HCC
Cr P Lambert, UHCC
Cr H Swales, UHCC
APOLOGIES: Deputy Mayor Bassett (from 9.34am)
Mayor W N Guppy, UHCC
Mayor W R Wallace, HCC
IN ATTENDANCE: Mr P Kelly, Chief Executive, UHCC
Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, HCC
Mr B Sherlock, Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, HCC (part meeting)
Mr B Latimer, Parks and Reserves Manager, UHCC (part meeting)
Mr D Bentley, Team Leader, Environmental Health, HCC
Ms J McKelvey, Administration Support Officer, UHCC
Ms D Male, Committee Advisor, HCC
Mrs H Clegg, Minute Taker, UHCC
REPORT TO COUNCIL
PUBLIC BUSINESS
1. |
APOLOGIES |
||
|
|
RESOLVED: That the apologies received from Deputy Mayor Bassett (for lateness), and from Mayor Guppy and Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted. Moved Cr Wheeler/Cr Swales |
HVSC190101
CARRIED |
2. |
PUBLIC FORUM |
|
There was no public forum. |
3. |
CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS |
|
There were no conflict of interest declarations. |
4. |
MINUTES |
||
|
With regard to item 13: Dog Control Update, Cr Wheeler requested an update on the neutering programme and the Doggone Pilot Project. The Team Leader, Environmental Health HCC agreed to arrange for the appropriate officer to report back on these issues. Deputy Mayor Bassett entered the meeting at 9.34am. With regard to item 8: Silverstream Landfill Update, Cr Wheeler requested an update on the proposed workshop concerning possible changes to the landfill levy. The Contracts Manager, Solid Waste agreed to report back with suitable dates. Cr Swales requested that in future, action points that arose from minutes be included in reports for the following meeting’s agenda. |
||
|
|
RESOLVED: That the minutes of the Hutt Valley Services Committee meeting held on 23 November 2019 be confirmed as a true and correct record. Moved Cr Wheeler/Cr Swales |
HVSC190102
CARRIED |
5. |
PROGRESS REPORT: PROPOSED APPEARANCE BYLAW |
|||
|
Report by the Principal Policy Advisor, Hutt City Council. |
|||
|
In response to questions from members, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council confirmed a draft Bylaw would be presented to Upper Hutt City Council. He agreed to ensure the appropriate officer reported back to this committee on the composition of the joint hearings subcommittee. Cr Lambert requested clarity in the title of the Bylaw and suggested a preamble introduction to explain the nature of the Bylaw. He expressed concern that members of the public would be unaware of the nature of this Bylaw. The Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council advised the title would probably be changed to ‘Appearance Industries Bylaw’, and that it covered all industries where piercing occurred, and where beauty processes could lead to infection. In response to a query as to whether the proposed timeframe was realistic and achievable, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council confirmed this was the case, providing resources were available to progress the bylaw. In response to a question from a member, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council advised that this was a multi-cultural issue and the appropriate consultation had occurred. |
|||
|
|
RESOLVED:
THAT the Committee recommends that Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council agree to the amended timeframe for the development of the proposed Appearance Bylaw as follows:
(i) 1 March 2019 Hutt Valley Services Committee (HVSC) receives the new timeframe. (ii) 18 March to 31 May 2019 Pre-consultation undertaken. (iii) 30 August 2019 Results of pre-consultation presented to the Hutt Valley Services Committee. (iv) 8 October – 8 November 2019 Special consultative procedure concerning the proposed bylaw. (v) 19 October 2019 Local body elections. (vi) Late 2019/early 2020 establish a (joint) hearings subcommittee. (vii) Early 2020 hear submissions to proposed bylaw and resulting recommendations considered by a hearings subcommittee.
Moved Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Swales |
HVSC190103
CARRIED |
|
6. |
PROJECT PENCARROW PROGRESS REPORT: 9 NOVEMBER 2018 – 28 JANUARY 2019 |
|||
|
Report by the Environmental Engineer, Hutt City Council. |
|||
|
The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, Hutt City Council advised a preferred tenderer had been selected for the DBO Contract, Veolia, with a contract expected to be finalised in four to six weeks’ time. The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, Hutt City Council advised the resource consent application was on hold, pending the outcome of the proposed Natural Resources Plan, expected by the end of July 2019. In response to a question from a member, the Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, Hutt City Council advised that the Limited Notification Process would take a few weeks, and that he understood the existing consent would end within the next two months. He added that as an application by Wellington Water Ltd (WWL) to Greater Wellington Regional Council for a renewal had already been lodged, the terms of the existing consent would roll over until the new consent became operative. In response to a question from a member, the Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, Hutt City Council explained the Whaitua Implementation Process in Porirua had taken several years to complete, and that the Wellington Harbour/Hutt Valley Whaitua process had just commenced. He agreed any recommendations would need to be taken into account. Deputy Mayor Bassett, Hutt City Council advised that for water quality, central government had already announced a regulator would be appointed, and that water standards would be revisited. He commended officers for the work completed to date on this project. |
|||
|
|
RESOLVED:
That the Committee notes the progress on Project Pencarrow as outlined in the report. Moved Cr Wheeler/Cr Sutton |
HVSC190104
CARRIED |
|
7. |