HuttCity_TeAwaKairangi_BLACK_AGENDA_COVER

 

 

 

21 March 2019

 

 

 

Order Paper for Council meeting to be held in the

Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt,

on:

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday 26 March 2019 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

Membership

 

 

Mayor W R Wallace (Chair)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs

Cr M Cousins

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich

Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne

Cr L Sutton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the dates and times of Council Meetings please visit www.huttcity.govt.nz


HuttCity_TeAwaKairangi_SCREEN_MEDRES
 

 

 

 


COUNCIL

 

Membership:

13 

Meeting Cycle:

Council meets on a six weekly basis (Extraordinary Meetings can be called following a resolution of Council; or on the requisition of the Chair or one third of the total membership of Council)

Power to (being a power that is not capable of being delegated)[1]:

        Make a rate.

        Make bylaws.

        Borrow money other than in accordance with the Long Term Plan (LTP).

        Purchase or dispose of assets other than in accordance with the LTP.

        Purchase or dispose of Council land and property other than in accordance with the LTP.

        Adopt the LTP, Annual Plan and Annual Report.

        Adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Act in association with the LTP or developed for the purpose of the Local Governance Statement.

        Appoint the Chief Executive.

        Exercise any powers and duties conferred or imposed on the local authority by the Public Works Act 1981 or the Resource Management Act 1991 that are unable to be delegated.

        Undertake all other actions which are by law not capable of being delegated.

        The power to adopt a Remuneration and Employment Policy.

Decide on:

Policy issues

        Adoption of all policy required by legislation.

        Adoption of policies with a city-wide or strategic focus.

District Plan

        Promotion of Plan Changes and Variations recommended by the District Plan Committee prior to public notification.

        The withdrawal of Plan Changes in accordance with clause 8D, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

        Approval, to make operative, of District Plan and Plan Changes (in accordance with clause 17, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991).

Representation, electoral and governance matters

        The method of voting for the Triennial elections.

        Representation reviews.

        Council’s Code of Conduct and Local Governance Statement.

        Elected Members Remuneration.

        The outcome of any extraordinary vacancies on Council.

        Any other matters for which a local authority decision is required under the Local Electoral Act 2001.

        All matters identified in these Terms of Reference as delegated to Council Committees (or otherwise delegated by the Council) and oversee those delegations.

        Council‘s delegations to officers and community boards.

Delegations and employment of the Chief Executive

The review and negotiation of the contract, performance agreement and remuneration of the Chief Executive.

Meetings and committees

        Standing Orders for Council and its committees.

        Council’s annual meeting schedule.

Operational matters

        The establishment and disposal of any Council Controlled Organisation or Council Controlled Trading Organisation and approval of annual Statements of Corporate Intent on the recommendation of the Finance and Performance Committee.

        Civil Defence Emergency Management Group matters requiring Council’s input.

        Road closing and road stopping matters.

        All other matters for which final authority is not delegated.

Appoint:

        The non-elected members of the Standing Committees (including extraordinary vacancies of non-elected representatives).

        The Directors of Council Controlled Organisations and Council Controlled Trading Organisations. 

        Council’s nominee on any Trust.

        Council representatives on any outside organisations (where applicable and time permits, recommendations for the appointment may be sought from the appropriate standing committee and/or outside organisations).

        The Chief Executive of Hutt City Council.

        Council’s Electoral Officer, Principal Rural Fire Officer and any other appointments required by statute.

 

    


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Ordinary meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 26 March 2019 commencing at 6.00pm.

 

ORDER PAPER

 

Public Business

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Generally up to 30 minutes is set aside for public comment (three minutes per speaker on items appearing on the agenda). Speakers may be asked questions on the matters they raise.

3.       Mayoral Statement (19/296)

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

5.       Committee Reports with Recommended Items

a)      Traffic Subcommittee

25 February 2019                                                                                          15

Recommended Items

Item 4i)     Muritai Road - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (18/1699)      16

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4ii)    Orr Crescent - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/47)       16

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4iii)   Naenae Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/57)      17

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4iv)   Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/67) 17

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4v)     Connolly Street - Proposed P60 Parking Restrictions (19/68) 18

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4vi)   Rutherford Street - Proposed P30 Parking Restrictions (19/73)           19

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4vii)  Amberley Grove - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions (19/76)           19

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4viii) Bristol Square - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions (19/89) 20

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4ix)   Eastern Hutt Road Proposed Parking Restriction on Omnibus Parking (19/182)      21

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4x)     Myrtle Street - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (19/203)        22

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

 

 

b)      Policy and Regulatory Committee

4 March 2019                                                                                                35

Recommended Item

Item 4i)     Revised Training Budget for Community Boards (19/208) 36

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

c)       City Development Committee

5 March 2019                                                                                                44

Recommended Item

Item 5)       Central City Transformation Plan (19/169)                          46

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

d)      Finance and Performance Committee

6 March 2019                                                                                              253

Recommended Items

Item 4i)     Wellington Water Limited's Shareholders Agreement and Constitution (19/205)     254

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4ii)    Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/166)                                                                                   257

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4iii)   Seaview Marina Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/167)      257

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

 

Item 4iv)   Urban Plus Group Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/168)      258

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed with a new part to read:

 

notes that as Council completes its Homelessness and Housing Strategies, the Statement of Intent may need to be reviewed and changed at a later date.”

 

e)      Recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee meeting dated 25 March 2019

Recommended Item

Item 4)       Homelessness - Council Contribution to Improving the Response to Homelessness in Lower Hutt (19/278)                                                                     

The recommendations will be tabled at the meeting

 

6.       Miscellaneous

a)      Triennial Local Authority Elections 2019 (19/259)

Report No. HCC2019/1/31 by the Electoral Officer                               390

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

b)      2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference (19/280)

Memorandum dated 8 March 2019 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services          394

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That part (i) be endorsed and a new part (ii) to read “nominates the Mayor and two Councillors to represent Hutt City Council at the 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference to be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019.”

c)       Membership of the Homelessness Working Group (19/293)

Memorandum dated 13 March 2019 by the Mayor                                 398

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

 

 

7.       Council MINUTES

11 December 2018                                                                                                400

14 January 2019                                                                                                   421

17 January 2019                                                                                                   423

12 February 2019                                                                                                 425

Extraordinary 27 February 2019                                                                         428

8.       Committee Reports without Recommended Items

a)      District Plan Committee

29 November 2018                                                                                     430

          Please note the recommended item was considered by Council at its meeting held on 29 November 2018

b)      Community Plan Committee

12 February 2019                                                                                        441

          Please note the recommended items were resolved by Council at its meeting held on 12 February 2019

c)       Hearings Panel

Hearings Panel Decision - 4-6 Bolton Street, Petone                                449

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That Council receives the decision from the Hearings Panel for 4-6 Bolton Street, Petone.”

 

d)      Hearing by Independent Commissioner

Decision 96A Witako Street, 79B Copeland Street, 51 Hall Crescent, Lower Hutt    492

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That Council receives the decision from the Independent Commissioner for 79B Copeland Street, 96A Witako Street and 51 Hall Crescent, Lower Hutt.”

 

 

e)      Hutt Valley Services Committee

1 March 2019                                                                                              541

 

f)       Community Services Committee

7 March 2019                                                                                              548

9.       Sealing Authority (18/1996)

Report No. HCC2019/1/13 by the Executive Assistant, Corporate Services 553

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

10.     QUESTIONS

With reference to section 32 of Standing Orders, before putting a question a member shall endeavour to obtain the information. Questions shall be concise and in writing and handed to the Chair prior to the commencement of the meeting.

11.     EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION:

 

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

12.     Committee Report withOUT Recommended Item

Finance and Performance Committee - 6 March 2019

13.     Council Minutes

11 December 2018 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/330)

14 January 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/300)

17 January 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/329)

Extraordinary 27 February 2019 (Restricted to Mayor and Councillors) (19/328)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Report of the Finance and Performance Committee held on 6 March 2019 – The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust – Six Monthly Report to 31 December 2018

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities(s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Council Minutes 11 December 2018 Purchase of Land Lowry Bay, Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Board Appointment of Director, Land Purchase Eastern Hills, Sale Negotiations, Strategic Structure Review

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Minutes of Council 14 January 2019 and 17 January 2019 – Recruitment of the Chief Executive

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Extraordinary Minutes of Hutt City Council 27 February 2019 – Update from the Chief Executive’s Employment Subcommittee – Appointment of the Chief Executive.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

         


24

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Traffic Subcommittee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

 Monday 25 February 2019 commencing at 3.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr Cousins (Chair)                      Cr Briggs        

                                           Cr Edwards (Deputy Chair)       Cr Lewis (from 3.04pm)

                                           Cr Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There was an apology received from Cr Barratt.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:        Mr D Simmons, Traffic Asset Manager

                                           Mr J Gloag, Divisional Manager, Transport (part meeting)

                                           Mr A Hopkinson, Senior Traffic Engineer

                                 Mr Z Moodie, Traffic Engineer – Network Operations

                                 Mr D Wood, Traffic Engineer 

                                 Ms D Male, Committee Advisor

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                                     Minute No. TRS 19101

“That the apology received from Cr Barratt be accepted and leave of absence be granted and the apology for late arrival received from Cr Lewis be accepted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

Cr Lewis joined the meeting at 3.04pm.

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS    

There were no conflict of interest declarations.    

Precedence of Business

Resolved:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                                     Minute No. TRS 19102

“That, in terms of Standing Order 10.4, precedence be accorded to item 4vii) dealing with Amberley Grove - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions and item 4ix) dealing with Eastern Hutt Road Proposed Parking Restriction on Omnibus Parking.”

The items are recorded in the order in which they were listed on the order paper.

4.       Recommendations to Council - 26 March 2019

i)

Muritai Road - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (18/1699)

 

The Traffic Engineer - Network Operations elaborated on the report.

 

Members noted that the Eastbourne Community Board endorsed the recommendations contained in the officer’s report at its meeting held on 19 February 2019.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Lewis)                        Minute No. TRS 19103

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)    approves the installation of a Mobility Parking Restriction outside Muritai School as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)   approves the installation of No Stopping at all Times Restrictions outside Muritai School as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

For the reasons that the proposed restrictions will improve the availability of mobility parking in the vicinity of the school.

ii)

Orr Crescent - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/47)

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.

Cr Lewis left the meeting at 3.43pm.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Briggs)         Minute No. TRS 19104

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions at the intersection of Orr Crescent and Epuni Street, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve road safety for the benefit of all road users; would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; would support Council’s Parking Policy 2017; and are supported by all of the local residents who responded to the consultation documents.

 

iii)

Naenae Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/57)

 

Cr Lewis rejoined the meeting at 3.44pm.

The Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that officers could consult with any affected residents and provide feedback at the Council meeting to be held on 26 March 2019. He noted this was in relation to extending the No Stopping At All Times restrictions to the corner of Gibson Crescent and Naenae Road.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)          Minute No. TRS 19105

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)            approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times restrictions on Naenae Road, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)          approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times restrictions on the western side of the corner of Gibson Crescent and Naenae Road, subject to officers consulting with any affected residents.

 

For the reasons the proposed restrictions: would prevent vehicles parking too close to driveways; would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; and are supported by the local residents who responded to the consultation documents.

iv)

Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (19/67)

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.

Cr Briggs left the meeting at 3.50pm.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Engineer – Network Operations advised that the road went from the bend into a 70km/h road. He highlighted that it was unlikely to be safe enough to provide off street parking in that area of road.

Cr Briggs rejoined the meeting at 3.51pm.

 

Members noted that the Petone Community Board endorsed the recommendations contained in the officer’s report at its meeting held on 18 February 2019.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Lewis/Cr Cousins)                        Minute No. TRS 19106

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)    approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions at the intersection of Gracefield Road and Seaview Road, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)   approves the relocation of the existing No Parking sign, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve safety within the street for the benefit of all road users; would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; and           are supported by all the local residents who responded to the consultation documents.

v)

Connolly Street - Proposed P60 Parking Restrictions (19/68)

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on Council’s Parking Policy hierarchy, which was dependent upon the area being defined as a live and play area or commercial area. He added that the area was a mixed area.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Engineer – Network Operations advised there was parking behind the building with some of the car parks allocated to the businesses in the immediate vicinity.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Sutton)         Minute No. TRS 19107

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of P60 parking restrictions over eight currently unrestricted parking spaces on Connolly Street, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve parking availability on the street for the benefit of all road users; support Council’s Parking Policy 2017; and are supported by the local residents who responded to the consultation documents.

 

 

vi)

Rutherford Street - Proposed P30 Parking Restrictions (19/73)

 

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that the parking was currently paid parking and the P30 would be free parks.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Engineer – Network Operations advised that there were some P30 parks in similar areas and more were planned for inbetween P120 and all day paid parks.

Cr Edwards expressed supported for option 9a. within the officer’s report to leave the area without any restrictions and to accept the current level of service for parking availability. 

Cr Lewis expressed support for the recommendation within the officer’s report.

Cr Briggs commented that he did not see the demand for P30 parking in the area and was in support of Cr Edwards’ comments.

 

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Sutton)         Minute No. TRS 19108

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council leaves the area as it is without any restrictions and accept the current level of service for parking availability on Rutherford Street, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”           

vii)

Amberley Grove - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions (19/76)

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr E Robinson advised that he had lived in Amberley Grove (the Grove) and in recent years parking had become an issue. He noted that workers from the local businesses on Kings Crescent often parked in the Grove for long periods along with commuters parking for six to eight hours a day. He expressed concern that the consultation letter stated a restriction for Monday to Friday from 8am-10am, when it should be from 8am-12pm or P120 for all day. He queried why, within the turning area on the Grove, there was a gap within the broken yellow lines.

In response to questions from members, Mr Robinson advised that most of the properties in the Grove had off street parking, with most residencies owning two cars and some had four cars. He added that commuter parking in the Grove restricted visitor parking, neighbouring streets had time restricted parking and residents wanted the same.

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report. He said that the time of the restriction had been increased to 12pm following the feedback from the consultation.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that the impact on the business in Kings Crescent should be minimal, as time restricted parking was installed in 2018 to improve parking turnover for the businesses.

MOVED: (Cr Edwards/Cr Briggs)

That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of P120 (Monday to Friday 8am to 12pm only) parking restrictions over three parking spaces on Amberley Grove.

Cr Edwards clarified that the three parks closest to the corner should have the time restrictions. He added that street parking was valuable public space, even if commuter parking was lower on Council’s Parking Policy hierarchy, it was still required.

The Chair suggested to add a 12 month review period to the motion. Crs Edwards and Briggs as mover and seconder of the motion agreed to include the wording.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Briggs)         Minute No. TRS 19109

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)       approves the installation of P120 (Monday to Friday 8am to 12pm only) parking restrictions over three parking spaces on Amberley Grove, closest to the corner of Kings Crescent, attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)     ask officers to review parking in the area in 12 months’ time.”

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve parking availability on the street for local residents and visitors;    would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; would support Council’s Parking Policy 2017; and are supported by the local residents who responded to the consultation documents.

viii)

Bristol Square - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions (19/89)

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)      Minute No. TRS 19110

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of P10 Pick up Drop off 8.30-9.00am and 2.30-3.15pm Monday-Friday School Days only parking restrictions over three currently unrestricted parking spaces on Bristol Square, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve accessibility and parking availability within the street for the benefit of all road users; would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; would support Council’s Parking Policy 2017; and are supported by the local residents who chose to respond to the consultation documents.

 

ix)

Eastern Hutt Road Proposed Parking Restriction on Omnibus Parking (19/182)

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Shierlaw said that officer’s recommendations contained in the report were merely a response to complaints on availability of parking in the area. He believed that there were no road safety issues and that there should not be an expectation of gaining parking in the area on public road space. He queried why the officer’s recommendations were only to prevent buses but not trucks parking in the area. He commented that the college students had a disregard for safe road crossing.

Speaking under public comment, Mr G Rutherford and Mrs L Rutherford elaborated on problems with the buses being parked on Eastern Hutt Road. They noted buses from Stokes Valley would not stop as the buses parked on the road were blocking the buses from pulling into the bus stop. When they were travelling from Stokes Valley to pull into Eldon Grove, they were concerned that an overtaking vehicle would crash into a parked bus. They had witnessed a few near misses with trucks passing the parked buses.

In response to questions from members, Mr and Mrs Rutherford advised that they did not know where the buses had recently been parking. They confirmed it was a safety issue, rather than an inconvenience issue.

 

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the report. He advised that 20 formal complaints had been received and additional complaints had been received through Council’s Customer Services team. He said that the bus parking restriction was proposed over a large area to ensure that the buses did not just move further down the road causing the same complaints. He noted that another bus company was establishing a depot in the area. He added that all the public feedback received had been negative in relation to parking of the buses, the bus company owner had provided feedback after the report had been finalised, the owner was against the proposal.

In response to a question from a member, the Traffic Engineer – Network Operations advised that only trucks were required to display a rear red light when parked at night.

In response to questions from members, the Traffic Asset Manager advised that buses would still be able to stop at the designated bus stops, provided that the vehicle was attended. He confirmed that a similar restriction had been put in place restricting trucks from parking on The Esplanade, Petone.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Sutton/Cr Edwards)         Minute No. TRS 19111

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)       approves the prohibition of Omnibus parking at all times on Eastern Hutt Road, between Peterkin Street and High Street and Eldon Grove, as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)     ask officers to review if the bus company move out of the area on Eastern Hutt Road; and

(iii)   asks officers to inform the Traffic Subcommittee if any consequential issues arise in surrounding areas to Eastern Hutt Road, following the installation of the prohibition of Omnibus parking at all Times.

 

For the reasons the proposed prohibition would: reduce the risk of vehicle conflict; improve accessibility for other road users including students at Taita College; prevent damage to the footpath, grass berm and underground services; and improve pedestrian accessibility and safety.

x)

Myrtle Street - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions (19/203)

 

The Traffic Engineer – Network Operations elaborated on the report.

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Sutton)         Minute No. TRS 19112

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)    approves the installation of a P60 Mobility Parking Restriction outside Ss Peter & Paul School, Myrtle Street as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)   approves the installation of No Stopping at all Times Restrictions outside Ss Peter & Paul School, Myrtle Street as shown attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

 

 

For the reasons, the proposed restrictions: would improve parking availability within the street for the benefit of all road users; would promote compliance with the Land Transport (Road User) Rule 2004; and would support Council’s Parking Policy 2017.

5.       Information Items

a)

Review of Parking - No Stopping At All Times Restriction - Richmond Grove (19/148)

Memorandum dated 30 January 2019 by the Senior Traffic Engineer

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the memorandum.

Members requested that officers include information on the demand for on street parking, when the report was brought back for the members’ consideration.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Sutton/Cr Cousins)                           Minute No. TRS 19113

“That the Traffic Subcommittee:

(i)    receives the information; and

(ii)   notes that officers will submit a report in Meeting Cycle 2 recommending the extension of the new No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Richmond Grove, as requested by the requester.”

b)

Review of Parking - Shepherd Grove (19/150)

Memorandum dated 7 February 2019 by the Traffic Asset Manager

 

Cr Briggs left the meeting at 4.17pm.

The Traffic Asset Manager elaborated on the memorandum.

Cr Briggs rejoined the meeting at 4.18pm.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Cousins)                       Minute No. TRS 19114

“That the Traffic Subcommittee:

(i)    receives the information; and

(ii)   notes that officers will subsequently submit a report recommending changing the existing P5 time restriction to a P10 or P15 restriction in Shepherd Grove.”

c)

Review of Parking - Near 313 Jackson Street (19/151)

Memorandum dated 31 January 2019 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations

 

The Traffic Engineer - Network Operations elaborated on the memorandum.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Lewis/Cr Cousins)                             Minute No. TRS 19115

“That the Traffic Subcommittee:

(i)    receives the information; and

(ii)   notes that no further action is taken at this time, although officers will likely review the parking in the area, near 313 Jackson Street, further once the effects of any changes to the bus stop are finalised and incorporated by Greater Wellington Regional Council.”

d)

Review of Parking - Gear Street Parking Restrictions (19/154)

Memorandum dated 4 February 2019 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations

 

The Traffic Engineer - Network Operations elaborated on the memorandum.

The Traffic Asset Manager informed members that the recent consent granted for new apartments in the vicinity could increase the demand on the unrestricted parking in Gear Street.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Edwards/Cr Cousins)                       Minute No. TRS 19116

“That the Traffic Subcommittee:

(i)    receives the information; and

(ii)   notes that officers will subsequently submit a report recommending further parking time restrictions on Gear Street.”

6.       QUESTIONS   

Cr Sutton raised a question relating to Eastern Hutt Road and making a safer crossing area to get to and from the train station.

The Traffic Asset Manager responded that there were pedestrian refuse islands in the area and the road was a collector road with a 70km/h speed restriction. He noted that the lighting in the area was soon to be upgraded to LED lights. However, with the road speeds a pedestrian crossing would not be considered due to safety reasons. He agreed to respond to Cr Sutton in writing to provide to the resident who raised the issue. 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 4.28pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cr MJ Cousins

CHAIR

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


Attachment 1

Muritai Road - Proposed Mobility Parking Restrictions 43.2018 18/1699 Cycle 1 2019

 


Attachment 1

Orr Crescent - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions

 

 


Attachment 1

182 Naenae Rd, Naenae - No stopping at all times markings

 


Attachment 1

Gracefield Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions

 

 


Attachment 1

Connolly Street - Proposed P60 Parking Restrictions

 


Attachment 1

Rutherford Street - Proposed P30 Parking Restrictions

 

 


Attachment 1

Amberley Grove - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions

 

 

 


Attachment 1

Bristol Square - Proposed P10 Parking Restrictions

 


Attachment 1

Eastern Hutt Road - Proposed Bus Parking Restrictions 12.2019 19/182 CYCLE 1 2019

 


Attachment 1

Myrtle Street - Proposed Mobility Carpark 37.2018 19/203 Cycle 1 2019

 

 


39

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Policy and Regulatory Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

 Monday 4 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                         Cr MJ Cousins (Chair)               Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett             Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                    Cr S Edwards (Deputy Chair)

                                             Cr T Lewis                                   Cr M Lulich

                                             Cr C Milne (from 5.36pm)          Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  Mayor WR Wallace

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

                                          Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation

Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services

Mr J Scherzer, Sustainability and Resilience Manager

Mr G George, Manager, Trade Waste

Mr J Hoyle            , Communications and Marketing Advisor

Ms J Randall, Committee Advisor

 

 

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                                      Minute No. PRC 19101

 “That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS        

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

 

 

4.       Recommendation to Council - 26 March 2019

 

Revised Training Budget for Community Boards (19/208)

In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive advised proposed revisions to the Training Budget Policy were to address a specific point raised rather than as part of a full review of the policy.

Members agreed the proposed amendments made sense. They noted there were no financial implications. They considered the amendments allowed Boards to manage their budgets in a way that worked best for them and their communities.

 

 

RECOMMENDED:    (Cr Briggs/Cr Edwards)        Minute No. PRC 19102

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes and receives the revised Training Policy for Community Boards attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(ii)   adopts the revised Training Policy for Community Boards attached as Appendix 1 to the report.

 

5.

Update on Strategic Waste Reviews and the Review of the Refuse Collection and Disposal Bylaw 2008 (19/152)

Report No. PRC2019/1/11 by the Sustainability and Resilience Manager

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms S Nem, the Chair of Youth Council, expressed concern with waste issues and their impact on young people.

She noted it was important to reduce waste, particularly the large amount of construction and demolition waste. She asked for more initiatives to encourage the recovery of this waste. She agreed there were a lack of incentives to encourage waste management and she recognised that investigating possible initiatives was key. She added this would provide an opportunity for innovative ideas and potentially jobs for young people. She suggested the Innovative Young Minds programme could be used for this purpose. She noted many young people attended the programme and would welcome a project to work on.

Ms Nem considered the report raised important issues. She advised Youth Council would be investigating the impact of waste on young people and ways to reduce it. She said Youth Council would like to create a more sustainable environment for Lower Hutt.

In response to questions from a member, Ms Nem advised Youth Council had no specific initiatives planned yet, but intended discussing ideas and recommending solutions on behalf of the young people of Lower Hutt.

Ms Nem was thanked for her presentation and for the work of Youth Council for Lower Hutt.

The Sustainability and Resilience Manager elaborated on the report. In response to questions from members, the Sustainability and Resilience Manager advised there were examples of ways to recycle constuction and demolition waste within New Zealand but he noted that in Wellington there was nothing to incentivise industry to do this. He noted in the Wellington region there were a number of quarries with easy access to industry and waste levies were low. He suggested a higher regional waste levy would send the right signals and create the necessary incentives to a wider market. He added the creation of a bylaw that was consistent across local Councils would require industry to create plans and would send a joint message to industry. He considered there was an opportunity for Council to take a leadership role in procurement by ensuring Council contractors planned for recovery of waste. 

In response to questions from members, the Sustainability and Resilience Manager considered developing a waste recovery centre would not be useful without incentives. He welcomed involvement from representatives of Youth Council at an upcoming workshop on the review and also at the consultation stage of the review. He advised the main issues with construction and demolition material were the embedded carbon it contained and the landfill and cleanfill space it occupied. He added there was increasing social pressure to take action on the issue. He said Council did not hold data on the volume of wastestreams at cleanfills. He confirmed materials needed to be separated early in the process for waste recovery to be effective.

In response to questions from members, the Sustainability and Resilience Manager said the process of working through issues and consultation would continue throughout the year. He expected a proposed bylaw, ideally in conjunction with other Councils, to be ready by early 2020. He acknowledged Councils would experience different challenges in implementing a bylaw. He noted that finding the best way to give effect to a regional procurement policy would be a challenge for Councils. He advised this would be discussed further at an upcoming Councillor workshop.

The Sustainability and Resilience Manager was thanked for his detailed work on the issue. The Chair noted a more detailed workshop held in conjunction with other local Councils would take place on 14 March 2019.

 

Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Briggs)                                       Minute No. PRC 19103

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes the progress on three strategic projects to review our waste management system;

(ii)   notes Tonkin & Taylor Ltd’s report regarding construction and demolition waste, and the options available to councils in the Wellington region to address them;

(iii) notes the information on waste management and minimisation issues that have been identified so far for Lower Hutt, with an opportunity to discuss these in more detail at a workshop on 14 March 2019;

(iv)  notes that officers are continuing to work with the other Councils in the Wellington region to support the Waste Management and Minimisation Plan’s (WMMP) action to “investigate and if feasible,

       develop … a regional bylaw or a suite of regionally consistent bylaws;
    

(v)   notes that draft bylaw provisions could be made available for Council consideration by the middle of 2019; and

(vi)  formally invites the Youth Council to a workshop on the issue on 14 March 2019.”

6.

General Manager's Report (19/63)

Report No. PRC2019/1/12 by the General Manager City Transformation

 

Cr Lewis advised the Whaitua Committee had held their first meeting on Matiu/Somes Island recently. She said the group would be working on a report and expected it to be completed in two years’ time. She noted members of the Whaitua Committee were in contact with their communities and would be taking that community knowledge with them to meetings.

The General Manager, City Transformation elaborated on the report. She advised local earthquake prone buildings with expired notices were currently being inspected by officers. She said officers would assess the condition and circumstances of each building and take actions that could range from infringement notices to prosecution. She added that Councillors would be advised if any prosecutions ensued.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, City Transformation said said she did not have detail on whether all the buildings were occupied or unoccupied. She highlighted it was a factor officers would take into account before deciding on actions. She said officers might issue notices but full assessments needed to be completed first.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, City Transformation said it was possible the contract with Lime Scooters might be renegotiated when the current one had expired.

In response to questions from members, the Manager, Trade Waste said it was not feasible or sustainable to install litter traps in all areas of Lower Hutt. He considered the traps would provide better value if strategically placed in areas where there was less leaf litter and more waste litter. He noted the Litter Act was onerous to enforce and warnings needed to be given before infringements could be issued.  The General Manager, City Transformation agreed to find out how many infringements had been issued for litter and cigarette butts.

In response to questions from members, the Sustainability and Resilience Manager emphasised the trial of litter traps discussed in the report was based on only six weeks of data. He advised officers intended extending the trial into industrial and residential areas to determine where priority areas were, the amount of litter and which outlets would be the most effective for trial of litter traps. He added officers would develop a business case for the project. He said without the litter taps most of the litter would have flushed into the harbour. He agreed an effective campaign to change behaviour would be needed once the project was completed.

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                                      Minute No. PRC 19104

“That the Committee notes the contents of this report.”

 

7.       Information Item

Policy and Regulatory Committee Work Programme (19/64)

Report No. PRC2019/1/21 by the Committee Advisor

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                 Minute No. PRC 19105

“That the programme be noted and received.”

8.       QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 6.27pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cr MJ Cousins

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


Attachment 1

Revised Training Policy for Community Boards2019

 

 

 


training policy for community boards

1.         Purpose

The purpose of ensuring that Community Board members have access to training is to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of Boards in representing the interests of their specific community and supporting Council in its governance role by facilitating local input into Council’s decision-making processes.

The Training Policy (the policy) for Community Boards should be read in conjunction with the Code of Conduct for Elected Members. 

2.         PRINCIPLES

The following principles underpin Hutt City Council’s approach to the training and development of Community Board members.

 

·           Training begins with the induction of Community Board members.  Newly elected members will come from a variety of backgrounds and have differing degrees of training needs when they take up their role.

·           Community Board members will have ongoing training and professional development needs which should be met to ensure they are able to fulfil their roles.

·           Because having inadequately trained Community Board members is potentially more costly than providing training, Hutt City Council will invest in training.

·           Any training undertaken must relate to the roles and responsibilities of each individual Community Board member.

·           Funding will be available for training which meet the criteria contained in this policy.  Funding will not be available for any training outside of those criteria.

3.         Financial support

Community Board members are eligible for financial support for training and development.  Such training and development may include on-demand webinars, development videos, formal training courses, attendance at seminars or attendance at relevant conferences in addition to training or information provided during induction.

A maximum cap of $3,000 per financial year for each Community Board will be applied.  The maximum amount Council will pay towards the training needs and work programme of any one Community Board member is $1,500 per financial year.

There will be an overall training budget of $9,000 available to meet the training needs and work programme requirements of Community Boards each financial year.

Financial support may include the cost of attending the training courses, seminars, forums or conferences and other events and the related costs of travel and accommodation, if the training is not held in Wellington.

LGNZ courses at the beginning of each triennium are provided to members at no cost to their budget - this is funded through the induction training budget for elected members.

 

Community Boards’ Conference

The Community Boards’ Conference is held every two years.  More than one Community Board member can attend if still within the overall training budget and any expenditure beyond budget be personally funded.  Approval requires a formal decision as part of their Community Board meeting.

The number of Community Board members being funded through the training budget to attend the biennial Community Boards’ conference is limited to one per Board. 

 

4.         Procedure for applying for financial support

Consideration and Approval

 

          Any request for funding must first be made to the relevant Board for consideration and approval.  When making the decision to either approve or decline the request for professional development Boards must have regard to:

 

·           The purpose and principles of the Training Policy

·           the skills make up of Board members

·           the skills required; and

·           the amount of assistance requested with reference to the amount of training budget available.

 

The Board may approve any request for funding up to $750.  They must advise the Divisional Manager Secretariat Services Divisional Manager Democratic Services directly of any requests and approvals.  They must also make a formal decision as part of their Community Board meeting.  The request must be placed on the relevant Board agenda for discussion.

 

Requests to attend formal training courses, seminars, forums or conferences and other events with a value over $750 (other than the Community Boards’ Conference) are to be made by the Chair or Deputy Chair of the Board in writing to the Divisional Manager Democratic Services General Counsel for a decision with a recommendation regarding whether or not the request should be approved based on the training criteria.

 

Any member attending a training course, conference, seminar or similar event will be required to provide a written report and evaluation to:

 

·           The relevant Board in a form agreed in advance and

·           The Divisional Manager Secretariat Democratic Services.

 

5.         criteria and basis for approval

The criteria and basis for any approval for financial support to be given for training and development under this policy are as follows:

 

·       The training course is either specified in Schedule A of this policy OR relates directly to the specific Community Board member’s duties and responsibilities that are not covered in Schedule A; and

·       Related to knowledge and successes including acceptance of recognition and prizes where this is relevant to the Community Board activity.

 

 

 

 

6.      Procedure for applying for financial support for longer term training courses

 

All requests for financial support to attend longer-term training courses are to be made in writing to the General Manager Corporate Services General Counsel for a decision.  Additional guiding principles when making a decision in this situation are:

 

·      what is the overall duration of the course; and

·      the point of time in the triennium when the training is requested.

 

Financial support, if approved, is capped at 50% of total costs (and within the maximum stated above). 

 


 

 

 

SCHEDULE a

 

APPROVED TRAINING

Approval may be given by the relevant Board for attendance at any of the following courses:

Induction

·      This includes Hutt City Council’s normal induction process for Elected Members.

·      Chair and Deputy Chair training

 

LGNZ Courses – Local Government Equip

A series of two day workshops to bring new members up to speed and refresh longer serving members are held shortly after local government elections.  Designed for all members, whether from district, city and regional Councils or Community Boards, the programme draws on a broad range of sector expertise and up-to-date information.  Topics covered include:

·      understanding the local government system

·      role of members

·      introduction to the Local Government Act

·      decision-making

·      long-term planning

·      consultation

·      regulation and the Resource Management Act

·      funding

·      putting democracy into practice - ethics, conflicts of interest and freedom of information.

This training provides knowledge about legislation and council processes to ‘get started'. 

Members may also attend other LGNZ Professional Development Courses that:

·      are relevant to the role they are playing as a Board member eg Chair, Deputy Chair, events, community development

·      add to their level of experience and expertise as a Community Boards member and

·      grow the engagement/consultation skills of members

·      grow the technical/financial skill sets of members relevant to the role they play on the Board

 

http://www.lgnz.co.nz/equip/training/

 

 


55

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

City Development Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 5 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 

PRESENT:

Acting Mayor D Bassett (Chair)

Cr G Barratt

 

Cr C Barry (until 6.37pm)

Cr M J Cousins

 

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

 

Cr M Lulich

Cr C Milne

 

Cr L Sutton (Acting Chair)

 

 

APOLOGIES:                  Apologies received from Mayor Wallace and Cr McDonald

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)

Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation  

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services

Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services (part meeting)

Mr G Craig, Divisional Manager, City Growth (part meeting)

Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager (part meeting)

Mr C Gousmett, Corporate Information Manager (part meeting)

Ms J Henton, City Archivist (part meeting)

Mr A Hopkinson, Senior Traffic Engineer (part meeting)

Ms D Male, Committee Advisor

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:  (Cr Barratt/Acting Mayor Bassett)                        Minute No. CDC 19101

“That the apologies received from Mayor Wallace and Cr McDonald be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.

 

Precedence of Business

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)                        Minute No. CDC 19102

“That, in terms of Standing Order 10.4, precedence be accorded to item 7 dealing with Technology Valley Six Monthly Update to 31 December 2018.”

The items are recorded in the order in which they were listed on the order paper. 

3.       Presentation

Presentation by the Southend Business Group on the Marketing Plan (19/199)   

Cr Barry left the meeting at 6.37pm.

Ms Andrea Thompson, from Baseline and Mr Michael Gray, owner of Buzz Café gave a presentation which highlighted:

·           the key objectives were to create an identity and brand for the southern entrance to High Street and to fill empty shops in the area;

·           creating zones, to include shared paths, green zones, utilising existing signage, new branded signage and new stencilling on the ground;

·           to create steps up to the existing green areas in Andrews Avenue; and

·           there were three stages to the project, which had received funding from Council and reviewing gaining funding from business owners. The timeframes for Stage 1 was the end of May 2019, Stage 2 was the end of August 2019 and Stage 3 was the end of December 2019.

In response to a question from a member, Ms Thompson advised that the funding already received from Council covered Stage 1 of the project. She noted that larger costs were likely in Stage 2 of the project.

Cr Barratt congratulated the group. She commented that it looked like a fun and innovative way to revitalise the southern end of High Street.

Cr Lewis left the meeting at 6.54pm.

The Chief Executive advised that requests for funding would be timely with the upcoming Annual Plan process.

Cr Lewis rejoined the meeting at 6.56pm.

The Chair commented that it would be timely for a report to be received at the next Committee meeting, prior to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Gray advised that it was difficult to get all interested parties together for discussions. He noted the aim was to get life back into the southern end of High Street.

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS      

There were no conflict of interst declarations.

5.       Recommendation to Council - 26 March 2019

 

Central City Transformation Plan (19/169)

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr R Veldman representing Hutt City Youth Council wanted housing available for all levels of income. He believed that housing worked best with a mixture of income levels in the area. He wanted to encourage safe and direct cycleways throughout the CBD, which required many stops with rails. He thought that a bridge across the river should directly link the CBD to the train station.

Speaking under public comment, Ms W Bailey representing Hutt City Youth Council supported what was written in the development of District Plan Change 43 in relation to the Central City Transformation Plan. She supported medium density housing with the CBD for a wide variety and diverse range of people. She supported reducing the speed limit to 30km/h in the CBD to improve the efficiency of public transport and to make it safer for pedestrians.

The Chair said that he would be interested in a submission from the Youth Council on their issues raised as part of the Annual Plan process to either the Community Plan Committee or Council.

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young said that he had attended the community workshops and believed the Central City Transformation Plan (CCTP) was blue sky thinking and not linked to the realities of Council decisions. With regard to the Civic Precinct expansion part of CCTP, he believed that a lot of money had already been spent on this and it should be given a lower priority. He considered it would allow the private business owners to decide what to do with their land in the Civic Precinct expansion area. He added that there was dormant potential in the bus network and the wording in the plan suggested it would not be improved. He commented that the bus precinct around Queensgate was not attractive for use, he would like to see a good quality bus hub investigated and a focus on the core transport network.

The Chair asked officers to open discussions with Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) on the issue of a bus hub and report back to the Committee in due course. He asked that the report be added to the Committee’s work programme.

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms G Anderson MP congratulated Council on the Civic Precinct and asked how this could be expanded to be reflected throughout the rest of the city. She said that the CCTP excluded areas outside the CBD which could be considered for quality housing. She said that the challenge was to be more daring on discussions of housing and focus on the long term benefits.

In response to questions from members, Ms Anderson MP said that the topic of homelessness was up for Council debate, when Council had land which could be used for housing. She informed members that the new 300 homes to be built in Epuni had some delays due to adjustments related to affordable homes. She noted that confirmation was coming from Housing New Zealand and she expected that building work would commerce before the end of the year.

Cr Cousins informed members that there was a workshop arranged on the Homelessness Strategy to be held on 12 March 2019, prior to the matter being discussed at the Policy and Regulatory Committee meeting to be held on 25 March 2019.

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Dr D Thorburn, Clinical Director, representing Te Awakairangi Health Network. He advised the network was a primary care provider to thousands of Lower Hutt residents. He advised of the benefits for health and wellbeing for residents of turning the city towards the river and nature, together with mixed lane use for cyclists. He added that Council in its planning could have a big and profound effect on residents. He highlighted the challenges in the area, of equity for minorities and the effect of diabetes. He believed that the scoping stage offered a great opportunity to put resources to support the wellbeing of communities to make a difference. He thought that Council should be encouraging playing within the CBD with free activities and also to create health options within Naenae and Wainuiomata.

In response to questions from members, Dr Thorburn said that urban design and internal planning and design could impact health and wellbeing for residents. He said that he had just started in his role in the Hutt Valley and he had been reviewing the information gathered, such as the statistics on obesity and equity gaps.

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms H Down, Chief Executive, representing the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce & Industry Incorporated (HVCC) advised that an interactive workshop had been held and HVCC members were pleased to have the opportunity to make a difference. She said that the health and housing discussions were being reflected by the business community and turning the city to the river was strongly supported, with walkway arounds the city. She believed the plan gave a one-off opportunity to create an identity for the city, with iconic bridges and art structures etc, to create social media photograph opportunities. She thought this would help to build the reputation both nationally and internationally of the city, with the potential for increased tourism. She reiterated concerns around parking for workers who lived outside city with the transport infrustructure being important, which was a barrier for businesses moving to the city. She supported moving the Melling bridge towards Margaret Street, as an important part of linking the CBD to Wellington CBD.

 

 

The Urban Design Manager elaborated on the report. He added that a bus hub could be considered when a decision was made on the location of the train station.

In response to questions from members, the Urban Design Manager advised that some early implementation projects could go ahead which would not require consent, prior to RiverLink. He said that there was a need to understand the full laneway system. He added that some parts of RiverLink were dependent upon GWRC land use. He further advised that there was opportunity to work with interested parties on where work commenced and how far reaching it could be.

In response to further questions from members, the Urban Design Manager advised that there was work to do with the community and with other interested parties, which included partners. He added that the CCTP had differing triggers, which included RiverLink, to review the bus interchange and the beltway interchange.

The Chair thanked officers for their work on the CCTP and their work with businesses, residents, GWRC and the New Zealand Transport Agency.

 

 

 

 

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)     Minute No. CDC 19103

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    approves the Central City Transformation Plan as Council’s long term strategy for the Central City for the reason that it updates and supersedes CBD Making Places 2030 approved by Council in 2009, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)   notes the Central City Transformation Plan affects neighbouring areas and that more work will be needed to better understand opportunities for the Western Hill suburbs; and

(iii)  notes that the Central City Transformation Plan is not a design and that any implementation will involve due diligence to test ideas, where appropriate with stakeholders and the community.”

 

 

Resolved:  (Cr Cousins/Cr Barratt)                                 Minute No. CDC 19104

“That the Committee agrees to add to the City Development Committee work programme an item to identify the southern entrance to the City.”

 

6.

Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce Six Monthly Report to 31 December 2018 (19/201)

Report No. CDC2019/1/22 by the Divisional Manager City Growth

 

The Divisional Manager City Growth elaborated on the report.

Ms Helen Down, Chief Executive, Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce & Industry Incorporated (HVCC) and Mr Mark Skelly, Vice President, HVCC elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive, HVCC advised that transport infrustructure was the top issue identified in the recent business confidence survey. She further advised the second was labour shortages, with shortages of both skilled and unskilled staff and 44%, which had increase from the September survey conducted. She said that construction and trades and also marketing and hospitality were industries which were experiencing skills shortages, which stopped the growth of businesses unable to take on additional work. She added that HVCC members were keen to provide on-site skills based training.

 

The Chief Executive advised that he was co-opted onto the Board of HVCC. He highlighted he was not part of the reporting or contract negotiations, but was there to help improve the synergies with HVCC and Council. He congratulated HVCC on its remarkable transformation to be in the position it was currently.

The Vice President, HVCC commented that the health of the community was important to HVCC. He saw the role of HVCC to consider the employees within the Hutt Valley, not just to focus on business owners.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                        Minute No. CDC 19105

“That the Committee receives the report.”

 

For the reason the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce is required to report six monthly to this Committee on performance against agreed performance measures.

7.

Technology Valley Six Monthly Update to 31 December 2018 (19/194)

Report No. CDC2019/1/23 by the STEMM Sector Development Manager

 

Ms Anthea Armstrong, Executive Director of Technology Valley Inc. (TV) elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, Cr Milne, Chair of the TV Board, advised that a management group had emerged and the governance structure would be streamlined.

In response to a question from a member, the Executive Director, TV advised that TV may need to diversify income streams, rather than relying on membership fees. She hoped they would be better placed at the same time next year. The Chair of the TV Board added that contact had been made with the Silicon Valley Forum, which had matured and did not have membership as a revenue stream. He said that TV’s biggest challenge was to get the brand in common usage.

In response to a question from a member, the Executive Director, TV advised that Callaghan Innovations was committed to localised identity and brand. He also advised there was potential for the TV brand to be used with its Gracefield Campus.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                    Minute No. CDC 19106

“That the Committee receives the report.”

8.

Options for Exhibition Spaces (19/141)

Report No. CDC2019/1/24 by the Corporate Information Manager

 

Cr Sutton left the meeting at 7.51pm.

The Corporate Information Manager and the City Archivist elaborated on the report.

 

Cr Sutton rejoined the meeting at 7.52pm.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Information Officer advised that The Dowse Art Museum (the Dowse) was a fine arts museum and community archives did not fit into that profile. The Corporate Information Manager added that The Dowse planned its exhibitions years in advance. He highlighted the Dowse was a highly skilled and professional institution, where the archives exhibition planning had previously been more ad hoc. The City Archivist further added that the new Museums Director wanted The Dowse to continue to focus on fine arts and he saw the importance of community history in a different exhibition space.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Information Officer advised that a move to the new archives storage facility would be when the lease ended at the current location. He noted a report would be received in approximately 18 months time to be considered in time for Council’s next Long Term Plan.

Members commented on using the community hubs for exhibitions as previous exhibitions had been well received.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                    Minute No. CDC 19107

“That the Committee:

(i)    receives the report;

(ii)   notes the options listed;

(iii)  notes the model for future funding for exhibitions;

(iv)  notes the outline plan for archives exhibition themes; and

(v)   wishes the Corporate Information Manager well in his retirement.”

 

For the reason that these are the best options available given limitations of staffing, funding and facilities until such time as a permanent Archives facility incorporating its own exhibition space is available.

9.

General Managers' Report (19/27)

Report No. CDC2019/1/25 by the Development Planning Liaison Manager

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr B Aschebrock wanted to know when the Wainuiomata hill works would be completed. He noted the barrier in place for the shared path was stopping trucks and other vehicles from being able to stop on the shoulder of the hill road.

The Chair said that officers would be asked to respond back directly to Mr Aschebrock.

Speaking under public comment, Ms L Dobbs, Chair, representing Jackson Street Programme (JSP) provided an update on Petone 2040 (P2040) and elaborated on work on a colour palate for heritage, which could then be used throughout the street. She advised that a report was due at the end of March, then tenders would then be sought for repairs and painting works, with scaffolding costs to be managed. She confirmed that the timeframe was for works to commence in April and be completed by the end of May 2019.

 

In response to a question from a member, the Divisional Manager, City Growth advised that the developer of the social housing apartments at 2-14 Laings Road had been placed into liquidation.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, City Transformation advised that the water feature in Riddiford Garden had not worked correctly and had issues with draining into the stream. The Chief Executive added that the drainage system could not cope with the water flow, which was a flaw that the contractor was responsible for correcting.

The Chair requested that further information be sought on the issue and an update be provided to members.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, City Transformation advised that the RICOH Sports Centre, Fraser Park had a Certificate of Public Use issued for the centre, but did not include the changing rooms and the opening was planned for 11 March with a community open day to be held two weeks later.

The General Manager, Corporate Services reminded members that representatives from Hutt City Community Facilities Trust would be present at the Finance and Performance Committee meeting to be held on 6 March 2019.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Milne)                     Minute No. CDC 19108

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes the updates contained in the report; and

(ii)   notes that a report on the options available for Hutt Valley Tennis will be presented to its meeting to be held on 30 April 2019.”

10.

Closure of Laings Road and Queens Drive for Civic Anzac Day Ceremonies 2019 (19/188)

Report No. CDC2019/1/27 by the Senior Traffic Engineer

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.

Cr Milne queried if it was possible to review giving officers the delegation or some other way, to approve road closures for annual events for the following three years.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)                   Minute No. CDC 19109

“That the Committee:

(i)    agrees to approve the following proposed temporary road closures, subject to the conditions listed in the Proposed Temporary Road Closure Impact Report, attached as Appendix 1 to the report:

(a)   Anzac Day Dawn Parade

Laings Road from Myrtle Street to Queens Drive, and Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 05:00am to 07:00am, attached as Appendix 2 to the report; and

(b)   Anzac Day Civic Service and Wreathlaying Ceremony

Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 08:00am to 11:00am, attached as Appendix 3 to the report;

(ii)   agrees to rescind, for the Anzac Day ceremonies, the parking restrictions on Laings Road and Queens Drive as follows:

(a)   Anzac Day Dawn Parade

Laings Road from Myrtle Street to Queens Drive, and Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 05:00am to 07:00am; and

(b)   Anzac Day Civic Service and Wreathlaying Ceremony

Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 08:00am to 11:00am; and

(iii)  agrees to impose the following No Stopping At All Times restrictions:

(a)   Anzac Day Dawn Parade

Laings Road from Myrtle Street to Queens Drive, both sides and Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street, both sides; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 05:00am to 07:00am; and

(b)   Anzac Day Civic Service and Wreathlaying Ceremony 

Queens Drive from Laings Road to High Street; on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 08:00 am to 11:00 am.”

 

For the reasons:

·     the proposed road closures are required to accommodate the Anzac Day Ceremonies; and

·     no complaints have been received in relation to previous years’ closures.

 

11.

Closure of Muritai Road for the Eastbourne Memorial Returned Services Association Anzac Day Event 2019 (19/196)

Report No. CDC2019/1/28 by the Senior Traffic Engineer

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Barratt/Acting Mayor Bassett)                   Minute No. CDC 19110

“That the Committee:

(i)    agrees to approve the following proposed temporary road closure, subject to the conditions listed in the Proposed Temporary Road Closure Impact Report, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, at Muritai Road between Rimu Street and Makaro Street, on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 09:30am to 11:00am, attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(ii)   agrees to rescind, for the annual Eastbourne Memorial Returned Services Association Anzac Day Event 2019, parking restrictions on both sides of Muritai Road, between Rimu Street and Makaro Street, on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 09:30am to 11:00am; and

(iii)  agrees to impose No Stopping At All Times restrictions, for the annual Eastbourne Memorial Returned Services Association Anzac Day Event 2019, on both sides of Muritai Road, between Rimu Street and Makaro Street, on Thursday 25 April 2019 from 09:30am to 11:00am.”

 

For the reasons:

·     the proposed road closures are required to accommodate the annual Eastbourne Memorial Returned Services Association Anzac Day Event 2019; and

·     closures for previous year’s events have not solicited any complaints from the public.

12.

Proposed Temporary Road Closures: Tumeke Taita Festival 2019 and Hutt Valley Motorsport Club Silverstream Hill Climb 2019 (19/200)

Report No. CDC2019/1/29 by the Senior Traffic Engineer

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)                   Minute No. CDC 19111

“That the Committee agrees to approve the following proposed temporary road closures subject to the conditions listed in the Proposed Temporary Road Closure Impact Reports, attached as Appendix 1 and 3 to the report:

(i)    Tumeke Taita Festival 2019

Tocker Street from Molesworth Street, to a point 98 metres east of Molesworth Street, on Saturday 16 March 2019, from 7:00am to 5:00pm, for the Annual Tumeke Taita Festival, attached as Appendix 1 and 2 to the report; and

(ii)   Hutt Valley Motorsport Club Silverstream Hillclimb Event 2019  

Reynolds Bach Drive from a point 135 metres south of Eastern Hutt Road to the end, on Good Friday, 19 April 2019, from 7:00am to 6:00pm, for the Hutt Valley Motorsport Club Silverstream Hillclimb Event attached as Appendices 3 and 4 to the report.”

 

For the reasons:

·     the proposed road closures are expected to have minimal impact on the movement of traffic; and

·     no complaints have been received in relation to previous years’ closures.

13.

Proposed New Private Street Name: Subdivision of 237-241 Waterloo Road, Waterloo (19/230)

Report No. CDC2019/1/45 by the Traffic Engineer - Network Operations

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                        Minute No. CDC 19112

“That the Committee approves the name for the new private road at 237-241 Waterloo Road, Waterloo, Lower Hutt attached as Appendix 1 to the report, as Rose Way.”

14.     Information Item

 

City Development Committee Work Programme (19/28)

Report No. CDC2019/1/30 by the Committee Advisor

 

The Chair noted the request to add an item on a City bus hub and an item to identify the southern entrance to the City to the work programme.

 

Resolved:  (Acting Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)               Minute No. CDC 19113

“That the work programme be noted and received.”

15.     QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.21pm.

 

 

 

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019


Attachment 1

DRAFT Central City Transformation Plan Part 1 and 2

 


 


266

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Finance and Performance Committee

 

Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

 Wednesday 6 March 2019 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr C Milne (Chair)                       Cr C Barry (until 6.49pm)

                                          Cr G Barratt                                  Acting Mayor D Bassett

                                          Cr J Briggs                                     Cr MJ Cousins

                                          Cr S Edwards                               Cr M Lulich

                                          Cr L Sutton (Deputy Chair)        

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Mayor Wallace.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Cr G McDonald (part meeting)

Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)

                                          Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services

Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services

Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)

Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City & Community Services (part meeting)

Mr B Cato, General Counsel

Ms H Stringer, Rates and Receivables Team Leader (part meeting)

Mr R Newton, Business Transformation Manager (part meeting)

Ms H Clegg, Minute Taker  

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                                Minute No. FPC 19101

“That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS      

Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 4iii) and 8 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 4i), 4iv) and 9 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.

Cr Cousins declared a conflict on interest in relation to items 4ii) and 13 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.

Precedence of Business

Resolved(Cr Milne/Cr Briggs)                                               Minute No. FPC 19102

“That, in terms of Standing Order 10.4, precedence be accorded to items 10a), 10b) 5, 6, 7, 10c), 10d), 8 and 9 for the purpose of the most expeditious order of business, to allow for the later arrival of key personnel for certain items and to permit officers to leave the meeting immediately after their relevant items.”

The items are recorded in the order in which they were listed on the order paper.

4.       Recommendations to Council - 26 March 2019

i)

Wellington Water Limited's Shareholders Agreement and Constitution (19/205)

 

Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in voting on the matter.

 

The Chair elaborated on the report.  He advised that he supported the change to both the Constitution and Shareholders’ Agreement, in relation to the ability to bring in new shareholding Councils.  Regarding the mana whenua representation provisions, he noted that other Councils were seeking legal advice and he considered that the item should lie on the table, pending receipt of the advice.  He noted that numerous versions of the proposed changes to the report were circulating and he believed that members should be considering the correct and final version of the report.

The Chief Executive elaborated on the report.  He explained the proposed changes required unanimous support of all the shareholdering Councils.  He advised that a theme was coming from Central Government which legislated for Civil Defence management to include Iwi representation on governing bodies for civil defence, both regionally and nationally. He confirmed that GWRC had sought further legal advice concerning the introduction of up to three Iwi representatives to participate on the Wellington Water Committee (WWC).  He advised the introduction would not result in a loss of control for shareholdering Councils and would represent a valuable gesture to our Treaty partners with their participation in the decision-making regarding water.  He also advised that his advice to members was to agree to the recommendations as outlined in his report.

 

The Chair expressed concern with the proposed changes.  He noted there was no reference to the limit of up to three Iwi representatives and there appeared to be no protection for shareholdering Councils with mana whenua appointees having equal voting rights.  He highlighted that anyone could claim to be mana whenua.

The Chief Executive acknowledged that he may have got the limit of three representatives from the Civil Defence documents.  He noted that each representative would be required to be individually considered and appointed.

The General Counsel advised that WWC’s Terms of Reference had been included in the final report being brought before the Committee.  He stated that the number of mana whenua representatives could not outnumber the number of shareholding Councils present at meetings. He confirmed that he had spoken with officers at GWRC.  They had advised that GWRC had no specific issue with the documents but asked that the proposed constitutional changes be approved by an independent legal firm prior to their Council’s approval.

In response to questions from members, the Chair elaborated on his concerns.  He advised that at the draft agenda meeting he had requested the officer to expand on the specific benefits mana whenu would bring to the City by participating in the WWC meetings and highlighted that had not occurred.  He also advised the proposed changes appeared to be a dilution of the shareholding Councils control and WWC was a governance entity not an operational entity.  He considered that Iwi had special rights under the Resource Management Act and that by affording them a place at the WWC table amounted to a double level of representation resulting in a conflict in policy decisions.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive explained it was proposed that Iwi participate on WWC with limited voting rights and there was no changes proposed to the Board of Wellington Water Limited (WWL). He acknowledged the concerns raised by the Chair but believed that delaying the decision may not allay the Chair’s concerns.

Cr Briggs supported the officer’s recommendations contained the report.  He considered that it was positive to provide for mana whenua at the WWC table.

The Chair requested that his concerns be recorded in the minutes.   He believed the process for bringing the matter before the meeting was flawed as a new version of the papers had been substituted by officers, without notice to the Chair. He was not confident that he understood what it was that the Committee was being asked to approve.  He noted it was a complex matter.  He further reiterated his concerns as previously raised earlier in the debate.

Cr Cousins foreshadowed a consequential motion requesting officers to provide further information to Council on GWRC’s legal advice, the position of other shareholding Councils and the benefits to the City by mana whenua participating in the WWC meetings.  

The Chief Executive apologised for not addressing the Chair’s concerns regarding expanding on the benefits mana whenua would bring to the City.  He noted that he had been on leave and had not received the request from the officers attending the draft agenda meeting.

 

REcommended:  (Cr Briggs/Cr Sutton)                         Minute No. FPC 19103

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    receives the report;

(ii)   agrees to the proposed changes to the Shareholders’ Agreement attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(iii)  agrees to the proposed changes to the Constitution attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(iv)  agrees to the proposed changes to the Wellington Water Committee Terms of Reference attached as Appendix 3 to the report; and

(v)   delegates to the Chief Executive, Hutt City Council, the power to finalise the Shareholders’ Agreement and Constitution and make minor amendments to make them consistent with what is approved by other shareholders.”

 

The motion was declared carried by division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Cr Barratt

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr Lulich

Cr Sutton

 

Against

 

Cr Milne

Total: 7

Total: 1

 

REsolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Milne)                      Minute No. FPC 19104

“That the Committee requests that Council has clear, updated information provided to it, to include:

(i)        an update on the position of all other councils’ decisions with regards to the item;

(ii)      a summary of the Greater Wellington Regional Council situation be provided in terms of the legal advice they have sought; and

(iii)    that paragraph 8 of the report be expanded to advise on the benefits to the city of Lower Hutt resulting from the proposed Wellington Water Committee constitutional changes.”

 

Acting Mayor Bassett, speaking as Chair of WWC, explained South Wairarapa District Council had commenced the process to becoming a shareholder Council of the WWC.  He elaborated on the membership of WWC.

Cr Sutton left the meeting at 6.47pm and rejoined the meeting at 6.48pm.

Acting Mayor Bassett further explained the process he had undertaken which resulted in the proposed constitutional changes including input from each of the Council’s Mayors and Chair of GWRC.

Cr Barry left the meeting at 6.49pm.

Acting Mayor Bassett acknowledged the Chair’s concerns regarding the proposed Iwi involvement.  He highlighted that Iwi had an affiliation with water and their input into the decision-making concerning water was invaluable.

ii)

Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/166)

 

 

Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Mr David Butler, Acting Chair of Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (CFT) elaborated on the report. He elaborated on the existing situation with the Walter Nash Centre and the Naenae Bowls Centre.  He noted that the Fraser Park development was well advanced.  He highlighted that CFT was looking forward to new challenges and to welcoming the new Chair to the CFT Board.

Cr Barratt left the meeting at 8.22pm and rejoined the meeting during the public excluded part of the meeting at 8.26pm.

In response to a question from a member, the Acting Chair of CFT advised that Council’s Manager, Sustainability and Resilience had spoken with CFT and that pragmatic and sustainable goals were being set as a result of the discussions.

 

 

RECOMMENDED(Cr Milne/Acting Mayor Bassett) Minute No. FPC 19105

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that the Board of The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (CFT) has submitted a draft Statement of Intent (SOI) 2019/20 - 2021/22, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002;

(ii)   notes that officers have reviewed the draft SOI for compliance with the Local Government Act 2002 and provided their analysis;

(iii)  receives the draft SOI;

(iv)  reviews the draft SOI and considers if any modifications should be made; and

(v)   provides comment for the Board of the Trust to consider in finalising its SOI (including any modifications suggested by the Committee arising under recommendation (iv) above).”

 

iii)

Seaview Marina Limited Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/167)

 

 

The Chair declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Cr Sutton assumed the Chair for the duration of the item.

 

 

Acting Mayor Bassett and the Chair left the meeting at 7.47pm and rejoined the meeting at 7.49pm.

The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report.  He explained that officers would continue working with the Seaview Marina Limited (SML) Board and management to finalise the Statement of Intent.

Mr Alan McLellan, Chief Executive of SML, added that it was not anticipated to be a great deal of change between the draft and final Statement of Intent.  He noted that a multi-year view was being developed.  He explained that SML sought to finish the in-water development projects before making dividend payments.

The General Manager, Corporate Services advised that the return on equity was forecast to drop over the next two years and then increase from year three.  He noted that the large capital investment was increasing the asset base and there were some step changes in operational expenditure due to continued growth at the Marina.

 

 

RECOMMENDED:  (Cr Sutton/Cr Lulich)                  Minute No. FPC 19106

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that the Board of Seaview Marina Limited (SML) has submitted a draft Statement of Intent (SOI) 2019-2022, attached as Appendix 1, in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002;

(ii)   notes that officers have reviewed the draft SOI for compliance with the Local Government Act 2002 and provided their analysis;

(iii)  receives the draft SOI;

(iv)  reviews the draft SOI and considers if any modifications should be made; and

(v)   provides comment for the Board of SML to consider in finalising its SOI (including any modifications suggested by the Committee arising under part (iv) above).”

 

iv)

Urban Plus Group Draft Statement of Intent 2019/20 to 2021/22 (19/168)

 

 

Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

 

The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report.  He advised that profits from development projects and earlier asset sales of some of the Urban Plus rental portfolio had provided cash flow to enable Urban Plus Group (the Group) to further grow the rental portfolio.  He added that until Council made a final decision on the proposed Housing Strategy, the future direction of the Group could not be finalised.  Therefore the draft Statement of Intent (SOI) was a continuation of the current Urban Plus strategy.

The General Manager, Corporate Services advised officers would continue to work with the Group to finalise its SOI with the inclusion of e-carbon zero targets.

Mr Craig Walton, Chief Executive of Urban Plus Group added that development was capital driven. 

The General Manager, Corporate Services advised there was an amendment to the draft SOI document which related to the Financial Forecasts section contained in the Supplementary Order Paper.  He confirmed the Central Park development sales stood at 28.  He also advised there was an amendment to the Urban Plus Rental Portfolio table noting that the 17 Britannia Street purchase figure should appear in the 2018/19 column.

 

 

Recommended: (Cr Milne/Cr Edwards)           Minute No. FPC 19107

 “That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that the Board of Urban Plus Group has submitted a draft Statement of Intent (SOI) 2019-2022, attached as Appendix 1, in accordance with the Local Government Act 2002;

(ii)   notes that officers have reviewed the draft SOI for compliance with the Local Government Act 2002 and provided their analysis;

(iii)  receives the draft SOI;

(iv)  reviews the draft SOI and considers if any modifications should be made; and

(v)  provides comment for the Board of Urban Plus Group to consider in finalising its SOI (including any modifications suggested by the Committee arising under part (iv) above).”

 

 

5.

Progress Update on the Re-design of Council's Combined Rates Invoice (19/43)

Report No. FPC2019/1/6 by the Rates and Receiveables Team Leader

 

The Acting Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 6.51pm and rejoined the meeting at 6.53pm.

The Rates and Receiveables Team Leader elaborated on the report.  She confirmed that Greater Wellington Regional Council had provided its consent to the proposed new rates invoices.

In response to a question from a member, the Rates and Receiveables Team Leader advised that each page was mass printed and there would be considerable costs involved to highlight the rates instalment that each particular page referred to.

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Acting Mayor Bassett)                            Minute No. FPC 19109

“That the Committee receives the report and notes the revised design of Council’s combined rates invoice, attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

6.

2019/20 Revenue Increase and Cost Reduction Target Update (19/218)

Report No. FPC2019/1/37 by the Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Barratt)                                               Minute No. FPC 19110

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes the progress update on identifying $300,000 of cost reductions for the 2019/20 Annual Plan; and

(ii)   notes the action taken to generate $500,000 of additional revenue that is now included in the 2019/20 Draft Annual Plan.”

7.

Financial Report for the Quarter Ended 31 December 2018 (19/29)

Report No. FPC2019/1/5 by the Acting Chief Financial Officer

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Shierlaw expressed concern with the forecast development stimulus package overspend adding that an overspend represented revenue foregone.  He expressed further concern that the overspend was proposed to be offset by capital urban growth expenditure of $2.9M.  He believed the development incentives had to be paid to offset the extra infrastructural requirements and to prevent existing ratepayers subsidising such requirements.  He asked members to reject the $3.2M budget variance.  He considered the budget should be treated in a similar way to Council’s Grants Budget.  He asked members to exercise strong governance with regard to the matter.

 

The Acting Chief Financial Officer acknowledged the public speaker’s concerns.  He explained that it was proposed to offset the overspend in Council’s Developments Incentives Package Project (‘the scheme’).  He noted it was an operating cost by transferring budget from Council’s Urban Growth Strategy capital project.  He explained that the scheme and the Urban Growth Strategy Capital project were both intended as ways to stimulate growth and development in the City.  He highlighted that this was in line with what was intended in Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP).  He highlighted that while it was a transfer of funds it this was appropriate and reasonable with no additional monies being requested. 

 

The Chair noted that in hindsight, having the two budget items aimed at the same outcome may not have been best practice.  He advised that the scheme closed on 31 December 2018 with the current draw-down on the budget occurring to honour all applications made.  He also advised the critical point was that the proposal was for revenue foregone as opposed to a ‘cheque being written.’ This resulted in increasing the rates base which had long term benefits for the City. He added that the scheme was more successful than forecasted was a positive outcome.  

 

The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.  He corrected an error within his report which related to the tables on pages 167 and 168 of the order paper.  He highlighted that the graphs had been inserted the wrong way around.  He explained that the tables reported the statement of income in accordance with Council’s LTP and that the split out the costs related to the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust grants and costs related to the scheme.

 

The Acting Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the impact of the scheme, the additional consent fees and the expected higher landfill fees.  He also elaborated on the impact of higher bulk water costs, the increase in landfill operating costs and an overspend in the events’ costs.  He mentioned the forecast overspend on depreciation and explained that depreciation was complex and difficult to budget due to difficulty in arriving at the correct depreciation rates, the timing of when projects were completed and the deferral of some projects. He advised that officers were looking at ways to improve the accuracy of the depreciation budgets and further noted that depreciation was a non-cash item and had no bearing on debt levels.

 

RESOLVED(Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                                Minute No. FPC 19111

“That the Committee agrees that errors identified in Finance and Performance Committee’s Order Paper be corrected including on Council’s website.”

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                                Minute No. FPC 19112

“That the Committee notes Council’s financial performance and position for the quarter ended 31 December 2018.”

8.

Seaview Marina Limited Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/71)

Report No. FPC2019/1/35 by the Senior Management Accountant

 

Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Cr Sutton assumed the Chair for the duration of the item.

 

Mr Alan McLellan, Chief Executive of Seaview Marina Limited (SML), and Cr Milne, as Council’s representative on the Board of SML, elaborated on the report.  The Chief Executive of SML advised that it had been an excellent six months for SML.  He added that since the end of December 2018, occupancy had increased to 95% from 90%.  He highlighted that plans were underway to construct more berths in the next financial year resulting in an increase in revenue, along with payments for the leasing of the breakwater estimated at $100,000 each year for 10 years.  He said there had been no complaints received from the user group and that walkways and other beautification works had been completed.  He advised that the power rate had been corrected, which had resulted in a doubling of power costs and security costs had also increased.

The General Manager, Corporate Services advised the business was operating efficiently and that dividends could be expected in the future.

 

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of SML advised the breakwater structure was owned by Council and it was not insured at present.  He noted that investigations into SML insuring the structure was underway.  He highlighted that an engineering survey completed five years ago reported the structure to be in excellent condition.

Cr Milne advised that the breakwater was re-inspected after the Kaikoura earthquake and no impacts were found on its structure.

In response to a questions from members, the Chief Executive of SML explained it would cost approximately $400,000 in 2019 to replace all non-compliant power pedestal boxes.  He added water usage was being carefully monitored pier by pier. He confirmed that SML staff were working with officers regarding the carbon zero resolution.

 

Resolved(Cr Sutton/Acting Mayor Bassett)                           Minute No. FPC 19113

“That the Committee receives the half year report from Seaview Marina Limited attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

9.

Urban Plus Group Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/75)

Report No. FPC2019/1/36 by the Senior Management Accountant

 

Acting Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in the item and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

Mr Craig Walton, Chief Executive of Urban Plus Group (UPL), elaborated on the report.  He advised the Group had experienced a strong six months with the Fairfield, Avalon, Waterloo and Central Park developments progressing well. He added the Britannia Street apartments had been purchased and would slowly be transitioned to public housing.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive, UPL advised that occupancy over all properties was close to 100%. He explained that the net purchase yield for the Britannia Street property was 7% and there was a large plot of land associated with this property which could be developed in the future with up to 10 units. With regard to the Britannia Street property, he advised that the profile from the existing tenants was not clear without detailed analysis.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of UPL agreed to liaise with officers concerning Council’s proposed Homelessness Strategy and would await further direction from Council.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive, UPL explained a detailed Construction Management Plan was in place for the Jackson Street apartments which included a Traffic Management Plan. He added that talks were planned with the owner of the neighbouring supermarket concerning site access. He said that a final decision had yet to be made on the long term plan for the apartments.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive of UPL confirmed discussions with officers continued with regard to the management of all Council buildings.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                         Minute No. FPC 19114

“That the Committee receives the half year report from Urban Plus Limited Group attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

10.     Information Items

a)

TechnologyOne SaaS Project Update (19/219)

Report No. FPC2019/1/31 by the Business Transformation Manager

 

The Business Transformation Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Business Transformation Manager confirmed the information used in TechnologyOne to the Document Management System intregration may not be available through the Cloud Integration method.

 

In response to a question from a member, the Business Transformation Manager advised that a Solutions Architect provided the overall technical design for how the integrations would work and these were then handed to developers who completed the actual build.

The Chair thanked officers for their work to date and complimented the management of the project.

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Acting Mayor Bassett)                Minute No. FPC 19115

“That the report be noted and received.”

 

 

b)

Bulk Water Supply (19/140)

Memorandum dated 7 February 2019 by the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services

 

 

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the report.  He explained that the increase in water usage throughout the City could not be attributed to growth or leaks which had remained at a constant level.  He acknowledged that without water meters it was difficult to accurately explain the increase.  He added there was a known 18% loss of water due to undetected reasons and the average daily use of water per person in the City was 270 litres for 2018/19.  He further added this compared to the 220 litres per person for the rest of the Wellington region.  He highlighted that a workshop on water was planned for early May with representatives from Wellington Water Limited (WWL) to speak about projected future demand for bulk water in the region.

In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services explained that at the beginning of the year, officers estimated the amount of bulk water the commercial users would use based on figures from previous years and paid WWL for that amount.  He added that this year, the actual commercial usage figures were lower than estimated which resulted in the unfavourable budget variance.  He noted there was no further data was available to better assess the increased water usage of the City.  He added that the upcoming workshop would address the water conservation options.

The General Manager, City and Community Services advised that the cost of installing meters could be approximately $200 per residential meter.

 

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Lulich)                                    Minute No. FPC 19116

“That the information be received.”

 

c)

Health & Safety Officer Due Diligence Report July 2018 to December 2018 (19/85)

Report No. FPC2019/1/32 by the Health and Safety Wellbeing Advisor

 

 

The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report.  He highlighted that reporting on the matter would be moving to a six monthly reporting cycle.

 

 

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that officers were continually reminded to report near miss incidents and over time the reporting of these incidents was expected to improve.

Acting Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 7.22pm.

The General Manager, Corporate Services acknowledged the work of the Health and Safety Wellbeing Advisor.

 

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                    Minute No. FPC 19117

“That the report be noted and received.“

 

 

d)

Finance & Performance Committee Work Programme 2018 (19/30)

Report No. FPC2019/1/7 by the Committee Advisor

 

 

The General Manager, Corporate Services advised there would likely to be a meeting on 1 May 2019 which was not indicated on the work programme.  He elaborated on the reports that would be covered at the meeting. 

Acting Mayor Bassett rejoined the meeting at 7.24pm.

 

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                   Minute No. FPC 19118

“That the work programme be noted and received, with the insertion of the 1 May 2019 meeting.”

11.     QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

12.     EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                             Minute No. FPC 19119

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

13.     The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Six Month Report to 31 December 2018 (19/84)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

The Hutt City Community Facilities Trust
Six Month Report to 31 December 2018.

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.24pm and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 8.43pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cr C Milne

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019  


Attachment 1

WWL Shareholders Agreement

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 2

WWL Constitution

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 3

Wellington Water Committee Terms of Reference

 


 


 


 


Attachment 1

Appendix 1 - CFT DRAFT 2020-2022 SOI

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 1

SML DRAFT 2020-2022 SOI

 

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 1

UPL DRAFT 2020-2022 SOI

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


                                                                                     393                                                       26 March 2019

 

 

 

 

 Hutt City Council

25 February 2019

 

 

 

File: (19/259)

 

 

 

Report no: HCC2019/1/31

 

1.        The purpose of this report is to provide an update on planning for the 2019 elections and to seek Council approval for the ordering of candidate names on the voting paper and to conduct the election for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust in conjunction with the Council elections.

Recommendation

It is recommended that Council:

(i)       notes that in accordance with regulation 31 of the Local Electoral Regulations 2001, Council has the ability to determine the method used to order the names on the voting paper for the 2019 triennial local elections, using alphabetical, random or pseudo-random order;

(ii)     agrees to use the random order method of arranging candidates’ names on the voting paper for the 2019 triennial local elections for Lower Hutt City and its community boards; and

(iii)   agrees that the election for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust be conducted in conjunction with the 2019 triennial local elections for Lower Hutt City.

e

Background

2.        Planning for the 2019 triennial local elections is well underway with agreements in place for election services from NZ Post for the printing and distribution of voting papers and electionz.com for the processing of voting papers and provisions of results and statistics.

3.        Election Day is Saturday 12 October 2019 with the three-week voting period commencing on Friday 20 September 2019.  As with all other Councils the elections will be conducted by postal voting. It is unlikely that the on-line voting trial, (additional to and not instead of postal voting), being considered by nine Councils will proceed due to cost.

4.        Candidate nominations for the various elections, mayor and council, the community boards, the regional council and the district health board, open on Friday 19 July 2019 and close at 12.00 noon on Friday 16 August 2019.  Other key dates are shown in the table below.

5.        As in previous elections voting papers will be processed progressively with preliminary results available shortly after the close of polling.  Provisions for special voting will be available at three locations in the City as per the 2016 elections, (Wainuiomata Library, Walter Nash Centre and Main Administration Building). A further option is being considered to utilise the special voting booth provided by Wellington City Council at its central library, to enable Lower Hutt electors who work in Wellington to either drop off voting papers at the Wellington booth or make a special vote. 

6.        Electoral officials from throughout the country met in Wellington for two days in October 2018, to help prepare and plan for the elections.  Regional meetings of electoral officials will be held over the next few months to ensure there is good co-ordination and support.

7.        With a voting turnout of 37.8% of electors at the 2016 elections, officers are currently considering ways to better engage with electors to encourage participation in these elections.  A regional campaign is being planned, (spearheaded by Wellington City Council), to which we will be contributing.   On the national scale, Local Government New Zealand and SOLGM are jointly running a VOTE 2019 campaign The campaign will be about listening and engaging on the issues that matter to locals that will make New Zealand a better place to live, work and play.

8.        A change to section 42 of the Local Government Act is proposed, through the Local Government Regulatory Systems Bill, to require the Chief Executive Officer to “facilitate and foster representative and substantial elector participation in elections and polls held under the Local Electoral Act 2001”. 

Order of Candidates’ Surnames

9.        Council is able to determine the method used to order candidates’ surnames on the voting paper.  There are three options.  These are to order surnames in:

a.             alphabetical order; or

b.             random order, where each single voting paper has the names of the candidates randomly ordered; or

c.              pseudo-random where the surnames of candidates are randomly selected once for all of the voting papers.

10.    The cost of and time required to process voting papers will not be affected by whichever option is used.  If no decision is made, alphabetical order is the default order of candidate surnames that must be used.

11.    Council has resolved to use the random ordering of surnames at the 2013 and 2016 triennial elections, as well as for all by-elections held since 2011. Both Greater Wellington Regional Council and the Hutt Valley District Health Board used random order at the 2013 and 2016 elections.

Hutt Mana Charitable Trust Election

12.    The election of trustees for the Hutt Mana Charitable Trust has been conducted in conjunction with the past four triennial local elections for Lower Hutt.

13.    As the Trust is not specified as an organisation under section 7 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 to which the Act applies, (which would otherwise automatically require the Electoral Officer to conduct the election in conjunction with the local authority elections), authority for the Electoral Officer to conduct this election needs to be made by resolution of Council.

14.    Section 8 of the Local Electoral Act 2001 gives Council that authority to direct the electoral officer to conduct this election.

15.    As well as being a pragmatic solution in having all elections on the one combined voting paper, there is a financial benefit to Council in doing so, as shared costs such as printing and postage are distributed across the organisations for which the elections are being held.

Consultation

16.    Consultation is not required.

Legal Considerations

17.    The Local Electoral Act 2001 and Local Electoral Regulations 2001 govern the conduct of local elections and polls.

Financial Considerations

18.         The total cost of holding the elections is 2016 is estimated to be $408,000 of which approximately $230,000 will be recovered from the other organisations with issues on the combined voting paper. (Hutt Valley District Health Board, Greater Wellington Regional Council and Hutt Mana Charitable Trust.)

Other Considerations

19.         There are no other considerations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bruce Hodgins

electoral officer

 

 


MEMORANDUM                                                 395                                                       26 March 2019

Our Reference          19/280

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Kathryn Stannard

DATE:                08 March 2019

SUBJECT:           2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference

 

 

Recommendation

That Council:

 

(i)    notes the 2019 Local Government Conference programme attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum; and

 

(ii)   nominates the Mayor and one or two Councillors to represent Hutt City Council at the 2019 Local Government New Zealand Conference to be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019.

 

Purpose of Memorandum

1.    The purpose of the memorandum is for Council to nominate the Mayor and one or two Councillors to represent Council at the annual Local Government New Zealand conference from 7-9 July 2019.

Background

 

Local Government New Zealand (‘LGNZ’)

 

2.    LGNZ is the primary political representative body of local government in New Zealand.  Its purpose is to provide national representation to elected representatives.  LGNZ monitors developments affecting local government in New Zealand and has advocacy, research and advisory roles.

3.    To assist LGNZ in its activities the country is divided into six geographical zones.  Hutt City Council is a member of Zone 4 which comprises all members’ authorities within the Wellington Region.  

2019 LGNZ Conference

 

4.    This year LGNZ's annual conference and EXCELLENCE Awards will be held in Wellington from 7-9 July 2019.

5.    The 2019 conference theme is "Riding the localism wave: Putting communities in charge".  The programme is attached as Appendix 1.

 

6.    The conference will take place in Wellington and be host to approximately 500 delegates made up of Mayors, Chairs, Chief Executives, Councillors and senior management from New Zealand’s Council’s along with key players from the private sector.  It is the once chance each year for all Councils to be in the same room at the same time.

7.    The full registration cost per participant is $1,400.  Part registration (Monday only) is $720 and half day on Tuesday is $530. 

8.    Last year the Deputy Mayor Bassett (as Acting Mayor) and Crs Barratt, Barry and Bridson represented Council at the annual conference.

Financial Considerations

 

9.    There is financial provision in the 2018/2019 budget for this activity. 

 

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

LGNZConferenceProgramme

396

 

 

Author: Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

 

 

 

 

Approved By: Brent Kibblewhite

General Manager Corporate Services


Attachment 1

LGNZConferenceProgramme

 

Monday 8 July 2019

7.00am

Breakfast session 
Lisa King, Founder, Eat My Lunch and social entrepreneur

8.35am

Localism: No.8 wire fixes to New Zealand's challenges
Giving local people the power to make local decisions
Tania Tapsell, Councillor, Rotorua Lakes Council
Dr Lance O'Sullivan, founder and chair of The MOKO Foundation

 9.30am

Localism - what's your natural advantage? 
Incentivising communities to take a more proactive approach to local development
Christopher Luxon, Chief Executive Officer, Air New Zealand
Kindly sponsored by NZ Transport Agency

11.00am

Climate change - a stitch in time
Alternative thinking to mitigating and adapting to the changing climate.
John Mauro, Chief Sustainability Officer, Auckland Council

11.45am

Leader of the Opposition's address
The Leader of the Opposition will present his party's view on localism and response to LGNZ's localism discussion paper.
Hon Simon Bridges, Leader, National Party

12.00pm

'Zone of Origin' crocodile bike race

1.15pm

Have you drunk the central government Kool-Aid?
An ex-local government back bencher view on localism.

1.45pm

Minister of Local Government address
Hon Nanaia Mahuta, Minister of Local Government

2.00pm

Housing and building in New Zealand - can we fix it?
Ensuring our infrastructure is not just fit-for-purpose, but supports sustained improvement in the quality of life for all New Zealanders, now and into the future.
Justin Lester, Mayor, Wellington City Council
Adrian Orr, Governor, Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Kindly sponsored by Chorus

2.45pm

Walkshops
Wananga hikoi 
Delegates choose one workshop tour to attend
Social well-being
 - Housing affordability: Making it happen
Economic well-being
 - Transforming the way local government works digitally
Environmental well-being
 - Bringing back our native flora and fauna
Cultural well-being
 - What the arts and cultural well-being means for communities

6.45pm

Conference dinner and LGNZ EXCELLENCE Awards
TSB Bank Arena

Tuesday 9 July 2019

9.15am

Managing fresh water - best practice, breakthroughs in innovation and barriers
We all have a role to play - the government, the farming sector, the businesses who use freshwater, communities and individuals - and if we all work together we can make a big difference.
Doug Leeder, Chair, LGNZ Regional Group
Terry Copeland, Chief Executive, Federated Farmers
Kindly sponsored by GHD

10.45am

Out of the Shadows
Raising awareness of, and community support for, a greater investment in your community's cultural and natural heritage.
Natalie Palmer, Communication and Engagement Manager, Hamilton City Council
2018 Fulton Hogan EXCELLENCE Award for Community Engagement recipient - Out of the Shadows: Bringing Waipa's heritage to life.

11.30am

Creating change: Inspiring leadership in local communities 
Leadership in our communities
Colin D Ellis

12.15pm

Early bird registration prize draw
Kindly sponsored by New Zealand Motor Caravan Association

12.20pm

Poroporoaki | Closing ceremony

1.30pm - 3.30pm

Member meetings

·      Mayors Taskforce for Jobs AGM

·      Regional Sector meeting

·      Young Elected Members meeting

Members only

AddThis Sharing Buttons

Share to FacebookFacebookShare to TwitterTwitterShare to LinkedInLinkedInShare to EmailEmail


MEMORANDUM                                                 399                                                       26 March 2019

Our Reference          19/293

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Ray Wallace

DATE:                13 March 2019

SUBJECT:           Membership of the Homelessness Working Group

 

Recommendation

That Council:

 

(i)      receives and notes the information contained in the memorandum; and

(ii)     appoints Cr Briggs as a member of the Homelessness Working Group.

Purpose of Memorandum

1.    To ask Council to consider appointing Cr Briggs as a member of the Homelessness Working Group (the group).

Background

2.    In November 2017, Council asked officers to examine homelessness in Lower Hutt, the range and depth of the problem, the services available to homeless people and families, and what Council’s role might be in addressing homelessness.

3.    In May 2018, Council resolved the following:-

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. C 18201(4)

“That Council:

(i)                 notes the investigative study on Homeless in Lower Hutt has been completed;

(ii)     notes Council can play a leadership role in solving this growing problem by leading co-ordination with other Government Agencies, non-Government Agencies and the wider community to reduce homelessness in the city;

(iii)    requests officers to start work on a Homelessness Strategy for the City with a timeline and resourcing requirements presented to the Community Plan Committee on 6 June 2018;

(iv)    establishes a working group to work with officers consisting of the Chair and Deputy Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee (the Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee to chair the working group), the Chair and Deputy Chair of Community Services Committee and Crs Barry, Sutton and McDonald; and

(v)      agrees that the working group will have the power to co-opt external members as required who have skills and knowledge to assist the working group.”

Membership of the Group

4.    There was a discussion earlier this year as to whether Cr Briggs was still formally a member of the group after his role was changed from Deputy Chair of the Community Services Committee to a member of that committee late last year.

5.    Cr Briggs has asked that he be reinstated as a member of the group. 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Ray Wallace

Mayor

 

 

   


421

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 11 December 2018 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

 

 

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr L Bridson

 

Cr J Briggs

Cr MJ Cousins

 

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

 

Cr M Lulich (until 8.45pm)

Cr G McDonald

 

Cr C Milne

Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation (part meeting)

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services (part meeting)

Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)

Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services (part meeting)

Ms L Dalby, Senior Communications Advisor (part meeting)

Ms O Miller, Policy Advisor (part meeting)

Mr J Pritchard, Principal Research & Policy Advisor (part meeting)

Mr J Hoyle, Communications & Marketing Advisor (part meeting)

Mr M de Haast, Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)

Mr B Cato, General Counsel (part meeting)

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services (part meeting)

Ms J Randall, Committee Advisor (part meeting)

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

There were no apologies.

 

MAJOR ITEM NOT ON THE AGENDA

 

Mayor Wallace advised that the Strategic Structure Review item would be considered while the public was excluded for the reason that it contained personal information.

Resolved:                                                                              Minute No. C 18501(2)

“That in terms of Standing Order 10.12 Council:

(i)            notes that the matter of the Strategic Structure Review was not included in the agenda for the meeting, for the reason that the information was not available until after the agenda had been distributed; and

 

(ii)          agrees that the recommendation be considered at this meeting for the reason that the matter needs to be addressed urgently and cannot be delayed until a subsequent meeting.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.

3.

Mayoral Statement (18/1881)

Mayor Wallace read out the Mayoral Statement.

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                    Minute No. C 18502(2)

“That the Mayoral Statement be noted and received.”

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest in relation to Item 5b 4d) ‘Establishment of Alcohol Hearings’, and Item 15 ‘Sale Negotiations.’ 

5.       Committee Reports with Recommended Items

e)      Traffic Subcommittee

 

12 November 2018

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                                  Minute No. C 18503(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 12 November 2018, with the exception of items 4i)-4viii), be adopted.”

 

Recommended Items

Item 4i)

Trafalgar Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1593)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                 Minute No. C 18504(2)

“That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Trafalgar Street, Waterloo attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/298.”

 

Item 4ii)

Fraser Colman Grove - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1599)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)               Minute No. C 18505(2)

“That Council:

(i)    approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Fraser Colman Grove, Wainuiomata for the non-legal carparks outside numbers 11 and 17 and 15 and 16 Fraser Colman Grove, attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/299; and

(ii)   asks officers to review parking in Wise Street, Wainuiomata and after the implementation of any recommendations, will review other issues within Fraser Colman Grove.”

Item 4iii)

Randwick Road - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1608)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)               Minute No. C 18506(2)

“That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Randwick Road, Moera attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/300.”

Item 4iv)

Brown Grove - Proposed P120 and No Stopping At All Times Parking Restrictions (18/1609)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)               Minute No. C 18507(2)

“That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times restrictions, L and T bar parking bay markings and P120 parking restrictions on Brown Grove, Waterloo attached as Appendix 2 to Report TRS2018/5/301.”

Item 4v)

Bolton Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1659)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                 Minute No. C 18508(2)

“That Council:

(i)   approves the installation of the proposed Parking Bays (L and T bar markings) on Bolton Street, Petone, attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/302; and

(ii)  approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times and markings on the corners of Bolton Street and Adelaide Street, Petone attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/302.

Item 4vi)

Cleary Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1660)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                 Minute No. C 18509(2)

“That Council approves the installation of the proposed No Stopping At All Times restrictions on Cleary Street, Waterloo attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/303.”

Item 4vii)

High Street - Proposed School Bus Stop 3.00-3.30pm School Days Only (18/1717)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                Minute No. C 18510(2)

“That Council approves the installation of a School Bus Stop during the hours of 3.00-3.30pm School Days only, outside St Oran’s College on High Street, Lower Hutt attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/305.”

Item 4viii)

Fitzherbert Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (18/1718)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                 Minute No. C 18511(2)

“That Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions on Fitzherbert Street, Alicetown attached as Appendix 1 to Report TRS2018/5/304.”

f)       Policy and Regulatory Committee

 

26 November 2018

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Lewis)                                 Minute No. C 18512(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 26 November 2018, with the exception of items 4a)-4e), be adopted.”

Recommended Items

Item 4a)

Carbon Targets (18/1675)

Cr Milne highlighted that central government had not yet introduced its bill for setting carbon targets. He proposed a decision on the matter be delayed until legislation was passed.  He advised that he would not be supporting the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee.

Cr Briggs considered the recommendations should go further and include carbon from closed landfills.  He advised that he would not be supporting the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee.

Cr Bridson noted the recommendations asked officers to work on emissions from landfills in the future.  She regarded climate change as an extreme danger and expressed support for the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee. 

Cr Edwards considered that climate change would become irreversible in the not too distance future.  He noted the recommendations were an initial step only and expressed support for the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee.

Mayor Wallace reminded members the recommendations from the Policy and Regulatory Committee were just the beginning of the matter.  He noted there was no date for central government to set its carbon targets and he wanted Council to show leadership on the issue.  He added that officers would be asked for further reports on carbon emissions with regard to the landfill.

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)           Minute No. C 18513(2)

“That Council:

(i)     sets an organisational target of Council reducing its greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, by no later than 2050;

(ii)    notes that in order to put Council onto a low-carbon pathway, Council will need to make changes to its operations, including:

(a) preventing the installation of high-carbon-emitting technology (eg, natural gas for heating) at any existing facilities at the time of renewal, or new facilities not already under construction, and utilising lower carbon emitting options instead;

(b) increasingly electrifying its vehicle fleet; and

(c) having more regard to climate change objectives in its procurement decisions;

(iii)   agrees that officers will provide advice on recommended intermediate targets, and specific and measurable performance measures for Council activity areas and associated business units, such as existing buildings and facilities, the vehicle fleet, procurement, and waste management, toward achieving the target and any other relevant associated environmental objectives;

(iv)   agrees that officers will provide advice on the indicative cost of displacing natural gas as a heating energy source with a lower carbon emitting option for key Council infrastructure, in line with the organisational target;

(v)    requests that officers report to the Policy and Regulatory Committee annually on Council progress toward the target;

(vi)   requests that officers will investigate how best to reflect the target in relevant accountability documents, to enable periodic reporting against this target and/or relevant key performance indicators;

(vii)  agrees that Council’s organisational target should also apply to its wholly-owned or partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations, ie the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust, Urban Plus Ltd, Seaview Marina Ltd and Wellington Water Ltd;

(viii) requests that officers propose specific and measurable performance measures, in line with the target, for its wholly-owned and partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations, with a view to reflect these in the organisations’ next Statements of Intent;

(ix)   invites other councils to consider adopting the same organisational target, including for their relevant wholly-owned or partly-owned Council Controlled Organisations;

(x)    notes that if a New Zealand net Zero by 2050 target as proposed by the New Zealand Government is passed via the Zero Carbon Bill in 2019, then this will become the de-facto Lower Hutt community-wide emissions target;

(xi)   agrees that officers will scope the development of a Lower Hutt Climate and Resilience Plan to identify relevant objectives and prioritised community focused actions, to assist in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in line with the proposed New Zealand net Zero by 2050 target; and

(xii)  asks officers to report back on the feasibility of including old landfills, where practicable, in the organisational target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, by no later than 2050.”

Crs Milne and Briggs requested their dissenting votes be recorded against the above matter.

Item 4b)

Online Voting Trial (18/1736)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. C 18514(2)

“That Council:

(i)    notes the information in the report;

(ii)   agrees to take no further action, effectively agreeing not to participate in the online trial for the 2019 triennial local elections, on the basis that the tight timeframe for implementing the trial poses a relatively high cost in order to adequately manage risk; and

(iii)  requests officers to report back to the new Council in 2020 on the online trial, should it proceed, so that the new Council can consider introducing online voting for the 2022 triennial local elections.”

Item 4c)

Sale of Land - Bushey Way, Maungaraki (18/1722)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)             Minute No. C 18515(2)

“That Council agrees to sell the property known as Lot (ACC) 145 DP 25070, situated at the end of Bushey Way as shown shaded yellow attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2018/5/307, to the owners of the adjacent property at 26 Bushey Way.”

 

Item 4d)

Establishment of the Alcohol Hearings (18/1748)

 

Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)
                                                                                Minute No. C 18516(2)

“That Council approves the establishment of an Alcohol Hearings Subcommittee comprising Deputy Mayor Bassett (Chair), Cr Milne, Cr Sutton, Cr Barry (alternate) and Cr Barratt (alternate) for the purpose of hearing submissions on the pre-consultation to decide whether an Alcohol Fees Bylaw is needed and then make recommendations to Council.

Item 4e)

Smokefree in Pavement Licence Areas (18/1772)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Lulich)                 Minute No. C 18517(2)

“That Council:

(i)    notes the work that has been done to date to implement the smokefree outdoor pavement dining clause of the Smokefree Outdoor Public Places Policy;

(ii)   agrees to include a condition to the contract for businesses leasing public land from Council for the purposes of outdoor pavement dining that requires these businesses to:

(a)   display smokefree signage supplied by Council; and

(b)   not have ashtrays or other devices for collecting cigarette litter on or near tables or seating areas;

(iii)  implements time-limited incentives (to a maximum of two years) to businesses leasing public land from Council, for the purposes of outdoor pavement dining through reducing or removing the charge for leasing that land;

(iv)  agrees that where it assists a business owner to establish outdoor pavement dining for the premise, that assistance is provided on the condition that the outdoor dining area:

(a)   is actively promoted as a smokefree area; and

(b)   does not have ashtrays or other devices for collecting cigarette litter on or near tables or seating; and

(v)   agrees that it will communicate with businesses about the new requirement and that it will provide smokefree signage, as led by Healthy Families Lower Hutt.”

 

 

Item 4f)     Lower Hutt Homelessness – Homelessness Strategy report    

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr V Tamihere expressed concern with the number of homeless sleeping outside in Naenae.  

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms K Brown welcomed a Strategic Homelessness Plan to approach housing problems unique to Lower Hutt.  She noted homelessness affected all ages. She expressed concern Lower Hutt had more homeless than Wellington and advised Council needed to take action.

 

In response to questions from members, the Principal Research and Policy Advisor confirmed that a list of names had been circulated to members so that additional Homelessness Strategy Working Group (working group) members could be identified. He suggested circulating an expanded list for further consideration.  He said he was confident he could provide a range of people from an mixture of backgrounds. He would be recommending individuals working in the homelessness area who could take ideas and turn them into actions.

 

Members discussed the process of appointing external appointments to the working group.

 

Mayor Wallace noted there had already been considerable public input into the process so far. He agreed that officers should provide a list of suggested working group members for Council’s consideration.  He further agreed that the proposed numbers on the working group be changed to between two and four positions.

 

Cr Cousins expressed concern that Council was being pushed down a Wainuiomata/Labour Party point of view instead of a Citywide view.

 

Cr Briggs expressed concern regarding the comments made by
Cr Cousins.

 

Cr Barry raised a point of order believing the comments made by
Cr Cousins’ were inappropriate.  He asked for an apology.  

 

Mayor Wallace provided Cr Cousins with a right of reply.

 

Cr Cousins highlighted that most of those with input to the Homelessness Strategy had been from one part of the City.  She considered a broad vision from across the City was needed.  She advised that she would not apologise for her comments.

 

In response to a question from a member, the General Counsel agreed that there was a possibility members of the working group could disqualify themselves from being able to submit in the event of a hearing on the matter.  He further advised that members of organisations who were appointed to the working group in their personal capacity might avoid potential conflicts of interest.

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs)                Minute No. C 18518(2)

“That Council:

 

 (i)   agrees to the proposed strategic approach to homelessness:

Summary:

Working together to end homelessness: Ending homelessness doesn’t mean that no-one will lose their home again. It means that we have a response in-place to prevent homelessness whenever possible and that if homelessness occurs, it is rare, brief, and non-recurring;

Guiding principles:

Housing is a basic human right: everyone has the right to housing that is habitable, affordable, suitable, and secure; 

Person centred:  to give people control and enable them to set their own aims and goals for the future;

Culturally appropriate: an approach and service delivery that meets the needs of all our people;

Collaborative action: working together and taking action;

Priorities:

1.    Preventing homelessness;

2.    Improving the supply of suitable accommodation and support for people experiencing homelessness;

3.    Ending rough sleeping  - help people who are street homeless or living in their cars move into and retain settled accommodation;

4.    Increasing the supply of affordable homes to rent and buy; and

5.    Improving data on homelessness in Lower Hutt;

(ii)   agrees that officers consult on the strategic approach and priorities;

(iii)  agrees to officers continuing working with partners to develop actions and options for the role of Council in contributing to the response to homelessness;

(iv)  agrees to the development of a housing strategy to address housing needs in Lower Hutt;

(v)   makes available between two and four positions on the Homelessness Strategy Working Group for between two and four community representatives; and

 

(vi)  asks officers to provide a list of people for the positions of community representatives to the Homelessness Strategy Working Group for its consideration.”

 

 

g)      Finance and Performance Committee

 

28 November 2018

 

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)          Minute No. C 18519(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 28 November 2018, with the exception of items 4i)-4ii), be adopted.”

 

Recommended Items

Item 4i)

2019/20 Annual Plan (18/1720)

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Cr McDonald)           Minute No. C 18520(2)

“That Council:

(i)    notes there is no legislative requirement of public consultation for the 2019/20 Annual Plan if there are no significant changes from the Long Term Plan;

(ii)   notes no significant changes from Year 2 of the 2018-2028 Long Term Plan are proposed for the 2019/20 Annual Plan;

(iii)  agrees that for the 2019/2020 Annual Plan, there is no need to use the special consultation procedure as has occurred in previous years but that an engagement process will be carried out which Council believes will give better outcomes for the community;

(iv)  approves the high level budget assumptions outlined in Report No. FPC2018/5/325;

(v)   approves the high level community engagement approach for the 2019/20 Annual Plan; and

(vi)  provides any further direction and guidance required for the 2019/20 Annual Plan.”

Item 4ii)

Formation of Innovative Young Minds Charitable Trust (18/1854)

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Cr Barratt)                 Minute No. C 18521(2)

“That Council:

(i)    approves the establishment of the Innovative Young Minds Trust as a Council Controlled Organisation (CCO) and a charitable trust;

(ii)   approves an exemption from CCO requirements for the Innovative Young Minds Trust for the purposes of section 6(4)(i) of the Local Government Act 2002, for the following reasons:

(a)  due to its very small size and scope of activities (currently limited to one contractor and the management of one programme in Wellington and one alumnae programme in Silicon Valley); and

(b)  that being a CCO would place a large administrative burden on the charitable trust, and exempting it from this status will relieve it of that burden and therefore benefit the community, the charitable trust and Council by saving time and resources; and

(iii)  approves not publically advertising for the founding trustees and approves the appointment of three officers: Mr Gary Craig, Divisional Manager City Growth; Dr Laura Sessions, STEMM Sector Development Manager and Dr Anne Ryan, Director of Hutt Science; as founding trustees for a period of two years.”

h)      Hearings Subcommittee

15 November 2018

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)                            Minute No. C 18522(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 15 November 2018, with the exception of items 3)-4), be adopted.”

Recommended Items

Item 3)

Control of Animals Bylaw: Hearing (18/1937)

 

ResolvedCr Cousins/Cr Edwards)          Minute No. C 18523(2)

“That Council:

(i)       endorses Section 1 of the Control of Animals Bylaw with the following alteration:  That the definition of Trapping Device be altered to add the following at the end of the proposed wording:  “or other predator free devices (as approved by NAWAC)”; and

 

(ii)     endorses Sections 3 through to 8 inclusive, of the Control of Animals Bylaw.”

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)         Minute No. C 18524(2)

“That Council

 

(i)   requests officers to monitor the Control of Animals Bylaw in relation to its efficiency in dealing with bees, and provide a report after one year to assess if further controls are required; and

 

(ii)     requests officers to consider producing Guidelines for Keeping Bees in Urban Areas for inclusion on Council’s website.”

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)         Minute No. C 18525(2)

“That Council:

 

(i)          endorses Section 2 of the Control of Animals Bylaw;

 

(ii)    acknowledges that cats are an issue in the City, and requests officers to provide a report to the Policy and Regulatory Committee concerning options available to Council in relation to the control of cats, including whether a specific bylaw relating to the control of cats in the City is required, given there is an existing issue; and

 

(iii)   requests officers to advise whether Council needs to ask Local Government New Zealand to take action in relation to obtaining a change in the law to give Councils more accountability around cats in the city including feral cats.”

 

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)     
                                                                             Minute No. C 18526(2)

“That Council:

 

(i)     notes the Hearing Subcommittee has recommended that the proposed Control of Animals Bylaw be approved subject to some amendments;

 

(ii)        determines that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed bylaw-

 

(a)      is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and

 

(b)      does not give rise to any implications under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

 

(iii)   agrees to revoke the existing Control of Animals Bylaw 2008 and adopts the amended Control of Animals Bylaw 2018, attached as Appendix 3 to Report HSC2018/5/143 effective from 19 December 2018. “

 

Item 4)

Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw: Hearing (18/1939)

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards) Minute No. C 18527(2)

“That Council endorses the Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw attached as Appendix 1 to Report HSC2018/5/345.”

 

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)
                                                                    Minute No. C 18528(2)

“That Council:

 

(i)      notes that the Hearing Subcommittee has recommended that the proposed Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw be approved without any amendments;

 

(ii)    determines that, in accordance with section 155 of the Local Government Act 2002, the proposed bylaw –

 

(a)      is the most appropriate form of bylaw; and

 

(b)      does not give rise to any implications under the NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990; and

 

(iii)  agrees to revoke the existing Fire Prevention Bylaw 2008 and adopt the Prevention of Nuisance from Fires and Smoke Bylaw 2018, attached as Appendix 1 to Report HSC2018/5/345 effective from 19 December 2018.”

6.       Miscellaneous

d)

Protecting Lower Hutt's Biodiversity (18/1959)

Memorandum dated 6 December 2018 by the Mayor

 

Mayor Wallace elaborated on the memorandum.

Cr Milne noted the interpretation of a Significant Natural Area (SNA) as defined in the Regional Policy Statement, Policy 23 provided little discretion. He asked that further mapping was undertaken.

Cr Barry welcomed Council’s decision to change the recommendations on SNAs. He looked forward to working with the community to protect biodiversity.

In response to questions from members, Mayor Wallace asked officers to report back on whether they would be enforcing or challenging Policy 23 under the Regional Policy Statement.  He highlighted the damage caused to Council’s relationship with its community.

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. C 18529(2)

“That Council:

(i)       requests officers to report back on an action plan to implement Council’s resolutions of 29 November 2018 to protect biodiversity and including any consequential changes to the District Plan; and

 

(ii)      requests that the report shall specify any additional resources and funding required so that corresponding provisions can be considered for Council’s draft Annual Plan for 2019/2020.”

e)

District Plan Committee Restructure (18/1961)

Memorandum dated 6 December 2018 by the Mayor

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Shierlaw expressed support for the restructuring of the District Plan Committee.  He noted two other Councils’ decisions on Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) were being appealed through the Environment Court.  He suggested Council waited until those revised District Plans were operative so Council could gauge other options before making a decision on the matter.

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young expressed concern that the District Plan Committee (the Committee) was to be restructured without providing a clear recommendation.  He noted there was no supporting information on how the Committee’s Terms of Reference would be amended.

Mayor Wallace highlighted the need to regain the confidence of the community.  He believed the Committee needed to be better algined to the principles, strategic policies, goals and vision for the City.

In response to questions from members, Mayor Wallace considered the only way to rebuild confidence was for the City Development Committee (CDC) to provide oversight for the Committee.  He agreed the Terms of Reference for the CDC would be amended for this purpose at Council’s first meeting in 2019.  He said the additional layer of oversight from the CDC would enable a more thorough scrutiny of issues than the full Council could provide.  He confirmed he had addressed concerns about officers with the Chief Executive.  He also acknowledged the good work of officers.

Cr Bridson expressed concern that she had not been advised of any concerns with the way the Committee was operating.  She considered the decision to restructure the Committee needed more reflection and suggested it would be more appropriate to defer the matter until Council’s first meeting in 2019.  She noted the CDC considered only the Economic Strategy as part of its Terms of Reference and excluded other key strategies.   She expressed concern that the Chair of the CDC had openly opposed Council’s Urban Growth Strategy, the Heritage District Plan Change and the Residential and Suburban Mixed Use Plan Change. 

Mayor Wallace responded that he had communicated with Cr Bridson to voice his concerns. 

In response to a question from a member regarding the distrust from the community, officers and members, Mayor Wallace advised that a number of members of the Committee had held a secret meeting without the Chair’s knowledge resulting in the Chair being ‘thrown under the bus’.

Cr Barry raised a point of order in response to comments made by Mayor Wallace and asked him to retract the comments.

Mayor Wallace withdrew his comments. 

Cr Briggs proposed that a decision on the matter be deferred until the New Year. He suggested the Councillors planning session be used to discuss the matter further so members had time to consider what arrangement would provide the best outcome for the City.  He advised he would be voting against the recommendations.

Cr Bridson advised that she was resigning as Chair of the Committee.  Crs Briggs and Barry advised that they also were resigning from the Committee. 

 

 

MOVED: (Cr Briggs/Cr Barry)

 

 

 

That the item of business being discussed should lie on the table and not be further discussed at the meeting.”

 

 

The motion was declared lost by division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Cr Barry

Cr Bridson

Cr Briggs

Cr Edwards

Cr Lewis

Cr Lulich

Against

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Cousins

Cr Milne

Cr McDonald

Cr Sutton

Total: 6

 

Total: 7

 

 

Resolved:  (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett) (By Division) Minute No. C 18530(2)

“That Council:

(i)   restructures the District Plan Committee as a subcommittee reporting to the City Development Committee, chaired by Deputy Mayor Bassett to better align the District Plan to meet the Council’s strategic goals, policy and vision; and

(ii)  agrees to amend the terms of reference of the City Development Committee and District Plan Committee to reflect part (i) above.”

 

 

The motion declared carried by division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Cousins

Cr Milne

Cr McDonald

Cr Sutton

Against

 

Cr Barry

Cr Bridson

Cr Briggs

Cr Edwards

Cr Lewis

Cr Lulich

Total: 7

Total: 6

 

f)

Updated Schedule of Meetings for 2019 (18/1790)

Memorandum dated 12 November 2018 by the Committee Advisor

 

In response to questions from a member, Mayor Wallace advised that a concern had been raised by the Petone Community Board that Community Panels (the Panels) had been listed on Council’s Schedule of Meetings (the schedule). He noted he had no issue with the Panels being listed on the schedule.  He also noted that he had no issue with Cr Barratt continuing to hold Community Services Committee meetings in the community.

Cr Cousins believed that the Petone Community Board was being precious about its concerns.  She highlighted that Panels held statutory meetings when allocating funding and Councillors needed to be present at those meetings to legitimise the decisions made.  

Cr Barry raised a point of order relating to the comments made Cr Cousins.

Cr Cousins apologised for her comment. 

In response to a question from a member, Cr Lewis advised that while Community Boards were statutory bodies, Panels were quite separate and did not have the same regulatory status.  She considered that if the Panels were included in Council’s Schedule of Meetings for timetabling purposes only, their inclusion should be acceptable to the Petone Community Board.

 

Resolved:   (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)     Minute No. C 18531(2)

“That Council:

 

(i)       notes the recommendations from the Petone Community Board; and

 

(ii)     adopts the amended schedule of meetings for 2019 attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum.”

 

7.

Report of Hearings Panel 18 September 2018 to Council (18/1789)

Report No. HCC2018/5/57 by the Committee Advisor

 

Resolved(Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins)                                        Minute No. C 18532(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 18 September 2018 be received.”

8.       Minutes - COUNCIL

Resolved(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                     Minute No. C 18533(2)

“That the minutes of the meeting of the Hutt City Council held on Tuesday, 9 October 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Sutton)                                Minute No. C 18534(2)

“That the minutes of the meeting of the Hutt City Council held on Wednesday, 17 October 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)            Minute No. C 18535(2)

“That the minutes of the meeting of the Extraordinary Meeting of Council held on Thursday, 29 November 2018, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”

9.       Committee Reports without Recommended Items

g)      Finance and Performance Committee

 

17 October 2018

 

 

Resolved(Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)               Minute No. C 18536(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 17 October 2018 be adopted.”

h)      Community Services Committee

 

21 November 2018

Cr Lewis asked that work undertaken by officers with the sector, issues progressed within the sector and the ways the strategies were assisting Council be included in future reports to the Accessibility and Inclusiveness Plan Subcommittee.

Cr Barratt agreed to ask officers to provide a separate report dealing with the matters raised by Cr Lewis.  

 

Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Cr Lewis)                                    Minute No. C 18537(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 21 November 2018 be adopted.”

i)       City Development Committee

 

 

27 November 2018

 

 

 

Resolved(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)              Minute No. C 18538(2)

“That the report of the meeting held on 27 November 2018 be adopted.”

 

10.

Sealing Authority (18/1715)

Report No. HCC2018/5/15 by the Executive Assistant, Corporate Services

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)              Minute No. C 18539(2)

“That Council:

(i)    approves the affixing of the Common Seal to all relevant documents in connection with the items set out in Schedule 1 contained in the report; and

(ii)   approves the deeds executed under Power of Attorney set out in Schedule 2 contained in the report.

SCHEDULE 1 - General Sealing Authority

 

Subdivision related documents – including Easements to Council and Esplanade Strips

Standard easements and related requirements granting rights to Council as part of the subdivision process:

a)    Hutt City Council and Christopher John McNay and David William Hercus
Subdivision consent, 46 Stanley Street, Waiuiomata, Lower Hutt L18/88

b)    Hutt City Council and David Robert Lewis
Subdivision consent, 23 Hawthorn Crescent, Stokes Valley, Lower Hutt L18/175

c)    Hutt City Council and Tiller’s Holdings Limited
Subdivision consent, 53-55 Hewer Crescent, Lower Hutt L18/184

d)    Hutt City Council and T&T Leighton Avenue Development Limited
Part of subdivision of 54 Leighton Avenue, Lower Hutt (isolation strip) L18/206

e)    Hutt City Council and Terence Michael Jordan, Julie Anne Jordan and Charles David Ellesmere Lindsay, Subdivision consent, 214 Whites line East, Lower Hutt L18/200

f)     Hutt City Council and Yu’s Development Limited
Subdivision consent, 52 Copeland Street, Lower Hutt L18/203

g)    Hutt City Council and Kevin William Beck and Julie Ann Beck and Deblanc Limited
Subdivision consent, 35 Main Road, Wainuiomata, Lower Hutt L18/224

Agreement for Sale and Purchase

h)    Hutt City Council and Urban Plus Limited
Former reserve land adjacent to 132 Molesworth Street, Taita, Lower Hutt L18/192

Encumbrance and Transfer

i)     Hutt City Council and Lower Hutt Health Limited
135 Witako Street, Lower Hutt L18/204

Partial Cancellation of Building Line Restriction

j)     Hutt City Council and Michael Francis Martin and Joanna Elizabeth Martin
9 Nile Street, Waterloo, Lower Hutt L18/229


Warrants Approved

Dipal Dhanani – HCC WARRANT-18-27

1. Local Government Act 2002
Authorised person pursuant to ss171, 173 (powers of entry in general)
Enforcement Officer pursuant to s177 (including additional powers of entry)

2. Health Act 1956

Environmental Health Officer pursuant to 128

3. Hutt Valley Trade Wastes Bylaw 2016

Authorised Officer pursuant to 1.5 and 6.4 (including powers under Hutt Valley Drainage Act 1967)

4. Litter Act 1979

Litter Control Officer pursuant to s5

5. Resource Management Act 1991

Enforcement Officer pursuant to s38(1)

6. Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012

Inspector pursuant to s197(1)

David Kenneth Gallagher – HCC WARRANT-18-26

1. Local Government Act 2002
Authorised person pursuant to ss171, 173 (powers of entry in general)
Enforcement Officer pursuant to s177 (including additional powers of entry)

2. Health Act 1956

Environmental Health Officer pursuant to s128

3. Hutt Valley Trade Wastes Bylaw 2016

Authorised Officer pursuant to 1.5 and 6.4 (including powers under Hutt Valley Drainage Act 1967)

4. Litter Act 1979

Litter Control Officer pursuant to s5

5. Resource Management Act 1991

Enforcement Officer pursuant to s38(1)

6. Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012

Inspector pursuant to s197

Tatana Junior Wharepapa – HCC WARRANT 18-028

 

1. Local Government Act 2002
Authorised person pursuant to ss171, 173 (powers of entry in general)
2. Land Transport Act 1998
Parking Warden pursuant to s128D
3. Resource Management Act 1991
Enforcement Officer (noise control only) pursuant to s38(2)

11.     QUESTIONS

Cr Barry asked if members had been notified of the Naenae Learners Pool roof issue prior to the Councillors workshop on Monday 3 December 2018?  He also asked why the roof issue was not prioritised and on the Council order paper for consideration at this meeting?

          Mayor Wallace responded that he and the Eastern Ward Councillors had been notified on either Sunday, 2 December or the morning of Monday, 3 December 2018.  He added that members had not been notified of the roof issue before the workshop as the roof issue was already a priority and work was progressing.

          Cr Barry raised a point of order believing there were no grounds to reject his proposed Notice of Motion regarding the roof issue. 

          The Chief Executive responded that Cr Barry’s proposed Notice of Motion was refused under Standing Order 27.2 (d).

          Cr Briggs asked how action on the roof issue could be undertaken when Council had not made a decision on the matter?  He also asked if the Chief Executive had taken into account the significance of the roof issue in Council’s Long Term Plan and whether officers had been told to prioritise the roof issue? 

          Mayor Wallace responded that it was an operational decision made by Council’s Strategic Leadership Team.  

          The Chief Executive responded that the roof issue was a top priority for officers.

12.     EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)              Minute No. C 18540(2)

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

13.     Committee Reports with Recommended Items

a)       Policy and Regulatory Committee - 26 November 2018
b)       Finance and Performance Committee - 28 November 2018

14.     Land Purchase - Eastern Hills (18/1943)

15.     Sale Negotiations (18/1944)

16.     MINUTES – COUNCIL 9 October 2018

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Report of the Policy and Regulatory Committee held on 26 November 2018 – Purchase of Land Lowry Bay

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations)(s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Report of the Finance and Performance Committee held on 28 November 2018 – Hutt City CFT Board – Appointment of Director Strategic Portfolio 6 monthly update

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons.(s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities(s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Land Purchase - Eastern Hills

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Sale Negotiations

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Minutes of the Hutt City Council held on 9 October 2018 – Appointment of District Licensing Committee Members and Process for the Recruitment of the Chief Executive

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 8.08pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 9.11pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019


 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Monday 14 January 2019 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

 

 

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr L Bridson

 

Cr J Briggs

Cr MJ Cousins

 

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

 

Cr M Lulich

Cr G McDonald

 

Cr C Milne (from 5.32pm)

Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  Cr Milne for lateness.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services  

                                         

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald)                                Minute No. C 19101

“That the apology received from Cr Milne for lateness be accepted.”

Cr Milne joined the meeting at 5.32pm.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

5.       EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                  Minute No. C 19102

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

6.       Chief Executive's Recruitment (19/1)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Chief Executive's Recruitment.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                             Minute No. C 19103

“That Mr Hollander and Mr Boyes, Principal Consultants, JacksonStone & Partners be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item “Chief Executive’s Recruitment as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.”  

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 5.35pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 6.35pm.

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019


427

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Meeting Rooms 1 and 2, Lower Hutt Events Centre, 30c Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 17 January 2019 commencing at 9.30am

 

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

 

 

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr L Bridson

 

Cr J Briggs

Cr MJ Cousins

 

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

 

Cr M Lulich

Cr G McDonald

 

Cr C Milne

Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.     

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

5.       EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)              Minute No. C 19101(2)

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

6.       Chief Executive's Recruitment (19/2)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Chief Executive's Recruitment.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)         Minute No. C 19102(2)

“That Mr Hollander and Mr Boyes, Principal Consultants, JacksonStone & Partners be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item “Chief Executive’s Recruitment as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.”  

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 9.35am and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 2.30pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


 

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 12 February 2019 commencing at 2.18pm

 

 

 

PRESENT:

Deputy Mayor D Bassett (Chair)

 

 

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

 

Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs

 

Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards

 

Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich

 

Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne

 

Cr L Sutton

 

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Mayor Wallace.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:        Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation  

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services

Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services

Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services

Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

Ms D Male, Committee Advisor

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:  (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)                         Minute No. C 19101(3)

“That the apology received from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

Members noted the conflicts of interest from Deputy Mayor Bassett in relation to Urban Plus Limited, from Cr Cousins in relation to Hutt City Communities Facilities Trust and from Cr Milne in relation to Seaview Marina Limited and Hutt Valley Tennis.

4.

RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL FROM THE COMMUNITY PLAN COMMITTEE DATED 12 FEBRUARY 2019

PROPOSED ANNUAL PLAN 2019/2020 (19/120)

 

Resolved(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                         Minute No. C 19102(3)

“That Council:

(i)    adopts the draft budgets attached as Appendices 1 to 4 to the report;

(ii)   agrees to increase rates by an average of 1.8% in 2019/20;

(iii)  notes the potential cost pressures currently not included in the draft budget, as outlined in the report (paragraphs 28 to 30 inclusive and paragraphs 44 to 67 inclusive );

(iv)  agrees to the changes to the draft budgets including the amendments agreed at the meeting; and

(v)   notes the further requests for officers to report back to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.”

5.       Miscellaneous

Amendments to the Terms of Reference for the District Plan Subcommittee, the City Development Committee and Council (19/107)

Memorandum dated 30 January 2019 by the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

The Divisional Manager, Democratic Services elaborated on the memorandum.

Members discussed the opportunity of including a sustainability aspect under the City Development Committee’s Terms of Reference. 

Resolved:  (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr McDonald)                   Minute No. C 19103(3)

“That Council:

(i)    notes the recommended Terms of Reference for the newly established District Plan Subcommittee set out in Appendix 1 to address Council’s decision made at its meeting held on 11 December 2018;

(ii)   notes that amendments to the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee and Council are required as set out in Appendix 2 and Appendix 3 to address Council’s decision made at its meeting held on 11 December 2018; and

(iii)  adopts the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee, the District Plan Subcommittee and Council attached as Appendix 1, 2 and 3 to the memorandum, subject to the Divisional Manager Democratic Services, in consultation with Cr Cousins, making amendments to the Terms of Reference for the City Development Committee to include wording around the Environmental Strategy as seen as appropriate.”

6.       QUESTIONS   

         
There were no questions.

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 2.27pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D Bassett

DEPUTY MAYOR

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


429

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Wednesday 27 February 2019 commencing at 5.02pm

 

 

 

PRESENT:

Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

 

 

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr L Bridson

 

Cr J Briggs

Cr MJ Cousins

 

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

 

Cr M Lulich

Cr C Milne

 

Cr L Sutton

 

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Cr G McDonald

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Ms A Blackshaw, Divisional Manager Communications and Marketing

                                          Ms K Alkema, Divisional Manager Human Resources

                                          Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                             Minute No. C 19101(2)

“That the apology received from Cr G McDonald be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”   

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

5.       EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)              Minute No. C 19102(2)

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

6.    Update from the Chief Executive's Employment Subcommittee regarding the APPOINTMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE(19/256)

       The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Update from the Chief Executive's Employment Subcommittee regarding the Appointment of the Chief Executive.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

Resolved:                                                                              Minute No. C 19103(2)

“That the Divisional Manager Communications and Marketing, the Divisional Manager Human Resources and the Divisional Manager, Democratic Services be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item “Update from the Chief Executive's Employment Subcommittee regarding the Appointment of the Chief Executive” as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.”  

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 5.07pm, and the non-public portion of the meeting closed at 5.50pm.

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

  


440

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

District Plan Committee

 

Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 29 November 2018 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr L Bridson (Chair)                    Cr MJ Cousins           

                                          Cr C Barry                                                Cr S Edwards

                                          Cr J Briggs                                                Cr T Lewis                             

      Cr C Milne                                                                 

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mayor WR Wallace

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr G Barratt

Cr G McDonald

Cr L Sutton

Cr M Lulich

Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation  

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services (part meeting)

Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer

Mr B Cato, General Counsel (part meeting)

Ms H Oram, Divisional Manager Environmental Consents

Mr A Cumming, Divisional Manager, District Plan

Ms C Tessendorf, Senior Environmental Policy Analyst (part meeting)

Mr J Jeffries, Environmental Policy Analyst

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

Mr J Hoyle, Communications and Marketing Advisor

Ms S Haniel, Committee Advisor

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

 There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

The Chair determined that the time limit for public comment would be extended to allow all speakers to be heard by the members.

 

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS    

There were no conflict of interest declarations.  

4.       Recommendation to Council - 29 November 2018

Proposed District Plan Change 46 Significant Natural Areas, Outstanding Natural Landscapes, Outstanding Natural Features and Coastal Natural Character (18/1800)

Speaking under public comment, Mr W Bearman-Riedel, representing Power Inc, opposed Proposed District Plan Change 46 (PPC46).  He believed he would lose sunlight, have building restrictions and lose property rights. He considered there were already sufficient rules in place to protect the bush.

Speaking under public comment, Mr A Olney, representing Power Inc, said that there had not been enough consultation on PPC46. He also said the maps did not adequately identify where restrictions ought to apply. He cited Royal Forest & Bird Protection Society NZ v New Plymouth District Council, which ruled that voluntary controls, on their own were not a sufficient protection to meet Council’s legal obligations.

In response to questions from members, Mr Olney said that the scale and accuracy of the maps was important. He considered that voluntary management of Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) in combination with rules would be sufficient for Council to meet its statutory obligations.

Speaking under public comment, Ms D Clark, said that she had an online petition to stop Council’s SNA project. She added that the Chief Executive had received a copy of the petition.  She did not know how many of the signatories lived in Lower Hutt.

Speaking under public comment, Mr G Gilbert opposed PPC46.  He believed he would not be able to develop his land and there was no compensation available for his loss.  He considered that Council should stop all developments on its green fields that contained flora and fauna. He queried why the Wainuiomata and Orongorongo Rivers had been removed from the SNA areas.

Speaking under public comment, Mr A Beatson, representing landowners, considered that SNAs needed to be accurately identified before Council notified PPC46.  He further said that the SNAs identified by Wildlands needed to be “ground truthed” before being included in PPC46.

Speaking under public comment, Mr I Gordon representing Ms C Henshaw and the Cretney family in Eastbourne, agreed with Mr Onley’s and Mr Beatson’s comments and that Wildlands were required to have correct ground truthing. He said that it was fatuous to suggest that consultation could occur after notification.

Speaking under public comment, Mr P Marriot said that he was a Resource Consultant and Conservationist. He opposed PPC46 and believed that private property owners were best placed to carry out forest management.

Speaking under public comment, Mr G Innes said that he had previously worked as a Chief Executive in three Councils. He considered that Council should take more time to consult further with the community and have correct mapping before proceeding with PPC46.

Speaking under public comment, Ms R Dentice, representing her wider Puketapu whanau, said that they owned five properties and it was the responsibility of her whanau to care for the land. She considered that PPC46 undermined the mana of her whenua by placing an SNA cloak over it. She further considered PPC46 confusing, offensive, frustrating and would disconnect her people from their whenua.

Speaking under public comment, Ms V Horrocks, Chair, representing the Eastbourne Community Board, said that landowners wanted certainty about the effects of PPC46 on their properties. She knew of people that were still trying to get information about their SNA from Council and until that occurred, people would not have confidence in PPC46. She noted that Council had two years to notify the decision and asked that officers spend more time with individual landowners.

Speaking under public comment, Mr A Alcorn said that Council needed to co-operate with landowners to identify the SNAs and assist them to protect their land.

Speaking under public comment, Mr C White said that PPC46 would prevent him from cutting back his bush in order for him to graze sheep. Therefore, he had already cut back the bush so that it would not be affected by the SNA.

Speaking under public comment, Ms N Lambourne believed that historically, officers had come onto her land under false pretenses, using the guise of doing a possum count, to assess the SNA on her land. She recommended that landowners do not let officers onto their land.

Speaking under public comment, Mr S Galyer said that he had cleared the gorse off his land and the rest was native bush. He did not approve of the way Councils treated SNAs, particularly the use of 1080.

Speaking under public comment, Mr P Baker said that the SNA maps were not accurate. He recommended that Council stop the SNA process for private landowners and reconsider what it was trying to achieve from PPC46.

Speaking under public comment, Ms L Collins said that all the land around her house was shown as a SNA. She noted that she would not be able to cut down the hebe that was overgrowing her deck. She added that Wildlands was the decision maker and Council was not following a democratic process.

Speaking under public comment, Mr G Absalom said that he owned Orongorongo Station. He had asked Council for a meeting with officers three times and had no response. He was alarmed that he would not be able to put tracks in or develop his property for tourism ventures.

The meeting adjourned at 7.45pm and reconvened at 7.53pm.

The Chair indicated her intention to move a motion to delay notifying PPC46 to allow further consultation with the community.

Cr Cousins raised a point of order regarding members  of the public creating disorder at the meeting.

The Chair noted the point of order.

Speaking under public comment, Mr B Lett said that SNAs imposed a severe restriction on the land and was akin to taking private property. He had plans to build an astronomical observatory or a small house on his land and objected strongly to PPC46.

Speaking under public comment, Ms R Maxwell and Ms T A Puketapu, representing the Chairman of Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and the Waiwhetu Marae Trust said that they had not been consulted on PPC46.  They believed Council had not completed its obligations under the principles of the Treaty of Waitangi to consult with mana whenua who have inherent rights of landownership. They requested that Council stop the SNA process and consult with mana whenua.

Speaking under public comment, Mr S Buckland said that he supported PPC46 in principle, however, he did not understand the implications to him personally. He requested that it be delayed and be reported back to the Committee in six months time.

Speaking under public comment, Mr J Edmunson said that a valuer had told him that a covenant would decrease the value of a property. He advised that he had not seen an impact assessment of the effect that PPC46 would have on property values.  He considered that Council could not make a decision unless it knew the cost.

Speaking under public comment, Mr O Revera said that the issue of SNAs arose in 1999 and Council should have put them in place in 2001. He bought the property in 2005 after checking it did not have a covenant on it. He considered that Council had not completed its obligations in 2001.

Speaking under public comment, Mr I Caddis said that he could not make judgements about PPC46 because he could not get basic information from Council on the matter. He added that Council should not be blindly following law, and should push back on behalf of its ratepayers.

Speaking under public comment, Mr G Sinclair encouraged members to set the policy for Council and not to simply rubber stamp recommendations from officers. He added that Council needed maximal input from the community on the matter.

Speaking under public comment, Ms L Mead said that she supported SNAs because they offered a layer of protection for biodiversity assets. She added that SNAs were an overlay on the District Plan and were not to stop people doing things on their property. She believed there was a lot of misinformation about SNAs in the community and people did not understand the issue.

Speaking under public comment, Ms L Gerrard said that she had a river through her property and when it flooded, they moved their stock to high ground. She believed that under the SNA she would not be able to use the high ground for stock.

Speaking under public comment, Mr T Hefford said that he was the Rural Fire Officer in Wainuiomata.  He expressed concern that landowners would light fires to clear bush to avoid the SNAs in PPC46.

Speaking under public comment, Mr P Roy said that he was confused about the s293 notice he received.  He believed it had contrary rules to PPC46 about protecting the biodiversity on his property. He was therefore confused about whether he could remove wilding pines, indigenous or exotic vegetation.

Speaking under public comment, Ms J Martin said that 80% of her property would be a SNA. However, 40% of that was gorse, scrub and manuka which she planned to clear to run a tourism venture on her farm. She noted that under PPC46 she would not be able to do so.

Speaking under public comment, Mr A Hart said that he supported SNAs.  However she believed Council should have undertaken a better consultation process. H e considered that people would clear their bush before PPC46 came into effect.

Speaking under public comment, Ms J Sylvester said that SNAs would have a 20% decrease on the value of freehold land. She believed that Council was using drones to assess SNAs. She knew of people that had negative health issues because of the SNA process. She considered SNAs should only be on Council land and that it be a voluntary process for private landowners.

Speaking under public comment, Ms J Wooton said that there were incidents of stressed landowners becoming unwell because of the SNA process.  She believed there was a lot of mistrust and ill feeling in the community about the issue.

Speaking under public comment, Mr C Innes said that he endorsed Council taking a six month delay before progressing the SNAs.

Speaking under public comment, Mr D Collins said that he supported Council taking an extra six months to consult before progressing SNAs. he SNA map of his property was incorrect and did not show one of the houses that was on his land.

Speaking under public comment, Mr P Matcham said that he supported SNAs and there was a lot of misunderstanding and some deliberate misinformation about the issue which had caused confusion. He had received helpful responses from officers who had done a site visit and answered his queries. PPC46 would be a public good achieved through a partnership between Council and landowners.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Matcham said that he would support having a Queen Elizabeth II covenant on his land.

Speaking under public comment, Ms V Nelson said that she did not appreciate the way that SNAs had been imposed on her land. She requested that Council consult further with the community.

Speaking under public comment, Mr K Jackson said that community engagement on SNAs could occur through workshops with the Forest and Bird Society, landowners and Council. He added that the Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society NZ v New Plymouth District Council case was different to the situation at Lower Hutt because the typography of the land differed. He further said that there were inconsistencies with the SNA mapping and encouraged Council to obtain community buy-in.

The meeting adjourned at 9.17pm and reconvened at 9.30pm.

The Divisional Manager District Plan and Mr Stephen Quinn, Partner, DLA Piper, elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the Divisional Manager District Plan advised that:

·           Evidence to show changes in biodiversity could be obtained by having a comprehensive monitoring regime.

·           Officers had engaged with iwi, (the Port Nicholson Block Settlement Trust (PNBST) and the Wellington Tenths Trust), for the past 18 months. Council’s relationship agreement with iwi was that Council would engage with PNBST in the first instance and take the advice of the PNBST and the Wellington Tenths Trust regarding engagement with iwi. Council recognised engaging with iwi on this project was on at least three levels; as a Treaty partner, obtaining iwi input into the technical assessments and as landowners.

·           Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) did not have a Regional Policy Statement in 2003.  Therefore, Council did not have the same obligation then, as it did now to implement SNAs.

·           Finalisation of SNA maps could occur during the formal consultation and submission processes.  PPC46 maps did not need to be finalised prior to consultation.

·           Officers had not used drones to assess SNAs.

·           Legal advice from DLA Piper was that if SNA protection on private land was solely voluntary, then Council would be unlikely to be meeting its statutory obligations under the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA).

·           Officers were undertaking site visits at times that suited property owners.  Those times included evenings and weekends.

·           He believed that landowners had given each other advice not to let officers onto their land because of their concern that the SNA areas would be increased. However, officers had given an undertaking that the SNA would not be increased without the agreement of the landowner.

·           Officers would not conduct site visits without the agreement of the landowners.

·           Officers did not recommend the use of forcible entry onto properties where landowners did not agree to a site visit.

·           Officers had always seen the need to do ground truthing, hence the programme of site visits. However, where landowners refused officers entry, the SNA could not be ground truthed. Following a site visit, most but not all landowners were happier with the proposed SNA on their land.

·           Officers continually received requests for site visits. However, only two staff, an ecologist and another staff member were available for the work. An increase of another two staff members would speed up the process.

·           Officers would be pleased to talk to Mr Absalom to correct an error regarding fixing a date for his site visit.

·           Officers would be able to discuss with Ms Gerrard about using her high ground for stock during flooding events. A site visit would be helpful. There was nothing in PPC46 to prevent stock entering an SNA. The emergency provisions of the RMA would overrule resource consent requirements in a flood emergency.

·           Parks owned by Council and GWRC were required, under statute, to have management plans in place, therefore had more protection than private land. However, there was room for improved biodiversity management on Council holdings.

·           Council’s public notice regarding RMA s293 consultation notice resulted from an Environment Court order for Council to consult on the proposed minor technical amendments to Proposed Plan Change 36 (PPC36), Notable Trees and Vegetation Removal. PPC36 was complex and difficult to explain in simple terms. He agreed that the timing of the PPC36 notice and the PPC46 report was confusing.  However, they were two separate issues.

Resolved: (Cr Briggs/Cr Bridson)                         Minute No. DPC 18501

“That Standing Order 4.2 be suspended in order to extend the meeting duration past 10.30pm.”

Moved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins)

“That the Committee:

(i)    recommends that Council:

(a)     notes the Proposed Plan Change, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(b)     instructs officers to do further consultation including mana whenua and site visits;

(c)     instructs officers to puts out a draft plan change consistent with proposed plan change 46 for consultation;

(d)     notes that changes to the maps will continue as more information becomes available;

(e)     encourages landowners to have a site visit onto their land; and

(ii)   recommends that the Community Plan Committee:

(a)     notes the report “Non-regulatory Support Measures for Indigenous Biodiversity on Private Land,” attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(b)     supports the funding of the following non-regulatory support measures that are complementary to Proposed Plan Change 46 as follows:

Support Measure

Annual Budget

(additional to existing)

Information and Advice

$10,000

Rates rebates for land protected in perpetuity by legal instrument on Record of Title

$10,000

Land use consent assistance including ecological assessments and consent fee remission

$120,000

SNA Grants 1

(small grants for traps, sprays, trees)

$25,000

SNA Grants 2

(large grants for covenants, ecological assessments, management plans)

$80,000

Total

$245,000”

The motion was declared lost by Division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Against

 

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lewis

Cr Milne

Cr Edwards

 

Total: 2

Total: 5

 

Cr Barry considered that Council needed to work with residents to obtain a good result. He did not agree that Council had to follow the same process that New Plymouth District Council followed. He also considered that a Council subcommittee would assist in the process and encourage a partnership approach with the community.  He believed that a voluntary approach with incentives would achieve the same benefits as PPC46.

Cr Edwards expressed support with a partnership approach to establishing SNAs. He believed it was important for officers to work with environmental groups, such as the East Harbour Environmental Association.

Cr Milne considered that people valued the environment more than they used to as attested to by the proliferation of predator free groups and bird counts. He said that had not seen any evidence of wholesale clearing of native bush and there would be little gain in having PPC46. He supported having a voluntary approach to SNAs and the use of Queen Elizabeth II covenants.

Cr Briggs expressed support with Cr Barry’s comments. He believed Council needed to work face to face with the community, Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and Waiwhetu Marae, to regain the faith that had been lost.  He considered that Council could monitor the voluntary uptake and the biodiversity in the next 12 to 24 months. He supported a partnership approach with the community and accepted the level of legal risk with the approach.

Cr Cousins did not believe a voluntary approach to SNAs would meet Council’s legal obligations. She encouraged landowners to have a site visit and for Council to work toward a draft plan change.

Cr McDonald said that she felt for people whose health had been affected by the SNA process. She supported a voluntary approach to SNAs and to wait for six months before proceeding with PPC46.

Cr Lewis believed that Council needed to build trust and relationships with residents. The community had told Council that it was not listening; however, members had listened tonight and would do their best for the community. She supported a voluntary approach to SNAs.

Cr Lulich said that he was particularly concerned about the stress on Eastbourne residents with regard to; whether the SNA would be on their Land Information Memorandum; the implications when they sold the property; and whether future generations could live on part of the land. He considered that there would be opposition in the Environment Court if Council proceeded with PPC46.  He supported a voluntary approach to SNA.

The Chair said that she had heard the angst in the community, and that people loved the bush and their land noting that the best people to manage the bush were the landowners.  However, there had been a lot of misunderstanding and miscommunication about PPC46 which had put the community offside.  She considered PPC46 was the correct document for having better communication about SNAs.  She considered a voluntary approach would not be sufficient for Council to meet its statutory obligations.

In response to a question from a member, the Divisional Manager District Plan said that a District Plan change and mapping would not be required if Council decided to take a voluntary approach to SNAs.  If SNAs were mapped in the District Plan, then their purpose would be to trigger a consent process.  In a voluntary SNA scheme, the triggering of the consent process would not be required.

recommended: (BY DIVISION) (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs) Minute No. DPC 18502

“That the Committee:

(i)    recommends that Council:

(a)   takes a partnership approach in identifying and protecting Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) across Lower Hutt, without mandatory restrictions, and instead provide for incentives for the protection and conservation of SNAs and the flora and fauna that live within them;

(b)   notes that this would allow for stakeholders, and mana whenua (including Te Runanganui o Taranaki Whanui ki te Upoko o Te Ika a Maui and Waiwhetu Marae), to work together in good faith, and on a case by case basis, towards the enhancement of our biodiversity in Lower Hutt; and

(c)   asks officers to amend the proposed plan change to give effect to this resolution, and that it be reported back to full Council as soon as practicable;  and

(ii)   recommends that the Community Plan Committee:

(a)     notes the report “Non-regulatory Support Measures for Indigenous Biodiversity on Private Land,” attached as Appendix 2 to the report; and

(b)     supports the funding of the following non-regulatory support measures that are complementary to Proposed Plan Change 46 as follows:

Support Measure

Annual Budget

(additional to existing)

Information and Advice

$10,000

Rates rebates for land protected in perpetuity by legal instrument on Record of Title

$10,000

Land use consent assistance including ecological assessments and consent fee remission

$120,000

SNA Grants 1

(small grants for traps, sprays, trees)

$25,000

SNA Grants 2

(large grants for covenants, ecological assessments, management plans)

$80,000

Total

$245,000”

 

The motion was declared carried by Division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lewis

Cr Milne

Cr Edwards

 

Against

 

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Total: 5

Total: 2

5.       Information Item

District Plan Update (18/1661)

Report No. DPC2018/5/151 by the Divisional Manager District Plan

Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Cousins)                           Minute No. DPC 18503

“That the item being discussed be referred to the next meeting of the Committee.”

 

6.       QUESTIONS

There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 11.21 pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cr L Bridson

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


446

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Community Plan Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,

Lower Hutt on

Tuesday 12 February 2019 commencing at 9.30am

 

 

PRESENT:                        Mayor WR Wallace (Chair) (until 10.28am)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry (from 9.36am)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett (from 9.31am)   Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                          Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                             Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                               Cr L Sutton (from 9.33am)

 

APOLOGIES:                  Apologies were received for lateness from Deputy Mayor Bassett and Crs Barry and Sutton.  

 

IN ATTENDANCE:        Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Mr L Allott, Chief Information Officer (part meeting)

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, City Transformation (part meeting)  

Mr B Kibblewhite, General Manager, Corporate Services

Mr M Reid, General Manager, City and Community Services (part meeting)

Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services (part meeting)

Mr P Benseman, Acting Chief Financial Officer

Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs (part meeting)

Ms M Laban, Divisional Manager, Community Projects and Relationships (part meeting)

Ms L Dalby, Senior Communications Advisor (part meeting)

Mr J Pritchard, Principal Research and Policy Advisor (part meeting)

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager, Democratic Services

Ms D Male, Committee Advisor

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald)                       Minute No. CPC 19101

“That the apologies received from Deputy Mayor Bassett and Crs Barry and Sutton for lateness be accepted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Deputy Mayor Bassett joined the meeting at 9.31am.

Cr Sutton joined the meeting at 9.33am.

Cr Barry joined the meeting at 9.36am.

 

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

 

3.      PRESENTATION BY THE MAYOR (18/1994)

The Chair delivered his presentation. He said Council was on year two of three of the Long Term Plan (LTP), with a mix of ambitious projects to enchance the City. He said that budget assumptions were based on keeping the rates the lowest in the region with a number of significant cost pressures across the City, the region and nationally. He added that members and officers would work collectively to deliver on the exciting and ambitious LTP.

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS     

Members noted the conflicts of interest from Deputy Mayor Bassett in relation to Urban Plus Limited, from Cr Cousins in relation to Hutt City Community Facilities Trust and from Cr Milne in relation to Seaview Marina Limited and Hutt Valley Tennis.

5.       Recommendations to Council – at the conclusion of the Community Plan Committee meeting

i)

Supporting Lower Hutt's Indigenous Biodiversity (19/88)

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr D Innes and Ms P Innes expressed their view that Council should copy what Wellington had achieved with Zealandia and Whanganui with Bushey Park, to fence protected areas to extinguish pests and reintroduce birds. They said that 26k hectres of public land was not looked after, with wild goats, pigs and deer, where the natural vegetation had changes and gaps in the canopy cover had developed. They added that it had been successfully argued in 2002 in the Environment Court, the then called SNRs, were counter productive on private land. They believed that it would be ideal to fence the Mohaka Wetlands area and another area on the coast for marine bird breeding.

In response to questions from members, Mr Innes confirmed support for the additional funding, with more effective control on wild deer. He believed the 26k hectres of land was made up of public land and was owned jointly between Council, Greater Wellington Regional Council and the Department of Conservation with 5k in private ownership.

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services confirmed for members that 19k hectres was public land and 8k hectres was private land.

In response to a question from a member, Mrs Innes said that landowners required help with pest control and that there needed to be a pest plan to eradicate the wild goats, pigs and deer and barberry plants.

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms D Clark highlighted the importance of Council circulating information to all landowners in the City not just the landowners affected. She elaborated on the costs of pest traps.  She added there should be a commitment to being pest free.

In response to a question from a member, Ms Clark suggested that an exchange scheme be run to hire traps, with the payment of a deposit.

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young said that the funding requested was for $265k for the coming year, where last year it was $245k in addition to the statutory requirement funding. He expressed concern wiuth losing the money from the budget along with the protection, with only an additional $20k a year request.

Mayor Wallace commented that the $265k was a new request for money.  He added that a Council decision identified issues for officers to review and address, with work underway in relation to this.

 

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that a key issue was the regional plan, for a long term benefit, with consideration on landowners wanting to put on a covenant to protect their land.

Mayor Wallace left the meeting at 10.28am and Deputy Mayor Bassett assumed the chair.

In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) had a pest control plan which covered a wide area and related to wild pigs, goats and deer.  He also advised that Council’s plan concentrated on plant pests. He said that Council managed 200 hectres of land and 8k hectres had been identified as private land. He added that Council’s plan was to be reviewed as part of Council’s Environmental Strategy.

 

Cr Cousins commented that a submission to GWRC’s as part of its Annual Plan process should be consided, in relation to pests and specifically deers.

 

ReCOMMENDED: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)   Minute No. CPC 19102

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that Council owns and manages approximately 2,000 hectares of bush reserve land with ecological value, most of which has protection via Reserves Act classifications;

(ii)   notes that Council currently allocates within the Parks budget a total of $415,000 annually to support indigenous biodiversity on these reserves; and

(iii)  agrees to include an indicative ongoing annual provision in its 2019/20 draft annual plan of $265,000 to support indigenous biodiversity on identified private property.”

 

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)              Minute No. CPC 19103

“That the Committee:

(i)       asks officers to prepare suitable comments to include in Council’s submission to the Greater Wellington Regional Council’s Annual Plan on its Regional Pest Management Strategy to be signed by the Mayor and Deputy Mayor; and

(ii)     asks officers to send the submission to Councillors for their information.”

ii)

Draft Budget 2019/2020 (18/1995)

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms V Horrocks, Chair representing the Eastbourne Community Board (ECB) questioned the reasons why the Eastern Bays shared path had been reassessed. She said that ambitious projects with technical and bureaucratic processes were likely to go overcost. She hoped that the resource consent would be lodged in March. She added that is was not just a nice project to have, but there were safety issues to address.

Speaking under public comment  Mr D Wiltshire said that the shared path had been a vision of Council for more than two decades.   He added that a resident survey undertaken late in 2016 favoured completion of the project.  He believed that a beach replenishment project should be considered as part of the proposal. He added that an enhancement project would have a significant community, regional and national benefit. He concluded that to not proceed would signal a significant vote of no confidence in Council, not just from Eastbourne, but the whole Hutt Valley.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Wiltshire said that each bay had been consulted on the project, with ECB involved and the community’s views had been taken on board by the working group.

In response to a question from a member, Ms Horrocks advised that she thought the most dangerous areas to be addressed first would be Windy Point, between Days Bay and Eastbourne, Lowry and York Bays. She added that the whole project was required as issues could arise from areas being completed in part.  She noted that the subsidy was based on the whole project.

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Young expressed support for reassessing the shared paths and cycleways. He added that bulk water supply was a cost pressure which should have already been part of the draft budget. He questioned if the Whaitua process would consider water consumption in the Hutt Valley.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Young said that the cycleway in parts of the Eastern Bays would just stop and when cycling into the 70km/h roadway it felt quite dangerous.

 

Deputy Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 11.04am and Cr Cousins assumed the chair.

The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated on the report.

Deputy Mayor Bassett rejoined the meeting at 11.07am and assumed the chair.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that officers were working with contractors in relation to the living wage.  He noted that the matter would be reported to the next Finance and Performance Committee prior to consideration by this Committee.

In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that a report on the bulk water supply would be presented to the next Finance and Performance Committee.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that the potential cost increase for the Beltway and Eastern Bays shared pathway projects had been included within the draft budget.  He noted that other costs associated with the Mobility Hub had not yet been determined.

The meeting adjourned at 11.23am and resumed at 11.42am.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that rates rise was illustrated with example properties, although residential and commercial properties were not treated in the same way in relation to rates.

In response to a question from a member, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that Wellington Water Ltd (WWL) had a communication strategy for the region in relation to water usage. He further expanded on water consumption across the region.

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, City and Community Services advised that worked continued on the Eastern Bays shared pathway project and a workshop would be organised  within the next three months.  He added that funding was sought for the whole project from the New Zealand Transport Agency.

 

Members asked officers to report back on paying the Living Wage to contractors through the appropriate committee with proposed recommendations to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.

Members noted that officers were working with Wellington Water Ltd to organise a workshop on the resilience programme for water.

 

Members noted that officers would be reporting on water consumption to the next Finance and Performance Committee.

 

Members noted that officers would be reporting back on the Eastern Bays cycleway/shared path to the next Community Plan Committee meeting.

 

Resolved:(Cr Bridson/Cr McDonald)                 Minute No. CPC 19104

“That the Committee agrees that if the cycleway programme of work needs to be reassessed in the future that officers undertake consultation including the Walkway Cycle Advisory Group at that time.”

 

 

Cr Milne left the meeting at 12.33pm.

The Chief Information Officer and the General Manager, City and Community Services elaborated on the Petone Centre.

 

Cr Milne rejoined the meeting at 12.34pm.

 

In response to questions from members, the Chief Information Officer advised that options for the Petone Centre were as follows:

·           replacement of the current Petone library building, including building apartments above the community centre;

·           replacement of the current Petone library building with the addition of a master plan for the surrounding area;

·           repair and upgrade of the current Petone library building;

·           repair of the current Petone library building; or

·           explore the option of building a completely new building.

Members noted that officers were working with Urban Plus Ltd regarding options for the Petone Centre.  Members also noted that officers would be reporting back to the Community Plan Committee meeting on 5 June 2019.

 

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager, Corporate Services advised that the project would not breach Council’s Significance Policy.  

Members discussed information provided by Hutt Valley Tennis Inc.

 

Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr  Sutton)  Minute No. CPC 19105

“That the Committee:

(i)        asks officers to undertake further research on the Hutt Valley Tennis Inc proposal; and

(ii)     reports back to the City Development Committee with proposed recommendations to the Community Plan Committee at its meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.”

 

Cr Sutton left the meeting at 1.03pm.

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services elaborated on the options for Days Bay Wharf.

In response to questions from members, the Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services advised that the refurbishment works could potentially be deferred for three to five years, as works were completed on cycles on four to five years. He added that there was a risk that costs and tenders increasing over that period.

Cr Sutton rejoined the meeting at 1.20pm.

Members discussed the options, project budget contingency and community expectation of the works to the commercially utilised wharf.

The meeting was adjourned at 1.27pm and resumed at 2.03pm.

 

RECOMMENDED:(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Cousins)Minute No. CPC 19106

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)       accepts the lowest tender for the Days Bay Wharf reburbishment as is and asks officers to work hard keeping the project within budget; and

(ii)     establishes a project working group to oversee the Days Bay Wharf reburbishment with the membership being the Chair of the Finance and Performance Committee (Chair) and one Harbour Ward Councillor.”

 

Cr Milne requested that his dissenting vote be recorded against the above matter.

 

The Acting Chief Financial Officer displayed the net debt forecast including the $500k for wharves and $265k for biodiversity

The General Manager, Corporate Services elaborated the the net debt forecast.

 

RECOMMENDED(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Cousins) Minute No. CPC 19107

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    adopts the draft budgets attached as Appendices 1 to 4 to the report;

(ii)   agrees to increase rates by an average of 1.8% in 2019/20;

(iii)  notes the potential cost pressures currently not included in the draft budget, as outlined in the report (paragraphs 28 to 30 inclusive and paragraphs 44 to 67 inclusive );

(iv)  agrees to the changes to the draft budgets including the amendments agreed at the meeting; and

(v)   notes the further requests for officers to report back to the Community Plan Committee meeting to be held on 5 June 2019.”

 

6.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 2.18pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

D Bassett

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 26th day of March 2019

 


Attachment 1

HCC Hearing Decision FINAL – 4-6 Bolton St RM180261

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 1

HCC Hearing Decision FINAL – 96A Witako St, 79B Copeland St, 51 Hall Cr - RM180215 RM180236 RM180275

 

 

 

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


547

 

UPPER HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

HUTT VALLEY SERVICES COMMITTEE

 

Report of a meeting held in the Upper Hutt City Council Chambers,

Level 2, Civic Administration Building, 838-842 Fergusson Drive, Upper Hutt on
Friday 1 March 2019 commencing at 9.30am

 

 

PRESENT:                             Cr D Wheeler, UHCC (Chair)

Cr G McDonald, HCC (Deputy Chair)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett, HCC (from 9.34am)

Cr C Carson, UHCC

Cr L Sutton, HCC

                                                Cr P Lambert, UHCC

Cr H Swales, UHCC

 

                                               

APOLOGIES:                         Deputy Mayor Bassett (from 9.34am)

Mayor W N Guppy, UHCC

Mayor W R Wallace, HCC

 

 

IN ATTENDANCE:                 Mr P Kelly, Chief Executive, UHCC

Mr B Hodgins, Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, HCC

                                               Mr B Sherlock, Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, HCC (part meeting)

                                               Mr B Latimer, Parks and Reserves Manager, UHCC (part meeting)

Mr D Bentley, Team Leader, Environmental Health, HCC

Ms J McKelvey, Administration Support Officer, UHCC

Ms D Male, Committee Advisor, HCC

Mrs H Clegg, Minute Taker, UHCC

 

 

                                           

REPORT TO COUNCIL

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

 

1.

APOLOGIES

 

 

RESOLVED:

That the apologies received from Deputy Mayor Bassett (for lateness), and from Mayor Guppy and Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.

Moved                   Cr Wheeler/Cr Swales

HVSC190101

 

CARRIED

 

2.

PUBLIC FORUM

 

There was no public forum.

 

3.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

 

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

 

4.

MINUTES

 

With regard to item 13: Dog Control Update, Cr Wheeler requested an update on the neutering programme and the Doggone Pilot Project.  The Team Leader, Environmental Health HCC agreed to arrange for the appropriate officer to report back on these issues.

Deputy Mayor Bassett entered the meeting at 9.34am.

With regard to item 8: Silverstream Landfill Update, Cr Wheeler requested an update on the proposed workshop concerning possible changes to the landfill levy.   The Contracts Manager, Solid Waste agreed to report back with suitable dates.

Cr Swales requested that in future, action points that arose from minutes be included in reports for the following meeting’s agenda. 

 

 

RESOLVED:

That the minutes of the Hutt Valley Services Committee meeting held on 23 November 2019 be confirmed as a true and correct record.

Moved                   Cr Wheeler/Cr Swales

HVSC190102

 

 

 

 

CARRIED

 

5.

PROGRESS REPORT: PROPOSED APPEARANCE BYLAW

 

Report by the Principal Policy Advisor, Hutt City Council.

 

 

In response to questions from members, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council confirmed a draft Bylaw would be presented to Upper Hutt City Council. He agreed to ensure the appropriate officer reported back to this committee on the composition of the joint hearings subcommittee.

Cr Lambert requested clarity in the title of the Bylaw and suggested a preamble introduction to explain the nature of the Bylaw.  He expressed concern that members of the public would be unaware of the nature of this Bylaw.  The Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council advised the title would probably be changed to ‘Appearance Industries Bylaw’, and that it covered all industries where piercing occurred, and where beauty processes could lead to infection.

In response to a query as to whether the proposed timeframe was realistic and achievable, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council confirmed this was the case, providing resources were available to progress the bylaw.

In response to a question from a member, the Team Leader, Environmental Health, Hutt City Council advised that this was a multi-cultural issue and the appropriate consultation had occurred.

 

 

RESOLVED

 

THAT the Committee recommends that Hutt City Council and Upper Hutt City Council agree to the amended timeframe for the development of the proposed Appearance Bylaw as follows:

 

(i)         1 March 2019 Hutt Valley Services Committee (HVSC) receives the new timeframe.

(ii)       18 March to 31 May 2019 Pre-consultation undertaken.

(iii)      30 August 2019 Results of pre-consultation presented to the Hutt Valley Services Committee.

(iv)      8 October – 8 November 2019 Special consultative procedure concerning the proposed bylaw.

(v)       19 October 2019 Local body elections.

(vi)      Late 2019/early 2020 establish a (joint) hearings subcommittee.

(vii)    Early 2020 hear submissions to proposed bylaw and resulting recommendations considered by a hearings subcommittee.

 

Moved                   Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Swales

 

HVSC190103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CARRIED

6.

PROJECT PENCARROW PROGRESS REPORT: 9 NOVEMBER 2018 – 28 JANUARY 2019

 

 Report by the Environmental Engineer, Hutt City Council.

 

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, Hutt City Council advised a preferred tenderer had been selected for the DBO Contract, Veolia, with a contract expected to be finalised in four to six weeks’ time.

The Strategic Advisor, City and Community Services, Hutt City Council advised the resource consent application was on hold, pending the outcome of the proposed Natural Resources Plan, expected by the end of July 2019. 

In response to a question from a member, the Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, Hutt City Council advised that the Limited Notification Process would take a few weeks, and that he understood the existing consent would end within the next two months.  He added that as an application by Wellington Water Ltd (WWL) to Greater Wellington Regional Council for a renewal had already been lodged, the terms of the existing consent would roll over until the new consent became operative.

In response to a question from a member, the Contracts Manager, Solid Waste, Hutt City Council explained the Whaitua Implementation Process in Porirua had taken several years to complete, and that the Wellington Harbour/Hutt Valley Whaitua process had just commenced. He agreed any recommendations would need to be taken into account.

Deputy Mayor Bassett, Hutt City Council advised that for water quality, central government had already announced a regulator would be appointed, and that water standards would be revisited.  He commended officers for the work completed to date on this project.

 

 

RESOLVED:

 

That the Committee notes the progress on Project Pencarrow as outlined in the report.

Moved                   Cr Wheeler/Cr Sutton

HVSC190104

 

 

CARRIED

 

7.