HuttCity_TeAwaKairangi_BLACK_AGENDA_COVER

 

 

 

10 August 2017

 

 

 

Order Paper for Council meeting to be held in the

Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt,

on:

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday 15 August 2017 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

Membership

 

 

Mayor W R Wallace (Chair)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

Cr G Barratt

Cr C Barry

Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs

Cr M Cousins

Cr S Edwards

Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich

Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne

Cr L Sutton

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the dates and times of Council Meetings please visit www.huttcity.govt.nz


HuttCity_TeAwaKairangi_SCREEN_MEDRES
 

 

 

 


COUNCIL

 

Membership:

13 

Meeting Cycle:

Council meets on a six weekly basis (Extraordinary Meetings can be called following a resolution of Council; or on the requisition of the Chair or one third of the total membership of Council)

Power to (being a power that is not capable of being delegated)[1]:

        Make a rate.

        Make bylaws.

        Borrow money other than in accordance with the Long Term Plan (LTP).

        Purchase or dispose of assets other than in accordance with the LTP.

        Purchase or dispose of Council land and property other than in accordance with the LTP.

        Adopt the LTP, Annual Plan and Annual Report.

        Adopt policies required to be adopted and consulted on under the Act in association with the LTP or developed for the purpose of the Local Governance Statement.

        Appoint the Chief Executive.

        Exercise any powers and duties conferred or imposed on the local authority by the Public Works Act 1981 or the Resource Management Act 1991 that are unable to be delegated.

        Undertake all other actions which are by law not capable of being delegated.

        The power to adopt a Remuneration and Employment Policy.

Decide on:

Policy issues

        Adoption of all policy required by legislation.

        Adoption of policies with a city-wide or strategic focus.

District Plan

        Promotion of Plan Changes and Variations recommended by the District Plan Committee prior to public notification.

        The withdrawal of Plan Changes in accordance with clause 8D, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991.

        Approval, to make operative, of District Plan and Plan Changes (in accordance with clause 17, Part 1, Schedule 1 of the Resource Management Act 1991).

Representation, electoral and governance matters

        The method of voting for the Triennial elections.

        Representation reviews.

        Council’s Code of Conduct and Local Governance Statement.

        Elected Members Remuneration.

        The outcome of any extraordinary vacancies on Council.

        Any other matters for which a local authority decision is required under the Local Electoral Act 2001.

        All matters identified in these Terms of Reference as delegated to Council Committees (or otherwise delegated by the Council) and oversee those delegations.

        Council‘s delegations to officers and community boards.

Delegations and employment of the Chief Executive

The review and negotiation of the contract, performance agreement and remuneration of the Chief Executive.

 

Meetings and committees

        Standing Orders for Council and its committees.

        Council’s annual meeting schedule.

Operational matters

        The establishment and disposal of any Council Controlled Organisation or Council Controlled Trading Organisation and approval of annual Statements of Corporate Intent on the recommendation of the Finance and Performance Committee.

        Civil Defence Emergency Management Group matters requiring Council’s input.

        Road closing and road stopping matters.

        All other matters for which final authority is not delegated.

Appoint:

        The non-elected members of the Standing Committees (including extraordinary vacancies of non-elected representatives).

        The Directors of Council Controlled Organisations and Council Controlled Trading Organisations. 

        Council’s nominee on any Trust.

        Council representatives on any outside organisations (where applicable and time permits, recommendations for the appointment may be sought from the appropriate standing committee and/or outside organisations).

        The Chief Executive of Hutt City Council.

        Council’s Electoral Officer, Principal Rural Fire Officer and any other appointments required by statute.

 

    


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Ordinary meeting to be held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 15 August 2017 commencing at 6.00pm.

 

ORDER PAPER

 

Public Business

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Generally up to 30 minutes is set aside for public comment (three minutes per speaker on items appearing on the agenda). Speakers may be asked questions on the matters they raise.

3.       Mayoral Statement (17/1126)  

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

5.       Committee Reports with Recommended Items

a)      Traffic Subcommittee

3 July 2017                                                                                                    15

Recommended Items

Item 4a)     Mason Street, Moera - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions  (17/755)  16

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4b)    Parkside Road, Seaview - Proposed P15 Parking Restrictions (17/756)          16

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4c)     Seaview Road - Proposed Bus Stop and Associated No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (17/775)                                                                16

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4d)    Stevens Grove - Council Fleet Car Park Proposed Parking Restrictions  (17/913)     17

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

b)      Policy and Regulatory Committee

31 July 2017                                                                                                  36

Recommended Items

Item 4a)     Parking Policy (17/945)                                                           37

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4b)    Review of Traffic Bylaw (17/886)                                          38

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4c)     Naming Policy 2017-2020 (17/610)                                         39

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed with a new part (iv) to read:

 

(iv)      asks officers to prepare a set of guidelines for the Community             Boards around the process for naming.”

 

Item 4d)    Review of Parks and Reserves Bylaw 2007 (17/855)           39

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4e)     Review of Cemeteries Bylaw  (17/879)                                 40

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

Item 4f)     Draft Amended Local Alcohol Policy (DALAP) (17/1027) 41

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 c)        City Development Committee

1 August 2017                                                                                               90

Recommended Item

Item 4)       Report back on Proposal for Suburban Shopping Centre Revitalisation Budget  (17/1047)                                                                                   91

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

d)      Finance and Performance Committee

2 August 2017                                                                                               99

Recommended Item

Item 4)       Treasury Risk Management Policy Changes (17/1039)     100

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

e)      Community Services Committee

3 August 2017                                                                                             140

Recommended Item

Item 4)       Council Adoption of Regional Waste Mangement and Minimisation Plan (17/1171)                                                                                                  141

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

    

6.       Miscellaneous

a)      Temporary Discharges of Treated Wastewater (17/1092)

Report No. HCC2017/3/195 (3) by the General Manager, City Infrastructure        153

Mayor’s Recommendation:

“That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed with a new part (iii) to read:

 

(iii)       thanks officers for the detailed work undertaken on the project to         date.”

 

 

b)      Appointment to the Councillor Leadership Group  (17/1050)

Memorandum dated 7 July 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services    162

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendation contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

 

c)       Appointment of Trustee to the Louise Bilderbeck Hall Trust (17/1213)

Report No. HCC2017/3/199 (3) by the Solicitor                                     164

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendations contained in the report be endorsed and appoints Cr Briggs to the selection panel as the Wainuiomata Ward Councillor.”

 

d)      Road Stopping and Sale of Service Lane, Tocker Street, Taita (17/1209)

Report No. HCC2017/3/13 (3) by the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens      196

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendation contained in the report be endorsed.”

 

e)      Community Panel Delegations (17/1125)

Memorandum dated 18 July 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services  199

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendations contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

 

f)       Amendment to the Terms of Reference for the Finance and Performance Committee (17/1224)

Memorandum dated 9 August 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services          206

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendation contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

 

g)      Amendment to the Code of Conduct for Elected Members (17/1221)

Memorandum dated 9 August 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services          209

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendation contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

 

h)      Catering at Meetings (17/1220)

Memorandum dated 9 August 2017 by the Mayor                                  211

Mayor’s Recommendation:

That the recommendation contained in the memorandum be endorsed.”

     

7.       Minutes

Meeting minutes Hutt City Council, 23 May 2017                                            213

Meeting minutes Hutt City Council, 8 June 2017                                              241

Meeting minutes Extraordinary Meeting of Council, 12 June 2017                  243

Meeting minutes Hutt City Council, 29 June 2017                                            247  

8.       Committee Reports without Recommended Items

a)      Community Plan Committee

16 May 2017                                                                                               254

8 June 2017                                                                                                 270

b)      Hearing by Independent Commissioner

2 May 2017                                                                                                 292

c)       District Plan Committee

26 July 2017                                                                                                338

d)      Hutt Valley Services Committee

4 August 2017                                                                                             343

        

 

9.       QUESTIONS

With reference to section 32 of Standing Orders, before putting a question a member shall endeavour to obtain the information. Questions shall be concise and in writing and handed to the Chair prior to the commencement of the meeting.

10.     Sealing Authority (17/838)

Report No. HCC2017/3/12 (3) by the Executive Assistant - Governance and Regulatory           351

Mayor’s Recommendation:

It is recommended that Council approve the affixing of the Common Seal to all relevant documents in connection with the items specified in Schedule 1 in accordance with Standing Order 8.2.”

  

11.     EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

MAYOR'S RECOMMENDATION:

 

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

12.     Minutes

          23 May 2017

          12 June 2017

          29 June 2017

 

13.     Community Panel Appointments (17/1056)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes of the Hutt City Council held on 23 May 2017 – Community Representatives for Civic Honours Committee

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Minutes of the Hutt City Council held on 12 June 2017 – Matters pertaining to RiverLink Project

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Minutes of the Hutt City Council held on 29 June 2017 – Appointment of Trustees to Hutt City Community Facilities Trust

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Community Panel Appointments.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kathryn Stannard

DIVISIONAL MANAGER, SECRETARIAT SERVICES

         


 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Traffic Subcommittee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Monday 3 July 2017 commencing at 3.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr MJ Cousins (Chair)                Cr Bridson                 

                                           Cr Briggs                                      Cr Edwards (from 3.02pm)

                                           Cr Lewis                                       Cr Sutton

                                          

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:        Mr D Simmons, Traffic Asset Manager

                                           Mr Z Moodie, Traffic Engineer Network Operations

                                           Mr S Leal, Traffic Engineer

Ms K Glanville, Senior Committee Advisor

Ms R Bowman, Committee Administrator

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

 There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.

 

Cr Edwards joined the meeting at 3.02pm.

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS       

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

 

 

 

 

4.       Recommendations to Council - 15 August 2017

a)

Mason Street, Moera - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions  (17/755)

 

 

 

RECOMMENDED:       (Cr Lewis/Cr Bridson)           Minute No. TRS 17301

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Mason Street, Moera attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

b)

Parkside Road, Seaview - Proposed P15 Parking Restrictions (17/756)

 

 

 

recommended:       (Cr Lewis/Cr Sutton)             Minute No. TRS 17302

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of P15 Parking Restrictions, Monday to Friday only, in Parkside Road, Seaview attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

c)

Seaview Road - Proposed Bus Stop and Associated No Stopping At All Times Restrictions (17/775)

 

 

 

recommended:        (Cr Briggs/Cr Edwards)        Minute No. TRS 17303

“That the Traffic Subcommittee recommends that Council approves the installation of a Bus Stop and associated No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Seaview Road attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

d)

Stevens Grove - Council Fleet Car Park Proposed Parking Restrictions  (17/913)

 

The Chair considered that given the demand for parking in the City, the Stevens Grove car park should be available for public parking after hours and not be a bookable space.

 

recommended:    (Cr Cousins/Cr Lewis)             Minute No. TRS 17304

“That the Subcommittee recommends that Council:

(i)         approves the use of 21 car parks in the new car park off Stevens Grove as reserved parking for Council Authorised vehicles Monday to Friday 7am-5pm, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)        approves the installation of a P180 Electric Vehicle Parking Restriction Afterhours Only (5.00pm-7.00am, Monday to Friday and weekends) in the new car park off Stevens Grove, attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(iii)       approves that the Stevens Grove car park will be available after hours for public parking; and

(iv)       asks officers to monitor the parking situation at Stevens Grove and report back to the Subcommittee if any issue arises.”

        

5.       QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 3.15 pm.

 

 

 

 

 

Cr MJ Cousins

CHAIR

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017

 


Attachment 1

Mason Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions 9.2017

 


Attachment 1

Parkside Road - Proposed P15 Parking Restrictions 10.2017

 


Attachment 1

Seaview Road - Proposed Bus Stop and Associated No Stopping At All Times Restrictions 11.2017

 


Attachment 1

Stevens Grove - Council Fleet Car Park Plan

 


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Policy and Regulatory Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on

 Monday 31 July 2017 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                         Cr MJ Cousins (Chair)               Cr C Barry (until 6.51pm)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett             Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                    Cr S Edwards (Deputy Chair)

                                             Cr T Lewis                                   Cr M Lulich

                                             Cr C Milne                                   Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Mayor Wallace. An apology was received from Cr Barry for early departure.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr B Cato, Solicitor (part meeting)

Ms W Moore, Divisional Manager, Strategy and Planning

Mr J Gloag, Divisional Manager, Road and Traffic (part meeting)

Ms H Oram, Divisional Manager, Environmental Consents (part meeting)

Mr G Stuart, Divisional Manager, Regulatory Services (part meeting)

Mr D Simmons, Traffic Asset Manager (part meeting)

Mr G Sewell, Principal Policy Advisor (part meeting)

Mr J Pritchard, Senior Research Policy Advisor (part meeting)

Mr J Hoyle, Communications and Marketing Advisor

Ms S Haniel, Committee Advisor

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:  (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                Minute No. PRC 17301

“That the apology from received from Mayor WR Wallace, and the apology for early departure received from Cr Barry be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.     

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS       

Crs Cousins and Bridson declared a conflict of interest in item 4 f) and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

4.       Recommendations to Council - 15 August 2017

a)

Parking Policy (17/945)

Speaking under public comment, Mr M Fisher said that Petone had specific needs and would need flexibility in Council’s approach to parking.  He further said that he did not support paid parking in Petone.  He added that he supported the use of smart technologies which would limit parking times according to demand.

In response to questions from members, Mr Fisher said that the needs of Petone differed to the needs of the Central Business District because Petone had hospitality businesses.  He further said that he did not know whether there would be a stocktake of the parking. Other methods of alleviating parking would be to increase the supply of parks, possibly by making Park and Ride changes. He added that visitors to Petone did not know where the parks were located and would only look for parks on Jackson Street.

The Senior Research Policy Advisor, Strategy and Planning and the Divisional Manager, Strategy and Planning elaborated on the report.

Members considered that they needed the parking priorities to be clearly identified and there were many competing uses for parking from different groups of users.  They noted that officers had identified many uses and users in the report.

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. PRC 17302

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)       agrees to the following Parking Policy objectives:

 

(a)    a safe city – prioritising the safe and efficient movement of people, goods and services;

(b)    a liveable and thriving city – supporting place-making, amenity and economic growth;

(c)   a city that is environmentally resilient – reflecting Council’s work in leading environmental stewardship and resilience;

(d)   a city that has equity of access – supporting Council’s work to create a walkable and people-friendly city accessible to all transport modes; and

(e)   a high level of customer service – delivering a quality experience for residents and visitors;

(ii)     directs officers to proceed to developing Stage 2 which comprises developing operational guidelines and approaches to the mechanisms to deliver the Parking Policy objectives;

(iii)  directs officers to consult publicly on the Parking Policy and the operational approaches once completed; and

(iv)  directs officers to report back to the Policy and Regulatory Committee prior to consultation.”

 

b)

Review of Traffic Bylaw (17/886)

The Principle Policy Advisor and the Solicitor presented the report.

In response to questions from a member, the Solicitor said that he would send information to Cr Milne regarding reversing into angle parks, and parking on the wrong side of the road.

Members were concerned about the road safety aspects of containers being placed on roads without adequate rear lights to alert road users of the hazard.

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. PRC 17303

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA 2002) requires Council to review its bylaws within 10 years of a  previous review;

(ii)   notes that the Traffic Bylaw 2007 has been reviewed in accordance with section 155 of the LGA 2002;

(iii)  notes the outcome of the section 155 review of the Traffic Bylaw 2007 is to propose amendments to the Traffic Bylaw, more particularly detailed in the draft Statement of Proposal attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(iv)  agrees to consult on the draft Summary of Proposal, draft Statement of Proposal and the draft Traffic Bylaw 2017, attached as Appendices 1, 2 and 3 to the report, in accordance with the requirements of the LGA 2002, by means of a special consultative procedure; and

(v)     establishes a subcommittee consisting of Deputy Mayor Bassett and Councillors Cousins, Edwards, Briggs and Lulich to hear submissions on the proposed Traffic Bylaw and recommend the appropriate action to Council for consideration and approval.”

 

Resolved: Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                  Minute No. PRC 17304

“That the Committee notes that the draft Summary of Proposal, the draft Statement of Proposal and the draft Traffic Bylaw 2017 (subject to legal confirmation) will be included on the agenda for Council, together with the Committee’s recommendations.”

 

c)

Naming Policy 2017-2020 (17/610)

The Divisional Manager, Strategic Services elaborated on the report.

Members noted that if the Community Boards lost their naming delegations then they would have very minimal delegating powers left. Members further noted that Community Boards did not cover the entire City and that Council decided new names for streets, roads, parks, reserves and sports grounds for those areas. Members considered that Council should hold the lists of names that communities have recorded as being important to them.

 

MOVED: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)

That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)      approves the draft Naming Policy 2017-2020 attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)     directs officers to consult further on the revised Naming Policy 2017-2020;

(iii)           notes that the Terms of Reference for Community Boards will need to be changed to reflect the changes to the Naming Policy;

(iv)        approves the changes to the Terms of Reference for Community Boards as underlined in Appendix 2 to the report; and

(v)          agrees to add “Places of Remembrance” to the list of reserved street names.

The motion was put to the vote in two parts.  Parts (i) and (ii) and (v) were declared CARRIED on the voices.  Parts (iii) and (iv) were declared LOST on a show of hands with four votes in favour and five against.

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett) Minute No. PRC 17305

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)      approves the draft Naming Policy 2017-2020 attached as Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)     directs officers to consult further on the revised Naming Policy 2017-2020; and

(iii)    agrees to add “Places of Remembrance” to the list of reserved street names.” 

 

d)

Review of Parks and Reserves Bylaw 2007 (17/855)

The Principle Policy Advisor and the Solicitor presented the report.

 

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Lulich/Cr Briggs)         Minute No. PRC 17306

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that section 159 of the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA 2002) requires Council to review its bylaws no later than 10 years after they were last reviewed;

(ii)   notes that the Parks and Reserves Bylaw 2007 has been reviewed in accordance with section 155 of the LGA 2002;

(iii)  notes the outcome of the section 155 review of the Parks and Reserves Bylaw is to propose amendments to the Parks and Reserves Bylaw 2007 as more particularly detailed in the draft Statement of Proposal, as attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(iii)   agrees to consult on the draft Summary of Proposal, draft Statement of Proposal, and proposed draft Parks and Reserves Bylaw as attached as Appendices 1,2 and 3 to the report, in accordance with the requirements of the LGA 2002 by means of a special consultative procedure; and

(iv)   establishes a subcommittee consisting of Councillors Cousins, Edwards, Lewis, Bridson and Sutton to hear submissions on the proposed Parks and Reserves Bylaw and recommend the appropriate action to Council for consideration and approval.”

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Lulich/Cr Briggs)                        Minute No. PRC 17307

That the Committee notes that the draft Summary of Information, draft Statement of Proposal and the draft Parks and Reserves Bylaw 2017 (subject to legal confirmation), will be included on the agenda for Council, together with the Committee’s recommendation.”

 

e)

Review of Cemeteries Bylaw  (17/879)

The Principle Policy Advisor and the Solicitor elaborated on the report.

 

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Lewis/Cr Barry)           Minute No. PRC 17308

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA 2002) requires Council to review its bylaws to ensure that they comply with the matters set out in section 155 and 159 of the Act;

(ii)   notes that the Cemeteries Bylaw 2007 has been reviewed in accordance with section 155 of the LGA 2002;

(iii)  notes the outcome of the section 155 review of the Cemeteries Bylaw 2007 is to propose a new bylaw, as more particularly detailed in the draft Statement of Proposal attached as Appendix 2 to the report;

(iv)   agrees to consult on the draft Summary of Proposal, draft Statement of Proposal, and the draft Cemeteries Bylaw, attached as Appendices 1, 2 and 3 to the report, in accordance with the requirements of the LGA 2002 by means of a special consultative procedure; and

(v)     establishes a subcommittee consisting of Councillors Cousins, Edwards, Milne, Lulich and Lewis to hear submissions on the proposed Cemeteries Bylaw and recommend the appropriate action to Council for consideration and approval.”

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Lewis/Cr Barry)                      Minute No. PRC 17309

“That the Committee notes that the draft Summary of Proposal, draft Statement of Proposal and the draft Cemeteries Bylaw 2017 (subject to legal confirmation), will be included on the agenda for Council, together with the Committee’s recommendations.”                                                                    

 

f)

Draft Amended Local Alcohol Policy (DALAP) (17/1027)

Crs Cousins and Bridson declared a conflict of interest and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.  Crs Cousins and Bridson left the meeting for the duration of the item.

The Principle Policy Advisor and the Solicitor elaborated on the report.

The Principle Policy Advisor presented a map of the City which showed the suburbs which would have the proposed off-licence cap applied.  He advised that the map would be included in the Council Order Paper for its meeting to be held on 15 August 2017.

 

RECOMMENDED: (Cr Edwards/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. PRC 17310

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    receives the decision from the Policy and Regulatory Subcommittee (the Subcommittee), attached as Appendix 1 to this report;

(ii)   notes the unanimous recommendation of the Subcommittee is that Council adopts the proposed amendments to the Local Alcohol Policy (LAP) and moves to the next stage of the process, being the production and notification of a Provisional Amendment to its LAP;

(iii)  takes into account the information previously provided to the Policy and Regulatory Committee in the officers report dated 27 February 2017, attached as Appendix 3 to the report; and

(iv)  agrees to produce a provisional amendment to the LAP;

(a)           agrees that it continues to wish to have an amendment to the LAP;

(b)           agrees to adopt the provisional amendment to the LAP attached as Appendix 2 to the report; and

(b)     in accordance with section 80 of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012, instructs officers to give public notice of:

(1)     the provisional amendment to the LAP;

(2)     rights of appeal against it; and

(3)     the grounds on which an appeal may be made.”

 

5.

Dog Control Activity Report 2016/2017 (17/1052)

Report No. PRC2017/3/4 by the Regional Manager Animal Services

The Regional Manager Animal Services elaborated on the report.

Members noted that more dog attacks were reported to the Accident Compensation Corporation than were reported to Council because the majority of attacks were by dogs known to the victim.

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                 Minute No. PRC 17311

“That the Committee notes the information contained in this report.”

6.

General Manager's Report (17/1038)

Report No. PRC2017/3/181 by the Divisional Manager Environmental Consents

Cr Barry left the meeting at 6.51pm.

Cr Milne requested that the General Manager’s report include additional data about how many building consent applicants had been informed that they needed to provide additional information with their application.

 

Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                  Minute No. PRC 17312

“That the Committee notes the contents of the report.”

7.       Information Items

a)

Risk and Resilience Update (17/1089)

Memorandum dated 13 Jul 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Strategy and Planning

Speaking under public comment, Ms V Horrocks said that Council needed to take a precautionary approach to climate change and sea level rise.  She added that there were two inexpensive actions which Council could take; to engage legal expertise to assess any likely liability for Council; and to acquire and use an interactive software tool at a cost of approximately $100,000 to identify threatened places, assets and communities and specific response actions. She asked that Council appoint a senior manager to the climate change workstream.

Speaking under public comment, Mr J Horrocks asked Council to locate its climate change policies in a single place.  He further said that affected communities needed to be consulted before major changes were proposed.  However, the process should not be delayed because of consultation.  He asked Council to include climate change into its Long Term Plan in the same way that Greater Wellington Regional Council had included it in its Regional Policy Statement.  He further asked that Council use Key Performance Indicators so that there would be measurable deliverable actions to ensure climate change work occurred.

The Divisional Manager, Strategy and Planning elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Executive said that Council was planning to employ a Resource and Sustainability Manager in the near future to accelerate work in the Risk and Resilience area and this would include climate change.  He further said that there were a number of actions and measures in the Environmental Sustainability Strategy Implementation Plan.  He added there was a checklist for report writers, and that officers could review the wording to ensure that issues of resilience would be considered when writing reports.

The Chair asked officers in include environmental updates in the General Manager’s report.

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs)                             Minute No. PRC 17313

“That the Committee:

(i)       asks officers to prioritise and ascertain any additional costs required for:

(a)      legal expertise to assess any likely liability vis a vis land use decisions and the impact this has on where people decided or will decide where to build/live/carry out business; and

 

(b)    acquiring and using sea level rise maps to identify threatened places, assets and communities and specific response options.  This would require an interactive software tool to be developed and used at an indicative cost of $100k. this would provide Council with firm data on which to plan for adaptation and mitigation for individual assets and households.  Data at this granular level would assist Council to successfully plan for and protect vulnerable parts of the city; and

(ii)     asks officers to provide a report to the Policy and Regulatory Committee by the end of 2017 regarding any additional costs needed for this work to proceed, to enable consideration prior to forwarding to the Community Plan Committee.”

b)

Policy and Regulatory Committee Work Programme (17/1044)

Report No. PRC2017/3/12 by the Committee Advisor

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)        Minute No. PRC 17314

“That the report be noted and received.”

8.       QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 7.35 pm.

 

 

 

Cr MJ Cousins

CHAIR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017  


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

City Development Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 1 August 2017 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Deputy Mayor D Bassett (Chair)     Cr C Barry (from 5.34pm)

                                           Cr G Barratt                                       Cr MJ Cousins     

                                           Cr S Edwards                                    Cr T Lewis           

                                           Cr M Lulich                                       Cr G McDonald

                                           Cr C Milne                                         Cr L Sutton

                                           Mayor WR Wallace

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr B Sherlock, General Manager, City Infrastructure 

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr G Craig, Divisional Manager, City Development (part meeting)

Ms P Rotherham, Development Liaison Manager (part meeting)

Mr A Hopkinson, Senior Traffic Engineer (part meeting)

Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs

Mr M Curr, Sport and Recreation Programmes Manager (part meeting)

Ms S Simcox, Communications and Marketing Team Leader

Ms K Glanville, Senior Committee Advisor

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

 There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

 

Cr Barry joined the meeting at 5.34pm.

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS    

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.       Recommendations to Council - 15 August 2017

Report back on Proposal for Suburban Shopping Centre Revitalisation Budget  (17/1047)

The Divisional Manager, City Development and Development Liaison Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the Divisional Manager, City Development advised that it was important for the role to be ‘on the ground’ and seen to be making improvements in two or three suburban shopping centre areas.  He said the role would not mirror the previous roles of Retail Coordinator.  He agreed that relationship building was essential to the role and would investigate ways to address building relationships with non-english speaking retailers.

In response to questions from members, the Development Liaison Manager confirmed that the role would report on a six monthly basis to the Committee and would updated members during the initial planning stage.  She reitirated that the role would identify two to three shopping centres to focus on.

Cr Edwards questioned whether a 12 month fixed term contract would impact on the calibre of candidates applying for the role.

Cr Sutton considered a ‘Match-Fund’ would be a better use of the funds and all shopping centres would have an opportunity to apply.  She asked that some funding be released now to upgrade the condition of a particular shop in the Stokes Valley Shopping Centre especially with the Stokes Valley Community Hub opening soon.

In response to further questions from members, the Divisional Manager, City Development advised that there was not enough funding to employ a Neigbourhood Precinct Placemaker and provide a ‘Match-Fund’ across 15 shopping centres.  He confirmed there was no current resource undertaking work in this area.  He said that the role would be reviewed after 24 months.

Cr Milne said he would prefer an outcome based fund.

RECOMMENDED:       (Cr Edwards/Cr Barry)         Minute No. CDC 17301

“That the Committee recommends that Council approves the proposal for the Neighbourhood Precinct Placemaker role and activities.”

Cr Milne requested that his dissenting vote be recorded against the above matter.

5.

Proposed Temporary Road Closure and Proposed No Stopping Restriction - Andrews Avenue (17/1085)

Report No. CDC2017/3/185 by the Senior Traffic Engineer

 

The Senior Traffic Engineer elaborated on the report.  He confirmed that no objections to the temporary road closure had been received.

In response to questions from members, the Senior Traffic Engineer advised that consultation had been undertaken with businesses in Andrews Avenue.  He considered that all legal requirements had been met.

 

Resolved:           (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)               Minute No. CDC 17302

“That the Committee:

(i)    agrees to approve the following proposed Temporary Road Closures subject to the conditions listed in the Proposed Temporary Road Closure Impact Reports and Plan attached as Appendix 1 and 2 to the report:

       Kai On High

       Andrews Avenue from Daly Street to High Street, on the third Thursday of every month from August 2017 to July 2018, from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., for the Kai On High event;

(ii)   agrees, for the Kai On High event, to temporarily rescind, for the period 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on the third Thursday of every month from August 2017 to   July 2018, all current parking restrictions applying to Andrews Avenue on both sides, from Daly Street to High Street; and          

(iii)  agrees, for the Kai On High event, to approve for the period 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on the third Thursday of every month from August 2017 to July 2018, a No Stopping At All Times parking restriction for Andrews Avenue on both sides, from Daly Street to High         Street.”

 

6.

General Managers' Report (17/1043)

Report No. CDC2017/3/186 by the General Manager, Strategic Services

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Dave Grant representing Petone Hockey Club (the Club) advised that due to the Club amalgamating with a Wellington city based women’s hockey club, it had formally resigned from Petone Sportsville as of 1 August 2017.

Speaking under public comment, Mr Chris Carter representing Petone Central Bowling Club (the Club) advised that at its recent Annual General Meeting, the Club had given an unanimous direction to resign from Petone Sportsville.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Carter advised that the Club considered it would be disadvantaged by the new plan by going into a joint building and having a smaller space than they currently occupied.

Speaking under public comment, Mr Wayne Smith, Chairman of Petone Rugby Football Club (the Club) advised that the Club’s Executive Committee had unanimously agreed to resign from Petone Sportsville as the project did not fit with the strategic vision of the Club.  He asked for assistance with the Club’s application for a lease at North Park.

Mayor Wallace advised he would arrange a meeting with Mr Smith to discuss the lease application.

Speaking under public comment, Mr Richard Teone from the Petone Rugby Football Club supported Mr Smith’s comments.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, City Infrastructure advised he would follow up regarding plans to promote community use of the new pavilion area in Riddiford Gardens.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Community Services advised that currently $20,000 had been committed to complete an operational business plan for both the Petone and Wainuiomata Sportsvilles to address questions raised during the Annual Plan process.  He said no further funding had been committed until this work had been completed.  He stated that officers would not sign long term leases with Petone Central Bowling Club and Petone Rugby Club until such a time as a final decision was made on Petone Sportsville and North Park. 

Cr Cousins asked that photos of record be taken of the Stokes Valley Community House and archived.

 

Resolved:        (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Mayor Wallace)           Minute No. CDC 17303

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes the updates contained in the report;

(ii)   endorses the decision to demolish the Stokes Valley Community House; and

(iii)  notes the response contained in the officer’s report to questions from the committee regarding the Walter Nash Fitness Centre.”

 

7.       Information Items

a)

Recognition of Council's efforts in the North East (17/1036)

Memorandum dated 3 July 2017 by the General Manager, Community Services

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Roger Wood from Sport New Zealand provided an overview of the active communities work in the youth space undertaken in the North East.  He advised that the North East Pathways project had made a positive impact on Avalon Intermediate School and Taita College in both increased academic achievement and roll numbers.

Speaking under public comment, Mr Ian Hastie, Principal of Avalon Intermediate School thanked Council for identifying and supporting the North East area.  He informed members about the Taka Trust’s (Te Awakairangi Access Trust) work to provide children in the North East with access to Wifi and devices to take home. 

The General Manager, Community Services elaborated on the report.  He acknowledged the partners and officers involved in the three projects.  He advised that while Council was not a winner at the Beyond Sport Global Awards, it was an honour to be a finalist. 

The Chair congratulated the General Manager, Community Services and his team for their outstanding work and the recognition received.

 

Resolved:    (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Mayor Wallace)    Minute No. CDC 17304

“That the Committee receives the report.”

b)

City Development Committee Work Programme (17/1103)

Report No. CDC2017/3/107 by the Senior Committee Advisor

 

Resolved:    (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Mayor Wallace)          Minute No. CDC 17305

“That the work programme be received.”

8.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 7.04pm.

 

 

 

Deputy Mayor D Bassett

CHAIR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Finance and Performance Committee

 

Minutes of a meeting held in the Council Chambers,

2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Wednesday 2 August 2017 commencing at 5.30pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr G Barratt                                 Deputy Mayor D Bassett

                                          Cr J Briggs (from 6pm)                Cr MJ Cousins

                                          Cr S Edwards                               Cr M Lulich

                                          Cr C Milne (Chair)                       Cr L Sutton

                                          Mayor WR Wallace (until 6.49pm)

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Cr Barry. Apologies were received from Cr Briggs for lateness from Mayor Wallace for early departure.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer

Mr D Newth, Financial Accounting Manager (part meeting)

Ms E Davids, Risk and Assurance Manager (part meeting)

Mrs A Doornebosch, Committee Advisor

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:   (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                           Minute No. FPC 17301

“That the apologies received from Cr Barry and for lateness from Cr Briggs and early departure from Mayor Wallace be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.   

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS     

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

          Precedence of business

         

Resolved:     (Cr Milne/Mayor Wallace)                                       Minute No. FPC 17302

“In accordance with Standing Order 10.4, the Chair accorded precedence of business to item 5, Insurance Update.”

          The item is recorded in the order in which it is listed on the order paper.

 

4.

Recommendation to Council - 15 August 2017

Treasury Risk Management Policy Changes (17/1039)

 

 

 

The Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.  

Mr Stuart Henderson, Partner from PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and Mr Jason Bligh, Associate Director from PwC presented a Credit and Interest Rate Market Update and Outlook presentation.

Mr Henderson noted two key elements for Council within the Treasury Risk Management Policy (‘the Policy’) – how much it costs to borrow funds and the term of these loans.  He highlighted the increasing correlation between long term interest rates in the USA and New Zealand markets.  He said Reserve Bank actions with the official cash rate dictated interest rate levels in New Zealand.

Mr Bligh noted the continuing low interest rate trends, influenced by the US market.   He highlighted credit was more expensive than the interest rates implied, with a tight labour market, falling unemployment, low growth rates and low spending.  He said current low spending trends were a global issue which made it challenging for central banks to raise interest rates.   He said short term interest rates were not expected to move, but increases were expected with long term rates. He highlighted the challenge in the sector was accuracy with debt forecasting, which was one of the key considerations when determining policy limits.  It was important not to over-hedge.

In response to questions from members, Mr Henderson noted challenges in determining where to fix interest rates in organisations such as Council with large infrastructure spending.  He said PwC had been using 4% as a benchmark for interest rate levels, which provided Council room to extend its duration where possible.  He said a review of the Policy could entail reconsidering the maximum fixed debt forecast to align with Council’s new Financial Strategy. 

Mayor Wallace left the meeting at 6.49pm.

Deputy Mayor Bassett suggested a workshop for members on the Credit and Interest Rate Market Update and Outlook to outline what had been discussed at the meeting.

Cr Briggs suggested a transcript of the meeting and any background information be distributed to members prior to the workshop. 

 

 

 

RecommendED:    (Cr Milne/Cr Barratt)      Minute No. FPC 17303

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)       approves the recommended changes to the Treasury Risk Management Policy attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

 

(ii)     takes up the invitation from PricewaterhouseCoopers to provide a Credit and Interest Rate Market Outlook workshop to members.”

 

5.

Insurance Update (17/601)

Report No. FPC2017/2/124 by the Chief Financial Officer

 

The Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.   He highlighted Council’s insurance required renewal in October 2017.  He said Council had provided up to date information on its assets, including updated insured values, construction details, and percentage compliance with National Building Standards.  He said this together with Probable Maximum Loss modelling undertaken by Aon Insurance, and Tonkin and Taylor would provide a good data set to be presented to insurers in London in September 2017.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Financial Officer said the 60% provision from central government for underground assets was provided up to a claim of $350M, and anything above that Council would have to fund 40%.   He said the value of assets was reviewed annually with a focus on high value assets, and a thorough review was conducted every three years.   He noted the 100% budget assets increase had been absorbed through savings achieved from retaining some insurance policies prior to the Kaikoura earthquake, and the redirection of rural fire funding.

Mr Tony Owen, the Deputy Managing Director from Aon Insurance noted New Zealand insurers were working within the New Zealand and London markets.  He highlighted the ranging impacts from different insurers in New Zealand from the Kaikoura earthquake.  He noted both AIG and VERO had suffered the biggest losses, and as a result were considering increases in premiums and in some cases reducing or completely withdrawing the level of cover they provide to the Wellington market. 

In response to questions from members, Ms Joanna Wong, Aon Relationship Manager said Council’s insurance policies included loss of profit insurance, but this had to be associated with physical loss to Council property.  She said loss modelling was based on building construction details, GIS information and maps and percentage compliance with National Building Standards.  She noted this was completed on a property by property basis.  She advised Council could consider having higher excesses to keep premiums down, in consultation with the Wellington Council’s Insurance Group.

In response to questions from members, Mr Owen advised a representative from Porirua City Council on behalf of the Outer Wellington Shared Services Insurance Syndicate, along with the Aon Insurance team, would present to underwriters from Lloyds and the European company markets in London.  He said the Aon team would then negotiate final terms for Council.  

Mayor Wallace asked the Chair to discuss with the Chief Executive if the Chief Financial Officer should accompany presenters to London, to provide a local context,  build relationships and provide learnings for future needs.

Cr Briggs joined the meeting at 6pm.

Mayor Wallace acknowledged the contributions by Aon representatives and the Finance team during the recent period of uncertainty.  

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                             Minute No. FPC 17304

 

“That the Committee notes the report.”

 

6.

Risk and Assurance Update and Operational Risk Profile 2017 (17/1010)

Report No. FPC2017/3/183 by the Risk and Assurance Manager

 

The Risk and Assurance Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Risk and Assurance Manager noted items 9 and 11 contained in the officer’s report were new to the 2017 Operational Risk Profile.  She said officers now had a better understanding of health and safety obligations for officers acting in voluntary roles.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Milne/Cr Sutton)                                                  Minute No. FPC 17305

“That the Committee:

(i)         notes the information in this report; and

(ii)        notes the Operational Risk Profile 2017 as approved by the Strategic Leadership Team, attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

7.

Audit New Zealand Interim Management Report for the Year Ending 30 June 2017 (17/1042)

Report No. FPC2017/3/187 by the Financial Accounting Manager

 

The Financial Accounting Manager elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the Financial Accounting Manager advised officers met with representatives from Audit New Zealand prior to audits. He said Audit New Zealand representatives, at that time, provided some background to their focus, and had indicated this year’s additional area of focus would be 3 Waters, especially water quality.

In response to a question from a member relating to sensitive expenditure, the Chief Financial Officer noted the matter related to a staff farewell function, was appropriate, but not strictly in compliance with Council’s policy, and total expenditure was $100.

 

Resolved:   (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                          Minute No. FPC 17306

 

“That the Committee notes this report.”

 

8.

Interim Finance Update (17/1041)

Report No. FPC2017/3/188 by the Budgeting and Reporting Manager

 

The Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.  He noted additional financial Activity Statements would be emailed to members. 

In response to questions from members, the Chief Financial Officer said Council’s Annual Leave Policy allowed for officers to carryover comparatively high annual leave balances.  He highlighted however, that only two officers currently breached the policy and did not believe Council had an issue with annual leave balances.  He said he had expressed concern regarding the deadline of central government funding for Cycleways Projects.  He noted costs of these developments in Wainuiomata were higher than planned, which were being managed by budget offsets, and were still under negotiation.   He agreed to provide a six monthly report to the first Finance and Performance Committee meeting of 2018, regarding Huia Pool developments and funding.

 

Resolved:   (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                           Minute No. FPC 17307

 

“That the Committee notes the unaudited 2016/17 full year financial performance and year-end position.”

9.       Information Item

Finance and Performance Work Programme 2017 (17/803)

Report No. FPC2017/3/106 by the Committee Advisor

The Committee Advisor elaborated on the report.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Financial Officer advised the Rates Postponement Scheme for Ratepayers over 65 years was an optional scheme and applicants would not have to prove hardship to qualify, should Council approve such a policy.

Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Barratt)                                        Minute No. FPC 17308

“That the report be noted and received.”

 

10.     QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 7.29pm.

 

 

Cr C Milne

CHAIR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017


Attachment 1

Treasury Risk Management Policy June 2017 Review

 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Community Services Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 3 August 2017 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Cr G Barratt (Chair)

Cr J Briggs                                  Cr S Edwards

Cr M Lulich                                Cr G McDonald          

Cr C Milne (until 6.42pm)         Cr L Sutton

Mayor WR Wallace                   

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr J Partridge, Environmental Sustainability Manager (part meeting)

Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager (part meeting)

Ms M Laban, Community Projects and Relationship Manager

Mr J Ballantyne, City Safety Manager (part meeting)

Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs

Ms L Knowles, Community Facilitator (part meeting)

Ms S Lytollis, Communications and Marketing Advisor

Ms H Clegg, Minute Taker

 

 

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:       (Cr Barratt/Cr Sutton)                                 Minute No. CSC 17301

“That the apology for early departure received from Cr Milne, be accepted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.     

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS     

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

 

4.       Recommendation to Council - 15 August 2017

Council Adoption of Regional Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (17/1171)                                                                                            

The Environmental Sustainability Manager elaborated on the report.  He explained that the consultation undertaken showed strong support for the proposals and targets.

In response to questions from members, the Environmental Sustainability Manager advised that the Local Action Plan had already been approved by Council and that the only action within the Regional Waste Management and Minimisation Plan (WMMP) which may require additional funding in the future was the possible Resource Recovery Centre at Silverstream Landfill.  He explained that a feasibility study regarding the Resource Recovery Centre was currently being conducted, and any final decision in regard to this would need to be made by Council.  He agreed that income generated from a Resource Recovery Centre would cover operational costs and potentially produce a profit.  He believed that potential loss of income from the Landfill as a result of increased diversion would need to be accounted for, but that this should be regarded as deferred income rather than lost income.  He said that investigative work was continuing.  He concluded that Council would need to divert significantly more waste from landfill in order to comply with the WMMP waste reduction target.

recommended:    (Cr Barratt/Cr Bridson)           Minute No. CSC 17302

“That the Committee recommends that Council:

(i)    notes that 836 regional submissions were received on the draft Waste Management and Minimisation Plan;

(ii)   notes that the submissions signal a strong level of support (between 85%-100%) for the proposed primary regional target, which is to reduce the waste sent to municipal class A landfills from 600kg per person per annum to 400kg per person per annum by 2026;

(iii)  notes that feedback from submitters illustrates that there is a high level of support for the proposed regional actions, as well as for the suite of local level Territorial Authority action plans;

(iv)  notes that in response to submissions received, seven out of the eight territorial authorities have amended their local Waste Management Minimisation Plan Action Plans; and

 

 

 

(v)   adopts the Waste Management Minimisation Plan, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, including the following amendments with proposed new text underlined:

(a)     Add reference to “The Litter Act (1979)” in the bullet point list on page 10 of the draft WMMP;

 (b)    Under section 1.1.1 ‘Why work together?’ add a new sixth bullet point (aa) below, and a new paragraph immediately following the bullet point (bb) below:

(aa)    “Supporting tangata whenua in the exercise of kaitiakitanga, which broadly refers to the exercise of guardianship by the tangata whenua of an area in accordance with tikanga Māori in relation to natural and physical resources.  Kaitiakitanga also includes the ethic of stewardship, and includes the responsibility of ensuring that a resource is secured and in a fit state to pass onto future generations; and

(bb)    The tangata whenua view of reality is that the world is interrelated and interconnected.  Therefore tangata whenua are bound, through the whakapapa (lineage and genealogical descent) to the natural environment.  Issues of waste management are therefore a concern to iwi, as well as to the wider community;”

(c)      Under R.R.1. Develop and Implement a Regional Bylaw, add the following words:

Investigate and if feasible develop, implement and oversee monitoring and enforcement of a regional waste bylaw (including but not limited to regulating hazardous waste, polystyrene, e-waste, medical waste and other priority wastes), or suite of regionally consistent bylaws.

Note – A footnote shall also be added to clarify the interpretation of the action, as follows:

For clarity, a range of waste management and minimisation issues will be considered as part of the bylaw review process.  However in accordance with statutory requirements, the development of a bylaw will only be deemed necessary if a bylaw is determined to be the most appropriate way to addressing the perceived problem;

(d)     Under R.L.M.1 Shared Governance and Service Delivery, add the following words:

Promote, investigate and where appropriate and cost effective, support the establishment of shared governance and service delivery arrangements and pricing mechanisms where such arrangements have the potential to enhance the efficiency of waste management and minimisation initiatives within the region;

(e)      Amend the description of R.IN.1 Resource recovery network to:

Investigate and if feasible, develop a region-wide resource recovery network – including but not limited to, facilities for construction and demolition waste, glass, food and/or biosolids, and other organic waste; and

(f)           Add the following new regional action under Leadership and Management: (R.L.M.5) “In conjunction with the wider work on the resilience of the Wellington region, undertake analysis on the resilience of our waste systems in the Wellington region, and through regional engagement provide advice on how to deal with waste in an emergency such as natural disasters”.  (Action title proposed as “Resilient waste management systems” under Leadership and Management).”

5.

Jackson Street Streetscape Design (17/1098)

Report No. CDC2017/3/184 by the Urban Design Manager

 

 

The Urban Design Manager elaborated on the report.  He explained the project was focussed on understanding and balancing the diverse spatial demand placed upon the street, both now and into the future.  He indicated that self-identity and cultural expression took many forms and that these needed to be weighed up against other social amenity and business activity.  He advised a recent public workshop had been well attended.  He said comments included the area being more pedestrian and cycle friendly, bus stops sited appropriately and the establishment of suitable public gathering spaces.  He concluded that there were implications arising from Petone being identified as an area for future urban growth as well as being significant within the regional transport network.

Cr Milne left the meeting at 6.42pm.

In response to questions from members, the Urban Design Manager explained the final detailed concept plan was to be completed in October 2017.  He added that this was when decisions concerning the design of street lighting, street signs, rubbish bins, street seating and pavers would be made.

 

 

Resolved:     (Cr Barratt/Cr Edwards)                                  Minute No. CSC 17303

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes details of the proposed process for ‘The Jackson Street Streetscape Design’;

(ii)   notes given the modest $50,000 budget, that this piece of work will be to clarify a good high level approach to develop Jackson Street into the coming decades;

(iii)  notes that work will be sufficient to give timely direction to the selection of new street furniture and the installation of street art; and

(iv)  notes that project deliverables will not include detailed design, working drawings, accurate costings, or contract documentation.”

 

 

6.

Chair's Verbal Report

 

Resolved:   (Cr Barratt/Mayor Wallace)                                    Minute No. CSC 17304

“That the Chair and members of the Community Services Committee formally acknowledge and congratulate the General Manager and staff of Council’s Community Services Division for receiving the first place Award in the Community Engagement Category entitled Transformation Taita at the recent Local Government New Zealand Conference 2017.”

 

7.

General Manager's Report (17/974)

Report No. CSC2017/3/191 by the General Manager, Community Services

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Kevin Goldsbury and Mr Matt Renata on behalf of the Hutt Youth Workers Network (the Network), spoke in relation to Council’s Community Services Division’s support of the Network.  Mr Goldsbury explained how Council funding was being used to strengthen the Network across the Hutt Valley.  He highlighted the increased collaboration which had occurred as a result of Council’s support including funding.  He added that a Trust was being established so the Network could eventually be self sustaining, and that an effective Steering Committee was leading the way.

Mr Renata advised that collaboration with the Upper Hutt Youth Network had occurred and was increasing the sphere of influence and connections of the Network. 

In response to questions from members, Mr Renata said the Network was focussed on decreasing the youth unemployment figures.  He noted that youth suicide rates and mental health issues were high.  He said the Network was trying to influence early decision making made by youth by having positive role models and mentors available.  He agreed that homelessness was affecting the youth of the Hutt Valley.

In response to questions from members, Mr Goldsbury agreed that there was a need for additional funding and resourcing of existing organiasations to enable them to be more effective.  He said the Network had recently secured funding from the Ministry of Social Development and believed the emphasis for government funding was directed towards intervention programmes.  He confirmed he would present to the next Hutt Valley Governance Group meeting.

 

 

 

The General Manager, Community Services elaborated on the report.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Community Services advised that the proposed opening for the Walter Mildenhall Park redevelopment was scheduled for 25 August 2017.  With regard to Petone Sportsville, he explained that the Petone Rugby and Bowling Clubs had formally withdrawn from the project.  He said that officers continued to work on the project and would address the issues raised during the Annual Plan process.  He noted that once completed this would be presented to Council.  He further advised that feasibility work continued for the introduction of the Magic Cards into Naenae.

The City Safety Manager elaborated on the video clip played to members about Community Patrols.  He agreed that the video could be shared.

In response to a question from a member, the City Safety Manager agreed that Councillors could be invited to walk around the City with the Community Patrols.

 

Resolved:    (Cr Barratt/Mayor Wallace)                           Minute No. CSC 17305

“That the Committee:

(i)     notes the updates contained in the report;

 

(ii)   invites the Hutt Valley Youth Workers Network to present to the next Hutt Valley Governance Group meeting; and

 

(iii) asks that funding for the Hutt Valley Youth Workers Network is considered in the 2018 Long Term Plan process, through the Community Plan Committee.”

8.       Information Item

a)

Community Services Committee Work Programme (17/1104)

Report No. CSC2017/3/109 by the Senior Committee Advisor

 

Resolved:    (Cr Barratt/Cr Bridson)                         Minute No. CSC 17306

“That the work programme be received.”

9.       QUESTIONS   

There were no questions.

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 7.04pm.

 

 

 

Cr G Barratt

CHAIR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017


                                                                                      78                                                       15 August 2017

      Hutt City Council

14 July 2017

 

 

 

File: (17/1092)

 

 

 

 

Report no: HCC2017/3/195 (3)

 

Temporary Discharges of Treated Wastewater

 

Purpose of Report

1.    The purpose of this report is to seek Council endorsement of the recommended option upon which an application will be made for resource consent for ongoing temporary discharges of treated wastewater, from the Seaview Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Recommendations

It is recommended that the Council:

(i)    notes the detailed information included in this report and appendices;

(ii)   endorses option 12 as its preferred option for temporary discharges of treated wastewater from the Seaview Treatment Plant, and confirms that an application for a Resource Consent for such discharges should be submitted to Greater Wellington based on this option selection.

 

Background

2.    Hutt City Council currently has resource consents for two temporary discharges of treated wastewater from the Seaview Wastewater Treatment Plant (Seaview WWTP).  The discharges are:

a.    Discharges that occur while repair works are undertaken on the Main Outfall Pipeline (MOP). During such works treated wastewater from Seaview WWTP is diverted from the MOP and discharged from an outfall into the lower reach of the Waiwhetu Stream.

b.    Discharges during and/or immediately after heavy rain events.  If as a result of the rainfall events the flow of effluent through the Seaview WWTP exceeds the capacity of the Main Outfall Pipeline, and the storm tank within the Seaview WWTP is full, treated wastewater is discharged via the same outfall.

 

3.    It should be noted carefully that these consents are for temporary discharges only and that such discharges occur:

a.  In extreme wet weather events.  While the number of such events each year is an unknown, a reasonable average over the last few years has been 4-5 such events, lasting (again on average) 12 hours per event.  It should also be noted that in such events the Waiwhetu Stream and Hutt River are likely in flood, and that in layman’s terms the quality of the treated effluent discharge will be better than that of those rivers in flood.  In addition, concerns about mixing/dilution/the possibility of tidal flow back up to the Waiwhetu Stream, and impacts on recreation or amenity in the area, do not apply.

b.  When the Main Outfall Pipeline (MOP) is shut down for either planned or unplanned maintenance.  Planned maintenance will generally be undertaken in winter to minimize impacts on recreation and amenity, while unplanned maintenance may occur at any time.  In the last 2 years, there has been only 1 such event, for which the MOP was off-line for 6 days.   In the last 10 years there have been 12 maintenance events.

4.    The current consents expire in February 2018, and before applying for continuation of these discharges the current consents have a condition which requires HCC to consider a range of alternative options including:

-    Increasing storage capacity at the WWTP

-    Moving the outfall for such discharges (currently into the Waiwhetu Stream) to an alternative location

-    Upgrade the Treatment Plant to reduce ammoniacal nitrogen concentrations in the discharge

-    Full or part replacement of the MOP

5.    The Options Asssessment Report and appendices within that report are attached as Appendix 1.  That report contains detailed information on each of these investigations.

Discussion

6.    Note that each broad alternative category listed above (para. 4) may have a number of options within that category (e.g. there are a number of different alternative locations for an outfall).  Work has proceeded in assessing all these options over the last five years, and resulted in developing a “long list” of 18 options.  A team of people each with expertise in a relevant area, then trimmed that “long list” to a “short list” of 7 options, and further detailed investigation of these has been the focus of that team over the last 12 months.  Those 7 short listed options are:

Option 1 – status quo

Option 2 – Hutt Confluence:  a new outfall location at the confluence of the Waiwhetu Stream and the Hutt River

Option 3 – Barnes Street:  a new outfall location into the mouth of the Hutt River 100 metres off the end of Barnes Street

Option 5 – Port Road 100 m:  a new outfall location into the harbour 100 metres off the end of Port Road

Option 6 – Port Road 600 m:  a new outfall location into the harbour 600 metres off the end of Port Road

Option 8 – Hutt Confluence plus treatment

Option 12 – Hutt Confluence plus storage

 

Further information on each of these options is contained within the report and appendices.

 

7.    Those seven options were then screened using a Multi Criteria Analysis process.  We engaged experts in the field of understanding the impact of these various options on:

-      Human health

-      Marine environment

-      Maori cultural values

-      Recreation

-      Amenity and natural character

8.    Each of these experts produced a full report on their area of interest, and scored each of the options 1-5; 1 being poor (or having significant adverse effect) and 5 being good (or having less than minor adverse effect).  These scores were then aggregated and weighted to give an overall score, and therefore a ranking.

9.    Those scores and rankings are shown in Table 1 (attached as Appendix 2), along with capital cost estimates of each option, and other comments about statutory considerations, which have been previously discussed with Councillors at earlier workshops.

10.  Table 1 shows the MCA score which gives an overall ranking of the “environmental” outcomes associated with each option, and the capital costs which show the financial impact of each option.  In general terms, the higher the MCA score the higher the cost.  This is not unexpected, given that better environmental outcomes are (again in general terms) achieved by building longer pipes to deliver the discharge into deeper water and further away from recreation, cultural, amenity or natural character impacts.  But how do we then “balance” these competing factors?  Or to put that query more simply, does the higher MCA score of option 6 for example, justify an additional $13M compared to say option 3, or does option 3 give a satisfactory environmental outcome at that lower cost?

11.  To answer that question, the team then used a “Best Practicable Option” methodology. BPO is defined in the RMA as follows:

In relation to a discharge of a contaminant or an emission of noise, means the best method of preventing or minimizing the adverse effects on the environment having regard, among other things to:

 

a.   The nature of the discharge or emission and the sensitivity of the receiving environment to adverse effects; and

b.   The financial implications, and the effects on the environment, of that option when compared with other options;  and

c.   The current state of technical knowledge and the likelihood that the option can be successfully applied.

12.  To assess the short listed options in relation to the BPO definition, the team applied a structured decision making framework, and considered information in relation to the following headings:

-    The nature of the discharge or emission

-    The sensitivity of the receiving environment to adverse effects

The financial implications of that option when compared with other    options.

-    The effects on the environment of that option when compared with other options.

-    The current state of technical knowledge.

-    The likelihood that the option can be successfully applied.

13.  The information that Hutt City Council considered in relation to these headings is based on the detailed information in the Appendices to this report.  It is discussed in the Options Assessment Report (Appendix 1) and further summarized in Table 2 within that report.

What happens next 

14.  Council is required to lodge an application for new consents, (to replace those expiring in February next year), by November this year.  This report asks Council to endorse the recommended option as the basis on which those consent applications would be prepared and lodged.

15.  Under the regulations contained within the current Proposed Natural Resources Plan, option 12 is expected to be a Non Complying Activity  and therefore it is expected that this application would proceed to a hearing before the Regional Council, and the decision of the Regional Council may be appealed to the Environment Court.  The Regional Council hearing would likely occur in the first half of 2018.

16.  If the outcome of that hearing was to grant the consent, then it is likely that the consent conditions would specify a timeframe within which Council would be required to complete the works necessary.  The consent application will be lodged on the basis that Council will need an extension of the existing consent for a reasonable period of time until the works are complete.

17.  If the consent application was declined, then again an extension to the existing consent would be necessary while Council considered the basis on which the application had been declined, and determined a future course of action.

Options

18.  Detailed consideration of a wide range of options has been undertaken as outlined in this report and appendices.

Consultation

19.  A significant amount of consultation has been undertaken in respect of the project as follows:

20.  The Seaview Consultation Working Group, is a group which was formed during the last consenting process (2012) specifically to consider this project.  The Group comprises representatives from Friends of the Waiwhetu, the Recreational Marine Fishers Association (RMFA), Regional Public Health, East Harbour Environmental Society, and occasional attendance from GW officers.  Regular meetings have been held with this Group over the last 5 years to report progress, as required by condition of the current Resource Consent.  The latest such meeting was held early July this year, where the Group was advised of the recommended option.  Members of the Group have different views as to which they think is the “best” option, but perhaps with the exception of RMFA, no objection to option 12 was voiced, and it was supported by the RPH officer.

21.  Two recent meetings have been held with Iwi Groups.  Feedback from the most recent meeting, at which Iwi were informed of the recommended option, was summarised as follows:

-    The discharge of treated wastewater is offensive no matter how small the contaminant load is.

-    HCC needs to recognise this and the impact on the values held by the Iwi

-    Things that are tapu, can be made noa.

-    Notification of any overflow event is important to iwi, including the waka ama club.

-    Agreed that spending money on untreated wastewater discharges may be a higher priority.

-    Issues of community affordability were noted.

-    There was interest in the concept of using storage as a means to reduce the number of overflows.

22.  The Cultural Impact Assessment Report written as part of the MCA analysis favours options 3, 5, and 6 more highly, but does say in relation to option 12 which is now recommended that “this option would be acceptable to Iwi”.

Annual Plan Feedback

23.  Feedback on this project was sought as part of this year’s Annual Plan consultation.  In that consultation, only 4 options were put forward for public consideration.  That was in recognition of the fact that this is a complex issue, and expert advice was that seven options were too many for the community to sensibly appraise.  In making a decision to limit the number of options consulted on, it was understood that what we were seeking was not an absolute option selection, but an indication of the Community’s preference in terms of a balance between environmental outcomes and cost.  The results of that consultation are attached as Appendix 3.  In summary, when asked to rate the options “not acceptable”, “could live with it”, or “acceptable”, option 12 received the highest “acceptable” rating.  When asked to select a number one preference, option 12 had the highest rating.

Peter Glen Research Survey

24.  Because this is such a complex issue, and one which was difficult to adequately represent in a brief Annual Plan consultation document, a more detailed and targeted survey was also undertaken by Peter Glen Research, on behalf of Council.

25.  In this survey, 300 respondents (selected to cover the usual spread of geography, age, gender and ethnicity) were pre-selected and sent an “information pack” for them to read and understand before undertaking the phone survey.  Mr Glen commented on the excellent level of engagement produced by the approach, to the extent of many of the respondents visiting the sites of the proposed discharge to enhance their understanding.

26.  The results of this survey are included in the Options Assessment Report (Appendix 1).  Mr Glen’s conclusion was that “this analysis indicates that (option 12) may be the most acceptable option overall.  Sixty one percent (61%) of respondents ranked it either the first of second in their selection and very few (6%) ranked it as their least preferred option.

Legal Considerations

27.  Current consents for temporary discharges to the Waiwhetu Stream, expire in February 2018.  Council is required to lodge an application for a new consent by November this year.  Lodging an application by 1 November will enable Council to continue to operate the existing discharges while the application is being considered even if this process goes beyond the February 2018 expiry date (as is likely).  Endorsing the recommended option (or choosing an alternative) is a necessary step in that process.

28.  Paragraph 15 above refers to the difficulties which can be expected in applying for a consent for option 12, when that option is likely to be considered a Non Complying Activity under the Proposed Natural Resources Plan.  Barrister Philip Milne has been part of the team assessing this proposal and has acknowledged expertise in this area.  His opinion on this matter is attached as Appendix 4.  He notes the difficulties likely to be faced through the consenting process and lists a number of actions which can (and will) be taken to mitigate these.  Notably he concludes by saying

The NCA status under the PNRP gives rise to moderate to high risks in relation to consenting.  Notwithstanding this risk I remain of the view that the significant cost of options which are not NCAs warrants proceeding with the preferred option.  I am moderately optimistic that independent commissioners of the Environment Court would take a more reasonable approach than that and that which is currently indicated in the PNRP.

Financial Considerations

Capital Cost

29.  Council has for some years been carrying a budget provision for the project in the amount of $13M, currently showing in the Annual Plan in the 20/21 and 21/22 years.  The recommended option nominally fits within that budget, although cost estimates at this stage can only be quite preliminary.  If a more expensive option was chosen, or if the Consent Application for option 12 was rejected by the Environment Court, the Council has time to adjust future budgets to accommodate other options.

30.  It is worth reiterating that the recommended option represents a considerable capital sum, particularly when taking into account the very few number of events each year for which this spend will be utilised.  To the extent that Council’s overall finances are not limitless, additional capital spend on the project may limit Council’s ability to address other water and wastewater issues.  In this regard there was general concensus amongst Consultation Groups that upstream spend on untreated wastewater overflows during wet weather, was of higher priority.

Longer Term Financial Implications

31.  In selecting a preferred option as outlined above, the primary financial consideration has been the upfront capital cost of each option.  The team is obviously aware however, that there are ongoing operating cost implications, and depending on the option selected, there may be future Capex implications at some point when the MOP is upgraded, or indeed replaced.

32.  Some discussion of that is necessary.  There are two broad scenarios.  Firstly, that the MOP is totally replaced from Seaview to Burdans Gate, most likely by an underwater pipeline across the harbour. The second scenario is that the MOP is upgraded, either by replacement of all the rubber ring joints, or perhaps by “sleeving” the existing line.

33.  If the future scenario was that the MOP was replaced, then options 3, 5 and 6 could potentially form the first stage of that new pipeline, and thus represent some future capital cost savings.  Having said that, such a replacement option is currently considered most unlikely, largely on the basis of costs.  Such replacement could be expected to cost >$100M, whereas upgrade options would be less than half that, with little difference in performance or other qualitative outcomes.

34.  Therefore an upgrade of the MOP is a much more likely scenario.  In this scenario, the MOP would need to be shut down for a period of some months while upgrade works were undertaken, and during that time treated effluent would be continuously discharged to the harbour.  The outfall locations proposed for options 1, 2, 8 and 12 would not be considered suitable for discharging for such a length of time, and a temporary discharge location would therefore need to be built into deeper water, probably using a barging arrangement.  The current estimated cost of this extra work would be in the order of $9.5M.

35.  Options 3, 5 and 6 would provide outfall locations which would be suitable for that longer term (albeit temporary) discharge, and thus would avoid that future Capex.

36.  As noted above, upfront Capital cost has been the primary financial consideration when selecting the preferred option.  But in light of the above, we have also undertaken an NPV analysis of options 3 and 12, taking into account best estimates of future operating and capital costs under each of those options.  In brief, option 3 would have slightly higher annual operating costs, but engender no need for additional future Capex.  Option 12 has slightly lower operating costs, but would likely require future Capex to build a temporary outfall while the MOP was being upgraded, as described above.

37.  An NPV analysis of these options has therefore taken into account these differing cash flows. The analysis assumed that the MOP upgrade (and therefore additional Capex for option 12), would be undertaken in 20 years.  A discount rate of 10% has been used, (higher than Council’s average cost of capital which is currently approximately 6%), to represent the uncertainty around future timing, costs, technology, regulation, community meetings etc.

38.  The result of that analysis shows an NPV for option 3 of $18.2M, and NPV for option 12 of $12.1M.  Given that this analysis does not change the financial rankings of options 3 and 12, and that similar analysis on options 5 and 6 would necessarily produce a similar ranking result, option 12 remains the recommended option.

Other Considerations

39.  In making this recommendation, officers have given careful consideration to the purpose of local government in section 10 of the Local Government Act 2002. Officers believe that this recommendation falls within the purpose of the local government in that it meets the future needs of the Community by providing a controlled and approved methodology for occasional discharges of treated wastewater.  Cost effectiveness and efficiency has been ensured by rigorous analysis of a number of options as outlined in this report and appendices.

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

Seaview Temporary Discharge: Options Assessment Report (Under Separate Cover)

 

2

Table 1 (Under Separate Cover)

 

3

Annual Plan 2017-18 consultation (Under Separate Cover)

 

4

Legal opinion regarding Waiwhetu Stream (Under Separate Cover)

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Bruce Sherlock

General Manager, City Infrastructure

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approved By: Tony Stallinger

Chief Executive

 


MEMORANDUM                                                  87                                                       15 August 2017

Our Reference          17/1050

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Kathryn Stannard

DATE:                07 July 2017

SUBJECT:           Appointment to the Councillor Leadership Group

 

 

Recommendation

It is recommended that Council appoints Cr Cousins as a member of the Councillor Leadership Group, which comes under the umbrella of the Wellington Region Natural Hazards Management Strategy, due to her broad policy overview as Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee and Deputy Chair of the District Plan Committee for the remainder of the triennium.

 

Purpose of Memorandum

1.  To seek approval from Council to appoint Cr Cousins to the Councillor Leadership Group (‘the Group’), under the Wellington Region Natural Hazards Management Strategy.  

Background

2.  The purpose of the Wellington Region Natural Hazards Management Strategy (‘the Strategy’) is to help create a region resilient to the impacts from natural hazards.  The Strategy sets out a road map for Council co-operation to deliver greater efficiency in hazards research and planning and greater consistency in the management of natural hazards.  It provides a coherent regional framework that will allow the development of consistent policy responses in planning documents such as District and Regional Plans, Annual Plans, Long Term Plans and Asset Management Plans.

 

3.  Council, at its meeting held on 14 March 2017, agreed to the following:-

Wellington Region Natural Hazards Management Strategy (17/35)

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs)          Minute No. C 17101(3)

“That Council endorses the Wellington Region Natural Hazards Management Strategy, attached as Appendix 1 to Report No PRC2017/1/29.”

 

4.  Greater Wellington Regional Council is now setting up a Councillor Leadership Group, under the Natural Hazards Management Strategy.  The idea is that Group would help advocate and maintain momentum for the implementation of the Strategy.  The Group would be kept updated on the progress of the Strategy and would provide advice and input to the officer steering group.  Representatives of the Group would provide a ‘political presence’ for the implementation programme and present a consistent voice in the media and within Councils.  Greater Wellington Regional Council has asked Council to nominate a Councillor to be appointed to the Group.

5.  Cr Cousins is the logical person for the appointment because of her broad policy overview as Chair of the Policy and Regulatory Committee and Deputy Chair of the District Plan Committee.  Cr Cousins is happy to accept the appointment.

6.  There is no remuneration for representatives on the Group.

 

Appendices

There are no appendices for this report.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewed By: Andrew Cumming

Divisional Manager Environmental Policy

 

 

 

Approved By: Joycelyn Raffills

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

 

 

 

 

 


                                                                                      89                                                       15 August 2017

Hutt City Council

07 August 2017

 

 

 

File: (17/1213)

 

 

 

 

Report no: HCC2017/3/199 (3)

 

Appointment of Trustee to the Louise Bilderbeck Hall Trust

 

Purpose of Report

1.    This report seeks Council’s approval to establish a selection panel to identify, assess and appoint between five to eight independent Trustees to be appointed to the Louise Bilderbeck Hall Trust.  

Recommendations

That Council:

(i)      approves the appointment of a selection panel consisting of the Wainuiomata Community Hub Manager and a Wainuiomata Ward Councillor to identify, assess and approve potential candidates for between five to eight independent Trustees on the Louise Bilderbeck Hall Trust (LBHT), in line with the process set out in this report;

(ii)     approves this process for future appointments to the Board of the LBHT;

(iii)    delegates to the selection panel the power to appoint Trustees to LBHT; and        

(iv)    delegates to the selection panel members the ability to exercise all the powers of Council under the LBHT Trust Deed (including the amended Trust Deed) on an on-going basis. 

 

Background

2.    The Lions Club of Wainuiomata (the Club) has written to Council and requested we appoint new Trustees to the Board of the Louise Bilderbeck Hall Trust (LBHT).  This letter is attached as appendix 1 to this report. 

3.    The Club advises that all of the current Trustees have either resigned or died and only Council has the power to appoint more, under clause 11 of the amendment to the LBHT Trust Deed dated 2 May 1998.  The Trust Deed and Amendment to the Trust Deed are attached as appendix 2 and 3 to this report.

 

4.    The objectives of the LBHT is to administer the Louise Bilderbeck Hall as an amenity for the benefit of Wainuiomata and, in particular:

i)          To provide a place of meeting and recreation for Ladies Groups or Institutions or Societies in Wainuiomata; and

ii)         To provide a place of meeting and recreation for Service Organisations and other Public Spitied Bodies, Repertory, Cultural, Sporting Societies and Groups within Wainuiomata; and

iii)        To distribute net profits, if any, arising each year from the operation of the hall to a reserve. 

Discussion and process

5.    Because Council has a right to appoint one member of Council staff as a trustee to this Board, the LBHT meets the definition of a ‘council organisation’ (but not a council-controlled organisation) under the Local Government Act 2002 (LGA).  For this reason, Council’s policy on appointing directors or trustees applies (the Policy).  This policy follows best practice for governance appointments.  The process involves appointing a selection panel which will undertake a selection process.  A copy of the policy is attached as Appendix 4 to the report.

6.    In this particular instance, officers suggest the selection panel be given a wide discretion to apply or waive elements of the policy, as they see fit.  The focus should be on filling the 5 (minimum) to 8 (maximum) Trustee positions, to enable the LBHT to make decisions and operate lawfully.

7.    The selection panel should consider:

a.    A ‘person specification’ for the positions.  Given the nature of the positions, it is suggested this might just be a person who is willing and able to take on the task, depending on the level of interest in the positions.

b.    Whether it is necessary to advertise the position in a local paper.

8.    The recommendation is that the selection panel should be given the delegation to appoint the Trustees directly, as opposed to having this decision made in full Council.

Consultation

9.    The Club, the Mayor, relevant internal staff and Wainuiomata Ward Councillors have all been advised of this matter.

Legal Considerations

10.  In addition to the above, under the LGA, a local authority may only appoint a person to be a director equivalent if the person has in the opinion of the local authority the skills, knowledge or experience to –

i)     Guide the organisation given the nature and scope of its activities; and

ii)    Contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the organisation.

11.  The LGA specifies that the role of a director is to assist the organisation to meet its objectives and any other requirement in its statement of intent.

Other Considerations

12.  In making this recommendation, officers have given careful consideration to the purpose of local government in section 10 of the Local Government Act 2002. 

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

Lions letter to Council regarding LBHT

167

2

LBH Original Trust Deed

168

3

LBH Trust Deed Amendment

185

4

Appointment and Remuneration of Directors Policy

191

    

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Bradley Cato

Solicitor

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approved By: Joycelyn Raffills

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

 


Attachment 1

Lions letter to Council regarding LBHT

 


Attachment 2

LBH Original Trust Deed

 


Attachment 3

LBH Trust Deed Amendment

 


 


 


 


 


 


Attachment 4

Appointment and Remuneration of Directors Policy

 

APPOINTMENT AND REMUNERATION OF DIRECTORS POLICY

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Division

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

Date created

August 2008

Publication date

August 2008

Review period

August 2016

Owner

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

Approved by

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

 

Version

Author

Date

Description

V 1.0

Joycelyn Foo

25/8/2008

Approved by Council

V 2.0

Joycelyn Foo

22/8/2013

Reviewed

V 3.0

Joycelyn Raffills

11/8/2015

Format updates

 


Contents

 

1.     Section 57 of the Local Government Act 2002 provides: 3

2.     Appointment of Directors. 3

3.     Process for making appointments. 3

3.1       Preparation of a person specification. 3

3.2       Advertising the position. 4

3.3       Assessment of candidates. 4

3.4       Exceptions. 4

4.     Tenure and reappointment 5

5.     Conflicts of interest 5

6.     Remuneration of directors. 5

7.     Terms. 6

 

1. 
Section 57 of the Local Government Act 2002 provides:

(1) A local authority must adopt a policy that sets out an objective and transparent process for---

(a)        the identification and consideration of the skills, knowledge, and experience required of directors of a council organisation; and

(b)        the appointment of directors to a council organisation; and

(c)        the remuneration of directors of a council organisation.

(2)  A local authority may appoint a person to be a director of a council organisation only if the person has, in the opinion of the local authority, the skills, knowledge, or experience to---

(a)        guide the organisation, given the nature and scope of its activities; and

(b)        contribute to the achievement of the objectives of the organisation.

Note:    The term Director includes Trustee or Manager of a Council Organisation as per section 6 of the Local Government Act 2002.

2.  Appointment of Directors

Council is empowered to make appointments to a wide range of organisations.

In all cases the decision as to the appointment will be made at a full Council meeting.

In each case, Council will appoint a person who Council considers to show the following:

§ The skills, knowledge and experience needed to undertake the relevant role;

§ Sound judgement.

§ A high standard of personal integrity.

§ An understanding of the governance requirements for the type of organisation concerned.

§ The ability to work as part of a team.

3.  Process for making appointments

Identifying skills, knowledge, and experience required of directors

In each case, the selection and assessment process will involve the following:

3.1  Preparation of a person specification

In each case a person specification will be prepared setting out the skills, knowledge, and experience required of a director/s. In preparing this person specification consideration will be given to the following:

§ The nature and scope of Council organisation, its future direction and requirements in its constitutional documents.

§ The objectives of the organisation and the attributes, skills, knowledge, and experience required to contribute to the achievement of those objectives.

§ The skills of any existing directors.

§ Outstanding skills, knowledge, and experience required.

§ Any future skills, knowledge, and experience required.

3.2  Advertising the position

In most cases, the position will be advertised (at least in the local newspaper) and any potential candidates known to Council may be approached and asked if they would consider applying for the position.

3.3  Assessment of candidates

The assessment process will be as follows:

§ All applications will be assessed by a selection panel comprising an elected member, senior officer/s and if appropriate relevant external people and HR expertise (the panel). The panel will consider all applications received, shortlist, interview and prepare a report on the candidates for Council’s consideration. The panel may make a recommendation if it wishes to do so.

§ The final appointment/s will be made in committee (thus protecting the privacy of natural persons) by resolution of the full Council. Public announcement of the appointment will be made as soon as practicable after Council has made its decision.

§ If an elected member is under consideration to fill a particular vacancy, that elected member cannot take part in the discussion or vote on their appointment or on any other proposed appointees being considered for the same Board at the same meeting.

3.4  Exceptions

Elected member appointments

In the case where Council is considering the appointment of an elected member to a council organisation, there will be no need to advertise the position. This is because the potential pool of applicants for the position will be limited to elected members only. It will remain necessary for the assessment process to be followed in relation to the potential elected member candidates.

Existing pool of potential candidates

There may also be cases where, because of a recent appointment process, Council has a number of potential applicants for a position who have already submitted applications and who have agreed that their personal details could be used for consideration for future appointments. In such a case, the panel may elect not to advertise the position and may recommend to Council a potential appointee from this group of potential applicants. In such a case, the panel will include in its report to Council, for Council’s consideration, an explanation of the reasons that the advertising process was not followed. Where Council makes an appointment without advertising the position, Council will record that fact and the reasons for not advertising the position in the minutes of the relevant meeting.

Other situations where advertising not required

There may also be other situations where it is considered appropriate not to follow a full public advertising process in selecting potential applicants for appointment to Council organisations. In all cases where the decision is made not to advertise the vacancy publicly, the panel must include in its report to Council the reasons that a public advertising process was not followed. Where Council makes an appointment without advertising the position, Council will record that fact and the reasons for not advertising the position in the minutes of the relevant meeting.

4.  Tenure and reappointment

All appointments will specify the term of the appointment. Council may decide that, to prevent unwanted vacancies occurring during an election period, an appointment will be specified to extend beyond the end of a local government triennium. In such a case, it is prudent to specify that the appointment will last until the first ordinary meeting of the new triennium.

Where an elected member is appointed to a Board because one of the conditions is that the director be an elected member, the term of the appointment will cease on the same date the elected member ceases to be an elected member, if that date is prior to the expiry date of the term of the appointment.

In relation to a Council Controlled Organisation, directors may be reappointed to a Board for a second term and, where there is a compelling reason, a director may be appointed for further periods. Second and third terms are not automatic, and Council will make its decision based on the company’s business needs, the availability of candidates for the role (including the incumbent), the incumbent’s performance and the make-up of the Board.

If a reappointment is made without having first completed the process outlined above, Council will record in the minutes of the meeting at which the appointment is made the reasons for not having followed that process.

5.  Conflicts of interest

Hutt City Council expects that directors of council organisations will avoid situations where their actions could give rise to a conflict of interest. To minimise situations of conflict arising:

Council requires directors to be guided by the Institute of Directors in New Zealand’s Ethics (2003/1) and Conflicts of Interest (1996/3): Statements of Best Practice for New Zealand Directors.

Unless otherwise stated in the organisation’s constitutional documents, all directors are appointed at the pleasure of Council and may be dismissed for disregarding those guidelines.

6.  Remuneration of directors

The remuneration of directors of a council organisation will be determined by the nature of the business of the organisation and the financial situation of the organisation.

Where Council is the sole shareholder in a particular organisation Council will set the directors’ remuneration either by resolution at the annual general meeting or resolution of Council. The resolution will state whether the remuneration is set as a fixed cap for Board remuneration, to be allocated by the Board, or specifying the salaries to be paid for directors and the Chairperson.

Remuneration for directors of council-controlled organisations will be determined by an analysis of market rates for comparable positions at the commencement of every triennium.[2]

Remuneration for directors of other council organisations (if any) will be determined on a case by case basis taking into account the form and purpose of the organisation and any previous level of fees paid by the shareholder.

7.  Terms

The terms used in this policy have the meaning set out in section 6 of the Local Government Act 2002.

 

 


                                                                                     114                                                      15 August 2017

Hutt City Council

04 August 2017

 

 

 

File: (17/1209)

 

 

 

 

Report no: HCC2017/3/13 (3)

 

Road Stopping and Sale of Service Lane, Tocker Street, Taita

 

 

 

 

Purpose

1.    This brief report seeks Council agreement to amend an earlier resolution made in 2011, so that the service lane in Tocker Street, Taita, once stopped, can be sold to any adjoining owner.

 

Recommendation

That Council agrees that the service lane of Tocker Street in Taita be stopped and sold to any adjoining owner, subject to any offer back requirements under the Public Works Act 1981.

 

Background

2.    In December 2011 Council resolved to stop the service land in Tocker Street, Taita and sell to the adjoining owner at 23 Tocker Street.  The service lane was no longer deemed to be required for roading purposes.

 

3.    Since then UrbanPlus, on behalf of Council, has been negotiating with the adjoining property owner at 23 Tocker Street, but has not been able to reach agreement.  A tenant of this property has since fenced off the service lane and is using the land for his car dismantling business.

 

4.    Another adjoining owner has since expressed an interest in acquiring the service lane, once stopped.  The land has been valued at $90,000.

 

5.    This brief report seeks Council agreement to amend its earlier resolution so that the service lane, once stopped, can be sold to any adjoining owner, subject to any offer back requirements under the Public Works Act 1981.

 

6.    A plan showing the service lane is attached as Appendix 1 to the report.

 

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

Tocker Street Service Lane Plan

198

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Bruce Hodgins

Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approved By: Bruce Sherlock

General Manager, City Infrastructure


Attachment 1

Tocker Street Service Lane Plan

 


MEMORANDUM                                                 117                                                      15 August 2017

Our Reference          17/1125

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Kathryn Stannard

DATE:                18 July 2017

SUBJECT:           Community Panel Delegations

 

 

Recommendation

That the Council:

 

(i)    notes that at its meeting held on 23 May of this year Council approved the establishment of four Community Panels;

 

(ii)   notes that the new Community Panel delegations have been reviewed by Council’s Solicitor;

 

(iii)  notes that guidelines and criteria have been developed to assist Community Panels to allocate their funding and form part of the formal delegations;

 

(iv) adopts the new delegations for Community Panels for the remainder of the triennium, as set out in Appendix 1 attached to the memorandum;

 

(v)  agrees that the new delegations come into effect on 15 August 2017; and

 

(vi) agrees, if part (iv) above is adopted, to amend the Community Services Committee Terms of Reference by deleting the following wording under the heading ‘Determine and monitor’:

 

Community Engagement Fund (Central, Eastern, Western and Northern Wards only).

 

Purpose of Memorandum

1.    The purpose of this memorandum is to seek Council’s endorsement of the Community Panels proposed new delegations, set out in Appendix 1 attached to the memorandum, including the guidelines and criteria for allocation of the Local Community Projects Fund and the Community Engagement Fund.

Background

2.    At its meeting held on 23 May 2017 Council agreed the following:-

Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Cr McDonald)               Minute No. C 17225

“That Council:

(i)     approves the establishment of four Community Panels; and

(ii)    notes the new Community Panel approach would be reviewed after
12 months
.”

Training/Professional Development

 

3.    Each panel will be allocated $2,000 per annum for training/professional development.  In terms of training, officers are planning to hold a training session with Community Panel Chairs to discuss their new responsibilities.

Administration Budget

 

4.    Each panel will be allocated $2,000 per annum to cover meeting related costs.

Honorarium

 

5.    Each community representative will receive $750 per annum. 

Financial Considerations

 

6.    Expenditure for the Community Panels will fall inside existing budgets.

 

Publicity

 

7.    A press release, as well as targeted messages, will be issued advising the Community Panels new delegations.  Individual Community Panels may also wish to advise their communities of their new delegations including the new Local Community Projects Fund and can seek advice of Council’s Communications and Marketing Team Leader.

 

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

Community Panels Delegations Guidelines Criteria

202

    

 

 

 

Author: Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

 

 

 

Reviewed By: Matt Reid

General Manager Community Services

 

 

Approved By: Joycelyn Raffills

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

 

 


Attachment 1

Community Panels Delegations Guidelines Criteria

 

 

Central, Eastern, Northern and Western Community Panels

Delegations, Guidelines and Criteria

 

Membership:  7

 

5 community representatives and 2 Ward Councillors

 

Quorum:                     4 (to include one Ward Councillor)

Meeting Cycle:           When required

Reports to:                  Community Services Committee (yearly)

 

This document records the delegation of Council functions, responsibilities, duties and powers to Community Panels (‘the Panels’).  The delegations are expressed in general terms. The delegations shall be exercised with proper regard for the Council’s strategic direction, policies, plans and Standing Orders.

 

Note: Community Panels are a new concept for Hutt City.  Council has deliberately kept the guidelines and rules broad and at a high level.  Panels are encouraged to help shape themselves and evolve in order to best meet their key responsibilities.

 

PURPOSE:

 

The Panels were established by Council at its meeting held on 23 May 2017.  The purpose of the Panels is outlined in the general functions listed below.  The role of the Panels is to represent and act as an advocate for the interests of their communities.

 

GENERAL FUNCTIONS:

 

·    Representation – discuss, debate and provide feedback to Council on all important local issues, city wide matters of significance, Annual Plans and policy setting.   

·    Allocate and manage a Local Community Projects Fund.   

·    Allocate and manage the local Community Engagement Fund for the Central, Eastern, Northern and Western Wards to assist and support local community events and initiatives.

 

GUIDELINES AND CRITERIA FOR LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUNDS:

 

·    To be used to fund one or more local community projects per triennium.

·    Projects are to develop community assets that are not able to be funded in Council’s Long Term Plan and/or Annual Plan.  

·    Community assets include, but are not limited to, playgrounds, street furniture, public art, tree planting, lighting, safety improvements, way finding, signage, improvements to existing public places and facilities.  These community assets should be in public spaces.

·    The development of new assets needs to be in accordance with Council strategies, policies and plans.

·    Where on-going maintenance and or other costs are required after completion, these need to be provided for.  This may be by way of formal agreement with the relevant division of Council.

·    Approval of spending must be by resolution of the Panels.

·    A report must be submitted, at the end of each financial year, to the Community Services Committee, detailing expenditure over the year.

 

CRITERIA FOR THE PANELS TO MANAGE THE LOCAL COMMUNITY PROJECTS FUND:

 

·     See attached Appendix 1 for the internal process that must be followed to ensure appropriate officers receive information on projects and can provide feedback.

·     Projects must be supported by officers if there are on-going maintenance or other costs post completion.

·     Each Panel will agree and determine a process for determining how projects will be identified and how funding decisions will be made.

 

CRITERIA FOR THE PANELS TO MANAGE THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FUND

 

·     The fund is for local activities and events that directly benefit the communities concerned. 

 

·     To be eligible for funding the organisation must be a charitable trust or an incorporated society and the activity must take place within the Hutt. 

 

·     Panels may choose to allocate the entire fund in one funding round or they can have two funding rounds per annum.   An appropriate assessment sheet is used by members when determining which organisation(s) should receive funding.

 

·     The funds can be used towards the hireage of equipment, advertising costs, purchasing food for a specific event.  Operational costs cannot be applied for.   

 

·     Organisations that are granted funding are responsible for completing an accountability form to report on the funds spent.

 

·     Council’s Community Funding Advisor is available to support and assist community groups when making applications through the Council’s online grants system.

STANDING ORDERS:

 

The Hutt City Council’s Standing Orders apply, subject to the provisions for meeting quorum and decision making as set out in these delegations.

 

INFORMAL MEETINGS AND ADMINISTRATION:

·    Where funding decisions are not being made, the Panels are encouraged to meet informally. 

·    Council’s Secretariat Services Division will support each Panel by way of formal meeting administration, co-ordination and governance advice.

·    A senior member of Council’s Community Services Division will support each Panel.

 

CHAIRS

Chairs will be recommended to Council at the beginning of the triennium, for a 12 month period.  At which point, the Panel will elect its Chair for the remaining term.  It is preferred that Ward Councillors are not Chairs, although this is possible should no other panel member be able to commit to the role.


 

Appendix 1 - Checklist for Local Community Projects Fund

Attach project description/application to this checklist and email to relevant Manager(s).

 

Divisional Manager Parks and Gardens

Divisional Manager Road and Traffic

City Safety Manager

Divisional Manager Leisure Active

Divisional Manager Museums

Divisional Manager Environmental Consents

Divisional Manager Regulatory Services

 

Council Managers to complete:

 

1.    Do you support this project?  Yes or No (please circle)

 

2.    Do you have any initial concerns with this project?

 

 

3.    What needs to be taken into account when the panel is considering this project for funding? (bylaws, consents):

 

 

4.    Do you deem this to be a new asset? Yes or No (please circle)

 

If yes, does it align with Council’s strategic, policies or plans?

 

If no, why not?

 

 

5.    Is there budget set aside for this project?  Yes or No (please circle)

 

If yes, please state what year this funding will be made available:

 

 

Can you liaise with this group in your planning stages of this project, for their input
Yes or No (please circle)

 

If no, why not?



6.    Can this project be funded through Council’s Long Term Plan? Yes or No (please circle)

 

If no, why not:

 

 

7.    Will there be a maintenance budget or other costs post completed that need to be factored into this project? Yes or No (please circle)

 

If yes, please advise the amount required:


MEMORANDUM                                                 123                                                      15 August 2017

Our Reference          17/1224

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Kathryn Stannard

DATE:                09 August 2017

SUBJECT:           Amendment to the Terms of Reference for the Finance and Performance Committee

 

 

Recommendation

That Council approves the proposed amendment (as strike out) to the Finance and Performance Committee’s terms of reference as attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum.

 

Purpose of Memorandum

1.    As an administrative matter to seek Council’s agreement to amend the Finance and Performance Committee’s terms of reference.

Background

2.    At its meeting held on 1 March 2017, the Finance and Performance Committee asked officers to report back on whether the Chief Executive could be given delegated authority to approve overseas travel for staff, or have a cost limit for this delegation, within Council’s current Travel Policy.

3.    At its meeting held on 23 May 2017, Council made the following resolution in relation to overseas travel for staff:-

Overseas Travel Approval - Policy Change (17/651)

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)                Minute No. C 17207

“That Council:

(i)     approves the Chief Executive be given delegated authority to approve overseas travel for staff; and

(ii)    approves the ‘tracked’ changes in the Sensitive Expenditure Policy attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2017/2/110.”

4.    Currently the Finance and Performance Committee has as its terms of reference the following:

Determine and monitor:

•   Approval of overseas travel for both elected members and officers.

5.    This memorandum is asking Council to amend the terms of reference for the Finance and Performance Committee to reflect the amendment as follows:-

Determine and monitor:

·               Approval of overseas travel for elected members.

 

Appendices

No.

Title

Page

1

Amended TOR Finance and Performance

208

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

Approved By: Joycelyn Raffills

General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

 


Attachment 1

Amended TOR Finance and Performance

 

 

HuttCity_TeAwaKairangi_SCREEN_MEDRES
 


FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE COMMITTEE

Membership:

10

Meeting Cycle:

Meets on a six weekly basis, as required or at the requisition of the Chair

Quorum:

Half of the members

Reports to:

Council

PURPOSE

To assist the Council execute its financial and performance monitoring obligations and associated risk, control and governance frameworks and processes.

Determine and monitor:

•    Maintain an overview of work programmes carried out by the Council’s organisational activities (excluding strategy and policy development).

•    Progress towards achievement of the Council’s objectives as set out in the LTP and Annual Plans.

•    Revenue and expenditure targets of key City Development Projects.

•    The effectiveness of the internal audit, risk management and internal control processes and programmes for the Council for each financial year.

•    The integrity of reported performance information, both financial and non-financial information at the completion of Council’s Annual Report and external accountability reporting requirements.

•    Oversight of external auditor engagement and outputs.

•    Compliance with Council’s Treasury Risk Management Policy,

•    Requests for rates remissions.

•    Approval of overseas travel for both elected members and officers.

•    Requests for loan guarantees from qualifying community organisations where the applications are within the approved guidelines and policy limits.

Consider and make recommendations to Council:

•    The adoption of the budgetary parameters for the LTP and Annual Plans.

•    The approval of The Statements of Intent for Council Controlled Organisations, and Council Controlled Trading Organisations, and monitoring progress against the Statements of Intent.

•    The adoption of the Council’s Annual Report.

General Matters

·    Any other matters delegated to the Committee by Council in accordance with approved policies and bylaws.

·    Approval and forwarding of submissions on matters related to the Committee’s area of responsibility.


MEMORANDUM                                                 126                                                      15 August 2017

Our Reference          17/1221

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Kathryn Stannard

DATE:                09 August 2017

SUBJECT:           Amendment to the Code of Conduct for Elected Members

 

 

Recommendation

That Council amends the current Code of Conduct for Elected Members (the Code) to reflect that the first initial step in any complaint made under the Code is referred to the Mayor to determine if the complaint can be resolved prior to any further action.

 

Purpose of Memorandum

1.  The purpose of the memorandum is ask Council to amend the current Code of Conduct for Elected Members (the Code) to reflect that the first initial step in any complaint made under the Code is that the complaint is referred to the Mayor.  The Mayor will then determine if the complaint can be resolved, prior to any further action.

Background and discussion

2.    The process Council has been using for complaints made under the Code has resulted in costs that are unacceptable to the Mayor and Chief Executive.

3.    The Mayor and Chief Executive have agreed to review the process and it is recommended the Mayor reverts back to being the first point of contact for any complaint made under the Code before further action is pursued.

4.    In the event the Mayor cannot resolve the complaint or is a party to the complaint, the complainant will maintain the right to forward the complaint to the Chief Executive.

Proposed Amendments

5.    Clause 12.2 of the Code would be amended to read:

12.2 Complaints

All complaints under this Code must be made in writing and forwarded to the Mayor, unless the Mayor is a party to the complaint.  Upon receipt of a complaint, the Mayor will attempt to resolve the complaint through informal dispute resolution.

If the Mayor is a party to a complaint, or fails to resolve the complaint to the satisfaction of the complainant within a reasonable time, the complainant has the right to forward the complaint to the Chief Executive.

On receipt of a complaint, the Chief Executive must forward that complaint to an independent investigator for a preliminary assessment to determine whether the issue is sufficiently serious to warrant a full investigation. 

6.    Appendix B: Process for the Determination and Investigation of Complaints would be amended to read:

Step 1:  Mayor Receives Complaint

On receipt of a complaint under this Code, the Mayor will attempt to resolve the complaint through informal dispute resolution, within a reasonable time. 

If the complainant is not satisfied with the proposed resolution or the complaint has not been resolved within a reasonable time, the complaint has the right to forward the complaint to the Chief Executive.

 

7.    The numbering for the remaining steps would then be changed in Appendix B, to reflect the added first step.  Where the Mayor is a party to the complaint, the complaint will start at Step 2.

 

 

Appendices

There are no appendices for this report.   

 

 

 

 

 

 

Author: Kathryn Stannard

Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reviewed By: Bradley Cato

Solicitor

 

 

 

Approved By: Tony Stallinger

Chief Executive

 

 

 

 


MEMORANDUM                                                 128                                                      15 August 2017

Our Reference          17/1220

TO:                      Mayor and Councillors

Hutt City Council

FROM:                Ray Wallace

DATE:                09 August 2017

SUBJECT:           Catering at Meetings

 

 

Recommendation

Councillors will bring their own meal or pay for a meal to be provided at meetings of Council, committees, subcommittees, workshops and hearings.

 

 

Purpose of the Memorandum

1.    To ask Councillors to either bring their own meal or pay for their portion of catering for Council meetings themselves.

Background

2.    Council as an organisation provides catering for a range of occasions.  They include such events as citizenship ceremonies, civic and community awards as well as meetings with external organisations and Council meetings, workshops and hearings.

3.    The rationale for providing catering for Council meetings is that the majority of Council meetings last longer than two hours; Councillors are on-site before the meeting commences to ensure there is a quorum and it can be ideal networking opportunities.

Community Feedback

4.    The matter of catering for Council meetings has gained a great deal of attention with feedback from the community and the overwhelming majority did not support the catering.

Catering Recommendation

5.    Being conscious of the concerns raised and listening to the concerns of the community, as Mayor and being a proactive Council, I am recommending there be no ratepayer-funded catering at all Council meetings.

Appendices

There are no appendices for this report.   

 

Author: Ray Wallace

Mayor

 

    


                                                                     129                                                23 May 2017

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 23 May 2017 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                                Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr B Sherlock, General Manager, City Infrastructure 

Ms J Raffills, General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer

Mr B Cato, Solicitor (part meeting)

Ms J Beck, Manager, Human Resources (part meeting)

Mr A Cumming, Manager, Environmental Policy (part meeting)

Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager (part meeting)

Ms S Simcox, Team Leader Communications and Marketing

Mr P Healy, General Manager, Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (part meeting)

Mr S Keatley, Huia Pool Manager (part meeting)

Ms C Tessendorf, Senior Environmental Policy Analyst (part meeting)

Mr N Geard, Environmental Policy Analyst (part meeting)

Mr D Bradley, Facilities Manager (part meeting)

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager Secretariat Services

Mrs A Doornebosch, Committee Advisor

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.

 

3.

Mayoral Statement

The Mayor delivered his Mayoral Statement. 

 

 

Resolved:  (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                  Minute No. C 17201

“That the Mayoral Statement be noted and received.”

 4.      CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

          Deputy Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest in relation to item 5 e) 4a) (UrbanPlus Limited) and took no part in discussions or voting on the matter.

          Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in relation to item 5 e), 4a) (Seaview Marina Limited) and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter. 

          Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 5 e) 4b) and 12 b) 9 and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.         

          Cr Lewis declared a conflict of interest in relation to items 5 d) 4a) and 5 d) 4b and took no part in discussion or voting on the matters.

5.       Committee Reports with Recommended Items

a)      Traffic Subcommittee

 

10 April 2017 

 

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                           Minute No. C 17202

“That the report of the meeting held on 10 Apri 2017 with the exception of Item 4a) Korokoro Road – Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, item 4b) Randwick Road, Moera – Proposed P15 Parking, No Parking On Grass and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, item 4c) Randwick Crescent (Moera Carpark) - Proposed Mobility Park and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, item 4d)  The Esplanade (Petone Wharf) - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, 4e) Holyoake Crescent - Proposed Mobility Park and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, item 4f) 460 High Street - Proposed P15 Parking Restrictions, item 4g) Taita Drive - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions and item 4h) Titoki Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions be adopted.”

 

Items 4a)-4h)

Recommended Items

Korokoro Road – Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, Randwick Road, Moera – Proposed P15 Parking, No Parking On Grass and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, Randwick Crescent (Moera Carpark) - Proposed Mobility Park and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, The Esplanade (Petone Wharf) - Proposed P120 Parking Restrictions and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, Holyoake Crescent - Proposed Mobility Park and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions, 460 High Street - Proposed P15 Parking Restrictions, Taita Drive - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions and Titoki Street - Proposed No Stopping At All Times Restrictions.

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms Andrea Hill expressed concern regarding the lease issued to the Solar Power Throwing Academy at the intersection of Randwick Road, Moera.  She believed that there were issues with the area relating to non-compliance with its resource consent.  She noted that Automobile Association New Zealand (AA) had asked Council to keep it up to date with matters concerning the intersection.  She advised that Randwick Road was a major distributor road and questioned why a children’s activity centre had been located at the site. 

Cr Cousins highlighted that if Council agreed to refer the matter back to officers, it was to review traffic matters only and not to relitigate the resource consent. 

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Deputy Mayor Bassett)  Minute No. C 17203

“That Council:

(i)     approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Korokoro Road, Korokoro as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/93;

(ii)    requests officers to investigate alternative off road parking for the residents as close as possible to the area outlined in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/93 as a temporary measure until the Substandard Road Programme begins for Korokoro Road;

(iii)   notes that in light of additional information received after the Traffic Subcommittee’s meeting, Council refers the installation of P15 Parking At All Times in Randwick Road, Moera, the installation of No Parking On Grass Restrictions in Randwick Road, Moera and the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions back to officers for a full review;

(iv)   approves the installation of a Mobility Park and No Stopping At All Times Restrictions at the Moera Carpark, in Randwick Crescent, as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/95;

(v)    approves the installation of P120 Parking Restrictions in the Petone Wharf car parking area, on the Esplanade, Petone as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/95;

(vi)   approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in the Petone Wharf car parking area, on the Esplanade, Petone as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/95;

(vii)  approves the installation of a Mobility Park Restriction in Holyoake Crescent, Avalon as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/97;

(viii) approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Holyoake Crescent, Avalon as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/96;

 (ix)  approves the replacement of three P60 Parking Restrictions with P15 Parking Restrictions outside Nº 460 High Street, Lower Hutt, as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/97;

 (x)   approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions along Taita Drive as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/98; and

 (xi)  approves the installation of No Stopping At All Times Restrictions in Titoki Street, Alicetown as shown in Appendix 1 attached to Report TRS2017/2/99.”

b)      District Plan Committee

 

26 April 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Bridson/Cr Lewis)                                     Minute No. C 17204

“That the report of the meeting held on 26 April 2017 with the exception of item 5, Proposed District Plan Change 49 Copeland Street Reserve Rezoning to General Residential Activity Area – Medium Density and General Recreation Activity Area be adopted.”

Recommended Item

Item 5)

Proposed District Plan Change 49 Copeland Street Reserve Rezoning to General Residential Activity Area - Medium Density and General Recreation Activity Area (17/565)

 

RESOLVED: (Cr Bridson/Deputy Mayor Bassett)  Minute No. C 17205

“That Council:

(i)     notes the proposed Plan Change which is attached as Appendix 1 to Report DPD2017/2/100;

(ii)    resolves to promulgate Proposed Plan Change 49 for consultation;

(iii)   instructs officers to publicly notify Proposed Plan Change 49 as soon as practicable;

(iv)   allows officers to make any non-policy related changes to the details of the proposed Plan Change should the need arise;

(v)    asks the Parks and Gardens division to work in conjunction with officers to provide development details for the recreation area; and

(vi)   asks the Communication division to be involved in the project.

Cr Barry and Cr Briggs requested that their dissenting votes be recorded
 against the above matter.

c)       Policy and Regulatory Committee

 

1 May 2017

 

 

Resolved:                                                                              Minute No. C 17206

“That the report of the meeting held on 01 May 2017 with the exception of item 4a) Overseas Travel Approval – Policy Change, item 4b) Redrafted Gift Policy for Elected Members, item 4c) Reserve Reclassification – Wainuiomata, item 4d) Future of Molesworth Street Reserve Pomare, item 4e) Proposed Road Stopping and Sale of Legal Road on the corner of Knights Road and Birch Street Waterloo, item 4f) Dog Controls for Avalon Park and item 4g) Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy be adopted.”

Recommended Items

Item 4a)

Overseas Travel Approval - Policy Change (17/651)

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)                Minute No. C 17207

“That Council:

(i)     approves the Chief Executive be given delegated authority to approve overseas travel for staff; and

(ii)    approves the ‘tracked’ changes in the Sensitive Expenditure Policy attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2017/2/110.”

 

Item 4b)

Redrafted Gift Policy for Elected Members (17/587)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                   Minute No. C 17208

“That Council approves the proposed Gift Policy for Elected Members (changes as underlined) attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2017/2/111.”

Item 4c)

Reserve Reclassification - Wainuiomata (17/252)

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Briggs)                     Minute No. C 17209

“That Council reclassify the Local Purpose Reserve (Community Use) located at the end of Hinau Grove, Wainuiomata, being Lot 1 DP 83036 (WN49C/742), as a Recreation Reserve in terms of section 19(1)(b) of the Reserves Act 1977.”

Item 4d)

Future of Molesworth Street Reserve Pomare (17/536)

 

Resolved(Cr Cousins/Cr Sutton)                   Minute No. C 17210

“That Council:

(i)     notes that as a result of the Valley Floor Review officers were directed to undertake a review of the reserve property at 132A Molesworth Street for the purpose of considering its future;

(ii)    notes that an independent assessment of reserve values has been undertaken which considers that the property has a low reserves value;

(iii)   notes that an application has been received from Empower Management Limited seeking to use the property to establish an Early Childhood Education (ECE) centre;

(iv)   asks officers to work with Empower Management Limited to assist it to find a suitable location for an ECE centre;

(v)    asks officers to undertake general consultation with the community about the future of the property and report back on the options; and

(vi)   notes that a decision on an alternative use of the property would be a matter for further consideration should Council decide, following due process, to revoke the reserve status of the property.”

 

Item 4e)

Proposed Road Stopping and Sale of Legal Road on the corner of Knights Road and Birch Street Waterloo (17/600)

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)            Minute No. C 17211

“That Council:

(i)     notes that the owner of 227 Knights Road is interested in acquiring a small area of legal road of approximately 35m2 which is situated between the legal boundary and existing fence as shown in Appendix 1 to Report PRC2017/2/113;

(ii)    notes that the Road and Traffic Division see no need to retain this area of legal road for roading purposes now or in the future;

(iii)   agrees to stop the portion of legal road adjoining 227 Knights Road as depicted on the aerial photograph attached as Appendix 1 to Report PRC2017/2/113; and

(iv)   agrees to sell the stopped road to the owner of 227 Knights Road, noting that the owner has agreed to meet all costs associated with the road stopping process and subsequent boundary adjustment, as well as the assessed market value of the land.”

Item 4f)

Dog Controls for Avalon Park (17/632)

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr McDonald)         Minute No. C 17212

“That Council:

(i)     approves the public consultation process; and

(ii)    appoints a subcommittee consisting of Councillors Cousins, Lewis, Bridson, Briggs and Edwards, to hear submissions on the proposed dog controls for Avalon Park and make recommendations to Council.”

Item 4g)

Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy (17/575)

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Edwards)            Minute No. C 17213

“That Council:

(i)     notes the officer’s report on Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy that includes results of a pre-consultation phase;

(ii)    agrees to not take any further action and therefore not develop an Easter Sunday Shop Trading Policy at this time; and

(iii)   asks officers to keep the matter under review and bring it back to Council if there is any change in the position of the regional Metropolitan Councils.

 

 

d)      City Development Committee

 

2 May 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)                      Minute No. C 17214

“That the report of the meeting held on 2 May 2017 with the exception of item 4a) Petone 2040 and item 4b) Petone Clock Walk, be adopted.”

 

 

Item 4a)

Recommended Items

Petone 2040 (17/682)

 

 

Cr Lewis declared a conflict of interest and took no part in the discussion or voting on the matter.

 

 

Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Sutton)    Minute No. C 17215

“That Council:

(i)     notes that Petone 2040 is supported by the Petone Community Board (PCB), Jackson Street Programme (JSP), and the Petone 2040 Community Group;

(ii)    notes that Petone 2040 has been well received by Councillors and officers are seeking it as a spatial plan to assist their work;

(iii)   notes that Petone 2040 will form an important part of the Hutt growth ‘story’ being developed with the New Zealand Transport Agency and Greater Wellington Regional Council to consider city wide transport projects eg Cross Valley Link;

(iv)   approves the Petone 2040 Spatial Plan, attached as Appendix 2 to Report CDC2017/2/129 as Council’s and the community’s overarching long term development strategy for Petone and Moera;

(v)    notes the membership of the Petone 2040 Group as follows: Cr Tui Lewis (Chair of the Petone 2040 Group); Ms Pam Hanna (Petone Community Board Chair); Mr Mike Fisher (Petone Community Board Deputy Chair); Mr John Donnelly (JSP representative); Mr Matt Roberts (community representative); Ms Sue Piper (facilitator); and Mr Tom Bennion (community representative); and

(vi)   appoints Cr Sutton (Deputy Chair) as the City Development Committee representative to the Petone 2040 Group.”

 

Item 4b)

Petone Clock Walk (17/681)

 

Cr Lewis declared a conflict of interest and took no part in voting or discussion on the matter.

 

Resolved: (Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Lulich)     Minute No. C 17216

“That Council:

(i)     notes that the Jackson Street Programme (JSP) does not support the Petone Clock Walk;

(ii)    notes that Petone Community Board and Petone 2040 Community Group agree that Petone Clock Walk should be considered through Petone 2040;

(iii)   agrees that further discussions be held between JSP and Petone Clock Walk to then be brought forward to the P2040 Group;

(iv)   agrees that further progress for the Petone Clock Walk is considered through a Jackson Street streetscape design under the Petone 2040 Spatial Plan and asks that the P2040 makes this project a priority and notes Council’s support of the project; and

(v)    asks officers to report to the June 2017 Community Plan Committee on necessary funding for the Jackson Street Streetscape Design.”

e)      Finance and Performance Committee

 

3 May 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                Minute No. C 17217

“That the report of the meeting held on 3 May 2017 with the exception of item 4a) Urban Plus Limited – Amendment to Constitution, item 4b) Appointment of Trustees to Hutt City Community Facilities Trust and item 4c) Response to Fraser Park Business Case, be adopted.”

 


 

Recommended Items

Item 4a)

Urban Plus Limited - Amendment to Constitution (17/667)

 

Deputy Mayor Bassett declared a conflict of interest and left the table for the duration of the item.

 

Resolved: (Cr Milne/Cr Barry)                          Minute No. C 17218

“That Council:

(i)     approves the amendment to the UrbanPlus Limited (UPL) Constitution attached as Appendix 3 to the report, regarding the ability for UPL Directors to provide indemnity to Directors and employees of its current and future subsidiary companies;

(ii)    notes that a Deed of Indemnity will also have to be entered into as part of this proposal; and

(iii)   notes that the purpose is to provide indemnification to previous (retired), current and future Directors and employees of UPL subsidiary companies.”

 

Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter below.

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Barry/Cr Sutton)                             Minute No. C 17219

“That Council approves, subject to approval by the Seaview Marina Limited (SML) Board and Council’s General Manager, Governance and Regulatory, similar changes be made to the SML Constitution to allow indemnification of previous (retired), current and future Directors and employees of SML and SML subsidiary companies.”

 

 

Item 4b)

Appointment of Trustees to Hutt City Community  Facilities Trust (17/549)

 

Cr Cousins declared a conflict of interest and took no part in voting or discussion on the matter below.

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)Minute No. C 17220

“That Council:

(i)     approves the appointment of a selection panel consisting of Council’s General Manager Community Services, outgoing Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (CFT) Chair (subject to his agreement) and Cr Milne to identify, assess and approach potential candidates for the position of up to three independent Trustees on CFT, in accordance with the Council’s Policy for the Appointment of Directors;

(ii)    approves this process for future appointments to the Board of the CFT; and

(iii)   delegates to the selection panel the power to negotiate and decide an amount to be paid as an honorarium for the new Chair up to the existing remuneration level.”

 

Item 4c)

Response to Fraser Park Business Case (17/603)

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr  Mark Heissenbuttel representing Fraser Park Sportsville (FPS) highlighted the successful FPS partnership largely funded by Council and supported by the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust.  He also highlighted that the research undertaken for the business case had indicated a return of over $24M back to the community over the next 10 years from the operation of FPS.  He said the operating grant would allow FPS to deliver events and programmes for member sport clubs, local schools and the wider community.  He acknowledged the work completed by the FPS Board.    

 

Resolved: (Cr Milne/Deputy Mayor Bassett)      Minute No. C 17221

“That Council:

(i)     recommends to the Community Plan Committee, subject to Council approval, and subject to any cost reduction that Council is able to provide to the business case (eg Insurance), an operating grant to Fraser Park Sportsville (FPS) of:

a)  $150,000 for the first full year of operation;

b)  $125,000 for the second year;

c)  $100,000 for the third year; and

d)  $75,000 for the fourth year;

(ii)    agrees for this operating grant to be reviewed after three years of FPS operating; and

(iii)   agrees that a condition of annual funding will be that FPS formally reports to Council six monthly and in particular progress against its Business Case.”

 

Resolved(Cr Barry/Cr Briggs)                          Minute No. C 17222

“That Council asks officers to provide a report on the rating policy for sporting, recreational, cultural and community facilities.”

f)       Community Services Committee

 

4 May 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Cr Sutton)                                       Minute No. C 17223

“That the report of the meeting held on 4 May 2017 with the exception of item 4a) Review of Community Funding and item 4b) Review of Community Committees, be adopted.”

 


 

 

Recommended Items

Item 4a)

Review of Community Funding (17/656)

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms Carey Buck representing Petone Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) believed there was a lack of detail available for the new funding model process, criteria and measures.  She highlighted the services provided across the community by the CAB.  She noted the CAB was affiliated to a national body, which meant it could not apply for national body funding.

 

Speaking under public comment, Ms Ina Wharehinga representing the Petone Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) highlighted that the information did not provide clarity on how it would be determined whether the group fitted within the model.  She said officers had assured the CAB that the group would be taken into account in the new funding model, but she was now unsure if this was the case. 

 

The General Manager Community Services elaborated on the report.   He undertook to work with the organisations to ensure a smooth transition.

Mayor Wallace advised that the proposed change with the Community Funding Strategy would be incremental over a number of years and that Council would work to ensure the services provided by CAB were retained.

 

Resolved(Cr Barratt/Cr Briggs)                    Minute No. C 17224

“That Council:

(i)     approves the 2017/2022 Community Funding Strategy, attached as Appendix 2 to Report CSC2017/2/107, effective from 1 July 2018;

(ii)    notes that changes to the existing funding arrangements will be made incrementally over 2017/18, 2018/19 and 2019/20; and

(iii)   notes that the existing Community Funding Policy will be amended to ensure it aligns with aspirations and requirements of this proposed Community Funding Strategy.”

Cr Lewis and Cr Lulich requested that their dissenting votes be recorded against the above matter.

 

Item 4b)

Review of Community Committees (17/661)

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Michael Ellis expressed support for the proposed Community Panels.  He did not consider the Community Board delegations should be identical to the Community Panels’ delegations as the intent of the panels was that they would be community led. 

 

Mayor Wallace noted funding for the panels would be included in the representation review to be undertaken later in 2017.

 

Cr Cousins considered protocols should be included within the Community Panels’ delegations for the panels to manage funding requirements.

 

Resolved: (Cr Barratt/Cr McDonald)               Minute No. C 17225

“That Council:

(i)     approves the establishment of four Community Panels; and

(ii)    notes the new Community Panel approach would be reviewed after
12 months
.

Cr Lewis requested that her dissenting vote be recorded against the above matter.

 

The meeting adjourned at 7.40pm and recommenced at 7.50pm.

6.

a)

Miscellaneous

Living Wage - Next Steps (17/770)

Report No. HCC2017/2/136 by the Divisional Manager Human Resources

 

Speaking under public comment, Dr Jim Rose representing the New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union considered the introduction of the living wage would create a situation where future jobs would be filled by the top qualified applicants.  He outlined what had occurred at Wellington City Council where only 13 out of the 30 existing parking wardens had been re-hired.  He considered Councils, which adopted the living wage, would need to employ staff on merit with transparent processes and outcomes. 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Neville Hyde, President of the Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce (the Chamber), commented that the Chamber remained opposed to the introduction of the living wage and applying an arbitrary living wage figure.  He considered the living wage was politically driven and required an expectation that ratepayers would receive an improved service from its introduction.  He noted Council had a legal requirement to deliver services in a cost effective way and considered it could be legally challenged if the living wage was introduced.  

Speaking under public comment, Mr John Ryall representing the Hutt Valley Living Wage Group said that Council’s legal opinion provided a distinction between employed staff and contractors, but the requirement for Council to be a good employer was not a condition for contracted staff.  He noted the objective of the living wage was to provide fair and proper treatment and considered the draft policy was in line with Council’s obligations of being a good employer.   He considered that Council should continue discussions with living wage representatives, Wellington and Auckland City Councils and Greater Wellington Regional Council regarding the application of the living wage.

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Glenn Barclay representing the Public Service Association (PSA) noted the PSA had 63,000 national members and was an active member of the living wage movement.  He highlighted Council’s obligation to be a good employer and asked members to consider the human rights of staff against cost effectiveness requirements.  He expressed support for Mr Ryall’s comments.    

The Solicitor elaborated on the report. 

Mr Jonathan Salter, Partner, Simpson Grierson Lawyers, elaborated on the change to the initial purpose of the Local Government Act (the Act) which removed the requirement on local authorities to provide for the promotion of social, economic, environmental and cultural community well beings.  He advised that the initial purpose of the Act flowed through into the powers of local authorities since sections 10, 11 and 12 of the Act were closely related.  He highlighted that the new purpose was the requirement for local authorities to meet the current and future needs of communities for good quality local infrastructure, local public services and performance of regulation functions in a way that was the most cost-effective for households and businesses.  He explained that the change was deliberate by central government to encourage fiscal restraint by local authorities.  He also explained that local authorities were required to reference back its general powers to the new change to the purpose of the Act.  He highlighted other relevant provisions under the Act where local authorities were obliged to carry out financial and revenue and general dealings in a way that was prudent and met the interests of the communities.  In essence, he advised that paying a living wage above the market requirements to get a particular job done had some serious issues for local authorities.  He advised that there were counter arguments with the obligation of local authorities to be good employers under the Act.  However, he noted that he did not read anything in the obligation that regulated how much local authorities paid their staff.  He stated that local authorities needed justification and actual evidence and analysis outcomes to warrant paying the living wage.  He highlighted that the behaviour of local authorities could be judicially reviewable on the grounds of failure to comply with the Act.  He elaborated on the potential judicial review risk for Wellington City Council when it considered the same matter in 2016 when a serious threat was made by the Wellington Chamber of Commerce which had ended in a compromise. 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Salter clarified that the compromise related to paying a living wage for employees of Council contractors.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Salter highlighted that the new purpose of the Act had not been challenged and he was uncertain how the Courts would interpete the new purpose of the Act.  He advised that the risk would come at the time of a challenge.  He stated that the High Court had read the Act extremely literally.  

In response to questions from a member, Mr Salter advised that one of the reasons local authorities employed staff was to meet the needs of the communities for good quality local infrastructure and local body services and regulations, therefore it was fundamental local authorities employed staff as one of the mechanisms by which to deliver the needs of the communities. He also advised that the starting point was to determine whether local authorities had a problem.  He stated that the Act directed local authorities to consider the options for dealing with a decision and local authorities needed to undertake an analysis to confirm they had a problem that required a possible solution. 

In response to a question from a member regarding Council being consistent with its decisions, the Solicitor advised that when the change was made to the purpose of the Act, a requirement was included in the report templates which required officers to describe how the recommendations fell within the new purpose of the Act.  He also advised that he had been informed by Wellington City Council that the threat of a judicial review was both for contractors and employees. 

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive advised that he was nervous about a blanket approach due to the legal advice received.  He highlighted that Council did not have across the board problems with staff turnover, staff moral and the recruitment of staff.  He acknowledged that there may be some areas of issue discovered with a case-by-case basis which would be assisted by an adjustment of wages.

The Divisional Manager Human Resources advised that members needed to take into account how Council was going to acknowledge the performance of an individual staff member if all staff received an automatic wage increase.  She highlighted that Council would be treating staff differently at remuneration review time.

MOVED: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)

That Council:

(i)       receives the legal advice;

(ii)     adopts the Living Wage Policy, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, which allows the Living Wage to be paid to employees on a case-by-case basis; and

(iii)   requests the Chief Executive to continue to work with Living Wage Hutt Valley on issues such as contracting.

AMENDMENT MOVED: (Cr Sutton/Cr Milne)

That Council:

(i)       receives the legal advice;

(ii)     adopts the Living Wage Policy, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, which allows the Living Wage to be paid to employees on a case-by-case basis; and

(iii)   requests the Chief Executive to continue to work with Living Wage Hutt Valley, Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce and the New Zealand Taxpayers’ Union Inc on issues such as contracting.

The amendment (part iii) above was declared lost by division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Cousins

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

Against

 

Cr Barry

Cr Lulich

Cr McDonald

Cr Lewis

Cr Briggs

Cr Bridson

Cr Edwards

Total: 6

Total: 7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cr Edwards foreshadowed his intention to move a further amendment to part (iii) of the motion as follows:

(iii)requests the Chief Executive to continue to work with Living Wage Hutt Valley and Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce on issues such as contracting.”

AMENDMENT MOVED: (Cr Bridson/Cr Barry)

“That the Remuneration and Employment Policy be accepted with the following changes to the second paragraph under the heading ‘Paying the Living Wage” delete the words “where it can be demonstrated that doing so means that the performance of our functions and services will be the most cost-effective way to provide those services.”

The Chair ruled the amendment as a direct negative.  He advised Cr Bridson that she could foreshadow her intention to move the motion if the substantive motion was lost.

Cr Milne expressed support for the motion and considered that the blanket approach did not meet the requirements under the purpose of the Act.

Mayor Wallace left the meeting and the Deputy Mayor assumed the Chair.

Cr Barry expressed concern with the motion and considered Council was ‘passing the buck’ recommending a case-by-case basis focus.  He considered that it was Council’s responsibility to be a good employer and do what was right for Council staff.

Mayor Wallace rejoined the meeting and assumed the Chair.

AMENDMENT MOVED: (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs)

That Council:

(i)       asks officers to prepare an implementation plan for introducing the living wage for Council employees;

(ii)     asks officers to consult with Wellington City and Auckland City Councils on how they conducted their processes for implementing the living wage for their directly employed Council employees and that this helps inform any proposed implementation plan; and

(iii)   an implementation plan be presented to Council at its meeting to be held in September 2017.

The Chair ruled the above amendment as a direct negative.  He advised Cr Barry that he could foreshadow his intention to move the motion if the substantive motion was lost.

Cr Briggs expressed concern with the motion and advised that paying employees on a case-by-case basis did not work for him.  He advised that if the motion was carried then he believed Council was doing an injustice to its employees and not treating them with dignity and respect. 

PROCEDURAL MOTION: (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs)

“That the item of business being discussed should lie on the table.”            

 

The motion was LOST on a show of hands with 7 for and 6 against.

 

Resolved:   (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)           Minute No. C 17227

“That Council:

(i)       receives the legal advice; and

(ii)     adopts the Living Wage Policy, attached as Appendix 1 to the report, which allows the Living Wage to be paid to employees on a case-by-case basis; and

(iii)    requests the Chief Executive to continue to work with Living Wage Hutt Valley and Hutt Valley Chamber of Commerce on issues such as contracting.”

 

The  motion was taken in two parts.  Parts (i) and (ii) were declared carried by division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Cousins

Cr Milne

Cr McDonald

Cr Sutton

Against

 

Cr Barry

Cr Lulich

Cr Lewis

Cr Briggs

Cr Bridson

Cr Edwards

Total: 7

Total: 6
           

Part (iii) was declared CARRIED by division with the voting as follows:-

For

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Barry

Cr Bridson

Cr Briggs

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr Lulich

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

 

Against

 

Cr Lewis

 

Total: 12

Total: 1

Cr Lewis requested that her dissenting vote be recorded against part (iii) above.

b)

Skateboard Area - Civic Building (17/790)

Memorandum dated 15 May 2017 by the Solicitor.

Mayor Wallace highlighted the recent damage from the use of skateboards on the granite outside the front of the Hutt City Council Administration building.  He asked officers to manage and enforce the relevant skateboard bans around the central district precinct.  He encouraged skateboarders to make use of the skate park provided.     

In response to a question from a member, Mayor Wallace asked officers to report on the central business district skating areas in consultation with the Youth Council. 

The Chief Executive advised that the report would form part of the Traffic Bylaw review later in 2017.  

 

Resolved:  (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)      Minute No. C 17228

“That Council pursuant to clause 15.2 of the Hutt City Council Traffic Bylaw 2007, resolves to amend the skating ban area for the “central commercial area, Lower Hutt” to the area shown on the plan attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum.”

 

Resolved(Cr Bridson/Cr Briggs)                                               Minute No. C 17229

“That Council asks officers to review the CBD skating areas in consultation with the Youth Council to see whether there are any changes to be made to make the City more welcoming.”

 

c)

Changes to Terms of Reference and Subcommittee Membership (17/740)

Memorandum dated 2 May 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald)                        Minute No. C 17230

“That Council:

 

(i)    approves the proposed amendment (as strike out) to the City Development Committee’s terms of reference as attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum;

 

(ii)   approves the amendment (as underlined) to the Community Boards’ delegations as attached as Appendix 2 to the memorandum;

 

(iii)  approves the amendments to the Wellington Region Waste Management and Minimisation Plan Joint Committee’s (WMMP) terms of reference to reflect the following:

 

(a)   that territorial authorities can appoint an alternate member to attend and vote at its meetings in the appointed member’s absence; and

 

(b)   that the WMMP Joint Committee will agree at the beginning of each triennium where meetings are to be held; and

 

(iv)  appoints Cr Lewis as an alternate to the WMMP Joint Committee; and

 

(v)   appoints Cr Bridson as a sitting member of the Traffic Subcommittee and
Cr Barratt as alternate.”

d)

Alteration of Part of a Previous Council Resolution - Delaney Park (17/769)

Memorandum dated 9 May 2017 by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Bridson)                           Minute No. C 17231

“That Council:

 

(i)      notes its original resolution dated 15 December 2016 (Minute No. C 16506(3)) as follows:

 

“That Council agrees to provide for the following alcohol free areas within the city…part (f) Stokes Valley shopping centre and Speldhurst Park, Stokes Valley to be alcohol free zones at all times”…; and

 

(ii)     agrees to alter part (f) of the resolution to include Delaney Park to be alcohol free zone at all times as follows:

 

 Stokes Valley shopping centre, Delaney Park and Speldhurst Park, Stokes Valley to be alcohol free zones at all times as attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum.”

 

 

7.       Minutes

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)               Minute No. C 17232

“That the minutes of the meeting of the Hutt City Council held on Tuesday, 14 March 2017, be confirmed as a true and correct record.”

8.       Committee Reports without Recommended Items

a)      Community Plan Committee

 

21 February 2017

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)        Minute No. C 17233

“That the report of the meeting held on 21 February 2017 be adopted.”

 

 

14 March 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)       Minute No. C 17234

“That the report of the meeting held on 14 March 2017 be adopted.”

b)      Hutt Valley Services Committee

 

5 May 2017

 

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)        Minute No. C 17235

“That the report of the meeting held on 5 May 2017 be adopted.”

9.       QUESTIONS

There were no questions.

10.

Sealing Authority (17/477)

Report No. HCC2017/2/11 by the Committee Administrator

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                   Minute No. C 17236

“That Council:

 

(i)            approves the affixing of the Common Seal to all relevant documents in connection with the items set out in Schedule 1 contained in the report; and

(ii)     approves the deeds executed under Power of Attorney set out in Schedule 2 contained in the report.

 

SCHEDULE 1 - General Sealing Authority

 

Agreement for Sale and Purchase

a)       The Hutt City Council and Premans Limited
38 Manor Park Road, Manor Park
(Record Number L17/11)

Agreement with Another Organisation

b)       The Hutt City Council and Greater Wellington Regional Council
Consent for land declared to Road at Boulcott Stopbank Project
(Record Number L17/72)

Authority and Instruction for Deed of Nomination and Land Transfer Tax Statement – Sale or Purchase

c)       The Hutt City Council and Urban Plus Limited (nominator) and Fairfield Ltd Partnership (nominee)
Sale of Summit Road – 1 Laura Fergusson Grove, Lower Hutt
(Record Number L17/44)

Cancel Consent Conditions Legal 2.7

d)      The Hutt City Council
Cancel Consent Conditions: 17/106 for L17/31
Application to cancel consent
Summit Road 1-13 Laura Fergusson Grove, Fairfield
(Record Number L17/31)

Compensation Certificate under Section 19 of the Public Works Act 1981

e)       The Hutt City Council and DG Hall, P Hall and JD Hall
203 Marine Drive, Eastbourne
Land Swap and Road Stopping
(Record Number L17/77)

Easement

f)       The Hutt City Council and Yu’s Development Limited
950 High Street, Lower Hutt
(Record Number L17/62)

g)      The Hutt City Council and KB Roil and BD Makwana-Roil
Sewage Drainage
6-8 Petherick Grove, Taita
(Record Number L17/91)

Encumbrance

h)      The Hutt City Council and Urban Plus Ltd
47 Laings Road, Titles WN23A/788 and WN23A/789
(Record Number L17/42)

Memorandum of Encumbrance – No. B437677.1

i)       The Hutt City Council
Consent Form
117 Stratton Street
(Record Number L16/181)

Removal of Encumbrance

j)       The Hutt City Council
205 Wise Street, Wainuiomata
(Record Number L17/80)


Warrants Approved

Karl Peter Mittermuller – HCC WARRANT-17-7

1. Local Government Act 2002
Authorised Person pursuant to ss171, 173
(powers of entry in general)
Enforcement Officer pursuant to s177
(including additional powers of entry)
8. Health Act 1956
Environmental Health Officer pursuant to s28
9. Hutt Valley Trade Wastes Bylaw 2006
Authorised Officer pursuant to 1.5 and 6.4
(including powers under Hutt Valley Drainage Act 1967)
11. Litter Act 1979
Litter Control Officer pursuant to s5
13. Resource Management Act 1991
Enforcement Officer pursuant to s38(1)
Enforcement Officer (Noise Control only) pursuant to s38(2)
14. Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012
Inspector pursuant to s197(1)

SCHEDULE 2

Deed of Lease

a)       The Hutt City Council
7A Britannia Street, Petone
3 Carparks located off Britannia Street
(Record Number L17/70)”

11.     EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

RESOLVED:                                                                                       Minute No. C 17237

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

12.     Committee Reports with Recommended Items

a)       City Development Committee - 2 May 2017

b)       Finance and Performance Committee - 3 May 2017

c)       Community Services Committee - 4 May 2017

13.     Minutes HUTT CITY COUNCIL - 14 March 2017

14.     Community Representatives for the Civic Honours Committee (17/647)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Report of the City Development Committee held on 2 May 2017

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons.(s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

Report of the Finance and Performance Committee held on 3 May 2017

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

Report of the Community Services Committee held on 4 May 2017

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons(s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Minutes of the Hutt City Council held on 14 March 2017

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to maintain legal professional privilege (s7(2)(g)).

 

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

Report of the Hutt City Council held on 23 May 2017

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons.(s7(2)(a)).

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities(s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Report of City Development Committee 2 May 2017 to Council.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Report of Finance and Performance Committee 3 May 2017 to Council.

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Report of Community Services Committee 4 May 2017 to Council.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

 

 

Community Representatives for the Civic Honours Committee.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” 

 

 

Resolved (Mayor Wallace/Cr Sutton)                               Minute No. C 17238

“That Mr Alister Skene and Mr Peter Healy of the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of item 12b) ‘Response to Hutt City Community Facilities Trust Funding Proposal’ as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.”

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 9.30 pm and the non public portion of the meeting finished at 10.05 pm.

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017

 


                                                                     157                                                  8 June 2017

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 8 June 2017 commencing at 6.55pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr L Bridson (until 6.57pm)

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                                Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology for early departure was received from Cr Bridson.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer

Mr P Benseman, Budgeting and Reporting Manager

Ms H Clegg, Minute Taker

Ms K Stannard, Manager Secretariat Services

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Briggs)                                       Minute No. C 17301

“That the apology received from Cr Bridson for early departure be accepted.”.

 

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL FROM THE COMMUNITY PLAN COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 8 JUNE 2017

Annual Plan 2017-2018

 

Resolved:   (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                 Minute No. C 17302

“That Council:

(i)       adopts the Annual Plan 2017-2018 incorporating the budget and any other changes agreed by the Community Plan Committee; and

(ii)     authorises the Annual Plan Subcommittee comprising Mayor Wallace, Deputy Mayor Bassett and Councillors Barry, Cousins and Milne to sign off the typeset document.”

 

5.

Granting of Easements over Local Purpose Reserve (Road), Wise Street, Wainuiomata (17/851)

Report No. HCC2017/3/79 by the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Briggs)                                         Minute No. C 17303

“That Council grants easements for rights of way, rights to drain water and sewage, and rights to convey water, gas, electricity and telecommunications over the Hutt City Council owned Local Purpose Reserve (Road), being Lot 10, DP 336174, situated at the end of Wise Street, Wainuiomata, in favour of Lots 1 and 6 DP 302320.”

 

6.       QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

 

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 7pm.

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017.


                                                                     159                                                12 June 2017

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an extraordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the
Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Monday 12 June 2017 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                                Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr B Sherlock, General Manager, City Infrastructure 

Ms J Raffills, General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer

Mr B Cato, Solicitor

Mr G Craig, City Development Manager

Mr C Walton, Chief Executive, UrbanPlus Ltd

Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager

Ms S Simcox, Communications and Marketing Team Leader

Mr J Hoyle, Communications and Marketing Advisor

Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager Secretariat Services

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

          There were no apologies.

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

          There were no conflicts of interest.

4.

Notice of Motion (17/853)

Report No. HCC2017/3/82 by the Councillor

Speaking under public comment, Mr Shierlaw commended Cr Barry for raising the matter.  He believed Mayor Wallace had made misleading comments relating to meetings where tea, coffee and biscuits were provided for members.   He advised that the Maungaraki Residents Association held evening meetings and did not provide catering for its members.  He reminded members that they were self-employed and should be covering their own costs including their own meals.

Mayor Wallace highlighted that he had received advice from officers that tea, coffee and biscuits were provided at a number of meetings where agendas were light.

MOVED:  (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs)

"That Council require elected members to provide their own meals prior to, during, or after Full Council and Council Committee meetings.  If an elected member wishes for Council to arrange catering for them, then they shall be invoiced a set amount to fully cover the cost of that catering.”

Cr Barry elaborated on the reasons for the notice of motion.  He advised that Council had recently agreed to a ‘sham’ of a policy where Council had agreed to pay the living wage to its employees on a case on case basis when it was the most cost effective way.  He believed that Council had not considered the most cost effective way with any other criteria Council used for its decision making including free meals paid for by the ratepayer. 

Cr Lulich spoke in support of the motion.  He believed that the living wage should be controlled by central government.  He elaborated on the way MPs and Parliamentary Services treated employees and the benefits that the MPs received.   He advised that from now on he would be bringing his own meals to meetings.

Cr Edwards spoke in support of the motion.  He acknowledged that the cost of catering was a small amount taking everything else into account.  He advised that he was uncomfortable eating meals paid for by the ratepayers when, during the annual plan process, there was not enough funding for community groups.  He considered that day meetings were not a solution as that prevented certain people standing for Council and prevented certain members of the public participating in day meetings.

Mayor Wallace spoke against the motion.  He expressed disappointment that the matter had been handled in the first instance through the media with no attempt to correct misinformation.  He advised that guidelines were in place for the catering of meetings.  He highlighted that tea, coffee and biscuits were provided to members when meetings were scheduled to finish within the hour.

Cr Briggs spoke in support of the motion.,  He clarified that members received an email from Cr Barry before the media was alerted to the matter and that a discussion on catering had taken place with half of the members.  He highlighted that ratepayers were paying for the meals that they were eating.  He stated that he would be bringing his own meals to meetings. 

In his right of reply, Cr Barry expressed concern that members were missing the point.  He advised that he had not attended any meetings where the catering was just tea, coffee and biscuits.  He advised that he was disappointed that Mayor Wallace was not supporting the motion.  He considered that members were required to do business in the most cost effective way.

The motion was declared LOST by Division with the voting as follows:-

For

 

Cr Barry

Cr Lulich

Cr Lewis

Cr Briggs

Cr Bridson

Cr Edwards

Against

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Cousins

Cr Milne

Cr McDonald

Cr Sutton

Total: 6

Total: 7

Cr Barry left the meeting at 6.15pm and rejoined the meeting at 6.45pm

5.       QUESTIONS   

          There were no questions.

6.       EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved:                                                                                   Minute No. C 17301(2)

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

7.       Matters Pertaining to RiverLink Project (17/888)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

 

 

 

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Matters Pertaining to RiverLink Project.

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry out, without prejudice or disadvantage, commercial activities (s7(2)(h)).

 

The withholding of the information is necessary to enable the local authority to carry on, without prejudice or disadvantage, negotiations (including commercial and industrial negotiations) (s7(2)(i)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.”

 

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)          Minute No. C 17302(2)

“That Mr David Allen and Ms Libby Cowper of Buddle Findlay and Mr Craig Walton, Chief Executive of UrbanPlus Ltd be permitted to remain after the public during consideration of the item as they have knowledge of the matter to be discussed that will assist Council in relation to this item.”

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 6.25pm and the non public portion of the meeting finished at 7.45pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017


                                                                     163                                                29 June 2017

 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Minutes of an ordinary meeting of The Hutt City Council held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road, Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 29 June 2017 commencing at 6.00pm

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr L Sutton

 

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology was received from Cr Milne.

 

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)

Ms S Simcox, Communications and Marketing Team leader (part meeting)

Mr A Cumming, Divisional Manager Environmental Policy (part meeting)
Ms K Stannard, Divisional Manager Secretariat Services

 

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

 Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)         Minute No. C 17301(3)

“That the apology received from Cr C Milne be accepted and leave of absence be granted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.      

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

          There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.

Setting Rates for the year ending 30th June 2018 (17/904)

Report No. HCC2017/3/148 (2) by the Chief Financial Officer

 

Resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)          Minute No. C 17302(3)

“That Council resolves to set rates and add penalties to unpaid rates during the 2017/18 rating year by passing the following resolution:

1. SETTING THE RATES

In accordance with the relevant provisions of the current Long Term Community Plan and the Funding Impact Statement in the 2016/2017 Annual Plan, the Council hereby resolves, pursuant to Section 23 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, to set and assess the following rates for the year commencing 1 July 2017 and ending 30 June 2018.

 

(a) A General Rate set and assessed under sections 13 and 14 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 on every rating unit in the district, differentially on those categories of rateable land as defined in the Hutt City Council Funding Impact Statement as follows:

 

The General rates in the dollar calculated on the capital value of each rating unit shall be:

Differential Category

 

Cents in the $

Residential

RE

0.30472

Rural

RU

0.22244

Business Accommodation

BA

0.80750

Business Central

BC

0.91415

Business Suburban

BS

0.86844

Utility Networks

UN

0.73132

Community Facilities 1

C1

0.30472

Community Facilities 2

C2

0.15236

Community Facilities 3

C3

0.73132


(b) A Targeted Rate (Water Supply Rate) set and assessed under sections 16 and 19 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $394.00, on every separately used or inhabited portion of a rating unit in the district to which water is supplied, with a charge of $197.00 on every separately used or inhabited portion of a rating unit to which water can be, but is not supplied, (being a property situated within 100 metres from any part of the water works).

(c) A Targeted Rate (Wastewater Rate) set and assessed under sections 16 and 17 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, of $435.00, on the first water closet or urinal connected to the wastewater system from each rating unit, and a charge of $217.50 for the second and each subsequent water closet or urinal from each rating unit so connected, provided that each household is charged for no more than one water closet.

 

(d) A Targeted Rate (Recycling Charge) set and assessed under sections 16 and 17 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 of $40.50 on every separately used or inhabited portion of a rating unit in the Residential differential category to which the recycling collection service is provided, or is available to be provided.

(e) A Targeted Rate (Jackson Street Programme Rate) set and assessed under sections 16 and 17 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002 of .079403 cents in the dollar on the capital value of every rating unit in a Business differential category which is situated within that area of the former Petone Borough with a frontage on Jackson Street between the Hutt Road and Cuba Street.

 

The above rates for the financial year ending 30 June 2018 are all inclusive of GST at the prevailing rate and are payable by six instalments by the following due dates:

Instalment No.

Due Date

One

20 August 2017

Two

20 October 2017

Three

20 December 2017

Four

20 February 2018

Five

20 April 2018

Six

20 June 2018


Where a due date falls on a weekend or public holiday the next business day rule applies.

2. AUTHORISING PENALTY CHARGES

 

AND pursuant to Sections 57 and 58 of the Local Government (Rating) Act 2002, the Council further resolves for the period from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2018 to:

 

(a) Authorise a penalty charge of 10% to be added to the amount of rates remaining unpaid for each instalment after the due date. The dates upon which the 10% penalty charge will be added to any rates remaining unpaid for each instalment will be the day after the date each instalment is due;

 

(b) Authorise a further penalty charge of 10% to be added to rates levied prior to 1 July 2017 and which remain unpaid after the 20 August 2017 instalment has been processed.  This penalty will be added to the amount of unpaid rates the day after the 20 August 2017 instalment has been processed;

 

(c) Authorise a further penalty charge of 10% to be added to rates levied prior to 1 July 2017 and which remain unpaid after the 20 February 2018 instalment has been processed.  This penalty will be added to the amount of unpaid rates the day after the 20 February 2018 instalment has been processed.”

 

 

5.

Private Plan Change 45 - Rule Amendments and Rezoning of Land at 1N and 57N Mandel Mews
Final Approval and Operative Date
(17/854)

Report No. HCC2017/3/147 (2) by the Senior Environmental Policy Analyst

 

The Divisional Manager Environmental Policy elaborated on the report. 

 

Resolved:  (Mayor Wallace/Cr Cousins)                            Minute No. C 17303(3)

“That Council:

(i)    resolves, pursuant to clause 17 of the First Schedule of the Resource Management Act 1991, to approve Plan Change 45 to the City of Lower Hutt District Plan, as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report;

(ii)   approves the affixing of the Common Seal to Plan Change 45 in accordance with Standing Order 8.2, as set out in Appendix 2 to the report; and

(iii)  notes that a public notice will be included in the Hutt News on 4 July 2017 advising the operative date of Plan Change 45.”

6.

Appointment of Deputy Chair of Lower Hutt District Licensing Committee (17/964)

Report No. HCC2017/3/97 (2) by the Senior Committee Advisor

 

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                             Minute No. C 17304(3)

“That Council:

 

(i)    approves the appointment of Cr Simon Edwards as Deputy Chair and a list member of the Lower Hutt District Licensing Committee effective from 1 August 2017 for the remainder of his term of office; and

 

(ii)   notes that Cr Bridson will be resigning as Deputy Chair and a list member of the Lower Hutt District Licensing Committee on 31 July 2017.”

 

7.

Local Government New Zealand - Remit Proposals (17/912)

Report No. HCC2017/3/51 (2) by the Divisional Manager, Secretariat Services

 

The Chief Executive elaborated on the memorandum.

Cr Bridson elaborated on the problems facing the City with feral cats.  She considered that Councils should be given the power to encourage cat owners to microchip or de-sex their cats.   Crs Lewis, Briggs and Barry supported Cr Bridson’s comments.  They believed it was a good approach especially with the impact cats had on wildlife. 

Cr Cousins raised the issue that could occur on the day of the Annual General Meeting of Local Government New Zealand where additional information came to light regarding any of the proposed remits.  She highlighted that Mayor Wallace did not have the ability to amend Council’s decision.

Cr Cousins advised that she did not support the remit suggesting that all Councils should consider the development of a Sugar Sweetened Beverages Policy.

 

Resolved:   (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                                 Minute No. C 17305(3)

“That Council notes the following remits being submitted to Local Government New Zealand for consideration at the 2017 Annual General Meeting and:

(a)   supports the remit to amend the Litter Act 1979 to enable Councils to legally issue infringement notices where there is evidence of an offence, attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum;

(b)   supports the remit to use the appropriate mechanisms to enable a proportion of the 15% Goods and Services Tax (GST) be returned to the regions it was generated in so that Councils can use this money to pay for the servicing of visitor infrastructure, attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum;

(c)   supports the remit to take legislative action as a matter of urgency to develop national legislation to manage cats with the proviso that legislation includes provision for cost recovery for cat management, attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum; and

(d)   supports the remit ( attached as Appendix 1 to the memorandum) suggesting that all Councils should consider the development of a Sugar Sweetened Beverages Policy for their respective workplaces and facilities noting that Councils have the power to develop and adopt their own policies.”

 

Resolved: (Cr Cousins/Cr Bridson)                                             Minute No. C 17306(3)

“That Mayor Wallace be given the power to cast his vote appropriately, bearing in mind Council’s discussion on the development of national legislation to manage cats, if additional information is raised at the Local Government New Zealand 2017 Annual General Meeting.”

 

Mayor Wallace elaborated on the two nominations received for President of Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ).  He advised that the election for President would be held at the upcoming Annual General Meeting of LGNZ.

Members discussed the nominations and provided feedback on each of the nominations. 

In response to a question from a member, Mayor Wallace advised that the Vice President role will be filled by Bay of Plenty Regional Councillor Stuart Crosby who was elected unopposed.

 

Resolved:  (Cr Barratt/Deputy Mayor Bassett)                         Minute No. C 17307(3)

“That Council nominates Nelson Mayor Rachel Reese for President of Local Government New Zealand.”

8.       QUESTIONS

There were no questions.

8.       EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

Resolved(Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                  Minute No. C 17308(3)

“That the public be excluded from the following parts of the proceedings of this meeting, namely:

9.       Appointment of Trustees to the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (17/923)

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolution are as follows:

 

(A)

(B)

(C)

General subject of the matter to be considered.

Reason for passing this resolution in relation to each matter.

Ground under section 48(1) for the passing of this resolution.

 

 

 

Appointment of Trustees to the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust.

The withholding of the information is necessary to protect the privacy of natural persons. (s7(2)(a)).

That the public conduct of the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting would be likely to result in the disclosure of information for which good reason for withholding exist.

 

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1) of the Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 or 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or the relevant part of the proceedings of the meeting in public are as specified in Column (B) above.” 

 

 

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 6.30pm and the non public portion of the meeting finished at 6.45pm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017

 

  


 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Community Plan Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on

 Tuesday 16 May 2017 commencing at 9.30am and reconvening on

Wednesday 17 May 2017 commencing at 9.30am

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr C Barry

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                                Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  There were no apologies.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive (part meeting)

                                          Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer (part meeting)

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services (part meeting)

Mr B Sherlock, General Manager, City Infrastructure (part meeting)

Ms J Raffills, General Manager, Governance and Regulatory (part meeting)

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services (part meeting)

Mrs J Stevens, Corporate Planner (part meeting)

Mr B Hodgins, Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens (part meeting)

Mr G Craig, Divisional Manager, City Development (part meeting)

Ms W Moore, Divisional Manager, Strategy and Planning (part meeting)

Mr M Sherwood, Divisional Manager, Leisure Active (part meeting)

Mr S Keatley, Community Facilities Manager (part meeting)

Ms M Laban, Community Projects and Relationship Manager (part meeting)

Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs (part meeting)

M A Yip, Manager Strategic Projects (part meeting)

Ms C Christensen, CBD Development Manager (part meeting)

Mr A Marsh, Parks Asset Manager (part meeting)

Mr P Maaka, Urban Design Manager (part meeting)

Mr S Cager, Senior Project Engineer

Ms S Simcox, Communications and Marketing Team Leader (part meeting)

Mr B Monaghan, Divisional Manager, City Promotions (part meeting)

Ms S Beath-Croft, Environmental Sustainability Advisor (part meeting)

Ms S Lytollis, Communications and Marketing Advisor (part meeting)

Ms L Knowles, Community Facilitator (part meeting)

Ms H Stewart, Youth Council Facilitator (part meeting)

Mr C McKenzie, Marketing Advisor (part meeting)

Ms J Randall, Administrative Support Officer (part meeting)

Ms K Glanville, Senior Committee Advisor (part meeting)

Ms S Haniel, Committee Advisor (part meeting)

Mrs H Clegg, Minute Taker (part meeting)

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:    (Mayor Wallace/Cr Briggs)                             Minute No. CPC 17201

“That the apology received from Cr Barry for lateness on Wednesday, 17 May 2017, be accepted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

There was no public comment.

 

3.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS

There were no conflict of interest declarations.

4.

Hearing of Submission on the Draft Annual Plan 2017/18

Tuesday 16 May 2017

 

Mr Joseph Wyse presented submission  DAP17/125.  He expressed concern at the cost of overruns with the tender process and believed that monies should be spent on affordable housing.  He expressed further concern with the poor state of footpaths and vegetation in the City.

 

Mr Stuart Reid presented submission  DAP17/210.  He asked members to encourage innovative architecture with urban designers.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Reid believed that coatings could be applied to the glass flood barriers to help prevent etched graffitti.  He said he had not undertaken engineering investigative works as to how much land could be saved by not building stopbanks.  He explained that the glass flood barriers were not a constant wall, as access points would be provided.  He added the glass flood barriers were a cheaper, more effective alternative to stopbanks and that there were many engineering solutions to flood protection.

Mr Paul Duffin presented submissions  DAP17/721 and DAP17/730.  He explained the good work that the student exchange programme undertook, and the positive publicity it produced for the city.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Duffin advised that if full funding was reinstated, it would provide an opportunity for more students to apply and experience the programme. 

Mr Bob Moffat presented submission  DAP17/902. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Moffat supported the digitisation of the Dowse Art Museum items.

Dr David Tripp presented submission  DAP17/1029.

 

Ms Elaine Richardson presented submission  DAP17/1105.  She expressed concern with the lack of maintenance of cycle accessways, particularly in the Western Hills.

 

Mr Rhys Jones on behalf of survivors and rescuers during the Wahine disaster and their families presented submission  DAP17/871. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Jones said the confirmed numbers to attend proposed ceremonies had yet to be determined but up to 50 survivors had so far indicated they wished to be involved.

Ms Candace Williams, Mr Ewert Anderson and Mr David Percy representing Wingate Business Group presented submission DAP17/1131.  Mr Anderson advised that the Wingate area experienced a high number of boy racers. 

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Williams said they were currently assessing a security proposal where the monitoring company would monitor the cameras, and contact the police if appropriate.  She noted that the Seaview security system worked well and opined the problems may have shifted to Wingate.  She advised they had not discussed the issue of rubbish, vandalism and tagging in the area with Council officers.  She stated the Business Group was not seeking full funding for the security cameras as the  businesses in the area would cover the ongoing maintenance of the system.   She was receptive to meeting with officers to discuss youth initiatives.  Mr Anderson agreed it would be advantageous to have discussions with Council’s City Safety Manager regarding community patrols in the area.

Mr Phil Gibbons and Ms Nicky Sherriff presented submission DAP 17/962.  Mr Gibbons explained Sport Wellington was developing a regional strategy to enable all key stake holders in health, sport and recreation areas to work together.

In response to questions from members, Mr Gibbons said that nationwide evidence showed sports hubs were the way forward for many clubs.  He considered a regional approach to leisure facilities was required, to enable sustainable funding to be used in the best possible way.

The meeting adjourned at 11.07am and reconvened at 11.25am.

 

Mr Glen Todd and Ms Julie Thomson representing Volunteer Hutt presented submission DAP17/960. 

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Thompson acknowledged that Volunteer Hutt received funding from other funding streams.  She said for the organisation to continue having a significant impact in the Hutt and to be sustainable it required continued funding.  

Mr Steven Winyard presented submission DAP17/73. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Winyard suggested more recycling facilities should be available at Seaview.

Mr Trevor Mitchell presented submission DAP17/1011.

 

Ms Dana Carter and Ms Micheline Evans representing Enviroschools presented submission DAP17/946.  They highlighted the collaborative proposal for Enviroschools to work with Council on a long term basis.  The regional programme supported youth education and the engagement of residents.

 

In response to a question from a member, Ms Carter and Ms Evans explained that on a national scale, Hutt City did not perform well in the waste and recycling efforts.

The following action points were agreed:

·           DAP17/902 Bob Moffat – officers to advise on the Dowse building maintenance and report back to the relevant committee regarding digitising the Dowse collection;

·           DAP 17/125 Joseph Wyse – officers to follow up to ensure work undertaken by contractors was standardised;

·           DAP 17/1029 Dr David Tripp – officers to report back regarding progress about the cycleways;

·           DAP17/1105 Elaine Richardson – officers to investigate the maintenance programme for the Riverlink project to include the maintenance of the Western Hills cycle access;

·           DAP17/1131 Wingate Business Group – officers to investigate community patrols in the Wingate area and other options to assist with issues in the area egboy racers;

·           DAP17/946 Enviroschools – officers to provide a progress update regarding waste minimisation;

·           DAP 17/871 Rhys Jones -  officers to report on Wahine commemorations;

·           Members asked that officers report back on the wharves in particular; the possible impact on the aquifer and the types of timber proposed for the refurbishments;

·           DAP17/210 Stuart Reid – officers to write to Greater Wellington Regional Council for an official response regarding glass flood protection barriers.

Mr Colin Kelly presented submission DAP17/460.

 

Mr Neville Hyde and Mr Mark Futter representing Hutt Chamber of Commerce presented submission DAP17/949.  They expressed support for the stimulation initiatives, the rates differentials, the revised incentives, and a rates freeze. 

 

Mr Paul Caygill representing Normandale Residents’ Association presented submission  DAP17/1167.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Caygill asked Council to investigate ways to improve recycling collections taking into account the windy conditions. 

The meeting adjourned at 12.42pm and reconvened at 1.30pm.

 

Ms Virginia Horrocks and Mr Murray Gibbons representing Eastbourne Community Board presented submission  DAP17/404.  They thanked the officers for their work and consultation to date on the wharves issue. 

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Horrocks advised most users of the Point Howard wharf were fishers from outside the region and were unlikely to make a submission to Council’s Annual Plan.  She considered that as a result of climate change research, Eastbourne would have access problems in the future, and that re-planning for the whole of the city was required.

Mr Graeme Hall presented submission  DAP17/1123.  He said refurbishment rather than renewal of the wharves was the preferred option.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Hall agreed wharves were utilised by people in the Wellington region and were a regional asset.  He considered that opening up Rona Bay and Point Howard wharves to ferries would ease road traffic congestion. 

Mr Graeme Hall representing Great Harbour Way Te Aranui O Poneke Trust presented submission DAP17/1124.  He explained that funding had already been allocated for the shared pathway, and he stressed the project was vital.

Mr Gavin Wallace representing Wainuiomata Historical Museum Society presented submission DAP17/1.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Wallace explained that the Wainuiomata Museum was open for two hours on a Sunday, or by appointment.  He said that visitor numbers varied between 0-20 a day (between 500 and 600 per year).

Mr Jeremy Winter representing Muritai Yacht Club presented submission DAP17/898 662 and DAP17/933.  He said that removal of the Rona Bay wharf would increase storm damage to the area.

 

Barry Wilson and Finbar Kiddle representing Heritage New Zealand presented submission  DAP17/662.  Mr Kiddle advised that Rona Bay and Days Bay wharves both had Category 2 classifications, and that along with the Petone Wharf, they were all Scheduled Heritage sites in various plans (District and Regional).  He added he was unaware of any heritage aspects of the Point Howard Wharf.  He stated Heritage NZ’s preference was for Australian hardwoods to be used.  He noted this was used when the wharves were originally built and was more durable than pine.

 

Mr Arthur Bush presented submission DAP17/107.  He considered Council had shown a lack of attention to stormwater reticulation in Stokes Valley. 

 

The Mayor asked officers to investigate the stormwater issues at Horoeka Street, Stokes Valley.

 

Mr Stephen Malcolm presented submission  DAP17/713.

 

Bharat Ratanpal (Chair) and several members representing Wainuiomata Sportsville presented submission DAP17/980.  Mr Ratanpal stressed there was an urgent requirement for a modern sports facility for the Wainuiomata suburb to ensure all codes remained viable.  He explained that all codes would be responsible for their own club and would pool resources.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Ratanpal explained the clubs understood fundraising would need to be undertaken.  He noted that no club had yet committed any funds to the project.  He added it was the intention to not request further funds from Council.  He acknowledged Wainuiomata Rugby had not endorsed the draft, and that Cricket Wainuiomata had agreed in principle. 

Mayor Wallace requested officers to prepare an urgent update around costings and what was required to assist in operational planning for the Wainuiomata Sportsville proposal.

The meeting was adjourned at 3.13pm and reconvened at 3.23pm.

 

Ms Pam Hanna representing Petone Community Board presented submission DAP17/741.  She expressed concern regarding stormwater pipes discharging into the newly restored sand dunes at the end of Queen Street, Petone. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Ms Hanna expressed concern at a possible conflict of the future use of North Park as Petone 2040 required it for access and Sportsville required it for a building.

Ms Sandy Nimmo representing Rimutaka Inline Hockey Club Inc presented submission  DAP17/2 and introduced supporters from the Avalon Club.  She requested Council assistance in the creation of a new outdoor skating facility, as the current facility was unusable.  She said she had conducted initial discussions with Council officers.

Mayor Wallace requested additional information from officers regarding the Club’s request.

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Nimmo said a new rink would be compatiable with other sports, including cycling, miniature racing and all forms of skating.  She stated that the Club would be willing to work with the Fraser Park Sports Hub.

Mr Warren Thessman presented submission DAP17/979.  He expressed concern regarding the safety of the road to Eastbourne, due to its narrowness, and questioned the installation of a shared pathway alongside it. 

 

The Senior Project Engineer advised there were two width options for the proposed shared pathway - 2.5m and 3.5m.  He said that due to the terrain around the Eastern Bays, the pathway would vary in width. 

Mr Sigurd Magnusson presented submission  DAP17/1008. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Magnusson said that a regional approach to electric vehicles was being promoted through a Working Group across the nine councils in the Wellington region. 

The Chief Executive advised that Council replaced one fleet vehicle per year with an electric vehicle.

Mr Don Manning representing Sailability Wellington Trust presented submission DAP17/190.  He said he had spoken with the Manager from Seaview Marina who was receptive to the idea of a Mariner’s Shed.  He requested Council funding in the interim, and considered that after approximately six years the enterprise would be self-funding.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Manning advised he had not yet approached other organisations for funding as he required a guarantor.  He added that since the Trust had begun, it had raised over $1M for various projects.

Mr Derek Richardson presented submission DAP17/1128.  He reiterated the importance of an overall strategy and plan for the Urban Cycleway Strategy to raise awareness amongst citizens and to integrate all infrastructure.

 

Mr Daryl Green and members representing Hutt City Youth Council presented submission DAP17/947.  He believed that as well as Sportsville, ‘Creativevilles’ should also be built to cater for those who are not sports minded.  He asked that the Naenae Hub be brought forward.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Green confirmed the Hutt City Youth Council would provide Council with feedback on a number of issues, including the Local Authoriy Plan.

The following action points were agreed:

·           DAP17/404 Eastbourne Community Board – officers to provide information regarding  climate change and Council’s future planning;

·           DAP17/979 Warren Thessman – officers to provide an update regarding the Eastern Bays Shared Walkway;

·           DAP17/1 Wainuiomata Historical Society – officers to follow up with submitter regarding the amount of funding being requested;

·           DAP17/107 Arthur Bush – officers to provide an update regarding the Horoeka Street, Stokes Valley stormwater issues raised by the submitter;

·           DAP17/980 Sportsville Wainuiomata – officers to provide an update about the costings of the project and the operational plan;

·           Members requested additional information regarding the Petone Grandstand;

·           DAP17/741 Petone Community Board – officers to follow up regarding stormwater from Queen Street, Petone discharging into sand dunes;

·           DAP17/2 Rimutaka Inline Hockey Club Inc – officers to report back to the relevant Committee regarding the Avalon Inline Rink;

·           DAP17/947 Hutt City Youth Council – officers to provide an update regarding the possible impact of the Melling interchange project on the Melling Skateboard Park;

·           Cr Cousins requested an update about the greening of Queens Drive; and

·           DAP17/1008 Sigurd Magnusson -  officers to provide an update regarding electric vehicles and charging stations around the City.

Dido Dunlop presented submission DAP17/1037.  She said that building projects needed to be sited further from current water lines and extensive public education was required on climate change issues. 

 

Ms Esther Venning representing Love Wainuiomata presented submission DAP17/1034.

 

In response to a question from a member, Ms Venning explained the second stage of the Love Wainiuomata vision was ‘Tourism Wainui’. 

The following action points were agreed:

·           Members asked officers for additional information about the rates differential and freeze.  The Chief Executive advised that it would be appropriate to review this when the Revenue and Financing Policy was reviewed in late 2017;

·           Members asked officers for additional information concerning the aquifer and whether Rona Bay wharf helped prevent coastal erosion;

·           DAP17/1034 Love Wainuiomata – officers were asked to assist the submitter’s request for assistance; and

·           Members asked officers to investigate if there were any resources to assist the Naenae community.

The meeting adjourned at 5.13pm and reconvened at 6.00pm.

 

Mr Gareth Edwards representing Lowry Bay Yacht Club presented submission DAP17/918.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Edwards agreed that a starter boat could provide a solution.  He noted that the boat would require a minimum of three crew, maintenance, mooring and compliance costs.

 

Mr Terrance Poynter presented submission DAP17/1001.

Cr Barry left the meeting at 6.14pm.

Mr Carl Bakker representing Petone Urban Environmental Association presented submission DAP17/920.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Bakker agreed that major Petone projects should be completed through Petone 2040, with proper consultation and resourcing.

Ms Jan Milne and Ms Anna Brownlee representing Hutt Valley Tennis (HVT) presented submission DAP17/1116.  Ms Milne said that HVT’s financial situation had occurred due to Council’s proposed Fraser Sportsville and asked that Council treat all sports in an equitable manner.

 

Cr Barry rejoined the meeting at 6.30pm.

 

Mr David Syms, Mr Allan Hewson, Mr Gerry Salmon representing Petone Sportsville Board (PSB) presented submission DAP17/753.  Mr Hewson advised that bringing $300,000 forward to the 2017/18 budget would enable a funding plan to be developed, full consultation to occur, final plans to be approved and a staged development plan developed. 

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Syms advised they had the support of eight sports clubs. He confirmed that the PSB had held discussions with the Petone 2040 Group.  He acknowledged the Petone Working Men’s Club submission and agreed that the two organisations could be working closer together.  He stated the clubs were committed to moving forward.

 

Anita Mansell representing the Multicultural Council presented submission DAP17/875.

 

Casey Diver presented submission DAP17/919.

 

Mr Ron Beernink presented submmission DAP17/352.

Mr Timon Bakker representing Hutt Cycle Network presented submission DAP17/1117.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Bakker explained a paradigm shift was required towards cycling.

Ms Merran Bakker presented submission DAP17/724.

In response to questions from members, Ms Bakker agreed that while the Naenae Bowling Centre upgrade was an asset, it was not the type of facility required in the area.  She considered investment in housing and retail facilities would be more advantageous for the Naenae suburb.

Ms Laura Skilton presented submission DAP17/655.

Tute Porter-Samuels presented submission DAP17/1033. She queried the engagement process for the Annual Plan and expressed concern that few in the Pacifika and Maori community had made submissions.

Mr James Beban presented submission DAP17/733.  He said the Rates Remissions Policy had promoted four additional residential developments in the Hutt Valley.  He suggested there was scope to provide for larger developments with possibly a second tier of remissions.

Mr Zinny McCormick presented submission DAP17/909.  He cautioned forcing sporstvilles on to sports clubs.  He asked Council to undertake a robust due diligence process.

Mayor Wallace left the meeting at 8.47pm.  Deputy Mayor Bassett assumed the chair.

Mr Gerald Davidson representing Lower Hutt Historical Society presented submission DAP17/691. 

Mayor Wallace rejoined the meeting at 8.52pm and resumed the chair for the duration of business.

Mr Jim Hogg representing the Petone Working Men’s Club (PWMC) presented submission DAP17/981.  He expressed concern about the amount of consultation undertaken to date.  He said that while PWMC supported the sportsville concept in general, at present it did not support Petone Sportsville.

In response to questions from members, Mr Hogg agreed additional consultation was required.  He considered that the Fraser Park Sportsville should be completed prior to other sportsvilles being developed.  He said that Petone 2040 should be in consultation talks with the Sportsville Committee.

The following action points were agreed:

·      DAP17/352  Ron Beernik – officers to advise on the state of the pedestrian access around the new Rebel Sports/Briscoes building in Petone and investigate where the building fits within design guidelines;

·      DAP17/733 James Beban – officers to advise when the Rates Remission Policy was due for review;

·      Members asked officers to provide a detailed report to the Community Plan Committee meeting on 8 June 2017 regarding Sportsvilles;

·      Cr Briggs asked officers to include ethnicity details in the statistical analysis of Annual Plan submissions in the future;

·      Members asked officers to provide a detailed report to the Community Plan Committee meeting on 8 June 2017 regarding the Wharves;

·      DAP17/919 Casey Diver – officers to provide an update from Healthy Families about the state of mental health of youth; and

·      DAP17/655 Laura Skilton – the Chief Financial Officer to respond to the rate issue queries raised by the submitter.

 

The meeting adjourned at 9.10 pm.

Wednesday 17 May 2017 9.30 am

Ms Tracy Coleman and Mr Max Shierlaw representing Maungaraki Community Association presented submission DAP17/735.  Ms Coleman advised that the Association supported the projects occurring on the valley floor.  It was noted there was no current investment in Maungaraki.

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Coleman advised that there were public toilets in the community centre, but unfortunately they were accessed by walking through meeting rooms.  She noted the Association’s support for upgrading sports fields on the Western Hills.

Ms Claire Allan and Mr Wayne Rogers (Bulk Storage) representing Seaview Business Association (SBA), presented submission DAP17/1232.

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Allan advised that since the installation of CCTV cameras in the area, the boy racer issue had moved to other areas in the City.  She said SBA was currently in discussions with the Police to install additional cameras, as they also aided in stopping crime and vandalism.  She informed members that SBA had been advised that there would be no Heavy Traffic Bylaw for the Seaview area.

Mr Dave Grant presented submission DAP17/912.  He believed up to 40 residential properties would be affected by the Petone Sportsville proposal and that parking in the area would be placed under future strain. He expressed opposition regarding Petone Sportsville.

 

Cr Barry joined the meeting at 10.05am.

Ms Jo Clendon presented submission DAP17/477.  She requested that the Walking and Cycling Strategy be reviewed.

 

Ms Alison Black (Youth Inspire), Ms Karen Morgan (Principal of Taita College) and supporters representing Youth Inspire presented submission DAP17/1222.  Ms Morgan advised that Youth Inspire worked to provide college leavers with viable options for their future.  Ms Black detailed the success of the youth involved in the programme in Wainuiomata, and that in order to expand to Naenae and Taita, resourcing and funding were required. 

 

In response to a question from a member, Ms Black confirmed the systems were in place to begin an expansion of the Youth Inspire programme in the Naenae and Taita areas, once funding was obtained.

 

Ms Sarah Crawford presented submission DAP 17/1202.  She believed the wharves were an integral part of the harbour, were easily accessible and had no financial barriers for people to enjoy their use.

 

Mr Matt Claridge presented submissions DAP17/758 and DAP17/1125.

 

Mr Norman Wilkins presented submission DAP17/416.  He said that the Petone wharf should be used for commuters, and that the wider section should be retained to enable shelters to be built for patrons using a ferry service.

 

Mr Richard Sinnott representing Wainuiomata Community Board presented submission  DAP17/968.  He stated the Board’s support for Wainuiomata Sportsville.  He considered Council had a role to play in the provision of housing and requested Council’s continued support for the number of residential developments currently occurring in Wainuiomata.  He also requested Council continue to support the Wainuiomata Mall revelopment.

The meeting adjourned at 11.05am and reconvened at 11.20am.

 

Ms Sue Lafrentz presented submission DAP17/844.  She noted that some residents were struggling to pay their rates.  She said Council spending should either be spread over a 10-20 year period or cut now.

 

Mr John and Elisa Mendzela presented submission DAP17/543. 

In response to questions from members, Mr Mendzela considered that not all projects in the Annual Plan 2017/18 were necessary.  He said it was important to focus on the core functions of Council and then investigate complementary functions when assessing projects.

Mr Mike Fisher presented submission DAP17/1065 and DAP17/1140.

 

In response to a question from a member, Mr Fisher advised that parking issues in Petone impacted on residents, commuters and workers of the area.

Mr John Russell representing Naenae College presented submission DAP17/805.  

 

Mr Mike Mellor representing Living Streets Aotearoa presented submission DAP17/810.

Mr Gabriel Tupou presented submission DAP17/1171.  He advised that there was an affordable housing shortage in Wainuiomata and the wider City.

The following action points were agreed:

·      DAP17/810 Living Streets Aotearoa – officers to provide a street audit;

·      DAP17/1222 Youth Inspire – officers to report back on what the funding would look like;

·      DAP17/477 Jo Clendon – officers to provide a report on the delivery of the Cycling Strategy;

·      DAP17/1232 Seaview Business Association – officers to report back on:

1.    Gracefield proposal for parking;

2.    Heavy Vehicle Bylaw to assist moving boy racers out of the Seaview and Wingate areas; and

3.    Parking outside the Seaview Marina entrance;

·      DAP17/735 Maungaraki Community Association – officers to provide costings for toilets and water fountains; and

·      Cr Milne asked that requests for $10,000-$20,000 be assessed for community grant criteria.

The meeting adjourned at 12.40pm and reconvened at 1.30pm.

Ms Diane Livingstone and Helen Carter representing Wellington Free Ambulance (WFA) presented submission DAP17/607.

In response to questions from members, Ms Livingstone advised that central government had announced further funding for ambulance services from 73% to 78%.  She said that Council funding was the only regular funding received within the 4.2% fundraised by WFA.  She noted that when funding was locked in it took the pressure off the organisation.

Ms Libby Wilson and Ms Christine Wakefield representing Team Naenae Trust presented submission DAP17/1225. Ms Wilson said that Naenae needed to see investment in the area to plant hope in the community from Council.

Mr Allan Sainsbury representing Citizens Advice Bureau Lower Hutt (CAB Lower Hutt) presented submission DAP17/608. 

In response to questions from members, Mr Sainsbury advised that CAB Lower Hutt did not usually apply for funding through community engagement funds.  He noted that it was highly competitive to obtain funding.  He said that a CAB could be sited within a community hub however it was important that it be close to a transport hub and in a discreet position.

Cr Barry rejoined the meeting at 1.58pm.

Mr Jamie Marment and students representing Wilford School presented submissions DAP17/951, DAP17/953, DAP17/955, DAP17/972, DAP17/975, DAP17/976.

Mr Frank Sviatko representing Petone Planning Action Group  presented submission DAP17/861.  He said that the Petone Sporstville Group should be asked to liaise with the P2040 Group to incorporate the proposal into the P2040 vision.

Mr Graeme Ross representing Keep Lower Hutt Beautiful presented submission DAP17/983. 

Mr Peter Chrisp representing Summerset Group Holdings Limited presented submission DAP17/938. 

In response to questions from members, Mr Chrisp advised that the Boulcott Street and High Street intersection was already listed on the deficiency database and he did not consider it possible to impose an upgrade of the intersection as part of a resource consent.  He said that Summerset Group Holdings Limited was open to further discussions regarding the matter.

The following actions were agreed:

·           Members asked for an update in regard to the future needs and demands of parking in the Central Business District and Petone; and

·           DAP17/608 Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) Lower Hutt – officers to report back on community funding options for CAB Lower Hutt including Hubs and libraries.

Mr Tom Bennion presented submission DAP17/1127. 

Mr Alan Webb presented submission DAP17/1087. He expressed concern regarding the possible closing of the Riverbank car park.  He considered that the CBD would suffer from the closure.

Mr Phil Benge presented submission DAP17/1204.

In response to a question from a member, Mr Benge asked that the entranceway at Greenwood Park, Eastbourne be upgraded.

Cr Cousins asked that the maintenance of the entranceway to Greenwood Park, Eastbourne be investigated and the gift of the park be acknowledged.

Mr Michael Gray presented submission DAP17/1066.

Mayor Wallace noted that Council’s CBD Taskforce Group met with business and building owners and asked that Mr Gray be added to the Group’s list.

The meeting adjourned at 3.23pm and reconvened at 3.45pm.

Ms Keri Brown presented submission DAP17/1224.  She said that homelessness in the City was a problem and people were living in cars, garages and illegally in churches.  She asked that Urban Plus Ltd be more involved in housing rentals.

Ms Ginny Andersen, Labour Candidate Hutt South presented submissions DAP17/813-1 and DAP17/813-2.  She said that the wharves were an iconic part of the City’s history and the majority of people would like them retained.  She advised that there was a lack of housing and increased house prices in the City.  She further said that the Labour Party had promised to develop 400 houses in the City.  She considered that there should be a closer relationship between central government and local government with regard to housing issues.

Mr Chris Hay presented submission DAP/774.  He asked Council to improve its project management for future projects, such as Riverlink, to avoid cost over-runs. He further asked that Council review the drainage infrastructure with respect to pressure from infill housing.

Ms Evelyn Richter presented submission DAP17/1023.  She said that Council needed to invest in roading infrastructure for earthquake preparedness.

Deputy Mayor Bassett left the meeting at 4.30pm.

Ms Sally Nicholl and Ms Dina Awarau representing Hutt Union and Community Health Service (HUCHS) presented submission DAP17/982.  They said that HUCHS was a living wage employer and asked Council to also support the living wage.

Ms Muriel Tunoho representing Hutt Valley Living Wage presented submission DAP17/220.  She asked Council to become a living wage employer and asked Council’s Chief Executive to work with Living Wage Hutt Valley.

Ms Margot Fry and Ms Michelle Caldwell representing Wainuiomata Rural Community Association presented submission DAP17/812.  They asked Council to fund a trial in Wainuiomata for a diverter which would divert floating rubbish out of water ways.

Deputy Mayor Bassett rejoined the meeting at 4.55pm.

Mr Ian Dallas representing Wellington Rugby Referees Association presented submission DAP17/969.  He asked for funding to support volunteer rugby referees.

Deputy Mayor Bassett and Cr Milne left the meeting at 5.10pm.

Ms Gwen Isaac representing Residents for a Safe Korokoro Road presented submission DAP17/150.  She asked Council to provide a safe footpath with a barrier for a 1.5km stretch of Korokoro Road, similar to the footpath in Wairere Road.

Mr John Welch presented submission DAP17/1130. He advised that the community had a strong desire to either keep the Point Howard wharf in its present state or to refurbish it. He noted that demolition of the Point Howard wharf had been discussed in 1999 and had been considered to be problematic as the piles were drilled into the aquifer and removal could cause leakage in the artesian water supply.

The following actions were agreed:

·           DAP17/1224 Keri Brown – officers to investigate developing a coordinated approach to homelessness with regard to policy and community services and to provide an update on housing data in Wainuiomata;

·           DAP17/813-1 and DAP17/813-2 Ms Ginny Anderson – officers to investigate tiny homes for affordable housing;

·           DAP17/220 Hutt Valley Living Wage – the Chief Executive to work with the Living Wage movement;

·           DAP17/812 Wainuiomata Rural Community – Mayor Wallace asked officers to discuss a trial of waterways cross channel invention which clears rubbish from waterways and to consult with residents of Fitzherbert Road, Wainuiomata if Council was considering the development of in-flow research; and

·           DAP17/150 Gwen Isaac – Mayor Wallace requested a report on the walkways in Korokoro Road and on substandard roads.

 

 

There being no further business the Chair declared the meeting closed at 5.44 pm.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WR Wallace

MAYOR

 

 

 

 

 

CONFIRMED as a true and correct record

Dated this 15th day of August 2017


 

HUTT CITY COUNCIL

 

Community Plan Committee

 

Report of a meeting held in the Council Chambers, 2nd Floor, 30 Laings Road,
Lower Hutt on

 Thursday 8 June 2017 commencing at 9.30am

 

 

 PRESENT:                       Mayor WR Wallace (Chair)

Deputy Mayor D Bassett                         Cr C Barry (from 10.26am)

Cr G Barratt                                             Cr L Bridson

Cr J Briggs                                                Cr MJ Cousins

Cr S Edwards                                           Cr T Lewis

Cr M Lulich                                              Cr G McDonald

Cr C Milne                                                Cr L Sutton

 

APOLOGIES:                  An apology for lateness from Cr C Barry was received.

 

IN ATTENDANCE:       Mr T Stallinger, Chief Executive

                                          Mr B Kibblewhite, Chief Financial Officer

Ms K Kelly, General Manager, Strategic Services

Mr B Sherlock, General Manager, City Infrastructure (part meeting)

Ms J Raffills, General Manager, Governance and Regulatory

Mr M Reid, General Manager, Community Services

Mr P Benseman, Budgeting and Report Manager (part meeting)

Mr M Sherwood, Divisional Manager, Leisure Active (part meeting)

Mr B Hodgins, Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens (part meeting)

Mr G Craig, Divisional Manager, City Development (part meeting)

Mr S Keatley, Huia Pool Manager (part meeting)

Mr P Maaka, Urban Designer Manager (part meeting)

Mr A Yip, Strategic Projects Manager (part meeting)

Mr B Monaghan, Divisional Manager, City Promotions (part meeting)

Mr M Mercer, Divisional Manager, Community Hubs (part meeting)

Ms M Laban, Community Projects and Relationship Manager (part meeting)

Ms S Lytollis, Communications and Marketing Advisor (part meeting)

Ms P Rotherham, Development Liaison Manager (part meeting)

Mr J Partridge, Environmental Sustainability Manager (part meeting)

Mr J Lamb, Visitor Market Development Manager (part meeting)

Mrs J Stevens, Corporate Planner

Ms K Stannard, Manager Secretariat Services (part meeting)

Ms K Glanville, Senior Committee Advisor (part meeting)

Ms A Doornebosch, Committee Advisor (part meeting)

Ms S Haniel, Committee Advisor (part meeting)

Ms H Clegg, Minute Taker

 

 

 

 

PUBLIC BUSINESS

 

 

 

1.       APOLOGIES 

Resolved:     (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)           Minute No. CPC 17301(2)

“That the apology for lateness received from Cr Barry be accepted.”

2.       PUBLIC COMMENT

Ms Leonie Dobbs representing the Jackson Street Programme (JSP) presented submission DAP17/941.  She highlighted the support JSP was providing to building owners and Council regarding new earthquake legislative requirements, and to Petone 2040.  Ms Dobbs noted parking and traffic management issues in Petone, and asked Council to conduct a traffic management survey and update the Traffic Management Plan.  She further noted the impact from large trucks using Jackson Street during peak hour traffic rather than The Esplanade.  She requested the heritage light poles be re-installed along Jackson Street.

 

In response to questions from members, Ms Dodds considered parking was  exacerbated by the new “Big Box” retailers and the increased number of apartment inhabitants.  She believed there was a traffic bylaw prohibiting vehicles of a certain weight using Jackson Street.   

 

Mr Edward Heslin (DAP17/470) elaborated on his submission.  He requested the paving at Hillary Court be completed, and the cricket nets at the Naenae Cricket Club be re-positioned.

 

Other public comments are recorded under the item to which they relate.

3.

SETTING THE SCENE BY MAYOR WALLACE AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE

Mayor Wallace thanked officers for their contribution to the Annual Plan (‘the Plan’).  He noted the public consultation showed submitters were supportive of Council’s direction, the projects proposed and the new Financial Strategy.  He advised that although Council was looking to deliver the lowest overall average rates increase for the region, many residential properties within Hutt City had experienced unprecedented increases in their valuations.  He considered the proposed plan required a balance between growth, development and affordability.  He urged members to focus on the aim of the plan and to grow Hutt City while ensuring infrastructure was maintained and improved.  He noted that this would require a level of constraint.

The Chief Executive highlighted the positive community feedback.  He noted the new community funding model would provide one framework to ensure funding was allocated fairly. He supported the new Financial Strategy, but noted expenditure decisions needed to be treated with due care.

Cr Barry joined the meeting at 10.26am.

In response to questions from the members, the General Manager, Community Services said guidelines were being formulated for the new community funding strategy.

4.       CONFLICT OF INTEREST DECLARATIONS   

Cr Lulich declared that he was a honorary member of a sports club involved in Petone Sportsville.

 

Cr Sutton declared a conflict of interest in regard to Keep Lower Hutt Beautiful and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest in regard Hutt Valley Tennis and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

Deputy Mayor Basset declared a conflict of interest in regard to UrbanPlus Limited’s involvement in social housing and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

 

 

5.

Consultation Results - Proposed Annual Plan 2017-2018 (17/817)

Report No. CPC2017/3/137 by the Corporate Planner

 

Cr Sutton declared a conflict of interest concerning Keep Lower Hutt Beautiful and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Cr Milne declared a conflict of interest concerning Hutt Valley Tennis and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

Deputy Mayor Basset declared a conflict of interest concerningUrbanPlus Limited’s involvement in social housing and took no part in discussion or voting on the matter.

The Corporate Planner elaborated on the report.  She noted the high number of submissions received and that the transition from paper to on-line responses was improving.  She highlighted the large numbers of neutral responses received.  She noted in future, submitters would be informed of key decisions made and supplied with a summary of the consultation results.  She said officers would ensure specific requests were addressed.

In response to questions from the members, the Corporate Planner confirmed results from the Ctizen’s Panel and the general respondents were similar.  She explained that results were in line with the previous year’s telephone survey response numbers. She agreed some results were difficult to interpret as responses to follow up questions may not have followed in a logical manner  She said officers would review this in the future.

Members considered the document “Requests for Funding and agreed the following action points:

·           DAP17/2: Ms Sandy Nimmo – that officers assist in talks with the Fraser Park Sportsville team about the request for funding to improve the old outdoor skating rink and small banked track at the corner of Percy Cameron Street and Harcourt Werry Drive;

·           DAP17/190: Sailability Wellington Trust Inc – that officers provide a report regarding a Mariner’s Shed near Seaview Marina;

·           DAP17/607: Wellington Free Ambulance – the members approved funding for the next two years as follows; an increase to $0.75 per person in 2017/18; an additional increase to $1.00 per person in 2018/19;

·           DAP17/663 and DAP17/664: Ms Barbara Hay, Stokes Valley Community House - that officers meet with the submitter to further discuss an outdoor basketball court in Stokes Valley, following the removal of the community house and plunket rooms;

·           DAP17/721: Mr Paul Duffin, The Hutt Sister City Foundation (HSCF) -  that officers provide a report regarding recognising the work undertaken by the HSCF in the form of public art;

·           DAP17/735: Maungaraki Community Association (‘the Association’) – asked officers to reprioritise funding from Point Howard; that there be no increase to the budget other than $5,000 to the operating costs; and work with the Association on the location of a public toilet and drinking fountain at the Maungaraki Community Centre;

·           DAP17/805: Mr John Russell, Naenae College -  that officers assist Naenae College in obtaining funding through appropriate funding agencies;

·           DAP17/810: Ms Ellen Blake, Living Streets Aotearoa - that members approve $50,000 per year for five years to continue footpath audits and provide wheelchair friendly footpath routes;

·           DAP17/871: Mr Rhys Jones, The Wahine 50 Charitable Trust – that members approve $20,000 for the Wahine 50-year commemorations;

·           DAP17/941: Ms Hellen Swales, Jackson Street Programme Inc – that officers report back about the traffic issues on Jackson Street, specifically whether large trucks using Jackson Street were breaching the bylaw;

·           DAP17/960: Ms Julie Thomson, Volunteer Hutt – that members approve funding $10,000 to Volunteer Hutt  and ask officers to assist the organisation in obtaining the additional funding required through appropriate funding agencies;

·           DAP17/969: Mr Ian Dallas, Wellington Rugby Referees Association  - asked officers to further consider the request for funding to assist with operational running costs;

·           DAP17/983: Keep Lower Hutt Beautiful – asked officers to consider the request for funding to reinstate the Riddiford Gardens flower beds by Queens Drive;

Mayor Wallace left the meeting and Deputy Mayor Bassett assumed the Chair.

·           DAP17/1116: Mrs Jan Milne, Hutt Valley Tennis – that members approve the removal of $200,000 in 2017/18 and replacement with $250,000 in 2018/19;

Mayor Wallace rejoined the meeting and assumed the Chair.

·           DAP17/1124: Mr Graeme Hall, Great Harbour Way Te Aranui O Poneke Trust – members noted that funding had been allocated for the Eastern Bays shared path;

·           DAP17/1131: Ms Candace Williams, Wingate Business Group – that officers report back to the City Development Committee regarding a street camera proposal for Peterkin Street and large parts of the Eastern Hutt Road;

·           DAP17/1222: Ms Alison Black, YOUth Inspire Mayor’s Taskforce for Jobs -  members asked that the submitter apply for funding through the Youth Partnership Fund for 2017/18 and the Community Funding Strategy from 1 July 2018.

·           DAP17/1029: Dr David Tripp – that officers establish an active transportation guideline for new developments and develop a shift in culture to consider cycling with new projects;

·           DAP17/865: Mr and Mrs Mackay – that officers report back to the City Development Committee regarding the greening of Queens Drive;

·           Approve funding of $100,000 per annum for the next three years to revitalise suburban shopping centres.

o    officers to report back to the City Development Committee regarding  the status of the suburban shopping centre upgrades;

o    officers to report back to the City Development Committee regarding recommendations for how the revitalisation fund for suburban shopping centres could be used;

·           DAP17/150: Mr Brian Cross and Ms Gwen Isaac, Residents for a Safer Korokoro Road – that officers report back to the City Development Committee regarding the walkways in Korokoro Road and substandard roads;

·           DAP17/1224: Keri Brown – that officers report on housing support for people with mental health issues;

·           DAP17/1224: Keri Brown – that officers provide the KPMG report about social housing to Cr Briggs;

·           DAP17/813: Keri Brown – that officers investigate tiny homes as a form of affordable housing and report back to the appropriate committee;

·           Officers to provide an update on the Waste Minimisation Strategy;

·           Officers to report back regarding a review of the green recycling buckets to the appropriate committee.

·           Officers to investigate limiting the proliferation of junk shops in Stokes Valley;

·           Officers to report back about paving at Hillary Court and the cricket nets at the Naenae Cricket Club issues in relation to submission DAP17/470 Mr Edward Heslin;

·           Officers to prepare guidelines for the new community funding process and clarify how this would be communicated to the community;

·           Officers to investigate improved live-streaming equipment and technology for the Council Chambers;

·           Members agreed that both the Naenae and Wainuiomata Community Hubs be brought forward for consideration in the 2018 Long Term Plan;

·           Officers to report back on prohibiting the use of plastic bags at the Riverbank market.

The General Manager, City Infrastructure elaborated on the Seaview Treatment Plan resource consent process.  He advised that the results of the public consultation process were inconclusive and that the matter would ultimately be decided in the Environment Court.  He further advised that several of the options being considered did not comply with the Resource Management Act and that officers were currently working to see if an agreement could be reached. 

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, City Infrastructure confirmed the $12M provisionally allocated to the project was a fair and reasonable amount given that final costings were not able to be determined until the preferred option was agreed upon.  He highlighted that the funding would not be required for at least five years.

Technology Valley (STEMM Festival)

Members approved $160,000 for 2017/18 including $40,000 in carryover for Technology Valley and the STEMM Festival.  Mayor Wallace asked officers for a detailed report for the Long Term Plan 2018-2028, explaining the approach for the STEMM Fesitval.

Hutt Multicultural Council

In response to a question from a member, the General Manager Community Services advised that the Hutt Multicultural Council had secured funding for this year. 

Members asked that officers report back to the Long Term Plan 2018/2028 about how the funding was utilised, with a view to Council being supportive of future funding requests. 

Members discussed that a funding application for next year needed to come through the approriate committee.  It was noted funding was provided for the Tangata Whenua.

Members asked officers to report back regarding the Safe City Patrols to the approriate committee.

          In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive assured members that there were sufficient resources to cover all projects currently underway.

 

Resolved(Deputy Mayor Bassett/Cr Barratt)                  Minute No. CPC 17302(2)

“That the Committee approves a budget increase of $15,000 per annum from 2017/18 for International Relations to support local secondary schools attracting more international students.”

 

 

Resolved:     (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)      Minute No. CPC 17303(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes that 1,236 submissions were received on the proposed Annual Plan 2017-2018 (including one submission with 322 attachments from supporters of the Living Wage), 15 late submissions were received and 87 individuals or groups presented their submissions in person;

(ii)   notes the results of the consultation attached as Appendices 1 - 3 to the report, including a table of funding requests;

(iii)  notes that the Committee, at its meetings held on 16 and 17 May 2017, requested additional information to assist with decision-making, and this information is attached as Appendix 4 to the report; and

(iv)  considers the information presented in these reports as part of the Committee’s decision-making on the Annual Plan 2017-2018.”

6.          6.

Financial Strategy (17/852)

Report No. CPC2017/3/143 by the Chief Financial Officer

                       

The Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.  He highlighted that changes to the proposed Financial Strategy would provide greater budget flexibility and enable Council to continue rejuvenation projects while limiting rate increases.  He said it would provide for borrowing to be linked to affordability and some contingency for natural disasters.  He advised that the Local Government Cost Index (LGCI) was the appropriate measure for Council to use to benchmark rate increases. He noted the consultation results showed support for the proposed strategy.  He highlighted if Council decided not to support the recommendation, some capital projects would need to be reconsidered under alternative funding proposals.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Financial Officer said the proposed Annual Plan consultation document was prefaced with a note that there would be a change to the Financial Strategy.  He noted officers considered the growth factor over the next 20 years at a net annual growth rate of 1%.  He said this was reviewed on a year by year basis.  He advised Council did not have a written guarantee that any increase in debt would not change Council’s credit rating.  He further noted Council’s credit rating agency, Standard and Poors, would provide a credit rating review for Council in August 2017.  He highlighted that Treasury Advisors did not believe a change in Council’s Financial Strategy or forecast would result in a change to Council’s credit rating.

Cr Milne considered the proposed Financial Strategy would provide certainty to the community and a framework to plan over the long term.  He noted it allowed for additional capacity but cautioned the use of debt limits. 

 

resolved:    (Mayor Wallace/Cr McDonald)                     Minute No. CPC 17304(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)      approves changing the Financial Strategy, to:

(a)     rates increases limited to the Local Government Cost Index after allowing for estimated growth of 1%;

(b)     net debt to be no more than:

     (aa)   150% of Total Revenue in years 1-3 of the plan;                             

(bb)   130% of Total Revenue in years 4-6 of the plan;                             

(cc)   110% of Total Revenue in years 7-9 of the plan;                              

(dd)   90% of Total Revenue in year 10 of the plan and beyond;   

(c)      net Debt can be increased to 170% of Total Revenue should the need arise following a significant natural disaster;

(ii)     approves the marked up changes contained in the revised Financial Strategy attached as Appendix 1 to the report; and

(iii)    notes an additional 1% rates increase in 2017/18 was approved in the 2016/17 Annual Plan to fund rejuvenation projects.”

Cr Cousins requested that her dissenting vote be recorded against part (i) (b) above.

 

         

7.

Proposed Budget Changes for Final 2017/18 Annual Plan (17/833)

Report No. CPC2017/3/142 by the Chief Financial Officer

        

The Chief Financial Officer elaborated on the report.  He highlighted the large amount of carry-over items was not expected to continue after 2018. He said that because of the abnormal impact to residential ratepayers from the three yearly revaluations, that the residential and business rates transition would be frozen for one year.  He noted this would reduce the rate increase from 5.1% to 4.3%.

In response to questions from members, the Chief Financial Officer explained the Local Government Cost Index rates were published once a year and that the most recent rate was used in all calculations.  He said officers would scrutinise carryover projects for the coming year to ensure Council’s ability to deliver on those projects.  He noted additional funding for the Silverstream Landfill was included in the budget if the proposed Financial Strategy was adopted.

In response to a question from a member, the Chief Executive explained the higher than usual amount of carry-over projects was the result of optimistic time planning rather than capacity issues.

In response to a question from a member, Mayor Wallace advised that a working group would assess the live streaming equipment for Council Chambers and report back to Council in due course.

In response to questions from the members, the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens explained the wharves maintenance budget had been committed, a contract signed and work had commenced.  He highlighted the Rona Bay Wharf comments made by officers 12 months ago was based on information that ‘gravel slug’ movement in the bay had stabilised.

The meeting adjourned at 11.35am and reconvened at 11.49am. 

In response to questions from members, the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens explained the Delaney Park works had been deferred due to the timetable of the contractor.  He further explained the works were first on the sportsground maintenance and were required due to the poor state of the grounds.  He said the entire project would be carried out at the same time.

 

 

RESOLVED:      (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barry)                            Minute No. CPC 17305(2)

“That the Committee approves the list of projects being carried over from 2016/17 to 2017/18 attached as Appendix 1 to the report.”

 

In response to further questions from members, the Chief Financial Officer confirmed the amount of $20,000 was for the Wainuiomata and Petone Sportsvilles.  He said the amount of $7,507,000 under the heading ‘CFT Sportsville and Artificial Surfaces’ was for Fraser Park Sportsville. 

 

MOVED:  (Cr Briggs/Cr Barry)

“That the Committee recommends that Council agrees to not allocate funding to the Promenade aspect of the Riverlink Project.”

Cr Briggs considered there were too many unknowns with the Promenade project.  He expressed support for the Riverlink Project and flood management in general but not the Promenade project aspect of it.

Cr Barry believed the CBD had already had significant amounts of investment and that the Promenade budget could be better spent in suburban centres.  He clarified he supported the Promenade project in principle but not as a priority.

Members noted the Promenade project had to be designed and constructed in conjunction with the whole Riverlink Project and that the Greater Wellington Regional Council (GWRC) had altered the design of the stopbanks to take into account the Promenade project. 

Mayor Wallace advised that there had been widespread consultation concerning the Promenade project, with the public showing support for the concept.  He noted that Council had already agreed that the total project would be a key project for the City. 

The Chief Executive highlighted that the exact amount of funding required for the entire project had yet to be determined and that spending in the CBD area was benefiting all residents of Hutt City.

 

 

The motion was declared LOST by Division with the voting as follows:

For

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lulich

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:   3

Against

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr Lewis

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

 

Total: 10

 

MOVED: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)

“That the Committee agrees to bring forward $7M of the total $39M currently staged from 2019/20 to 2033/34 into the 2017/18 budget to provide for Council to have the ability to purchase any property that may become available and is relevant for the Riverlink Project.”

 

resolved (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt) (BY DIVISION)     Minute No. CPC 17306(2)

“That the Committee agrees to bring forward $7M of the total $3M currently staged from 2019/20 to 2033/34 into the 2017/18 budget to provide for Council to have the ability to purchase any property that may become available and is relevant for the Riverlink Project.”

 

The motion was declared CARRIED by Division with the voting as follows:

For

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr Lewis

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

 

Total:   10

Against

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lulich

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total: 3

 

Community Panels

 

MOVED: (Cr Barry/Cr Briggs)

“That the Committee agrees to increase the Community Panels budget to $304,000 per annum.”

The motion was declared LOST by Division with the voting as follows:

For

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:   2

Against

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr Lewis

Cr Lulich

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

 

Total: 11

 

Cr Milne considered that the current rates differential transition system did not address the underlying issues of how costs and benefits were allocated.  He considered that a review was required following the one year freeze. 

 

resolvedMayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)             Minute No. CPC 17307(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)         approves the proposed budget changes highlighted in paragraphs 9 and 10 of the officer’s            report;

(ii)        approves a general rates increase of 2.3 percent in 2017/18; and

(iii)       approves a one year freeze of the current rates differential transition.”

 

The motion was put to the vote in three parts.  Parts (i), (ii) and (iii) were declared CARRIED on the voices.

8.

Future of HCC Wharves (17/832)

Report No. CPC2017/3/138 by the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Chris Hay believed that reasons now being advanced for the retention of the Rona Wharf may have merit but the essential issue was that due to future tidal changes, the Rona Bay Wharf would become a wharf structure on dry land.

 

The Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens elaborated on the report.  He reiterated that the recommendations had been made on a strategic basis, with the wharves being treated as a set of assets.  He explained a number of factors were involved in the assessments, including heritage, useage, sustainability and cost.  He said that this had resulted in the officer’s recommendations not necessarily reflecting the majority of submissions.  With regard to any potential effects on the aquifer, he advised Tonkin and Taylor had been commissioned to investigate the issue. 

In response to questions from the members, the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens advised Petone Wharf would remain closed for up to one year, while studies, design works, sourcing of materials and construction works were carried out.  He further advised that if Point Howard Wharf was demolished, there was adequate room for  fishing on the remaining three wharves and that officers would investigate fishing platforms off the Seaview Marina breakwater.  He confirmed Point Howard Wharf required funding for maintenance every three to five years, and that, barring any major storms, the wharf could remain for approximately five years.  He added should the wharf be demolished, timber would be salvaged for use in the refurbishment of the other wharves.

In response to further questions from members, the Divisional Manager, Parks and Gardens said that the amount of the Petone Wharf proposed to be demolished was 1/8th  of the total length of the wharf.  He noted that the original shipping purpose of the wharf end was no longer required.  He explained the operating costs of the newly refurbished wharves had not been detailed as yet and that these costs would not become apparent for eight years.  He estimated these would be approximately $200,000 every four years.  He advised that there was no information supporting the statement that Rona Wharf would become a wharf structure on dry land.

The meeting was adjourned at 1.07pm and resumed at 1.50pm.

 

 

MOVED:     (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                     Minute No. CPC 17308(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)         notes the summary of responses to the consultation on the future of the wharves;

(ii)        notes that officers are seeking further specialist advice regarding the possible effect of piling works, including the removal of piles, on the Waiwhetu aquifer;

(iii)       agrees in principle to implement the following options, subject to the specialist advice on the aquifer;

(a)        Days Bay Wharf – fully refurbish

(b)        Rona Bay Wharf – fully refurbish

(c)        Petone Wharf – partially remove approximately 50 metres of the 393 metre wharf and fully refurbish the rest

(d)       Point Howard Wharf – demolish and don’t replace

(iv)      agrees that the funding in the draft budget be amended to reflect the recommended options and likely timing of works as follows:

(a)        2017/18          $1.4M

(b)        2018/19          $2.5M

(c)        2019/20            $3.4M”

AMENDMENT MOVED:(Cr Barry/Cr Lulich)

“(iii) (c) That the Committee agrees to fully refurbish the Petone Wharf.”

Cr Barry believed the Petone Wharf was currently under utilised due to its run down state, and that if fully restored, more users would be attracted to it.  He considered removing part of the wharf would restrict opportunities for the future.

Mayor Wallace noted that Heritage New Zealand was supportive of the officer’s recommendations and that the funding saved by not refurbishing the entire Petone Wharf would be used for the Rona Bay Wharf refurbishment. 

 

The motion was declared LOST by Division with the voting as follows:

For

 

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lewis

Cr Lulich

Against

 

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

Total: 4

Total: 9

 

 

 

RESOLVED:     (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                                 Minute No. CPC 17309(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)    notes the summary of responses to the consultation on the future of the wharves;

(ii)   notes that officers are seeking further specialist advice regarding the possible effect of piling works, including the removal of piles, on the Waiwhetu aquifer;

(iii)  agrees in principle to implement the following options, subject to the specialist advice on the aquifer;

(a)   Days Bay Wharf – fully refurbish

(b)   Rona Bay Wharf – fully refurbish

(c)   Petone Wharf – partially remove approximately 50 metres of the 393 metre wharf and fully refurbish the rest

(d)   Point Howard Wharf – demolish and don’t replace

(iv)  agrees that the funding in the draft budget be amended to reflect the recommended options and likely timing of works as follows:

(a)        2017/18    $1.4M

(b)        2018/19    $2.5M

(c)        2019/20    $3.4M”

 

The motion was put to the vote in four parts.  Parts (i), (ii) and (iv) were declared CARRIED on the voices and part (iii) was declared CARRIED by Division with the voting as follows:

For

Mayor Wallace

Deputy Mayor Bassett

Cr Barratt

Cr Bridson

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

 

Total:   9

Against

Cr Barry

Cr Briggs

Cr Lewis

Cr Lulich

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total: 4

 

9.

Sportsville (17/820) 2.09pm

Report No. CPC2017/3/139 by the Divisional Manager, Leisure Active

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Dave Head representing Wainuiomata Sportsville, requested that Council support Wainuiomata Sportsville to enable them to proceed with future planning and fundraising for the project. 

 

In response to questions from the members, Mr Head noted Wainuiomata Sportsville supported the officer’s recommendations as long as the project progressed.  He said costings for the project had been discussed at Board level and preliminary approaches had been made to possible funders.  He advised that Wainuiomata Sportsville would prefer that they be a separate entity to Petone Sportsville.

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Zinny McCormick reiterated his initial request that the four recommendations from the feasibility study be adhered to and that full public consultation occur.  He suggested that Fraser Park Sportsville be operational before any further Sportsvilles were considered.  He questioned why sports clubs from the Hutt Recreation Ground had been advised they would be required to form a Sportsville within two years.

 

In response to questions from members, Mr McCormick considered the Sportsville Strategic Plan should be considered for future Sportsville developments in Hutt City.  He said Hutt City needed new facilities to attract high level athletes and that the use of the new Fraser Park turf was in question.

 

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Alan Hewson representing Petone Sportsville, expressed support for the officer’s recommendations regarding Sportsville.  He explained the Board wanted to move forward with the project and considered there was a lot of mis-information in the public arena.  He stressed the need for Council approval over the next 12 months to allow the next steps in the process to continue and Council commitment going forward.

 

In response to questions from the members, Mr Hewson confirmed the Board understood Council would only release funds upon receipt of a sustainable business case and approval of the project.  He said the Board would conduct further consultation over the next 12 months, with a view to having design drawings completed in this period. He said initial concept plans had been completed for the North Park development and further consultation would also be undertaken for this project. 

 

Speaking under public comment, Mr Jay Waters representing Petone Sportsville expressed support for the officer’s recommendations regarding Sportsville.  He considered that if the project was not able to move forward then other options should be considered for the community.  He noted the Board would not commit to spending funds without a way forward. 

 

In response to questions from members, Mr Waters said Petone Sportsville had consulted extensively with the community.  He considered the hub model was the best way forward for the clubs and the community.  He said if Council funding was not forthcoming then some clubs would cease to exist whilst others would be forced to move to other areas. 

 

Cr Lulich declared that he was a honorary member of a sports club involved in Petone Sportsville.

The General Manager, Community Services and the Divisional Manager, Leisure Active elaborated on the report.  The General Manager, Community Services reiterated that Sportsvilles would only proceed if a robust business case was presented. 

In response to questions from the members, the General Manager, Community Services responded to the issues raised by submitters as follows: the Petone Sportsville currently had a partial operating model; that Sport New Zealand was using Council’s Sportsville model as an example; that public consultation was ongoing; that Stage 1 of Fraser Park Sportsville had been a success; that Hutt Park Recreation club users had been approached by officers to undertake a collabarative approach; that a regional approach to sport was being taken and no additional running track in the region was required and that the assessment of both Petone and Wainuiomata Sportsvilles together was being undertaken to achieve economies of scale in the procurement and project management processes.

In response to questions from members, the General Manager, Community Services advised that considerable work had been completed by all Sportsvilles to reach the stages they were now at.   He confirmed if funding was not forthcoming in this year’s budget, momentum would be lost and many clubs could pull out, bringing the total concept into doubt.  He explained the fundraising efforts over the next 12 months would be directed towards Fraser Park Sportsville.  He noted that Gymsports New Zealand had provided a letter of support for the Petone Sportsville.   He also explained that should funding be approved to progress to design stages, officers would assist the Sportsville Boards in producing detailed business cases. 

Cr Cousins declared she was the Council representative on the Hutt City Community Facilities Trust (CFT).  Mayor Wallace noted this and agreed that the matter was not directly related to CFT.  He advised that he did not consider Cr Cousins had a conflict of interest.

In response to further questions from members, the General Manager, Community Services advised Fraser Park was classified as the main regional facility with Petone and Wainuiomata Sportsvilles being more suburban facilities.  He further clarified the efficiencies to be gained by assessing Petone and Wainuiomata Sportsvilles together included using the same consultants, similar capital fundraising plans, ability to submit joint applications and other cost efficiencies.  He stated the main reason for having three Sportsvilles was to get all sports clubs communicating with each other and to provide for the continuation of sports and recreation within Hutt City.

In response to questions from members, the Divisional Manager, Leisure Active advised that Petone Sportsville had consulted with the Petone Working Men’s Club in the past.  He agreed public consultation was vital to the success of both Sportsvilles and that the funding requested would enable more details to be finalised so that meaningful consultation could occur.

In response to additional questions from members, the General Manager, Community Services confirmed that the funding amounts referred to in part (viii) of the officer’s recommendations were already budgeted for in the Long Term Plan.  He advised that if progress on one of the Sportsvilles was delayed then the progress for the other Sportsville would not be compromised.  He noted that if strict conditions were not met over the coming year, then reports would be presented to the relevant Council committee for consideration.  He said all figures shown were regarded as good estimates and that after one year Council would be in a much better position to assess the projects.

Members discussed the releasing of funding for the project versus the number of uncertainties.  It was noted that if no long term provision was made, investors and the community could question Council’s commitment to the projects.  Members acknowledged Petone 2040 was a visionary project and that all other projects proposed for the area should adhere to this vision.  Members agreed that to grow Hutt City wisely, all parties needed to work collaboratively and there needed to be widespread public consultation.

Mayor Wallace suggested the recommendations reflect that while the projects were separate, synergies could be achieved through the procurement process and that the delay of one sportsville would not impact on the progress of the other.

Cr Bridson asked that the matter be considered following an assessment of all proposed projects.

The meeting adjourned at 3.35pm and resumed at 3.45pm.

 

MOVED: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)

That the Committee recommends that Council agrees that the Naenae and Wainuiomata Community Hubs be brought forward for consideration in the 2018 Long Term Plan.

 

resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Cr Barratt)                              Minute No. CPC 17310(2)

“That the Committee agrees that the Naenae and Wainuiomata Community Hubs be brought forward for consideration in the 2018 Long Term Plan.”

 

 

resolved: (Mayor Wallace/Deputy Mayor Bassett)          Minute No. CPC 17311(2)

“That the Committee:

(i)         notes the information contained in the officer’s report attached as Appendices 1 and 2 to the report;

(ii)        notes that Petone and Wainuiomata Sportsvilles have been working in a voluntary capacity with Council since 2009;

(iii)       notes that Council has endorsed sportsville developments in the Long Term Integrated Community Facilities Strategy;

(iv)       notes that Petone Sportsville has requested funding be brought forward for capital development at North Park;

(v)        agrees to include capital funding of $300k in 2017/18 to enable Council officers to work with Petone Sportsville to:

(a)        advance design work (including community consultation) and that Petone Sportsville be obliged to consult with Petone2040 and address wider policy outcomes in finalising the design;

(b)        complete a business case analysis of the proposal; and

(c)        fully develop an operational model;

(vi)       agrees that any alteration to capital funding for this project will be considered by the Community Plan Committee in 2018;

(vii)      agrees to reduce capital funding for Wainuiomata Sportsville in 2017/18 from $500k to $300k as a joint procurement process will be used for both sportsvilles, understanding both projects, Petone and Wainuiomata, are separate projects but synergies are achieved through the procurement process;

 (viii)    agrees that Council capital funding for construction for both sportsvilles will only be released conditional on:

(a)   a sustainable operational business case – clearly demonstrating a sustainable operating model that does not rely on Council operational funding; and

(b)   all capital funding being confirmed; and

(ix)       notes that any delay in one sportsville will not affect the progress of another sportsville.”

 

The motion was put to the vote in three parts.  Parts (i) to (iv) and parts (vi) to (ix) were declared CARRIED on the voices and part (v) was declared CARRIED by Division with the voting as follows:

 

 

 

For                                                                               Against

Mayor Wallace                                                   Cr Lewis

Deputy Mayor Bassett                                       Cr Lulich

Cr Barratt

Cr Barry

Cr Bridson

Cr Briggs

Cr Cousins

Cr Edwards

Cr McDonald

Cr Milne

Cr Sutton

Total: 11                                                             Total: 2

         

10.

Report back on Consultation Results of Review of Rates and Development Charges Remissions Policies (17/824)